Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 3/2010

01.03.2010 | Reconstructive Oncology

Computer-Based Learning Module Increases Shared Decision Making in Breast Reconstruction

verfasst von: Bernard T. Lee, MD, FACS, Chen Chen, MS, Janet H. Yueh, MD, Minh-Doan Nguyen, MD, PhD, Samuel J. Lin, MD, Adam M. Tobias, MD

Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Ausgabe 3/2010

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Shared decision making (SDM) combines evidence-based medicine with individual patient preferences. Patients who are actively engaged in their own health care management with their physicians have been shown to experience not only increased compliance, but also higher satisfaction and better outcomes. We hypothesize that a computer-based learning module for breast reconstruction increases patient involvement in the decision-making process.

Materials and Methods

Women who underwent either immediate or delayed breast reconstruction at an academic teaching hospital from 2004 to 2007 were identified. Patients meeting inclusion criteria were mailed questionnaires on demographics, informational resources, and decision-making processes. Questionnaire results were divided into 2 groups for analysis: patients who received a standard surgeon consultation and patients who were shown a computer-based decision aid in addition to the standard consultation.

Results

There were 358 women eligible for our study. A total of 255 patients (75.9%) responded to the survey; 168 patients were shown the computer-based decision aid and 87 patients were not. Patients who used the computer-based learning module reported a greater role in choosing the type of reconstruction (P < .001). Additionally, these patients reported a greater number of reconstructive options offered to them (P < .001) and were more satisfied with the amount of information provided by their reconstructive surgeon (P = .049).

