Skip to main content
Erschienen in: BMC Cancer 1/2022

Open Access 01.12.2022 | Research

Comprehensive analysis of the prognosis and immune infiltration landscape of RNA methylation-related subtypes in pancreatic cancer

verfasst von: Siyuan Lu, Jie Hua, Jiang Liu, Miaoyan Wei, Chen Liang, Qingcai Meng, Bo Zhang, Xianjun Yu, Wei Wang, Jin Xu

Erschienen in: BMC Cancer | Ausgabe 1/2022

insite
INHALT
download
DOWNLOAD
print
DRUCKEN
insite
SUCHEN

Abstract

Background

RNA methylation refers to a form of methyl modification in RNA that modulates various epigenetic alterations. Mounting studies have focused on its potential mechanisms in cancer initiation and progression. However, the prognostic value and potential role of RNA methylation in the immune microenvironment of pancreatic cancer remain unclear.

Methods

Comprehensive bioinformatics analysis was performed to illuminate the expression profiles of RNA methylation modulators. In addition, the ConsensusClusterPlus algorithm was utilized to identify two remarkably different subtypes, and a feasible risk stratification method was established to accurately estimate prognosis. In addition, we validated our signature at the cytology and histology levels and conducted functional experiments to explore the biological functions of our key genes.

Results

Two subtypes with remarkable survival differences were identified by the consensus clustering algorithm. Cluster 2 tended to have higher expression levels of RNA methylation regulators and to be the high RNA methylation group. In addition, cluster 1 exhibited a significantly higher abundance of almost all immune cells and increased immune checkpoint expression compared to cluster 2. Chemotherapeutic sensitivity analysis indicated that there were significant differences in the sensitivity of four of the six drugs between different subgroups. Mutation investigation revealed a higher mutation burden and a higher number of mutations in cluster 2. An accurate and feasible risk stratification method was established based on the expression of key genes of each subtype. Patients with low risk scores exhibited longer survival times in one training (TCGA) and two validation cohorts (ICGC, GSE57495), with p values of 0.001, 0.0081, and 0.0042, respectively. In addition, our signature was further validated in a cohort from Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center. The low-risk group exhibited higher immune cell abundance and immune checkpoint levels than the high-risk group. The characteristics of the low-risk group were consistent with those of cluster 1: higher stromal score, estimate score, and immune score and lower tumor purity. Additionally, cell function investigations suggested that knockdown of CDKN3 remarkably inhibited the proliferation and migration of pancreatic cancer cells.

Conclusions

RNA methylation has a close correlation with prognosis, immune infiltration and therapy in pancreatic cancer. Our subtypes and risk stratification method can accurately predict prognosis and the efficacy of immune therapy and chemotherapy.
Hinweise

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at https://​doi.​org/​10.​1186/​s12885-022-09863-z.
Si-Yuan Lu, Jie Hua and Jiang Liu contributed equally to this work.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Introduction

Pancreatic cancer is regarded as one of the most aggressive and lethal malignances and has an extremely high mortality rate [1]. Given the lack of early symptoms and late diagnosis, patients with pancreatic cancer always miss the opportunity to undergo radical surgery [2]. Drug resistance makes the effects of various common chemotherapy regimens for pancreatic cancer unsatisfactory [3]. Additionally, newly emerging immunotherapy drugs have achieved disappointing outcomes in the treatment of pancreatic cancer, which may be attributed to the cold immune microenvironment of pancreatic cancer [4]. The immune microenvironment of pancreatic cancer tend to be less infiltrated by immune cells, leading to the low reactivity of pancreatic cancer to immunotherapy [4] Therefore, new risk stratification methods and biomarkers are urgently needed for clinical practice and therapy in pancreatic cancer.
RNA methylation is a form of RNA methyl modification that modulates epigenetic alterations [5]. More than 70 types of RNA methylation modifications have been identified in messenger RNA (mRNA) and noncoding RNA (ncRNA), and the most essential types in humans include N6-methyladenosine (m6A), 5-methylcytosine (m5C), and 7-methylguanosine (m7G) modification [57]. m6A methylation refers to adenosine methylation at the N6 position; the form of methylation was discovered in 1974 and thought to be the most common [8, 9]. m5C methylation adds a methyl group to cytosine at the 5th carbon in mRNAs [10], enhancer RNAs (eRNAs) [11], transfer RNAs (tRNAs) [12], small RNAs (sRNAs) [13], and ribosomal RNAs (rRNAs) [13]. m7G methylation modifies the N7 guanosine with a methyl group and has been found to exist in various mRNAs and ncRNAs [14, 15]. RNA methylation is a reversible process requiring various auxiliary enzymes and binding proteins, including methyltransferases, demethylases, and modified RNA binding proteins known as “writers”, “erasers”, and “readers”, respectively. Writers dominate the RNA methylation process [5]. In the writer complex consisting of METTL3 and METTL14, METTL3 functions as the catalytic subunit, while METTL14 facilitates RNA binding. In addition, the zinc finger protein ZC3H13 has also been reported to promote the nuclear localization of the writer complex [16]. Erasers play an essential role in RNA demethylation. FTO and ALKBH5 are key erasers in demethylation. FTO is mainly localized to the nucleus and mediates m6A demethylation. In addition, FTO can also promote m6A demethylation without affecting transcriptional stability [17]. Correspondingly, readers recognize and bind methylated RNA, affecting its posttranscriptional modification [18] The reader YTHDC1 regulates mRNA splicing and alters transcript metabolism [19], and YTHDC2 has also been found to bind methylation sites and mediate mRNA stability [20].
Many studies have demonstrated the potential connection between RNA methylation and various biological processes, especially the occurrence and progression of malignant tumors [21, 22]. Wang et al. revealed that elevated expression of METTL3 (m6A writer) contributed to the progression and metastasis of gastric cancer and indicated poor prognosis [23]. Interestingly, METTL14 (m6A writer) was reported to exhibit decreased levels in colorectal cancer and to attenuate colorectal cancer cell invasion and proliferation by suppressing m6A modification [24]. In addition, pancreatic cancer was also found to have upregulated METTL3 and downregulated ALKBH5 (m6A eraser) expression, and this dysregulation significantly influenced RNA methylation and resulted in poor clinical outcomes. METTL3 mainly affects RNA splicing and cellular regulation to promote chemotherapy and radiation tolerance, while ALKBH5 mainly regulates WIF-1 RNA methylation and Wnt signaling to modulate tumor progression [25, 26]. In conclusion, the disturbance of RNA methylation is closely related to the occurrence and progression of different tumors.
Many scientists have shed light on the correlation between RNA methylation and the tumor immune microenvironment [27]. Some studies have indicated that T-cell differentiation is regulated by METTL3 because it initiates the methylation of IL7-related pathways. Depletion of YTHDF1 (m6A reader) can also suspend the related methylation process and enhance the antigen presentation competence of dendritic cells, ultimately affecting the activation of other immune cells [28]. Additionally, RNA methylation may also be involved in innate immunity modulation. Gu et al. revealed that deletion of FTO (m6A eraser) contributed to the inhibition of M1 and M2 macrophages by silencing STAT1 and NF-κB pathway activity [29]. Given the potential correlation between RNA methylation and the tumor immune microenvironment of pancreatic cancer, it may be promising to analyze and investigate biological targets and therapeutic methods for immunotherapy of pancreatic cancer through RNA methylation.
In our research, we comprehensively analyzed the potential relationship of RNA methylation with distinct pancreatic cancer subtypes and the role of RNA methylation in risk classification, prognostic assessment, immune regulation and treatment.

