nach oben

International Journal of Colorectal Disease

Erschienen in:

30.01.2016 | Review

Complete mesocolic excision and extended (D3) lymphadenectomy for colonic cancer: is it worth that extra effort? A review of the literature

verfasst von: Andrew Emmanuel, Amyn Haji

Erschienen in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease | Ausgabe 4/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Recent interest in complete mesocolic excision (CME) with central vascular ligation (CVL) or extended (D3) lymphadenectomy (EL) for curative resection of colon cancer has been driven by published series from experienced practitioners showing excellent survival outcomes and low recurrence rates. In this article, we attempt to clarify the role of CME or EL in modern colorectal surgery.

Methods

A narrative review of the evidence for CME and EL in the curative treatment of colon cancer.

Results

The principal of CME surgery, similar to total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer, is the removal of all lymphatic, vascular, and neural tissue in the drainage area of the tumour in a complete mesocolic envelope with intact mesentery, peritoneum and encasing fascia. Extended (D3) lymphadenectomy (EL) is based on similar principles. Sound anatomical and oncological arguments are made to support the principles of removing the tumor contained within an intact mesocolic facial envelope together with an extended lymph node harvest. Excellent oncological outcomes with minimal morbidity and mortality have been reported. This has led to calls for the standardisation of surgery for colon cancer using CME. However, there is conflicting evidence regarding the prognostic benefit of greater lymph node harvests and the evidence for an oncological benefit of CME is limited by methodology flaws and several potential confounding factors.

Conclusions

Although there is a reasonable anatomical and oncological basis for these techniques, there are no randomised controlled trials from which to draw confident conclusions and there is insufficient consistent high quality evidence to recommend widespread adoption of CME.

Martling AL, Holm T, Rutqvist LE, Moran BJ, Heald RJ, Cedemark B (2000) Effect of a surgical training programme on outcome of rectal cancer in the County of Stockholm. Stockholm Colorectal Cancer Study Group, Basingstoke Bowel Cancer Research Project. Lancet 356:93–96CrossRefPubMed

Kapiteijn E, Putter H, van de Velde CJ, Cooperative investigators of the Dutch ColoRectal Cancer Group, (2000) Impact of the introduction and training of total mesorectal excision on recurrence and survival in rectal cancer in The Netherlands. Br J Surg 89:1142–1149CrossRef

Wibe A, Møller B, Norstein J, Carlsen E, Wiig JN, Heald RJ, Langmark F, Myrvold HE, Søreide O, Norwegian Rectal Cancer Group (2002) A national strategic change in treatment policy for rectal cancer—implementation of total mesorectal excision as routine treatment in Norway. A national audit. Dis Colon Rectum 45(7):857–866CrossRefPubMed

Sondenaa K, Quirke P, Hohenberger W et al (2014) The rationale behind complete mesocolic excision (CME) and a central vascular ligation for colon cancer in open and laparoscopic surgery: proceedings of a consensus conference. Int J Colorectal Dis 29(4):419–428CrossRefPubMed

Kessler H, Hohenberger W (2013) Extended lymphadenectomy in colon cancer is crucial. World J Surg 37(8):1789–1798CrossRefPubMed

West NP, Kobayashi H, Takahashi K et al (2012) Understanding optimal colonic cancer surgery: comparison of Japanese D3 resection and European complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation. J Clin Oncol 30(15):1763–1769CrossRefPubMed

Le Voyer TE, Sigurdson ER, Hanlon AL, Mayer RJ, Macdonald JS, Catalano PJ et al (2003) Colon cancer survival is associated with increasing number of lymph nodes analyzed: a secondary survey of intergroup trial INT-0089. J Clin Oncol 21(15):2912–2919CrossRefPubMed

Tsai H-L, Lu C-H, Hsieh J-S et al (2007) The prognostic significance of total lymph node harvest in patients with T2-4N0M0 colorectal cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 11:660–665CrossRefPubMed

West NP, Hohenberger W, Weber K, Perrakis A, Finan PJ, Quirke P (2010) Complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation produces an oncologically superior specimen compared with standard surgery for carcinoma of the colon. J Clin Oncol 28(2):272–278CrossRefPubMed

10.

West NP, Morris EJA, Rotimi O, Cairns A, Finan PJ, Quirke P (2008) Pathology grading of colon cancer surgical resection and its association with survival: a retrospective observational study. Lancet Oncol 9(9):857–865CrossRefPubMed

11.

Hohenberger W, Weber K, Matzel K, Papadopoulos T, Merkel S (2009) Standardized surgery for colonic cancer: complete mesocolic excision and central ligation-technical notes and outcome. Colorectal Dis 11(4):354–364, discussion 364-355 CrossRefPubMed

12.

