nach oben

Current Cardiology Reports

Erschienen in:

19.10.2023 | Pericardial Disease (AL Klein and CL Jellis, Section Editors)

Computed Tomography–Guided Pericardiocentesis: A Practical Guide

verfasst von: Kunaal R. Bafna, Anouva Kalra-Lall, Ram Kishore Gurajala, Karunakaravel Karuppasamy

Erschienen in: Current Cardiology Reports | Ausgabe 11/2023

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose of Review

The purpose of this article is to serve as a practical guide to computed tomography (CT)–guided pericardiocentesis and to discuss the role of this approach in current clinical practice. An overview of indications, technique, advantages, and limitations specific to CT-guided pericardiocentesis will be provided. The reader will have an enhanced understanding of the use of this imaging modality to guide pericardial drainage.

Recent Findings

Use of CT guidance to drain the pericardial space is safe, especially when adequate echocardiographic evaluation is precluded and when echocardiography-guided pericardiocentesis is deemed unsafe and or not feasible.

Summary

Our review and experience indicate that CT-guided pericardiocentesis is technically successful in more than 94% of patients, with a low risk (<1%) of significant complications. CT-guided pericardiocentesis is therefore a viable alternative when echocardiographic guidance is insufficient and can obviate the need for surgery in most patients.

Levene G, Kaufman SA. The roentgen diagnosis of pericardial effusion, with special reference to the appearance of the barium-filled esophagus and the cardiohepatic angle. Radiology. 1951;57(3):373–83. https://doi.org/10.1148/57.3.373.CrossRefPubMed

Imazio M, Adler Y. Management of pericardial effusion. Eur Heart J. 2013;34(16):1186–97. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehs372.CrossRefPubMed

Callahan JA, Seward JB, Nishimura RA, Miller FA Jr, Reeder GS, Shub C, et al. Two-dimensional echocardiographically guided pericardiocentesis: experience in 117 consecutive patients. Am J Cardiol. 1985;55(4):476–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9149(85)90397-2.CrossRefPubMed

Tsang TS, Enriquez-Sarano M, Freeman WK, Barnes ME, Sinak LJ, Gersh BJ, et al. Consecutive 1127 therapeutic echocardiographically guided pericardiocenteses: clinical profile, practice patterns, and outcomes spanning 21 years. Mayo Clin Proc. 2002;77(5):429–36. https://doi.org/10.4065/77.5.429.CrossRefPubMed

Osman A, Wan Chuan T, Ab Rahman J, Via G, Tavazzi G. Ultrasound-guided pericardiocentesis: a novel parasternal approach. Eur J Emerg Med. 2018;25(5):322–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000471.CrossRefPubMed

Chandraratna PA, Reid CL, Nimalasuriya A, Kawanishi D, Rahimtoola SH. Application of 2-dimensional contrast studies during pericardiocentesis. Am J Cardiol. 1983;52(8):1120–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9149(83)90544-1.CrossRefPubMed

Karuppasamy K. Real-time image-guided pericardial drain placement. American College of Cardiology website. https://www.acc.org/Latest-in-Cardiology/Articles/2017/07/12/07/04/Real-Time-Image-Guided-Pericardial-Drain-Placement. Published July 12, 2017. Accessed 3 Aug 2023.

Uppot RN. Technical challenges of imaging & image-guided interventions in obese patients. Br J Radiol. 2018;91(1089):20170931. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20170931.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Ibrahim AO, Jaber F, Alghizzawi M, Metzinger M, Asif T. CT-guided pericardiocentesis in a case of tension pneumopericardium and tamponade secondary to an enteropericardial fistula. J Am Coll Cardiol Case Rep. 2023;18:101909. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccas.2023.101909.

10.

Cosyns B, Plein S, Nihoyanopoulos P, Smiseth O, Achenbach S, Andrade MJ, et al. European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI) position paper: multimodality imaging in pericardial disease. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;16(1):12–31. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jeu128.CrossRefPubMed

11.

Palmer SL, Kelly PD, Schenkel FA, Barr ML. CT-guided tube pericardiostomy: a safe and effective technique in the management of postsurgical pericardial effusion. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;193(4):W314–20. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.08.1834.CrossRefPubMed

12.