Materials and methods

Dataset acquisition and RNA methylation modulator identification

We extracted the sequencing, mutation (version varscan2), and clinical data of pancreatic cancer patients from the UCSC Xena database (https://​xena.​ucsc.​edu/​). A total of 124 complete data points was retained after excluding those from benign tumor and neuroendocrine cancer samples (GDC TCGA PAAD, log2(tpm + 1) values). In addition, the transcriptome data of PACA-AU (80 samples) and GSE57495 (63 samples) were obtained from the ICGC (https://​dcc.​icgc.​org/​) and GEO databases, respectively (https://​www.​ncbi.​nlm.​nih.​gov/​geo/​). Overall, 38 critical RNA methylation modulators (readers, writers, or erasers of RNA methylation) were identified from previously published literature, and the information is listed in Table 1. The transcriptome data of cancer and normal pancreatic samples (TCGA TARGET GTEx cohort, log2(tpm + 0.001) values) were obtained from the UCSC Xena database and utilized to analyze the expression profiles of RNA methylation modulators.
Table 1
List of RNA methylation regulators of M5C, M6A, and M7G methylation
 
Writer
Reader
Eraser
M5C
TRDMT1 [30], NSUN1 [31], NSUN2 [31]
NSUN3 [31], NSUN4 [31], NSUN5 [31]
NSUN6 [31], NSUN7 [31], DNMT1 [32]
DNMT2 [33], DNMT3A [32], DNMT3B [32]
ALYREF [34],
YBX1 [34]
TET2 [35]
M6A
METTL3 [36], METTL14 [36], METTL16 [37],
WTAP [38], KIAA1429 [39], RBM15 [40],
RBM15B [41], ZC3H13 [42]
EIF3A [43], IGF2BP1 [44],
IGF2BP2 [44], IGF2BP3 [44],
YTHDC1 [45], YTHDC2 [45],
YTHDF1 [45], YTHDF2 [46],
YTHDF3 [47], HNRNPC [48],
HNRPA2B1 [44]
FTO [49],
ALKBH5 [50]
M7G
METTL1 [51],
WDR4 [52]
  

Identification of significantly different subtypes based on expression patterns of RNA methylation modulators

A consensus clustering algorithm was employed to identify optimal subtypes based on a matrix composed of RNA methylation regulators using the R package “ConsensusClusterPlus” (K-means, Euclidean distance, reps = 1000, pItem = 0.8, clusterAlg = “hc”) [53]. Additionally, we performed survival analysis to compare the prognoses of different subtypes (R package “survminer 0.4.9”, R package “survival 3.3.7”, conf.int = T, pval = T, risk.table = T) [54, 55].

Elucidating the immune characteristics, chemotherapy sensitivity and mutation landscape of different subtypes

We compared the immune infiltration, chemotherapy sensitivity and mutation landscapes of the subtypes. The R package “GSVA” (version 1.38.2, mx.diff = FALSE, verbose = FALSE, parallel.sz = 1) [56] and the CIBERSORT algorithm (version 1.0.3, perm = 100, QN = TRUE) [57] were used to estimate the proportions of infiltrating immune cells in various subtypes. The R package “PRRophetic” (version 0.5, batchCorrect = ‘eb’, powerTransformPhenotype = T, removeLowVaryingGenes = 0.2, minNumSamples = 10) was used to estimate the common drug IC50 values of various samples [58]. Based on the drug sensitivity data from the Cancer Genome Project, users could predict the IC50 value from sample expression data. The mutation landscapes of different subtypes were also evaluated by the R package “maftools” (version 2.6.05, rmOutlier = TRUE, addStat = ‘median’, dashboard = TRUE, titvRaw = FALSE) [59]. The differences in immune cell abundance, drug IC50, and mutation burden between different risk groups were compared through the Wilcoxon test. The results were visualized with box plots and violin plots using the R package “ggpubr” (version 0.4.0) [60] and “ggplot2” (version 3.3.5), respectively [61].

Differential expression and coexpression analyses

The empirical bayesian algorithm was employed by the R package “limma” to identify RNA methylation-related differentially expressed genes (DEGs) (version 3.46.0, abs (logFC) > 1, P.value < 0.05) [62]. A volcano plot of the DEGs was drawn by the R package “ggplot2” (version 3.3.5) [61]. In addition, we analyzed the correlations among the DEGs, and a correlation heatmap was utilized to visualize the coexpression profiles. The coexpression analysis was performed and the heatmap was generated by the R package “corrplot” (version 0.92, method = “circle”,insig = “pch”, number.cex = 0.5, order = “AOE”) [63]. Functional analysis, including Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) analyses and gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA), was performed by the R packages “clusterProfiler 3.18.1” (pvalueCutoff =0.05, qvalueCutoff =0.05, readable = TRUE) [64] and “org. Hs.eg.db 3.12.0” (fromType = “SYMBOL”, toType = “ENTREZID”) [65].

Identification of RNA methylation-related hub genes and construction of a risk model

We screened the DEGs to identify the most important biomarkers. The filtering methods included univariate Cox regression analysis, LASSO regression analysis, random forest algorithm analysis, and multivariate Cox regression analysis. Univariate Cox regression analysis was used to identify survival-related genes (R package “survminer 0.4.9”, R package “survival 3.3.7”) [54, 55]. Significant genes (P value < 0.005) identified in the univariate Cox regression analysis were included in the LASSO regression and random forest analyses. We then combined the hub genes identified in the LASSO regression and random forest analyses. The random forest algorithm analysis was performed with the R package “randomForestSRC” (version 2.12.0, set.seed = 60, ntree = 100, nsplit = 1) [66]. LASSO regression analysis was performed with the R package “glmnet” (version 4.1.2, nfold = 1000, family = ‘cox’) [67]. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to eliminate collinearity and construct a risk signature (R package “survival 3.3.7”) [55]. The risk score formula was as follows: \({\sum}_1^n coef\ast \exp \left(\mathrm{xn}\right)\). The R packages “survival” (version 3.3.7) and “surviminer” (version 0.4.8) were used to draw survival curves and compare the prognosis of different risk groups [54, 55]. Additionally, we established a clinical nomogram integrating the risk signature and some clinical characteristics to increase clinical applicability (R package “rms 6.2.0”) [68]. Area under the curve (AUC) analysis was used to evaluate the risk signature, and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were drawn by the R package “timeROC” (version 0.4.0, marker = lpFit, cause = 1, weighting = “marginal”,ROC = T, iid = T) [69].

Comprehensively analyzed our risk model in immune regulation activities, immune checkpoint therapy and chemotherapy

The CIBERSORT [57] and ssGSEA [70] algorithms (method = ‘ssgsea’, kcdf = ‘Gaussian’, abs.ranking = TRUE) were used to estimate the immune cell infiltration between various risk groups. The R package “ESTIMATE 1.0.13” was used to calculate the stromal score, estimate score, immune score, and tumor purity of all samples [71]. These algorithms allowed us to assess various immune cell scores and proportions based on the sample expression matrix. In addition, we also compared the expression levels of immune checkpoints and the IC50 values of chemotherapeutic drugs in different risk groups. Information on immune checkpoints is presented in Table S1. The R package ‘PRRophetic’ (version 0.5, batchCorrect = ‘eb’, powerTransformPhenotype = T, removeLowVaryingGenes = 0.2, minNumSamples = 10) was used to estimate the common drug IC50 values of various samples [58]. The Wilcoxon test was used to compare the differences in immune checkpoints and chemotherapeutic drug IC50 values between different risk groups, and a p value < 0.05 was considered significant.

Comparison of our risk model with other published risk signatures

To prove the superiority of our risk model in prognostic ability, several published models were compared with our model in the following aspects: survival curve, ROC curve and c-index (“rms” 6.2.0) [68]. We mainly compared our model with three published models, the 3-gene model of Tang et al [72], the 4-gene model of Meng et al [73], and the 5-gene model of Xu et al [74]. A well-differentiated survival curve, a better ROC curve area and a larger c-index indicate more ideal prediction performance.

Cell culture and qRT–PCR verification

We obtained one human normal pancreatic epithelial cell line (HPDE) and four human pancreatic cancer cell lines (SW 1990, BxPC-3, CFPAC-1, PANC-1) to verify the expression levels of ANLN, ARNTL2, CDKN3, and FAM53B. In addition, the expression levels of all RNA methylation regulators in different cell lines were also measured and compared. All cell lines were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 1% antifungal. Additionally, 70 clinical samples with complete follow-up information that underwent pancreatic cancer resection were extracted from Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center. We extracted the RNA of these paraffin-embedded specimens to verify the clinical application value of our risk model. The primer sequences of all genes are provided in Table S2. The expression data were normalized to GAPDH, and the relative mRNA expression level was calculated by the 2-ΔΔCt method.

Flow cytometry

PANC-1 cells were chosen to perform the flow cytometry experiment. A PE Annexin V Apoptosis Detection Kit (BD, cat: 559763) was used to stain PANC-1 cells, and a FACSCalibur flow cytometer was used to count them.