West NP, Sutton KM, Ingeholm P, Hagemann-Madsen RH, Hohenberger W, Quirke P (2010) Improving the quality of colon cancer surgery through a surgical education program. Dis Colon Rectum 53(12):1594–1603CrossRefPubMed

13.

Willaert W, Ceelen W (2015) Extent of surgery in cancer of the colon: is more better? World J Gastroenterol 21(1):132–138CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

14.

Willaert W, Mareel M, Van De Putte D, Van Nieuwenhove Y, Pattyn P, Ceelen W (2014) Lymphatic spread, nodal count and the extent of lymphadenectomy in cancer of the colon. Cancer Treat Rev 40(3):405–413CrossRefPubMed

15.

Liang J, Fazio V, Lavery I, Remzi F, Hull T, Strong S, Church J (2015) Primacy of surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 102(7):847–852CrossRefPubMed

16.

Rosenberg J, Fischer A, Haglind E (2011) Current controversies in colorectal surgery: the way to resolve uncertainty and move forward. Colorectal Dis 14:266–269CrossRef

17.

Bertelsen CA, Neuenschwander AU, Jansen JE et al (2015) Disease-free survival after complete mesocolic excision compared with conventional colon cancer surgery: a retrospective, population-based study. Lancet Oncol 16(2):161–168CrossRefPubMed

18.

Siani LM, Pulica C (2014) Laparoscopic Complete Mesocolic Excision with Central Vascular Ligation in right colon cancer: long-term oncologic outcome between mesocolic and non-mesocolic planes of surgery. Scand J Surg 57:1169–1175

19.

Kotake K, Mizuguchi T, Moritani K et al (2014) Impact of D3 lymph node dissection on survival for patients with T3 and T4 colon cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 29(7):847–852CrossRefPubMed

20.

Storli KE, Sondenaa K, Furnes B et al (2014) Short term results of complete (D3) vs. standard (D2) mesenteric excision in colon cancer shows improved outcome of complete mesenteric excision in patients with TNM stages I-II. Tech Coloproctol 18(6):557–564CrossRefPubMed

21.

Galizia G, Lieto E, De Vita F et al (2014) Is complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation safe and effective in the surgical treatment of right-sided colon cancers? A prospective study. Int J Colorectal Dis 29(1):89–97CrossRefPubMed

22.

Ovesen SH (2010) Total mesocolic excision versus traditional resection in right-sided colon cancer—method and increased lymph node harvest. Dan Med Bull 57(12):A4224PubMed

23.

Mukai M, Ito I, Mukoyama S et al (2003) Improvement of 10-year survival by Japanese radical lymph node dissection in patients with Dukes’ B and C colorectal cancer: a 17-year retrospective study. Oncol Rep 10(4):927–934PubMed

24.

Tagliacozzo S, Accordino M, Tocchi A (1994) Extended lymphadenectomy during resection of cancer of the right colon. Eur J Surg 160(3):179–181PubMed

25.

Bokey EL, Chapuis PH, Dent OF, Mander BJ, Bissett IP, Newland RC (2003) Surgical technique and survival in patients having a curative resection for colon cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 46(7):860–866CrossRefPubMed

26.

Chang GJ, Rodriguez-Bigas MA, Skibber JM, Moyer VA (2007) Lymph node evaluation and survival after curative resection of colon cancer: systematic review. J Natl Cancer Inst 99(6):433–441CrossRefPubMed

27.

Liang JT, Lai HS, Huang J, Sun CT (2014) Long-term oncologic results of laparoscopic D3 lymphadenectomy with complete mesocolic excision for right-sided colon cancer with clinically positive lymph nodes. Surg Endosc 29:2394–2401CrossRefPubMed

28.

Cho MS, Baek SJ, Hur H, Soh Min B, Baik SH, Kyu KN (2015) Modified complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation for the treatment of right-sided colon cancer: long-term outcomes and prognostic factors. Ann Surg 261(4):708–715CrossRefPubMed

29.

Shin JW, Amar AH, Kim SH et al (2014) Complete mesocolic excision with D3 lymph node dissection in laparoscopic colectomy for stages II and III colon cancer: long-term oncologic outcomes in 168 patients. Tech Coloproctol 18(9):795–803CrossRefPubMed

30.

Kanemitsu Y, Komori K, Kimura K, Kato T (2013) D3 lymph node dissection in right hemicolectomy with a no-touch isolation technique in patients with colon cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 56(7):815–824CrossRefPubMed

31.