Hongo T, Sugiyama H, Naito H, Nakao A. Successful computed tomography-guided pericardiocentesis after performing a failed conventional transthoracic echocardiography-guided approach: a case report. J Emerg Med Case Rep. 2020;11(2):39–42. https://doi.org/10.33706/jemcr.632857.

13.

Sheafor DH, Paulson EK, Kliewer MA, DeLong DM, Nelson RC. Comparison of sonographic and CT guidance techniques: does CT fluoroscopy decrease procedure time? AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000;174(4):939–42. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.174.4.1740939.CrossRefPubMed

14.

Gallagher S, Syed F, Gurajala R, Gill A, Levitin A, Karuppasamy K. Real-time image-guided drainage of postsurgical pericardial effusion is an effective alternative to surgical window. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2021;32(5):S153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2021.03.366.CrossRef

15.

Klein SV, Afridi H, Agarwal D, Coughlin BF, Schielke LH. CT directed diagnostic and therapeutic pericardiocentesis: 8-year experience at a single institution. Emerg Radiol. 2005;11(6):353–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-004-0389-5.CrossRefPubMed

16.

David S, Mansoubi H, Hoey E, Agrawal B, Tasker A. CT guided pericardiocentesis: a UK experience. ECR 2010. Poster No. C-0494. https://doi.org/10.1594/ecr2010/C-0494.

17.

Tomoda H, Hoshiai M, Furuya H, Oeda Y, Matsumoto S, Tanabe T, et al. Evaluation of pericardial effusion with computed tomography. Am Heart J. 1980;99(6):701–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-8703(80)90618-3.CrossRefPubMed

18.

Sandring KH, Müller C. CT-gestützte perkutane Punktion und Drainage von Perikardergüssen [CT-guided percutaneous puncture and drainage of pericardial effusion]. Radiol Diagn (Berl). 1989;30(6):643–6.PubMed

19.

Ceviz M, Çolak A, Becit N, Kaya U, Ogul H. Computed tomography-guided drainage of pericardial effusion. Turk J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;22(3):553–7.CrossRef

20.

Neves D, Silva G, Morais G, Ferreira N, Carvalho M, Gama Ribeiro V, et al. Computed tomography-guided pericardiocentesis - a single-center experience [erratum in Rev Port Cardiol. 2016;35(6):392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.repc.2016.05.001]. Rev Port Cardiol. 2016;35(5):285–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.repc.2015.11.015.

21.

Duvernoy O, Magnusson A. CT-guided pericardiocentesis. Acta Radiol. 1996;37(5):775–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/02841851960373P269.CrossRefPubMed

22.

Tam A, Ensor JE, Snyder H, Gupta S, Durand JB, Wallace MJ. Image-guided drainage of pericardial effusions in oncology patients. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2009;32(6):1217–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-009-9594-7.CrossRefPubMed

23.

Eichler K, Zangos S, Thalhammer A, Jacobi V, Walcher F, Marzi I, et al. CT-guided pericardiocenteses: clinical profile, practice patterns and clinical outcome. Eur J Radiol. 2010;75(1):28–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.04.012.CrossRefPubMed

24.

Syed F, Slaughter R, Tjahjadi C, Hansen M, Raffel O. Computed tomography guided pericardiocentesis in adults: a single centre experience of 44 procedures. Heart Lung Circ. 2011;20(suppl 2):S165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlc.2011.05.411.CrossRef

25.

Nour-Eldin NA, Alsubhi M, Gruber-Rouh T, Vogl TJ, Kaltenbach B, Soliman HH, et al. CT-guided drainage of pericardial effusion after open cardiac surgery. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2017;40(8):1223–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-017-1624-2.CrossRefPubMed

26.

•• Ingber RB, Lodhi U, Mootz J, Siegel A, Al-Roubaie M, Greben C. Comparing outcomes of CT-guided percutaneous pericardial drainage with surgical pericardial window in patients with symptomatic pericardial effusions. Acad Radiol. 2023 Mar 14:S1076–6332(23)00087–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2023.02.014. Findings from this study suggest that complications from CT-guided percutaneous pericardial drainage are significantly lower compared to subxiphoid surgical pericardial window.