Transwell migration assay

To detect the migration ability, PANC-1 cells (5 × 104 cells) were cultured in the upper chamber with 200 μL of serum-free medium. Then, 500 μl medium with 20% FBS was added to the lower chamber. After fixing, staining and washing the upper chamber cells, we counted the migrating cells with 5 random areas per chamber.

EdU assay

PANC-1 cells (3 × 104 cells) were cultured in 96-well plates with 4 replicate wells and incubated with EdU working solution for two hours (BeyoClick™ EdU Cell Proliferation Kit with Alexa Fluor 594, China). After fixation, membrane rupture and nuclear staining, we used a fluorescence microscope (OLYMPUS, Tokyo, Japan) to capture fluorescence images.

Results

Expression profiles of RNA methylation modulators in pancreatic cancer

To investigate the potential role of RNA methylation modulators (including m5C, m6A, and m7G modulators) in the occurrence and progression of pancreatic cancer, we compared the expression profiles of 38 RNA methylation modulators between pancreatic cancer samples and normal samples. The heatmap shows the expression levels of these 38 RNA methylation modulators (Fig. 1A). The box plot further shows a comparison of tumor and normal samples (Fig. S1A). Almost all RNA methylation modulators showed elevated expression levels in tumors compared to normal tissue (except METTL1, EIF3A, YTHDC1, and YTHDC2) (Fig. S1A). In addition, NSUN6, NSUN7, and DNMT3B exhibited downregulated trends in pancreatic cancer (Fig. S1A). Coexpression analysis indicated high correlation among the majority of RNA methylation modulators (Fig. 1B). We further explored direct associations between these regulators at the proteomic level. The protein interaction network further demonstrates the strong correlations among these RNA methylation modulators (Fig. 1C).

Identification of two clusters of pancreatic cancer with different survival characteristics

We identified 2 unique expression patterns through unsupervised clustering: cluster 1 and cluster 2 (Fig. 2A, B, C). A heatmap was generated to show the expression levels of the RNA methylation modulators. The expression level of the RNA methylation modulators in cluster 2 was higher than that in cluster 1, indicating that cluster 2 featured high RNA methylation (Fig. 2D). Furthermore, we compared prognoses between cluster 1 and cluster 2, and cluster 1 exhibited better overall survival (P value =0.01) (Fig. 2E). A total of 2130 DEGs were identified between the two clusters by the R package “limma” (p value< 0.05). The volcano plot depicts the upregulated and downregulated DEGs, which are marked in red and blue, respectively (Fig. 2F).

Patients in the two clusters differed in immune landscape, drug sensitivity, and mutation burden

To further investigate the practical application utility of the clusters, we assessed immune and mutation characteristics and drug sensitivity in the two clusters. Cluster 1 exhibited a significantly higher abundance of almost all immune cells than cluster 2 (Fig. 3A, ssGSEA), except for activated NK cells and M0 macrophages (Fig. S1B, CIBERSORT). Pancreatic cancer samples showed elevated immune checkpoint expression levels compared to normal samples, indicating changes in the immune microenvironment (Fig. 3B). Interestingly, cluster 1 exhibited relatively higher expression of almost all immune checkpoints than cluster 2, except for LGALS9, indicating that it may have high responsiveness to immune checkpoint inhibitors (Fig. 3C). However, in terms of drug resistance, the different clusters showed different responses to commonly used chemotherapeutic drugs. Cluster 1 exhibited lower IC50 values of nilotinib, paclitaxel and cisplatin and higher IC50 values of etoposide compared to cluster 2 (Fig. S1C). Mutation analysis indicated that cluster 2 had a higher tumor mutation burden than cluster 1 (Fig. 4A). Additionally, cluster 2 exhibited a higher number of various mutation types, including frame-shift deletion, frame-shift insertion, in-frame deletion, missense, nonsense, and silent mutations (Fig. 4B). Similarly, a relatively higher proportion of the samples in cluster 2 exhibited gene mutation, and the two genes with the highest mutation frequency were KRAS and TP53 in both clusters (Fig. 4C, D). Based on these results, cluster 1 exhibited higher immune cell abundance, higher immune checkpoint expression levels, and a lower mutation frequency than cluster 2.

Functional annotation and molecular pathway analyses of the DEGs between the two clusters

Subsequently, we performed functional enrichment analysis, including GO and KEGG analyses and GSEA, and visualized the results with a dot plot (Fig. S2A, Fig. S2B) and GSEA plot (Fig. S2C, Fig. S2D). The main enriched biological functions and processes included the terms “immune response”, “immune cell differentiation and migration”, “cell activation”, “angiogenesis”, and “response to cytokine”, indicating a correlation with immune regulation and cancer development. In addition, the main enriched KEGG pathway terms of the DEGs were “chemokine signaling pathway”, “cell adhesion molecules”, and “JAK-STAT signaling pathway”; some immune differentiation-related pathways were also enriched. These results were consistent with the GO analysis results and indicated a potential role of the DEGs in pancreatic cancer.

Establishment of a subtype-related risk model and prognostic nomogram

Given the remarkable differences in the characteristics of the RNA methylation-related subtypes, we further investigated the prognostic role of genes with differential expression between the subtypes. A total of 26 and 17 genes were identified after univariate Cox regression and LASSO regression combined with random forest analysis, respectively (Fig. S3A, Fig. S3B). In total, 4 differential genes were ultimately identified and utilized to construct a risk signature (Fig. S3B). The model formula is as follows: risk score = 1.0746*exp. (CDKN3)-0.9659*exp. (FAM53B)-0.5651*exp.(ANLN) + 0.7498*exp.(ARNTL2). The correlation heatmap shows a high correlation between the screened genes (Fig. S3C). The prognostic utility of the risk signature was determined in a TCGA training cohort and validated in external datasets: GSE57495 and ICGC. The results indicated that patients with low risk scores exhibited longer survival times in all cohorts, with p values of 0.001, 0.0081, and 0.0042 in the TCGA, GSE57495, and ICGC cohorts, respectively (Fig. 5A, B, C). The risk plots depict the risk score and survival time of each patient (Fig. 5D, E, F). ROC curve analysis was used to test the reliability and stability of the risk signature (Fig. 5G, H, I). The high AUC values in the training set and validation set indicated the good predictive performance of our model (generally greater than 0.7). Furthermore, we compared the prognostic value of our risk signature with those of some important clinical parameters. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses indicated that our risk score was an independent prognostic indicator in pancreatic cancer (p value< 0.001) (Fig. 6A, B). A clinical nomogram was constructed based on our risk signature and included the clinical parameters age, sex, AJCC T stage, AJCC N stage, and tumor stage (Fig. 6C). Calibration curve analysis and decision curve analysis (DCA) verified the predictive utility of our nomogram (Fig. S4A, Fig. S4B).

Ability of the RNA methylation-based model to reflect the immune landscape and drug sensitivity

To further explore the practical application of our subtype-related risk model in pancreatic cancer, we investigated its ability to reflect immune infiltration and chemotherapeutic sensitivity. ssGSEA analysis indicated that the low-score group had higher immune cell abundance than the high-score group (Fig. 7A). The level of M0 macrophages was higher in the high-score group than in the low-score group (CIBERSORT); macrophages can be polarized into M1 or M2 macrophages, which play opposite roles (Fig. S5A) [75]. In addition, the high-score group exhibited a lower stromal score, estimate score, and immune score and a higher tumor purity, which was consistent with the features of cluster 2 (Fig. 7B, C). Interestingly, cluster 2 exhibited a higher risk score than cluster 1, suggesting that cluster 2 may have a higher risk and worse prognosis (Fig. 7D). Additionally, the low-score group exhibited high expression levels of all immune checkpoints, indicating increased potential for immunotherapy in this group (Fig. 7E). We estimated the chemotherapy sensitivity of the different risk groups. The low-score group had a higher IC50 value of etoposide but a lower IC50 value of cisplatin (Fig. S5B).

The risk model had better predictive ability and accuracy than other published models

To further prove the superiority of our risk model, we compared our model with some published methylation-related models, including a 3-gene signature, a 4-gene signature, and a 5-gene signature. Survival curve, ROC curve, and c-index analyses were used to evaluate the models. The analyses were based on TCGA data, and the result indicated that our model exhibited a better ability to predict survival and to distinguish the high- and low-risk groups than other models (Fig. 8A, B, C). The ROC curve analysis suggested that our model had higher stability and accuracy (Fig. 8D, E, F). We also performed these analyses in the ICGC and GSE57495 cohorts, and the results validated our conclusion (Fig. S6, Fig. S7). In addition, we comprehensively compared the c-indexes of various models in the TCGA, ICGC, and GSE57495 cohorts. Our model exhibited a higher c-index than other published models for all cohorts (Fig. 8G).

