This is an investigator initiated study which was financially supported with a grant received from St. Jude Medical (Plano, TX, USA). All phases of the study ranging from design until submission of this article have been independently performed by our research group.
All authors were involved in the design and performance of the trial. The manuscript has been read and corrected by all authors before their final approval was given.
Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) is a disabling disease that is sometimes difficult to treat. Although spinal cord stimulation (SCS) can reduce pain in most patients with CRPS, some do not achieve the desired reduction in pain. Moreover, the pain reduction can diminish over time even after an initially successful period of SCS. Pain reduction can be regained by increasing the SCS frequency, but this has not been investigated in a prospective trial. This study compares pain reduction using five SCS frequencies (standard 40 Hz, 500 Hz, 1200 Hz, burst and placebo stimulation) in patients with CRPS to determine which of the modalities is most effective.
All patients with a confirmed CRPS diagnosis that have unsuccessfully tried all other therapies and are eligible for SCS, can enroll in this trial (primary implantation group). CRPS patients that already receive SCS therapy, or those previously treated with SCS but with loss of therapeutic effect over time, can also participate (re-implantation group). Once all inclusion criteria are met and written informed consent obtained, patients will undergo a baseline assessment (T0). A 2-week trial with SCS is performed and, if successful, a rechargeable internal pulse generator (IPG) is implanted. For the following 3 months the patient will have standard 40 Hz stimulation therapy before a follow-up assessment (T1) is performed. Those who have completed the T1 assessment will enroll in a 10-week crossover period in which the five SCS frequencies are tested in five periods, each frequency lasting for 2 weeks. At the end of the crossover period, the patient will choose which frequency is to be used for stimulation for an additional 3 months, until the T2 assessment.
Currently no trials are available that systematically investigate the importance of variation in frequency during SCS in patients with CRPS. Data from this trial will provide better insight as to whether SCS with a higher frequency, or with burst stimulation, results in more effective pain relief.
Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN36655259
Merskey H, Bogduk N. Classification of chronic pain: descriptions of chronic pain syndromes and definitions of pain terms. In . Edited by Press I. Seattle: IASP Press; 1994: 40–43.
Kemler MA, Barendse GAM, Van Kleef M, Van Den Wildenberg FAJM, Weber WEJ. Electrical spinal cord stimulation in reflex sympathetic dystrophy: retrospective analysis of 23 patients. J Neurosurg. 1999;90(1 Suppl):79–83. PubMed
Geurts JW, Smits H, Kemler MA, Brunner F, Kessels AGH, van Kleef M: Spinal Cord Stimulation for Complex Regional Pain Syndrome Type I: A Prospective Cohort Study With Long-Term Follow-Up. Neuromodulation 2013;16(6):523-529.
Linderoth B. Spinal cord stimulation: a brief update on mechanisms of action. Eur J Pain Suppl. 2009;3(2):89–93. CrossRef
McMahon SB, Koltzenburg M, Tracey I, Turk DC. Wall and Melzack’s textbook of pain. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders; 2013.
De Vos C, Bom M, Vanneste S, Lenders M, De Ridder D. Burst spinal cord stimulation evaluated in patients with failed back surgery syndrome and painful diabetic neuropathy. Neuromodulation. 2013;16(5):e217.
Sherman RA, Barja RH, Bruno GM. Thermographic correlates of chronic pain: analysis of 125 patients incorporating evaluations by a blind panel. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1987;68(5 Pt 1):273–9. PubMed
Bohannon RW. Muscle strength testing with hand-held dynamometers. In: Amundsen LR, editor. Muscle strength testing. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1990.
Andrews AW. Hand held dynamometry for measuring muscle strength. J Muscle Perform. 1991;1(1):35–50.
Schreuders TA, Roebroeck ME, Goumans J, van Nieuwenhuijzen JF, Stijnen TH, Stam HJ. Measurement error in grip and pinch force measurements in patients with hand injuries. Phys Ther. 2003;83(9):806–15. PubMed
Nelissen L. Rubriek ‘meten in de praktijk’. De 10 meter looptest bij CVA patiënten. Ned Tijdschrift voor Fysiotherapie. 2005;115(2):51.
van Dam-Baggen R, Kraaimaat F. De inventarisatielijst Sociale Betrokkenheid. Gedragstherapie. 1992;25(1):27–46.
Sullivan MJL, Bishop SR, Pivik J. The pain catastrophizing scale: development and validation. Psychol Assess. 1995;7:524–33. CrossRef
Snaith RP, Zigmond AS. HADS: Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Windsor: NFER Nelson; 1994.
Kori SH, Miller RP, Todd DD. Kinesiophobia: a new view of chronic pain behavior. Pain Management. 1990;3:35–43
Miller MP, Kori SH, Todd DD. Tampa Scale. 1991.
Roorda LD. The walking ability questionnaire; hierarchical scales to measure disabilities in rising and walking. Revalidata. 1996;18:34–8.
Gelman A, Hill J. Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models: Cambridge University Press; 2006.
De Vos C, Dijkstra-Scholten C, Lenders MWPM, Van Looy P, Plazier M, De Ridder D. Burst spinal cord stimulation in a patient with diabetic neuropathic pain. Neuromodulation. 2011;14(5):459.
Kriek N, Groeneweg G, Van Looy P, Vancamp T, De Ridder D, Huygen F. Successful burst spinal cord stimulation in a CRPS patient with failed conventional stimulation. Neuromodulation. 2013;16(5):e87.
- Comparison of tonic spinal cord stimulation, high-frequency and burst stimulation in patients with complex regional pain syndrome: a double-blind, randomised placebo controlled trial
- BioMed Central
Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie
Mail Icon II