Hashiguchi Y, Hase K, Ueno H, Mochizuki H, Shinto E, Yamamoto J (2011) Optimal margins and lymphadenectomy in colonic cancer surgery. Br J Surg 98(8):1171–1178CrossRefPubMed

32.

Pramateftakis MG (2010) Optimizing colonic cancer surgery: high ligation and complete mesocolic excision during right hemicolectomy. Tech Coloproctol 14(Suppl 1):S49–S51CrossRefPubMed

33.

Yao HW, Liu YH (2013) Re-examination of the standardization of colon cancer surgery. Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf) 1(2):113–118CrossRef

34.

Chow CF, Kim SH (2014) Laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision: west meets east. World J Gastroenterol 20(39):14301–14307CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

35.

Sehgal R, Coffey JC (2014) Historical development of mesenteric anatomy provides a universally applicable anatomic paradigm for complete/total mesocolic excision. Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf) 2(4):245–250CrossRef

36.

Culligan K, Coffey JC, Kiran RP, Kalady M, Lavery IC, Remzi FH (2012) The mesocolon: a prospective observational study. Colorectal Dis 14(4):421–428, discussion 428-430 CrossRefPubMed

37.

Culligan K, Sehgal R, Mulligan D et al (2014) A detailed appraisal of mesocolic lymphangiology—an immunohistochemical and stereological analysis. J Anat 225(4):463–472CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

38.

Watanabe T, Itabashi M, Shimada Y et al (2012) Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum. Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (JSCCR) guidelines 2010 for the treatment of colorectal cancer. Int J Clin Oncol 17(1):1–29CrossRefPubMed

39.

Chen SL, Bilchik AJ (2006) More extensive nodal dissection improves survival for stages I to III of colon cancer: a population-based study. Ann Surg 244(4):602–610PubMedPubMedCentral

40.

Johnson PM, Porter GA, Ricciardi R, Baxter NN (2006) Increasing negative lymph node count is independently associated with improved long-term survival in stage IIIB and IIIC colon cancer. J Clin Oncol 24(22):3570–3575CrossRefPubMed

41.

Parnaby CN, Scott NW, Ramsay G, MacKay C, Samuel L, Murray GI, Loudon MA (2015) Prognostic value of lymph node ratio and extramural vascular invasion on survival for patients undergoing curative colon cancer resection. Br J Cancer. doi:10.1038/bjc.2015.211 PubMedPubMedCentral

42.

Lykke J, Roikjaer O, Jess P, Danish Colorectal Cancer Group (2013) The relation between lymph node status and survival in Stage I-III colon cancer: results from a prospective nationwide cohort study. Colorectal Dis 15(5):559–565CrossRefPubMed

43.

Rosenberg R, Friederichs J, Schuster T, Gertler R, Maak M, Becker K, Grebner A, Ulm K, Höfler H, Nekarda H, Siewert JR (2008) Prognosis of patients with colorectal cancer is associated with lymph node ratio: a single-center analysis of 3,026 patients over a 25-year time period. Ann Surg 248(6):968–978CrossRefPubMed

44.

Liang JT, Huang KC, Lai HS, Lee PH, Sun CT (2007) Oncologic results of laparoscopic D3 lymphadenectomy for male sigmoid and upper rectal cancer with clinically positive lymph nodes. Ann Surg Oncol 14(7):1980–1990CrossRefPubMed

45.

Toyota S, Ohta H, Anazawa S (1995) Rationale for extent of lymph node dissection for right colon cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 38(7):705–711CrossRefPubMed

46.

Færden AE, Sjo OH, Bukholm IR, Andersen SN, Svindland A, Nesbakken A, Bakka A (2011) Lymph node micrometastases and isolated tumor cells influence survival in stage I and II colon cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 54(2):200–206CrossRefPubMed

47.

Murphy J, Young-Fadok T (2013) Extended lymphadenectomy in colon cancer is debatable. World J Surg 37(8):1799–1807CrossRefPubMed

48.

Kang J, Kim IK, Kang SI, Sohn SK, Lee KY (2014) Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with complete mesocolic excision. Surg Endosc 28(9):2747–2751CrossRefPubMed

49.

Nash GM, Row D, Weiss A et al (2011) A predictive model for lymph node yield in colon cancer resection specimens. Ann Surg 253(2):318–322

50.

Bläker H, Hildebrandt B, Riess H, von Winterfeld M et al (2015) Lymph node count and prognosis in colorectal cancer: the influence of examination quality. Int J Cancer 136(8):1957–1966CrossRefPubMed

51.