Validation of the accuracy of our risk stratification model with cytology and histology experiments

We cultured a normal pancreatic ductal epithelial cell line (HPDE) and four pancreatic cancer cell lines (SW 1990, BxPC-3, CFPAC-1, and PANC-1), extracted RNA from the cells, and performed qRT-PCR to determine the expression profiles of key prognostic genes (ANLN, ARNTL2, CDKN3, and FAM53B) and RNA methylation regulators. The results (Fig. S8) indicated that the mRNA levels of ANLN, ARNTL2, CDKN3, and FAM53B in the cancer cell lines (SW 1990, BxPC-3, CFPAC-1, and PANC-1) were significantly higher than those in the normal cell line (HPDE), indicating their prognostic value. In addition, the expression levels of ANLN, ARNTL2, CDKN3, and FAM53B were upregulated in cancer tissues from our cancer center (Fig. S9A). The expression levels of most RNA methylation regulators were also elevated in the tumor cell lines, suggesting that pancreatic cancer tumor cells may have higher levels of RNA methylation (Fig. S10). Our model also performed well in a FUSCC cohort. The survival time of high-risk patients was significantly lower than that of low-risk patients (P value < 0.05), with AUCs of 0.66 and 0.75 for one and two years, respectively (Fig. S9B, Fig. S9C).

CDKN3 significantly promotes the proliferation and migration of pancreatic cancer cells

CDKN3 expression was silenced in PANC-1 cells with small-interfering RNA. The apoptosis rate of pancreatic cancer cells was not remarkably influenced by gene silencing (Fig. S11). The proliferation of CDKN3-silenced cells was decreased compared to that of control cells (Fig. 9A). Additionally, CDKN3-silenced cells exhibited lower migration ability in Transwell migration experiments (Fig. 9B).

Discussion

Recently, epigenetic alterations triggered by RNA methylation have become a research focus, and such alterations may be associated with the initiation and progression of malignances. In the field of pancreatic cancer RNA methylation research, some scientists have illuminated the potential role of the methylation modifying enzyme METTL3 in modulating proliferation, invasion and therapeutic sensitivity [76], and efforts to investigate the internal mechanism have been made. Some studies have also explored the prognostic role of RNA methylation in pancreatic cancer from the perspective of m6A and constructed risk classification models [74]. However, no risk stratification or prognostic models have been generated based on holistic bioinformatics exploration of RNA methylation. In this research, we identified methylation-related subtypes of pancreatic cancer based on the expression patterns of 38 RNA methylation regulators and explored the immune, mutation, and chemosensitivity characteristics of the different subtypes. Additionally, a risk stratification signature based on DEGs was established to further explore differences in prognosis and immunotherapy and chemotherapy efficacy between the two risk groups.
Aberrant RNA methylation plays an essential role in the occurrence and progression of pancreatic cancer [74, 77]. Our results suggest that stratifying pancreatic cancer patients based on RNA methylation profiles may be useful for improving patient outcomes. Two subtypes with remarkable survival differences were identified by consensus clustering, indicating the prognostic role of RNA methylation in pancreatic cancer. In addition, we shed light on the distinct immune, chemotherapy sensitivity, and mutation characteristics of the two clusters. Cluster 1 exhibited a significantly higher abundance of almost all immune cells than cluster 2, suggesting that cluster 1 features robust immune infiltration. Similarly, cluster 1 had higher expression of the majority of immune checkpoints than cluster 2, revealing that cluster 1 is more likely to benefit from immunotherapy. Additionally, chemotherapeutic sensitivity analysis indicated that there were significant differences in the sensitivity of four drugs between the different subgroups, suggesting that our RNA methylation-based stratification method has potential for guiding chemotherapy drug selection. Further mutation investigation revealed a higher mutation burden and higher number of mutations in cluster 2, which was consistent with the survival analysis. Overall, we identified 2 subtypes with considerable differences and verified the poor biological behaviors and prognosis of cluster 2, providing guidance for predicting clinical outcomes and drug selection. Further experiments are needed to explore the clinical value of the clustering and validate its performance.
We established an accurate and feasible risk stratification method based on DEGs. The use of multiple screening methods, including univariate Cox regression, LASSO regression, random forest, and multivariate Cox regression analyses, ensures the robustness of our results. A four-gene risk signature was ultimately identified and exhibited an optimal ability to predict survival. Univariate and multivariate Cox analyses indicated that our risk score was an independent prognostic indicator. Additionally, comparison of our risk model with other published risk signatures confirmed the superiority of our model. These findings suggest that our risk stratification method based on RNA methylation is useful.
Studies of the immune microenvironment have increased with the rise of immunotherapy and targeted therapy. Pancreatic cancer exhibits an immunosuppressive microenvironment that includes various immunosuppressive cells (tumor-associated macrophages, myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), and regulatory T cells), which may contribute to the failure of immune therapy [78]. Surprisingly, RNA methylation may be involved in the modulation of immune cells and immune microenvironments [79]. Some scientists have demonstrated that elevated expression of METTL3 promotes the proliferation of CD33+ MDSCs, leading to the progression of cervical cancer [80]. In our study, comprehensive analysis of different risk groups and clusters was performed, and immune infiltration levels were analyzed. The low-risk group exhibited higher immune cell abundance and immune checkpoint levels than the high-risk group, indicating that the low-risk group is more likely to benefit from therapy and have a good prognosis. Additionally, the characteristics of the low-risk group were consistent with those of cluster 1: higher stromal score, estimate score, and immune score and lower tumor purity. In conclusion, the risk stratification model is more accurate and practical for subgroup classification and has a robust ability to predict immunotherapy efficacy and prognosis. Subsequent experiments are needed to validate its utility in clinical practice.
Our study has some strengths and limitations. First, our model was tested in multiple datasets and is thus reliable. Second, we verified the expression differences and prognostic utility of the hub genes in our own cohort. A limitation of our research is potential differences in sample standardization methods between various datasets. Further verification with data from more centers and larger sample sizes is needed.

Conclusion

In conclusion, we systematically analyzed the expression patterns of RNA methylation regulators in pancreatic cancer and identified two molecular subtypes with completely different characteristics. We constructed a risk stratification model based on these subtypes that performed better than published risk models. Our study is the first to include comprehensive bioinformatics and prognostic analysis of RNA methylation in pancreatic cancer, and we hope the results will provide references for clinical practice.

Acknowledgments

Not applicable.

