Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 8/2017

29.05.2017 | Genetics

Complex chromosomal rearrangement—a lesson learned from PGS

verfasst von: Tsvia Frumkin, Sagit Peleg, Veronica Gold, Adi Reches, Shiri Asaf, Foad Azem, Dalit Ben-Yosef, Mira Malcov

Erschienen in: Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics | Ausgabe 8/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of the study is to report a case of non-diagnosed complex chromosomal rearrangement (CCR) identified by preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) followed by preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) which resulted in a pregnancy and delivery of healthy offspring.

Methods

A 29-year-old woman and her spouse, both diagnosed previously with normal karyotypes, approached our IVF-PGD center following eight early spontaneous miscarriages. PGS using chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) was performed on biopsied trophectoderm. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), as well as re-karyotype, were performed on metaphase derived from peripheral blood of the couple. Subsequently, in the following PGD cycle, a total of seven blastocysts underwent CMA.

Results

A gain or loss at three chromosomes (3, 7, 9) was identified in six out of seven embryos in the first PGS-CMA cycle. FISH analysis of parental peripheral blood samples demonstrated that the male is a carrier of a CCR involving those chromosomes; this was in spite of a former diagnosis of normal karyotypes for both parents. Re-karyotype verified the complex translocation of 46,XY,t (3;7;9)(q23;q22;q22). Subsequently, in the following cycle, a total of seven blastocysts underwent PGD-CMA for the identified complex translocation. Two embryos were diagnosed with balanced chromosomal constitution. A single balanced embryo was transferred and pregnancy was achieved, resulting in the birth of a healthy female baby.