Moro-Valdezate D, Pla-Martí V, Martín-Arévalo J et al (2013) Factors related to lymph node harvest: does a recovery of more than 12 improve the outcome of colorectal cancer? Colorectal Dis 15(10):1257–1266CrossRefPubMed

52.

Tsikitis VL, Larson DL, Wolff BG, Kennedy G, Diehl N, Qin R, Dozois EJ, Cima RR (2009) Survival in stage III colon cancer is independent of the total number of lymph nodes retrieved. J Am Coll Surg 208(1):42–47CrossRefPubMed

53.

Gleisner AL, Mogal H, Dodson R et al (2013) Nodal status, number of lymph nodes examined, and lymph node ratio: what defines prognosis after resection of colon adenocarcinoma? J Am Coll Surg 217(6):1090–1100CrossRefPubMed

54.

Cirocchi R, Trastulli S, Farinella E et al (2012) High tie versus low tie of the inferior mesenteric artery in colorectal cancer: a RCT is needed. Surg Oncol 21(3):e111–e123CrossRefPubMed

55.

Titu LV, Tweedle E, Rooney PS (2008) High tie of the inferior mesenteric artery in curative surgery for left colonic and rectal cancers: a systematic review. Dig Surg 25(2):148–157CrossRefPubMed

56.

Hida J, Okuno K (2013) High ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery in rectal cancer surgery. Surg Today 43(1):8–19CrossRefPubMed

57.

Hida J, Okuno K, Yasutomi M, Yoshifuji T, Uchida T, Tokoro T, Shiozaki H (2005) Optimal ligation level of the primary feeding artery and bowel resection margin in colon cancer surgery: the influence of the site of the primary feeding artery. Dis Colon Rectum 48(12):2232–2237CrossRefPubMed

58.

Chen H, Wang Y, Liu H et al (2015) Factors influencing apical node metastasis in colorectal cancer patients treated with laparoscopic radical resection with D3 lymphadenectomy: results from two centers in China. Surg Today 45(5):569–575CrossRefPubMed

59.

Lan YT, Lin JK, Jiang JK (2011) Significance of lymph node retrieval from the terminal ileum for patients with cecal and ascending colonic cancers. Ann Surg Oncol 18(1):146–152CrossRefPubMed

60.

Ang CW, Tweedle EM, Campbell F, Rooney PS (2011) Apical node metastasis independently predicts poor survival in Dukes C colorectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 13:526–531CrossRefPubMed

61.

Monga DK, O’Connell MJ (2006) Surgical adjuvant therapy for colorectal cancer: current approaches and future directions. Ann Surg Oncol 13(8):1021–1034CrossRefPubMed

62.

Killeen S, Mannion M, Devaney A, Winter DC (2014) Complete mesocolic resection and extended lymphadenectomy for colon cancer: a systematic review. Colorectal Dis 16(8):577–594CrossRefPubMed

63.

Siani LM, Pulica C (2014) Stage I-IIIC right colonic cancer treated with complete mesocolic excision and central vascular ligation: quality of surgical specimen and long term oncologic outcome according to the plane of surgery. Minerva Chir 69(4):199–208PubMed

64.

West NP, Kennedy RH, Magro T et al (2014) Morphometric analysis and lymph node yield in laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision performed by supervised trainees. Br J Surg 101(11):1460–1467CrossRefPubMed

65.

Gouvas N, Pechlivanides G, Zervakis N, Kafousi M, Xynos E (2012) Complete mesocolic excision in colon cancer surgery: a comparison between open and laparoscopic approach. Colorectal Dis 14(11):1357–1364CrossRefPubMed

66.

Yamamoto S, Inomata M, Katayama H et al (2014) Short-term surgical outcomes from a randomized controlled trial to evaluate laparoscopic and open D3 dissection for stage II/III colon cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG 0404. Ann Surg 260(1):23–30CrossRefPubMed

67.

Storli KE, Sondenaa K, Furnes B, Eide GE (2013) Outcome after introduction of complete mesocolic excision for colon cancer is similar for open and laparoscopic surgical treatments. Dig Surg 30(4-6):317–327CrossRefPubMed

68.

Han DP, Lu AG, Feng H et al (2014) Long-term outcome of laparoscopic-assisted right-hemicolectomy with D3 lymphadenectomy versus open surgery for colon carcinoma. Surg Today 44(5):868–874CrossRefPubMed

69.

Zhao LY, Liu H, Wang YN, Deng HJ, Xue Q, Li GX (2014) Techniques and feasibility of laparoscopic extended right hemicolectomy with D3 lymphadenectomy. World J Gastroenterol 20(30):10531–10536CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

70.