Declarations

The Institutional Research Ethics Committee of Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center (FUSCC) approved this study, and written informed consent was obtained from all patients prior to the investigation. The ethics approval number was 050432–4-1212B. We confirm that the experiments using human tissue samples were performed in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.
Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0/​. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://​creativecommons.​org/​publicdomain/​zero/​1.​0/​) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
insite
INHALT
download
DOWNLOAD
print
DRUCKEN
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Strobel O, Neoptolemos J, Jäger D, Büchler MW. Optimizing the outcomes of pancreatic cancer surgery. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2019;16(1):11–26.PubMedCrossRef Strobel O, Neoptolemos J, Jäger D, Büchler MW. Optimizing the outcomes of pancreatic cancer surgery. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2019;16(1):11–26.PubMedCrossRef
2.
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Hoos WA, James PM, Rahib L, Talley AW, Fleshman JM, Matrisian LM. Pancreatic cancer clinical trials and accrual in the United States. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(27):3432–8.PubMedCrossRef Hoos WA, James PM, Rahib L, Talley AW, Fleshman JM, Matrisian LM. Pancreatic cancer clinical trials and accrual in the United States. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(27):3432–8.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Dolladille C, Ederhy S, Sassier M, Cautela J, Thuny F, Cohen AA, et al. Immune checkpoint inhibitor Rechallenge after immune-related adverse events in patients with Cancer. JAMA Oncol. 2020;6(6):865–71.PubMedCrossRef Dolladille C, Ederhy S, Sassier M, Cautela J, Thuny F, Cohen AA, et al. Immune checkpoint inhibitor Rechallenge after immune-related adverse events in patients with Cancer. JAMA Oncol. 2020;6(6):865–71.PubMedCrossRef
5.
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Xie S, Chen W, Chen K, Chang Y, Yang F, Lin A, et al. Emerging roles of RNA methylation in gastrointestinal cancers. Cancer Cell Int. 2020;20(1):585.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Xie S, Chen W, Chen K, Chang Y, Yang F, Lin A, et al. Emerging roles of RNA methylation in gastrointestinal cancers. Cancer Cell Int. 2020;20(1):585.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Perry RP, Kelley DE, LaTorre J. Synthesis and turnover of nuclear and cytoplasmic polyadenylic acid in mouse L cells. J Mol Biol. 1974;82(3):315–31.PubMedCrossRef Perry RP, Kelley DE, LaTorre J. Synthesis and turnover of nuclear and cytoplasmic polyadenylic acid in mouse L cells. J Mol Biol. 1974;82(3):315–31.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Cui X, Liang Z, Shen L, Zhang Q, Bao S, Geng Y, et al. 5-Methylcytosine RNA methylation in Arabidopsis Thaliana. Mol Plant. 2017;10(11):1387–99.PubMedCrossRef Cui X, Liang Z, Shen L, Zhang Q, Bao S, Geng Y, et al. 5-Methylcytosine RNA methylation in Arabidopsis Thaliana. Mol Plant. 2017;10(11):1387–99.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Motorin Y, Lyko F, Helm M. 5-methylcytosine in RNA: detection, enzymatic formation and biological functions. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;38(5):1415–30.PubMedCrossRef Motorin Y, Lyko F, Helm M. 5-methylcytosine in RNA: detection, enzymatic formation and biological functions. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;38(5):1415–30.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat David R, Burgess A, Parker B, Li J, Pulsford K, Sibbritt T, et al. Transcriptome-wide mapping of RNA 5-Methylcytosine in Arabidopsis mRNAs and noncoding RNAs. Plant Cell. 2017;29(3):445–60.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef David R, Burgess A, Parker B, Li J, Pulsford K, Sibbritt T, et al. Transcriptome-wide mapping of RNA 5-Methylcytosine in Arabidopsis mRNAs and noncoding RNAs. Plant Cell. 2017;29(3):445–60.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Huang W, Lan MD, Qi CB, Zheng SJ, Wei SZ, Yuan BF, et al. Formation and determination of the oxidation products of 5-methylcytosine in RNA. Chem Sci. 2016;7(8):5495–502.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Huang W, Lan MD, Qi CB, Zheng SJ, Wei SZ, Yuan BF, et al. Formation and determination of the oxidation products of 5-methylcytosine in RNA. Chem Sci. 2016;7(8):5495–502.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Pandolfini L, Barbieri I, Bannister AJ, Hendrick A, Andrews B, Webster N, et al. METTL1 promotes let-7 MicroRNA processing via m7G methylation. Mol Cell. 2019;74(6):1278–1290.e1279.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Pandolfini L, Barbieri I, Bannister AJ, Hendrick A, Andrews B, Webster N, et al. METTL1 promotes let-7 MicroRNA processing via m7G methylation. Mol Cell. 2019;74(6):1278–1290.e1279.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Guy MP, Phizicky EM. Two-subunit enzymes involved in eukaryotic post-transcriptional tRNA modification. RNA Biol. 2014;11(12):1608–18.PubMedCrossRef Guy MP, Phizicky EM. Two-subunit enzymes involved in eukaryotic post-transcriptional tRNA modification. RNA Biol. 2014;11(12):1608–18.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Shi H, Wei J, He C. Where, when, and how: context-dependent functions of RNA methylation writers, readers, and erasers. Mol Cell. 2019;74(4):640–50.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Shi H, Wei J, He C. Where, when, and how: context-dependent functions of RNA methylation writers, readers, and erasers. Mol Cell. 2019;74(4):640–50.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Mauer J, Luo X, Blanjoie A, Jiao X, Grozhik AV, Patil DP, et al. Reversible methylation of m(6)a(m) in the 5′ cap controls mRNA stability. Nature. 2017;541(7637):371–5.PubMedCrossRef Mauer J, Luo X, Blanjoie A, Jiao X, Grozhik AV, Patil DP, et al. Reversible methylation of m(6)a(m) in the 5′ cap controls mRNA stability. Nature. 2017;541(7637):371–5.PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang X, Zhao BS, Roundtree IA, Lu Z, Han D, Ma H, et al. N(6)-methyladenosine modulates messenger RNA translation efficiency. Cell. 2015;161(6):1388–99.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Wang X, Zhao BS, Roundtree IA, Lu Z, Han D, Ma H, et al. N(6)-methyladenosine modulates messenger RNA translation efficiency. Cell. 2015;161(6):1388–99.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Xiao W, Adhikari S, Dahal U, Chen YS, Hao YJ, Sun BF, et al. Nuclear m(6) a reader YTHDC1 regulates mRNA splicing. Mol Cell. 2016;61(4):507–19.PubMedCrossRef Xiao W, Adhikari S, Dahal U, Chen YS, Hao YJ, Sun BF, et al. Nuclear m(6) a reader YTHDC1 regulates mRNA splicing. Mol Cell. 2016;61(4):507–19.PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Hsu PJ, Zhu Y, Ma H, Guo Y, Shi X, Liu Y, et al. Ythdc2 is an N(6)-methyladenosine binding protein that regulates mammalian spermatogenesis. Cell Res. 2017;27(9):1115–27.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Hsu PJ, Zhu Y, Ma H, Guo Y, Shi X, Liu Y, et al. Ythdc2 is an N(6)-methyladenosine binding protein that regulates mammalian spermatogenesis. Cell Res. 2017;27(9):1115–27.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Jin D, Guo J, Wu Y, Du J, Yang L, Wang X, et al. M(6) a mRNA methylation initiated by METTL3 directly promotes YAP translation and increases YAP activity by regulating the MALAT1-miR-1914-3p-YAP axis to induce NSCLC drug resistance and metastasis. J Hematol Oncol. 2019;12(1):135.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Jin D, Guo J, Wu Y, Du J, Yang L, Wang X, et al. M(6) a mRNA methylation initiated by METTL3 directly promotes YAP translation and increases YAP activity by regulating the MALAT1-miR-1914-3p-YAP axis to induce NSCLC drug resistance and metastasis. J Hematol Oncol. 2019;12(1):135.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Dahal U, Le K, Gupta M. RNA m6A methyltransferase METTL3 regulates invasiveness of melanoma cells by matrix metallopeptidase 2. Melanoma Res. 2019;29(4):382–9.PubMedCrossRef Dahal U, Le K, Gupta M. RNA m6A methyltransferase METTL3 regulates invasiveness of melanoma cells by matrix metallopeptidase 2. Melanoma Res. 2019;29(4):382–9.PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang Q, Chen C, Ding Q, Zhao Y, Wang Z, Chen J, et al. METTL3-mediated m(6) a modification of HDGF mRNA promotes gastric cancer progression and has prognostic significance. Gut. 2020;69(7):1193–205.PubMedCrossRef Wang Q, Chen C, Ding Q, Zhao Y, Wang Z, Chen J, et al. METTL3-mediated m(6) a modification of HDGF mRNA promotes gastric cancer progression and has prognostic significance. Gut. 2020;69(7):1193–205.PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen X, Xu M, Xu X, Zeng K, Liu X, Pan B, et al. METTL14-mediated N6-methyladenosine modification of SOX4 mRNA inhibits tumor metastasis in colorectal cancer. Mol Cancer. 2020;19(1):106.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Chen X, Xu M, Xu X, Zeng K, Liu X, Pan B, et al. METTL14-mediated N6-methyladenosine modification of SOX4 mRNA inhibits tumor metastasis in colorectal cancer. Mol Cancer. 2020;19(1):106.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Taketo K, Konno M, Asai A, Koseki J, Toratani M, Satoh T, et al. The epitranscriptome m6A writer METTL3 promotes chemo- and radioresistance in pancreatic cancer cells. Int J Oncol. 2018;52(2):621–9.PubMed Taketo K, Konno M, Asai A, Koseki J, Toratani M, Satoh T, et al. The epitranscriptome m6A writer METTL3 promotes chemo- and radioresistance in pancreatic cancer cells. Int J Oncol. 2018;52(2):621–9.PubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Tang B, Yang Y, Kang M, Wang Y, Wang Y, Bi Y, et al. M(6) a demethylase ALKBH5 inhibits pancreatic cancer tumorigenesis by decreasing WIF-1 RNA methylation and mediating Wnt signaling. Mol Cancer. 2020;19(1):3.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Tang B, Yang Y, Kang M, Wang Y, Wang Y, Bi Y, et al. M(6) a demethylase ALKBH5 inhibits pancreatic cancer tumorigenesis by decreasing WIF-1 RNA methylation and mediating Wnt signaling. Mol Cancer. 2020;19(1):3.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Li HB, Tong J, Zhu S, Batista PJ, Duffy EE, Zhao J, et al. M(6) a mRNA methylation controls T cell homeostasis by targeting the IL-7/STAT5/SOCS pathways. Nature. 2017;548(7667):338–42.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Li HB, Tong J, Zhu S, Batista PJ, Duffy EE, Zhao J, et al. M(6) a mRNA methylation controls T cell homeostasis by targeting the IL-7/STAT5/SOCS pathways. Nature. 