27.

Bruning R, Muehlstaedt M, Becker C, Knez A, Haberl R, Reiser M. Computed tomography-fluoroscopy guided drainage of pericardial effusions: experience in 11 cases. Invest Radiol. 2002;37(6):328–32. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004424-200206000-00004.CrossRefPubMed

28.

• Khashper A, Shelef I, Taragin BH, Smolikov A. Therapeutic computed tomography-guided pericardiocentesis: lessons learned based on a 7-year single-center experience. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2021 Jul-Aug 01;45(4):643–648. https://doi.org/10.1097/RCT.0000000000001190. Findings from this study suggest that CT-guided pericardiocentesis is safe and effective in managing patients requiring therapeutic pericardial drainages.

29.

Vilela EM, Ruivo C, Guerreiro CE, Silva MP, Ladeiras-Lopes R, Caeiro D, et al. Computed tomography-guided pericardiocentesis: a systematic review concerning contemporary evidence and future perspectives. Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis. 2018;12(11):299–307. https://doi.org/10.1177/1753944718792413.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

30.

Shaalan AM, Ezeldin TH, Elwakeel EE, Salem EF. Predictors of cardiac injury during pericardiocentesis. Egypt J Surg. 2022;41(3):1009–18. https://doi.org/10.4103/ejs.ejs_150_22.CrossRef

31.

Luis SA, Sinak LJ, Michelena HI, Kane GC. American College of Cardiology website. ACC.org. Imaging-guided pericardiocentesis: a comparison of echocardiographic versus computed tomography guided approaches. https://www.acc.org/latest-in-cardiology/articles/2020/10/13/12/36/imaging-guided-pericardiocentesis. Published October 13, 2020. Accessed 3 Aug 2023.

32.

Committee Opinion No. 723: guidelines for diagnostic imaging during pregnancy and lactation [erratum in Obstet Gynecol. 2018;132(3):786. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000002858]. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;130(4):e210–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000002355.

33.

Cheon BK, Kim CL, Kim KR, Kang MH, Lim JA, Woo NS, et al. Radiation safety: a focus on lead aprons and thyroid shields in interventional pain management. Korean J Pain. 2018;31(4):244–52. https://doi.org/10.3344/kjp.2018.31.4.244.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Titel: Computed Tomography–Guided Pericardiocentesis: A Practical Guide
verfasst von: Kunaal R. Bafna
Anouva Kalra-Lall
Ram Kishore Gurajala
Karunakaravel Karuppasamy
Publikationsdatum: 19.10.2023
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Current Cardiology Reports / Ausgabe 11/2023
Print ISSN: 1523-3782
Elektronische ISSN: 1534-3170
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-023-01965-9

Update Kardiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Computed Tomography–Guided Pericardiocentesis: A Practical Guide

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Recent Findings

Summary

Neu im Fachgebiet Kardiologie

Vorsicht, erhöhte Blutungsgefahr nach PCI!

Triglyzeridsenker schützt nicht nur Hochrisikopatienten

Gibt es eine Wende bei den bioresorbierbaren Gefäßstützen?

Darf man die Behandlung eines Neonazis ablehnen?

Update Kardiologie

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Recent Findings

Summary

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 11/2023

New Potential Treatments for Resistant Hypertension

Indications for Cardiac Catheterization and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Resuscitated Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Endovascular Interventions for Peripheral Artery Disease: A Contemporary Review

Long-Term Remote vs. Conventional Monitoring of Pacemakers: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Coronary Angiography Complicated by Acute Ischaemic Stroke and the Use of Thrombolysis: a Cardiology Perspective and Narrative Review of Current Literature

Contraception and Cardiovascular Effects: What Should the Cardiologist Know?

Neu im Fachgebiet Kardiologie

Vorsicht, erhöhte Blutungsgefahr nach PCI!

Triglyzeridsenker schützt nicht nur Hochrisikopatienten

Gibt es eine Wende bei den bioresorbierbaren Gefäßstützen?

Darf man die Behandlung eines Neonazis ablehnen?

Update Kardiologie