Conclusions

PGS employing CMA is an efficient method to detect unrevealed chromosomal abnormalities, including complicated cases of CCR. The combined application of array CGH and FISH technologies enables the identification of an increased number of CCR carriers for which PGD is particularly beneficial.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Brezina PR, Kutteh WH. Clinical applications of preimplantation genetic testing. BMJ. 2015;350:g7611.CrossRefPubMed Brezina PR, Kutteh WH. Clinical applications of preimplantation genetic testing. BMJ. 2015;350:g7611.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Mastenbroek S, Twisk M, van der Veen F, Repping S. Preimplantation genetic screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs. Hum Reprod Update. 2011;17(4):454–66.CrossRefPubMed Mastenbroek S, Twisk M, van der Veen F, Repping S. Preimplantation genetic screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs. Hum Reprod Update. 2011;17(4):454–66.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Mastenbroek S, van der Veen F, Aflatoonian A, Shapiro B, Bossuyt P, Repping S. Embryo selection in IVF. Hum Reprod. 2011;26(5):964–6.CrossRefPubMed Mastenbroek S, van der Veen F, Aflatoonian A, Shapiro B, Bossuyt P, Repping S. Embryo selection in IVF. Hum Reprod. 2011;26(5):964–6.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Fiorentino F, Spizzichino L, Bono S, Biricik A, Kokkali G, Rienzi L, et al. PGD for reciprocal and Robertsonian translocations using array comparative genomic hybridization. Hum Reprod. 2011;26(7):1925–35.CrossRefPubMed Fiorentino F, Spizzichino L, Bono S, Biricik A, Kokkali G, Rienzi L, et al. PGD for reciprocal and Robertsonian translocations using array comparative genomic hybridization. Hum Reprod. 2011;26(7):1925–35.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Gutierrez-Mateo C, Colls P, Sanchez-Garcia J, Escudero T, Prates R, Ketterson K, et al. Validation of microarray comparative genomic hybridization for comprehensive chromosome analysis of embryos. Fertil Steril. 2011;95(3):953–8.CrossRefPubMed Gutierrez-Mateo C, Colls P, Sanchez-Garcia J, Escudero T, Prates R, Ketterson K, et al. Validation of microarray comparative genomic hybridization for comprehensive chromosome analysis of embryos. Fertil Steril. 2011;95(3):953–8.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Wells D, Alfarawati S, Fragouli E. Use of comprehensive chromosomal screening for embryo assessment: microarrays and CGH. Mol Hum Reprod. 2008;14(12):703–10.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wells D, Alfarawati S, Fragouli E. Use of comprehensive chromosomal screening for embryo assessment: microarrays and CGH. Mol Hum Reprod. 2008;14(12):703–10.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Wells D, Patrizio P. Gene expression profiling of human oocytes at different maturational stages and after in vitro maturation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;198(4):455 e1–9. discussion 455 e9-11CrossRef Wells D, Patrizio P. Gene expression profiling of human oocytes at different maturational stages and after in vitro maturation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;198(4):455 e1–9. discussion 455 e9-11CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Lathi RB, Westphal LM, Milki AA. Aneuploidy in the miscarriages of infertile women and the potential benefit of preimplanation genetic diagnosis. Fertil Steril. 2008;89(2):353–7.CrossRefPubMed Lathi RB, Westphal LM, Milki AA. Aneuploidy in the miscarriages of infertile women and the potential benefit of preimplanation genetic diagnosis. Fertil Steril. 2008;89(2):353–7.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Nonaka T, Ooki I, Enomoto T, Takakuwa K. Complex chromosomal rearrangements in couples affected by recurrent spontaneous abortion. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015;128(1):36–9.CrossRefPubMed Nonaka T, Ooki I, Enomoto T, Takakuwa K. Complex chromosomal rearrangements in couples affected by recurrent spontaneous abortion. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015;128(1):36–9.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Munne S, Marquez C, Magli C, Morton P, Morrison L. Scoring criteria for preimplantation genetic diagnosis of numerical abnormalities for chromosomes X, Y, 13, 16, 18 and 21. Mol Hum Reprod. 1998;4(9):863–70.CrossRefPubMed Munne S, Marquez C, Magli C, Morton P, Morrison L. Scoring criteria for preimplantation genetic diagnosis of numerical abnormalities for chromosomes X, Y, 13, 16, 18 and 21. Mol Hum Reprod. 1998;4(9):863–70.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Munne S, Wells D. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2002;14(3):239–44.CrossRefPubMed Munne S, Wells D. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2002;14(3):239–44.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Scriven PN. Communicating chromosome rearrangements and their outcomes using simple computer-generated color ideograms. Genet Test. 1998;2(1):71–4.CrossRefPubMed Scriven PN. Communicating chromosome rearrangements and their outcomes using simple computer-generated color ideograms. Genet Test. 1998;2(1):71–4.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Scriven PN, Handyside AH, Ogilvie CM. Chromosome translocations: segregation modes and strategies for preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Prenat Diagn. 1998;18(13):1437–49.CrossRefPubMed Scriven PN, Handyside AH, Ogilvie CM. Chromosome translocations: segregation modes and strategies for preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Prenat Diagn. 1998;18(13):1437–49.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Shpiz A, Kalma Y, Frumkin T, Telias M, Carmon A, Amit A, et al. Human embryonic stem cells carrying an unbalanced translocation demonstrate impaired differentiation into trophoblasts: an in vitro model of human implantation failure. Mol Hum Reprod. 2015;21(3):271–80.CrossRefPubMed Shpiz A, Kalma Y, Frumkin T, Telias M, Carmon A, Amit A, et al. Human embryonic stem cells carrying an unbalanced translocation demonstrate impaired differentiation into trophoblasts: an in vitro model of human implantation failure. Mol Hum Reprod. 2015;21(3):271–80.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Shaffer, L.G., McGowan-Jordan, J., Schmid, M., An International System for Human Cytogenetic Nomenclature (ISCN). 2013. Karger, 2013:140. Shaffer, L.G., McGowan-Jordan, J., Schmid, M., An International System for Human Cytogenetic Nomenclature (ISCN). 2013. Karger, 2013:140.
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Francke U, Oliver N. Quantitative analysis of high-resolution trypsin-giemsa bands on human prometaphase chromosomes. Hum Genet. 1978;45(2):137–65.CrossRefPubMed Francke U, Oliver N. Quantitative analysis of high-resolution trypsin-giemsa bands on human prometaphase chromosomes. Hum Genet. 1978;45(2):137–65.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Brezina PR, Kutteh WH, Bailey AP, Ke RW. Preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) is an excellent tool, but not perfect: a guide to counseling patients considering PGS. Fertil Steril. 2016;105(1):49–50.CrossRefPubMed Brezina PR, Kutteh WH, Bailey AP, Ke RW. Preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) is an excellent tool, but not perfect: a guide to counseling patients considering PGS. Fertil Steril. 2016;105(1):49–50.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Mastenbroek S, Repping S. Preimplantation genetic screening: back to the future. Hum Reprod. 2014;29(9):1846–50.CrossRefPubMed Mastenbroek S, Repping S. Preimplantation genetic screening: back to the future. Hum Reprod. 2014;29(9):1846–50.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Pellestor F, Anahory T, Lefort G, Puechberty J, Liehr T, Hedon B, et al. Complex chromosomal rearrangements: origin and meiotic behavior. Hum Reprod Update. 2011;17(4):476–94.CrossRefPubMed Pellestor F, Anahory T, Lefort G, Puechberty J, Liehr T, Hedon B, et al. Complex chromosomal rearrangements: origin and meiotic behavior. Hum Reprod Update. 2011;17(4):476–94.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Escudero T, Estop A, Fischer J, Munne S. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for complex chromosome rearrangements. Am J Med Genet A. 2008;146A(13):1662–9.CrossRefPubMed Escudero T, Estop A, Fischer J, Munne S. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for complex chromosome rearrangements. Am J Med Genet A. 2008;146A(13):1662–9.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Lim CK, Cho JW, Kim JY, Kang IS, Shim SH, Jun JH. A healthy live birth after successful preimplantation genetic diagnosis for carriers of complex chromosome rearrangements. Fertil Steril. 2008;90(5):1680–4.CrossRefPubMed Lim CK, Cho JW, Kim JY, Kang IS, Shim SH, Jun JH. A healthy live birth after successful preimplantation genetic diagnosis for carriers of complex chromosome rearrangements. Fertil Steril. 2008;90(5):1680–4.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Complex chromosomal rearrangement—a lesson learned from PGS
verfasst von
Tsvia Frumkin
Sagit Peleg
Veronica Gold
Adi Reches
Shiri Asaf
Foad Azem
Dalit Ben-Yosef
Mira Malcov
Publikationsdatum
29.05.2017
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics / Ausgabe 8/2017
Print ISSN: 1058-0468
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7330
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-017-0954-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2017

Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 8/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Alter verschlechtert Prognose bei Endometriumkarzinom

11.05.2024 Endometriumkarzinom Nachrichten

Ein höheres Alter bei der Diagnose eines Endometriumkarzinoms ist mit aggressiveren Tumorcharakteristika assoziiert, scheint aber auch unabhängig von bekannten Risikofaktoren die Prognose der Erkrankung zu verschlimmern.

Darf man die Behandlung eines Neonazis ablehnen?

08.05.2024 Gesellschaft Nachrichten

In einer Leseranfrage in der Zeitschrift Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology möchte ein anonymer Dermatologe bzw. eine anonyme Dermatologin wissen, ob er oder sie einen Patienten behandeln muss, der eine rassistische Tätowierung trägt.

Erhöhte Mortalität bei postpartalem Brustkrebs

07.05.2024 Mammakarzinom Nachrichten

Auch für Trägerinnen von BRCA-Varianten gilt: Erkranken sie fünf bis zehn Jahre nach der letzten Schwangerschaft an Brustkrebs, ist das Sterberisiko besonders hoch.

Menopausale Hormontherapie für Frauen über 65?

07.05.2024 Klimakterium und Menopause Nachrichten

In den USA erhalten nicht wenige Frauen auch noch im Alter über 65 eine menopausale Hormontherapie. Welche positiven und negativen gesundheitlichen Konsequenzen daraus möglicherweise resultieren, wurde anhand von Versicherungsdaten analysiert.

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.