2017;548(7667):338–42.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Han D, Liu J, Chen C, Dong L, Liu Y, Chang R, et al. Anti-tumour immunity controlled through mRNA m(6) a methylation and YTHDF1 in dendritic cells. Nature. 2019;566(7743):270–4.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Han D, Liu J, Chen C, Dong L, Liu Y, Chang R, et al. Anti-tumour immunity controlled through mRNA m(6) a methylation and YTHDF1 in dendritic cells. Nature. 2019;566(7743):270–4.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Gu X, Zhang Y, Li D, Cai H, Cai L, Xu Q. N6-methyladenosine demethylase FTO promotes M1 and M2 macrophage activation. Cell Signal. 2020;69:109553.PubMedCrossRef Gu X, Zhang Y, Li D, Cai H, Cai L, Xu Q. N6-methyladenosine demethylase FTO promotes M1 and M2 macrophage activation. Cell Signal. 2020;69:109553.PubMedCrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Pan J, Huang Z, Xu Y. m5C RNA methylation regulators predict prognosis and regulate the immune microenvironment in lung squamous cell carcinoma. Front Oncol. 2021;11:657466.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Pan J, Huang Z, Xu Y. m5C RNA methylation regulators predict prognosis and regulate the immune microenvironment in lung squamous cell carcinoma. Front Oncol. 2021;11:657466.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Squires JE, Patel HR, Nousch M, Sibbritt T, Humphreys DT, et al. Widespread occurrence of 5-methylcytosine in human coding and non-coding RNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40(11):5023–33.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Squires JE, Patel HR, Nousch M, Sibbritt T, Humphreys DT, et al. Widespread occurrence of 5-methylcytosine in human coding and non-coding RNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40(11):5023–33.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Reid R, Greene PJ, Santi DV. Exposition of a family of RNA m(5) C methyltransferases from searching genomic and proteomic sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 1999;27(15):3138–45.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Reid R, Greene PJ, Santi DV. Exposition of a family of RNA m(5) C methyltransferases from searching genomic and proteomic sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 1999;27(15):3138–45.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Goll MG, Kirpekar F, Maggert KA, Yoder JA, Hsieh CL, et al. Methylation of tRNAAsp by the DNA methyltransferase homolog Dnmt2. Science (New York, NY). 2006;311(5759):395–8.CrossRef Goll MG, Kirpekar F, Maggert KA, Yoder JA, Hsieh CL, et al. Methylation of tRNAAsp by the DNA methyltransferase homolog Dnmt2. Science (New York, NY). 2006;311(5759):395–8.CrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Yang Y, Wang L, Han X, Yang WL, Zhang M, et al. RNA 5-Methylcytosine facilitates the maternal-to-zygotic transition by preventing maternal mRNA decay. Mol Cell. 2019;75(6):1188–1202.e1111.PubMedCrossRef Yang Y, Wang L, Han X, Yang WL, Zhang M, et al. RNA 5-Methylcytosine facilitates the maternal-to-zygotic transition by preventing maternal mRNA decay. Mol Cell. 2019;75(6):1188–1202.e1111.PubMedCrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Fu L, Guerrero CR, Zhong N, Amato NJ, Liu Y, et al. Tet-mediated formation of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in RNA. J Am Chem Soc. 2014;136(33):11582–5.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Fu L, Guerrero CR, Zhong N, Amato NJ, Liu Y, et al. Tet-mediated formation of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in RNA. J Am Chem Soc. 2014;136(33):11582–5.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Liu J, Yue Y, Han D, Wang X, Fu Y, et al. A METTL3-METTL14 complex mediates mammalian nuclear RNA N6-adenosine methylation. Nat Chem Biol. 2014;10(2):93–5.PubMedCrossRef Liu J, Yue Y, Han D, Wang X, Fu Y, et al. A METTL3-METTL14 complex mediates mammalian nuclear RNA N6-adenosine methylation. Nat Chem Biol. 2014;10(2):93–5.PubMedCrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Su R, Dong L, Li Y, Gao M, He PC, et al. METTL16 exerts an m(6)A-independent function to facilitate translation and tumorigenesis. Nat Cell Biol. 2022;24(2):205–16.PubMedCrossRef Su R, Dong L, Li Y, Gao M, He PC, et al. METTL16 exerts an m(6)A-independent function to facilitate translation and tumorigenesis. Nat Cell Biol. 2022;24(2):205–16.PubMedCrossRef
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Ping XL, Sun BF, Wang L, Xiao W, Yang X, et al. Mammalian WTAP is a regulatory subunit of the RNA N6-methyladenosine methyltransferase. Cell Res. 2014;24(2):177–89.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Ping XL, Sun BF, Wang L, Xiao W, Yang X, et al. Mammalian WTAP is a regulatory subunit of the RNA N6-methyladenosine methyltransferase. Cell Res. 2014;24(2):177–89.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Lan T, Li H, Zhang D, Xu L, Liu H, et al. KIAA1429 contributes to liver cancer progression through N6-methyladenosine-dependent post-transcriptional modification of GATA3. Mol Cancer. 2019;18(1):186.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Lan T, Li H, Zhang D, Xu L, Liu H, et al. KIAA1429 contributes to liver cancer progression through N6-methyladenosine-dependent post-transcriptional modification of GATA3. Mol Cancer. 2019;18(1):186.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Cai X, Chen Y, Man D, Yang B, Feng X, et al. RBM15 promotes hepatocellular carcinoma progression by regulating N6-methyladenosine modification of YES1 mRNA in an IGF2BP1-dependent manner. Cell Death Discov. 2021;7(1):315.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Cai X, Chen Y, Man D, Yang B, Feng X, et al. RBM15 promotes hepatocellular carcinoma progression by regulating N6-methyladenosine modification of YES1 mRNA in an IGF2BP1-dependent manner. Cell Death Discov. 2021;7(1):315.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Tan C, Xia P, Zhang H, Xu K, Liu P, et al. YY1-targeted RBM15B promotes hepatocellular carcinoma cell proliferation and Sorafenib resistance by promoting TRAM2 expression in an m6A-dependent manner. Front Oncol. 2022;12:873020.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Tan C, Xia P, Zhang H, Xu K, Liu P, et al. YY1-targeted RBM15B promotes hepatocellular carcinoma cell proliferation and Sorafenib resistance by promoting TRAM2 expression in an m6A-dependent manner. Front Oncol. 2022;12:873020.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Wen J, Lv R, Ma H, Shen H, He C, et al. Zc3h13 regulates nuclear RNA m(6) a methylation and mouse embryonic stem cell self-renewal. Mol Cell. 2018;69(6):1028–1038.e1026.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Wen J, Lv R, Ma H, Shen H, He C, et al. Zc3h13 regulates nuclear RNA m(6) a methylation and mouse embryonic stem cell self-renewal. Mol Cell. 2018;69(6):1028–1038.e1026.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang Y, Hua X, Shi H, Zhang L, Xiao H, et al. Systematic analyses of the role of prognostic and immunological EIF3A, a reader protein, in clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Cancer Cell Int. 2021;21(1):680.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Zhang Y, Hua X, Shi H, Zhang L, Xiao H, et al. Systematic analyses of the role of prognostic and immunological EIF3A, a reader protein, in clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Cancer Cell Int. 2021;21(1):680.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Huang H, Weng H, Sun W, Qin X, Shi H, et al. Recognition of RNA N(6)-methyladenosine by IGF2BP proteins enhances mRNA stability and translation. Nat Cell Biol. 2018;20(3):285–95.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Huang H, Weng H, Sun W, Qin X, Shi H, et al. Recognition of RNA N(6)-methyladenosine by IGF2BP proteins enhances mRNA stability and translation. Nat Cell Biol. 2018;20(3):285–95.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Dominissini D, Moshitch-Moshkovitz S, Schwartz S, Salmon-Divon M, Ungar L, et al. Topology of the human and mouse m6A RNA methylomes revealed by m6A-seq. Nature. 2012;485(7397):201–6.PubMedCrossRef Dominissini D, Moshitch-Moshkovitz S, Schwartz S, Salmon-Divon M, Ungar L, et al. Topology of the human and mouse m6A RNA methylomes revealed by m6A-seq. Nature. 2012;485(7397):201–6.PubMedCrossRef
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Yu J, Chai P, Xie M, Ge S, Ruan J, et al. Histone lactylation drives oncogenesis by facilitating m(6) a reader protein YTHDF2 expression in ocular melanoma. Genome Biol. 2021;22(1):85.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Yu J, Chai P, Xie M, Ge S, Ruan J, et al. Histone lactylation drives oncogenesis by facilitating m(6) a reader protein YTHDF2 expression in ocular melanoma. Genome Biol. 2021;22(1):85.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
47.
Zurück zum Zitat Chang G, Shi L, Ye Y, Shi H, Zeng L, et al. YTHDF3 induces the translation of m(6)A-enriched gene transcripts to promote breast Cancer brain metastasis. Cancer Cell. 2020;38(6):857–871.e857.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Chang G, Shi L, Ye Y, Shi H, Zeng L, et al. YTHDF3 induces the translation of m(6)A-enriched gene transcripts to promote breast Cancer brain metastasis. Cancer Cell. 2020;38(6):857–871.e857.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
48.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang LC, Chen SH, Shen XL, Li DC, Liu HY, et al. M6A RNA methylation regulator HNRNPC contributes to tumorigenesis and predicts prognosis in Glioblastoma Multiforme. Front Oncol. 2020;10:536875.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Wang LC, Chen SH, Shen XL, Li DC, Liu HY, et al. M6A RNA methylation regulator HNRNPC contributes to tumorigenesis and predicts prognosis in Glioblastoma Multiforme. Front Oncol. 2020;10:536875.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
49.
Zurück zum Zitat Jia G, Fu Y, Zhao X, Dai Q, Zheng G, et al. N6-methyladenosine in nuclear RNA is a major substrate of the obesity-associated FTO. Nat Chem Biol. 2011;7(12):885–7.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Jia G, Fu Y, Zhao X, Dai Q, Zheng G, et al. N6-methyladenosine in nuclear RNA is a major substrate of the obesity-associated FTO. Nat Chem Biol. 2011;7(12):885–7.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
50.
Zurück zum Zitat Zheng G, Dahl JA, Niu Y, Fedorcsak P, Huang CM, et al. ALKBH5 is a mammalian RNA demethylase that impacts RNA metabolism and mouse fertility. Mol Cell. 2013;49(1):18–29.PubMedCrossRef Zheng G, Dahl JA, Niu Y, Fedorcsak P, Huang CM, et al. ALKBH5 is a mammalian RNA demethylase that impacts RNA metabolism and mouse fertility. Mol Cell. 2013;49(1):18–29.PubMedCrossRef