Bae SU, Saklani AP, Lim DR et al (2014) Laparoscopic-assisted versus open complete mesocolic excision and central vascular ligation for right-sided colon cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 21(7):2288–2294CrossRefPubMed

71.

Han DP, Lu AG, Feng H et al (2013) Long-term results of laparoscopy-assisted radical right hemicolectomy with D3 lymphadenectomy: clinical analysis with 177 cases. Int J Colorectal Dis 28(5):623–629CrossRefPubMed

72.

Mori S, Baba K, Yanagi M et al (2015) Laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision with radical lymph node dissection along the surgical trunk for right colon cancer. Surg Endosc 29(1):34–40CrossRefPubMed

73.

Takemasa I, Uemura M, Nishimura J et al (2014) Feasibility of single-site laparoscopic colectomy with complete mesocolic excision for colon cancer: a prospective case-control comparison. Surg Endosc 28(4):1110–1118CrossRefPubMed

74.

Munkedal DL, West NP, Iversen LH, Hagemann-Madsen R, Quirke P, Laurberg S (2014) Implementation of complete mesocolic excision at a university hospital in Denmark: an audit of consecutive, prospectively collected colon cancer specimens. Eur J Surg Oncol 40(11):1494–1501CrossRefPubMed

75.

Nakajima K, Inomata M, Akagi T et al (2014) Quality control by photo documentation for evaluation of laparoscopic and open colectomy with D3 resection for stage II/III colorectal cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG 0404. Jpn J Clin Oncol 44(9):799–806CrossRefPubMed

76.

Kobayashi H, West NP, Takahashi K et al (2014) Quality of surgery for stage III colon cancer: comparison between England, Germany, and Japan. Ann Surg Oncol 21(Suppl 3):S398–S404CrossRefPubMed

77.

Kontovounisios C, Kinross J, Tan E, Brown G, Rasheed S, Tekkis P (2015) Complete mesocolic excision in colorectal cancer: a systematic review. Colorectal Dis 17(1):7–16CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Complete mesocolic excision and extended (D3) lymphadenectomy for colonic cancer: is it worth that extra effort? A review of the literature
verfasst von: Andrew Emmanuel
Amyn Haji
Publikationsdatum: 30.01.2016
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease / Ausgabe 4/2016
Print ISSN: 0179-1958
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1262
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-016-2502-0

Neu im Fachgebiet Chirurgie

Wie erfolgreich ist eine Re-Ablation nach Rezidiv?

23.04.2024 Ablationstherapie Nachrichten

Nach der Katheterablation von Vorhofflimmern kommt es bei etwa einem Drittel der Patienten zu Rezidiven, meist binnen eines Jahres. Wie sich spätere Rückfälle auf die Erfolgschancen einer erneuten Ablation auswirken, haben Schweizer Kardiologen erforscht.

Hinter dieser Appendizitis steckte ein Erreger

23.04.2024 Appendizitis Nachrichten

Schmerzen im Unterbauch, aber sonst nicht viel, was auf eine Appendizitis hindeutete: Ein junger Mann hatte Glück, dass trotzdem eine Laparoskopie mit Appendektomie durchgeführt und der Wurmfortsatz histologisch untersucht wurde.

Mehr Schaden als Nutzen durch präoperatives Aussetzen von GLP-1-Agonisten?

23.04.2024 Operationsvorbereitung Nachrichten

Derzeit wird empfohlen, eine Therapie mit GLP-1-Rezeptoragonisten präoperativ zu unterbrechen. Eine neue Studie nährt jedoch Zweifel an der Notwendigkeit der Maßnahme.

Ureterstriktur: Innovative OP-Technik bewährt sich

19.04.2024 EAU 2024 Kongressbericht

Die Ureterstriktur ist eine relativ seltene Komplikation, trotzdem bedarf sie einer differenzierten Versorgung. In komplexen Fällen wird dies durch die roboterassistierte OP-Technik gewährleistet. Erste Resultate ermutigen.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Aktuelle BDC Leitlinien-Webinare

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2016

Malnutrition in rectal cancer patients receiving preoperative chemoradiotherapy is common and associated with treatment tolerability and anastomotic leakage

Letter to the editor: gallstone ileus, volvulus, and intestinal perforation in a patient with cholecystotomy and choledochoduodenostomy: a case report

Rectal stump suspension: a novel technique to facilitate and shorten totally laparoscopic Hartmann reversal

Factors associated with the location of local rectal cancer recurrence and predictors of survival

Impact of sphincter invasion on T stage definition in rectal cancer

Celiac disease and Hashimoto’s thyroiditis: a shared plot?

Update Chirurgie