51.
Zurück zum Zitat Orellana EA, Liu Q, Yankova E, Pirouz M, De Braekeleer E, et al. METTL1-mediated m(7) G modification of Arg-TCT tRNA drives oncogenic transformation. Mol Cell. 2021;81(16):3323–3338.e3314.PubMedCrossRef Orellana EA, Liu Q, Yankova E, Pirouz M, De Braekeleer E, et al. METTL1-mediated m(7) G modification of Arg-TCT tRNA drives oncogenic transformation. Mol Cell. 2021;81(16):3323–3338.e3314.PubMedCrossRef
52.
Zurück zum Zitat Lin S, Liu Q, Lelyveld VS, Choe J, Szostak JW, et al. Mettl1/Wdr4-mediated m(7) G tRNA Methylome is required for Normal mRNA translation and embryonic stem cell self-renewal and differentiation. Mol Cell. 2018;71(2):244–255.e245.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Lin S, Liu Q, Lelyveld VS, Choe J, Szostak JW, et al. Mettl1/Wdr4-mediated m(7) G tRNA Methylome is required for Normal mRNA translation and embryonic stem cell self-renewal and differentiation. Mol Cell. 2018;71(2):244–255.e245.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
53.
Zurück zum Zitat Qin X, Li J, Hu W, Yang J. Machine learning K-means clustering algorithm for interpolative separable density fitting to accelerate hybrid functional calculations with numerical atomic orbitals. J Phys Chem A. 2020;124(48):10066–74.PubMedCrossRef Qin X, Li J, Hu W, Yang J. Machine learning K-means clustering algorithm for interpolative separable density fitting to accelerate hybrid functional calculations with numerical atomic orbitals. J Phys Chem A. 2020;124(48):10066–74.PubMedCrossRef
54.
Zurück zum Zitat Alboukadel Kassambara, , MK, Biecek P: survminer: Drawing Survival Curves using 'ggplot2'. R package version 0.4.9. 2021. Alboukadel Kassambara, , MK, Biecek P: survminer: Drawing Survival Curves using 'ggplot2'. R package version 0.4.9. 2021.
55.
Zurück zum Zitat T T: A Package for survival analysis in R_. R package ,version 3.2-7. 2020. T T: A Package for survival analysis in R_. R package ,version 3.2-7. 2020.
56.
57.
Zurück zum Zitat Newman AM, Liu CL, Green MR, Gentles AJ, Feng W, Xu Y, et al. Robust enumeration of cell subsets from tissue expression profiles. Nat Methods. 2015;12(5):453–7.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Newman AM, Liu CL, Green MR, Gentles AJ, Feng W, Xu Y, et al. Robust enumeration of cell subsets from tissue expression profiles. Nat Methods. 2015;12(5):453–7.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
58.
Zurück zum Zitat Geeleher P, Cox N, Huang RS. pRRophetic: an R package for prediction of clinical chemotherapeutic response from tumor gene expression levels. PLoS One. 2014;9(9):e107468.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Geeleher P, Cox N, Huang RS. pRRophetic: an R package for prediction of clinical chemotherapeutic response from tumor gene expression levels. PLoS One. 2014;9(9):e107468.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
59.
Zurück zum Zitat Mayakonda A, Lin DC, Assenov Y, Plass C, Koeffler HP. Maftools: efficient and comprehensive analysis of somatic variants in cancer. Genome Res. 2018;28(11):1747–56.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Mayakonda A, Lin DC, Assenov Y, Plass C, Koeffler HP. Maftools: efficient and comprehensive analysis of somatic variants in cancer. Genome Res. 2018;28(11):1747–56.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
60.
Zurück zum Zitat Kassambara A: ggpubr: 'ggplot2' Based Publication Ready Plots. R package version 0.4.0. 2020. Kassambara A: ggpubr: 'ggplot2' Based Publication Ready Plots. R package version 0.4.0. 2020.
61.
Zurück zum Zitat Wickham H. ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2016.CrossRef Wickham H. ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2016.CrossRef
62.
Zurück zum Zitat Ritchie ME, Phipson B, Wu D, Hu Y, Law CW, Shi W, et al. Limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43(7):e47.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Ritchie ME, Phipson B, Wu D, Hu Y, Law CW, Shi W, et al. Limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43(7):e47.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
63.
Zurück zum Zitat Wei T, Simko V. R package 'corrplot': Visualization of a Correlation Matrix (Version 0.92); 2021. Wei T, Simko V. R package 'corrplot': Visualization of a Correlation Matrix (Version 0.92); 2021.
64.
65.
Zurück zum Zitat Carlson M: org. Hs.eg.db: Genome wide annotation for Human. R package version 3.12.0. 2020. Carlson M: org. Hs.eg.db: Genome wide annotation for Human. R package version 3.12.0. 2020.
66.
Zurück zum Zitat Ishwaran H, U. B K: Fast Unified Random Forests for Survival, Regression, and Classification (RF-SRC), R package version 2.12.0. 2021. Ishwaran H, U. B K: Fast Unified Random Forests for Survival, Regression, and Classification (RF-SRC), R package version 2.12.0. 2021.
67.
68.
Zurück zum Zitat Jr FEH: Rms: regression modeling strategies. R package version 6.2-0. 2021. Jr FEH: Rms: regression modeling strategies. R package version 6.2-0. 2021.
69.
Zurück zum Zitat Blanche P, Dartigues JF, Jacqmin-Gadda H. Estimating and comparing time-dependent areas under receiver operating characteristic curves for censored event times with competing risks. Stat Med. 2013;32(30):5381–97.PubMedCrossRef Blanche P, Dartigues JF, Jacqmin-Gadda H. Estimating and comparing time-dependent areas under receiver operating characteristic curves for censored event times with competing risks. Stat Med. 2013;32(30):5381–97.PubMedCrossRef
70.
Zurück zum Zitat Barbie DA, Tamayo P, Boehm JS, Kim SY, Moody SE, Dunn IF, et al. Systematic RNA interference reveals that oncogenic KRAS-driven cancers require TBK1. Nature. 2009;462(7269):108–12.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Barbie DA, Tamayo P, Boehm JS, Kim SY, Moody SE, Dunn IF, et al. Systematic RNA interference reveals that oncogenic KRAS-driven cancers require TBK1. Nature. 2009;462(7269):108–12.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
71.
Zurück zum Zitat Yoshihara K, Kim H, Verhaak RG. Estimate: estimate of stromal and immune cells in malignant tumor tissues from: Expression Data; 2016. Yoshihara K, Kim H, Verhaak RG. Estimate: estimate of stromal and immune cells in malignant tumor tissues from: Expression Data; 2016.
72.
Zurück zum Zitat Tang R, Zhang Y, Liang C, Xu J, Meng Q, Hua J, et al. The role of m6A-related genes in the prognosis and immune microenvironment of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. PeerJ. 2020;8:e9602.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Tang R, Zhang Y, Liang C, Xu J, Meng Q, Hua J, et al. The role of m6A-related genes in the prognosis and immune microenvironment of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. PeerJ. 2020;8:e9602.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
73.
Zurück zum Zitat Meng Z, Yuan Q, Zhao J, Wang B, Li S, Offringa R, et al. The m(6)A-related mRNA signature predicts the prognosis of pancreatic Cancer patients. Mol Ther Oncolytics. 2020;17:460–70.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Meng Z, Yuan Q, Zhao J, Wang B, Li S, Offringa R, et al. The m(6)A-related mRNA signature predicts the prognosis of pancreatic Cancer patients. Mol Ther Oncolytics. 2020;17:460–70.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
74.
Zurück zum Zitat Xu F, Zhang Z, Yuan M, Zhao Y, Zhou Y, Pei H, et al. M6A regulatory genes play an important role in the prognosis, progression and immune microenvironment of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Cancer Investig. 2021;39(1):39–54.CrossRef Xu F, Zhang Z, Yuan M, Zhao Y, Zhou Y, Pei H, et al. M6A regulatory genes play an important role in the prognosis, progression and immune microenvironment of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Cancer Investig. 2021;39(1):39–54.CrossRef
75.
Zurück zum Zitat Lei X, Lei Y, Li JK, Du WX, Li RG, Yang J, et al. Immune cells within the tumor microenvironment: biological functions and roles in cancer immunotherapy. Cancer Lett. 2020;470:126–33.PubMedCrossRef Lei X, Lei Y, Li JK, Du WX, Li RG, Yang J, et al. Immune cells within the tumor microenvironment: biological functions and roles in cancer immunotherapy. Cancer Lett. 2020;470:126–33.PubMedCrossRef
76.
Zurück zum Zitat Xia T, Wu X, Cao M, Zhang P, Shi G, Zhang J, et al. The RNA m6A methyltransferase METTL3 promotes pancreatic cancer cell proliferation and invasion. Pathol Res Pract. 2019;215(11):152666.PubMedCrossRef Xia T, Wu X, Cao M, Zhang P, Shi G, Zhang J, et al. The RNA m6A methyltransferase METTL3 promotes pancreatic cancer cell proliferation and invasion. Pathol Res Pract. 2019;215(11):152666.PubMedCrossRef
77.
Zurück zum Zitat Tian J, Zhu Y, Rao M, Cai Y, Lu Z, Zou D, et al. N(6)-methyladenosine mRNA methylation of PIK3CB regulates AKT signalling to promote PTEN-deficient pancreatic cancer progression. Gut. 2020;69(12):2180–92.PubMedCrossRef Tian J, Zhu Y, Rao M, Cai Y, Lu Z, Zou D, et al. N(6)-methyladenosine mRNA methylation of PIK3CB regulates AKT signalling to promote PTEN-deficient pancreatic cancer progression. Gut. 2020;69(12):2180–92.PubMedCrossRef
78.
Zurück zum Zitat Dougan SK. The pancreatic Cancer microenvironment. Cancer J (Sudbury, Mass). 2017;23(6):321–5.CrossRef Dougan SK. The pancreatic Cancer microenvironment. Cancer J (Sudbury, Mass). 2017;23(6):321–5.CrossRef
79.
Zurück zum Zitat Dong L, Cao Y, Hou Y, Liu G. N(6) -methyladenosine RNA methylation: a novel regulator of the development and function of immune cells. J Cell Physiol. 2021. Dong L, Cao Y, Hou Y, Liu G. N(6) -methyladenosine RNA methylation: a novel regulator of the development and function of immune cells. J Cell Physiol. 2021.
80.
Zurück zum Zitat Ni HH, Zhang L, Huang H, Dai SQ, Li J. Connecting METTL3 and intratumoural CD33(+) MDSCs in predicting clinical outcome in cervical cancer. J Transl Med. 2020;18(1):393.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Ni HH, Zhang L, Huang H, Dai SQ, Li J. Connecting METTL3 and intratumoural CD33(+) MDSCs in predicting clinical outcome in cervical cancer. J Transl Med. 2020;18(1):393.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Comprehensive analysis of the prognosis and immune infiltration landscape of RNA methylation-related subtypes in pancreatic cancer
verfasst von
Siyuan Lu
Jie Hua
Jiang Liu
Miaoyan Wei
Chen Liang
Qingcai Meng
Bo Zhang
Xianjun Yu
Wei Wang
Jin Xu
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2022
Verlag
BioMed Central
Erschienen in
BMC Cancer / Ausgabe 1/2022
Elektronische ISSN: 1471-2407
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-022-09863-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2022

BMC Cancer 1/2022 Zur Ausgabe

Wo hapert es noch bei der Umsetzung der POMGAT-Leitlinie?

03.05.2024 DCK 2024 Kongressbericht

Seit November 2023 gibt es evidenzbasierte Empfehlungen zum perioperativen Management bei gastrointestinalen Tumoren (POMGAT) auf S3-Niveau. Vieles wird schon entsprechend der Empfehlungen durchgeführt. Wo es im Alltag noch hapert, zeigt eine Umfrage in einem Klinikverbund.

Bestrahlung nach Prostatektomie: mehr Schaden als Nutzen?

02.05.2024 Prostatakarzinom Nachrichten

Eine adjuvante Radiotherapie nach radikaler Prostata-Op. bringt den Betroffenen wahrscheinlich keinen Vorteil. Im Gegenteil: Durch die Bestrahlung steigt offenbar das Risiko für Harn- und Stuhlinkontinenz.

ASS schützt nicht vor Brustkrebsrezidiven

02.05.2024 Mammakarzinom Nachrichten

Nützt nichts und ist vielleicht sogar schädlich: In einer Phase-3-Studie konnten täglich 300 mg ASS keine Brustkrebsrezidive bei Frauen vermeiden, die ein hohes Risiko für eine Tumorrückkehr aufwiesen. Tendenziell traten unter ASS sogar häufiger Rezidive auf als unter Placebo.

CUP-Syndrom: Künstliche Intelligenz kann Primärtumor finden

30.04.2024 Künstliche Intelligenz Nachrichten

Krebserkrankungen unbekannten Ursprungs (CUP) sind eine diagnostische Herausforderung. KI-Systeme können Pathologen dabei unterstützen, zytologische Bilder zu interpretieren, um den Primärtumor zu lokalisieren.

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.