Conclusions

A computer-based learning module allows patients to assimilate information and actively participate in choosing type of breast reconstruction. Use of this educational modality represents a simple and effective way to improve the shared decision-making process.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Alderman AK, Wei Y, Birkmeyer JD. Use of breast reconstruction after mastectomy following the Women’s Health and Cancer Rights Act. JAMA. 2006;295:387–8.CrossRefPubMed Alderman AK, Wei Y, Birkmeyer JD. Use of breast reconstruction after mastectomy following the Women’s Health and Cancer Rights Act. JAMA. 2006;295:387–8.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Dean C, Chetty U, Forrest AP. Effects of immediate breast reconstruction on psychosocial morbidity after mastectomy. Lancet. 1983;1:459–62.CrossRefPubMed Dean C, Chetty U, Forrest AP. Effects of immediate breast reconstruction on psychosocial morbidity after mastectomy. Lancet. 1983;1:459–62.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T. Decision-making in the physician-patient encounter: revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model. Soc Sci Med. 1999;49:651–61.CrossRefPubMed Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T. Decision-making in the physician-patient encounter: revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model. Soc Sci Med. 1999;49:651–61.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T. Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango). Soc Sci Med. 1997;44:681–92.CrossRefPubMed Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T. Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango). Soc Sci Med. 1997;44:681–92.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T. How to improve communication between doctors and patients. Learning more about the decision making context is important. BMJ. 2000;320:1220–1.CrossRefPubMed Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T. How to improve communication between doctors and patients. Learning more about the decision making context is important. BMJ. 2000;320:1220–1.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Coulter A. Partnerships with patients: the pros and cons of shared clinical decision-making. J Health Serv Res Policy. 1997;2:112–21.PubMed Coulter A. Partnerships with patients: the pros and cons of shared clinical decision-making. J Health Serv Res Policy. 1997;2:112–21.PubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Coulter A. Patient information and shared decision-making in cancer care. Br J Cancer. 2003;89:S15–6.CrossRefPubMed Coulter A. Patient information and shared decision-making in cancer care. Br J Cancer. 2003;89:S15–6.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Coulter A, Ellins J. Effectiveness of strategies for informing, educating, and involving patients. BMJ. 2007;335:24–7.CrossRefPubMed Coulter A, Ellins J. Effectiveness of strategies for informing, educating, and involving patients. BMJ. 2007;335:24–7.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Towle A, Godolphin W. Framework for teaching and learning informed shared decision making. BMJ. 1999;319:766–71.PubMed Towle A, Godolphin W. Framework for teaching and learning informed shared decision making. BMJ. 1999;319:766–71.PubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Kaplan RM. Shared medical decision making. A new tool for preventive medicine. Am J Prev Med. 2004;26:81–3.CrossRefPubMed Kaplan RM. Shared medical decision making. A new tool for preventive medicine. Am J Prev Med. 2004;26:81–3.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Sheridan SL, Harris RP, Woolf SH. Shared decision making about screening and chemoprevention. a suggested approach from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Am J Prev Med. 2004;26:56–66.CrossRefPubMed Sheridan SL, Harris RP, Woolf SH. Shared decision making about screening and chemoprevention. a suggested approach from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Am J Prev Med. 2004;26:56–66.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Briss P, Rimer B, Reilley B, Coates RC, Lee NC, Mullen P, et al. Promoting informed decisions about cancer screening in communities and healthcare systems. Am J Prev Med. 2004;26:67–80.CrossRefPubMed Briss P, Rimer B, Reilley B, Coates RC, Lee NC, Mullen P, et al. Promoting informed decisions about cancer screening in communities and healthcare systems. Am J Prev Med. 2004;26:67–80.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Goodwin PJ, Black JT, Bordeleau LJ, Ganz PA. Health-related quality-of-life measurement in randomized clinical trials in breast cancer–taking stock. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003;95:263–81.PubMedCrossRef Goodwin PJ, Black JT, Bordeleau LJ, Ganz PA. Health-related quality-of-life measurement in randomized clinical trials in breast cancer–taking stock. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003;95:263–81.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Andersen MR, Bowen DJ, Morea J, Stein KD, Baker F. Involvement in decision-making and breast cancer survivor quality of life. Health Psychol. 2009;28:29–37.CrossRefPubMed Andersen MR, Bowen DJ, Morea J, Stein KD, Baker F. Involvement in decision-making and breast cancer survivor quality of life. Health Psychol. 2009;28:29–37.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Keating NL, Weeks JC, Borbas C, Guadagnoli E. Treatment of early stage breast cancer: do surgeons and patients agree regarding whether treatment alternatives were discussed? Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2003;79:225–31.CrossRefPubMed Keating NL, Weeks JC, Borbas C, Guadagnoli E. Treatment of early stage breast cancer: do surgeons and patients agree regarding whether treatment alternatives were discussed? Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2003;79:225–31.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Keating NL, Guadagnoli E, Landrum MB, Borbas C, Weeks JC. Treatment decision making in early-stage breast cancer: should surgeons match patients’ desired level of involvement? J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:1473–9.CrossRefPubMed Keating NL, Guadagnoli E, Landrum MB, Borbas C, Weeks JC. Treatment decision making in early-stage breast cancer: should surgeons match patients’ desired level of involvement? J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:1473–9.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Waljee JF, Hawley S, Alderman AK, Morrow M, Katz SJ. Patient satisfaction with treatment of breast cancer: does surgeon specialization matter? J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:3694–8.CrossRefPubMed Waljee JF, Hawley S, Alderman AK, Morrow M, Katz SJ. Patient satisfaction with treatment of breast cancer: does surgeon specialization matter? J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:3694–8.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Katz SJ, Lantz PM, Janz NK, Fagerlin A, Schwartz K, Liu L, et al. Patient involvement in surgery treatment decisions for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:5526–33.CrossRefPubMed Katz SJ, Lantz PM, Janz NK, Fagerlin A, Schwartz K, Liu L, et al. Patient involvement in surgery treatment decisions for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:5526–33.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Man-Son-Hing M, Laupacis A, O’Connor AM, Biggs J, Drake E, Yetsir E, Hart RG. A patient decision aid regarding antithrombotic therapy for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 1999;282:737–43.CrossRefPubMed Man-Son-Hing M, Laupacis A, O’Connor AM, Biggs J, Drake E, Yetsir E, Hart RG. A patient decision aid regarding antithrombotic therapy for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 1999;282:737–43.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Waljee JF, Rogers MA, Alderman AK. Decision aids and breast cancer: do they influence choice for surgery and knowledge of treatment options? J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:1067–73.CrossRefPubMed Waljee JF, Rogers MA, Alderman AK. Decision aids and breast cancer: do they influence choice for surgery and knowledge of treatment options? J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:1067–73.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat O’Brien MA, Whelan TJ, Villasis-Keever M, Gafni A, Charles C, Roberts R, et al. Are cancer-related decision aids effective? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:974–85.CrossRefPubMed O’Brien MA, Whelan TJ, Villasis-Keever M, Gafni A, Charles C, Roberts R, et al. Are cancer-related decision aids effective? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:974–85.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Whelan T, Levine M, Willan A, Gafni A, Sanders K, Mirsky D, et al. Effect of a decision aid on knowledge and treatment decision making for breast cancer surgery: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2004;292:435–41.CrossRefPubMed Whelan T, Levine M, Willan A, Gafni A, Sanders K, Mirsky D, et al. Effect of a decision aid on knowledge and treatment decision making for breast cancer surgery: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2004;292:435–41.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Fallowfield LJ, Hall A, Maguire GP, Baum M. Psychological outcomes of different treatment policies in women with early breast cancer outside a clinical trial. BMJ. 1990;301:575–80.CrossRefPubMed Fallowfield LJ, Hall A, Maguire GP, Baum M. Psychological outcomes of different treatment policies in women with early breast cancer outside a clinical trial. BMJ. 1990;301:575–80.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Clauson J, Hsieh YC, Acharya S, Rademaker AW, Morrow M. Results of the Lynn Sage Second-Opinion Program for local therapy in patients with breast carcinoma. Changes in management and determinants of where care is delivered. Cancer. 2002;94:889–94.CrossRefPubMed Clauson J, Hsieh YC, Acharya S, Rademaker AW, Morrow M. Results of the Lynn Sage Second-Opinion Program for local therapy in patients with breast carcinoma. Changes in management and determinants of where care is delivered. Cancer. 2002;94:889–94.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Liang W, Burnett CB, Rowland JH, Meropol NJ, Eggert L, Hwang YT, et al. Communication between physicians and older women with localized breast cancer: implications for treatment and patient satisfaction. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:1008–16.CrossRefPubMed Liang W, Burnett CB, Rowland JH, Meropol NJ, Eggert L, Hwang YT, et al. Communication between physicians and older women with localized breast cancer: implications for treatment and patient satisfaction. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:1008–16.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Alderman AK, Hawley ST, Waljee J, Mujahid M, Morrow M, Katz SJ. Understanding the impact of breast reconstruction on the surgical decision-making process for breast cancer. Cancer. 2008;112:489–94.CrossRefPubMed Alderman AK, Hawley ST, Waljee J, Mujahid M, Morrow M, Katz SJ. Understanding the impact of breast reconstruction on the surgical decision-making process for breast cancer. Cancer. 2008;112:489–94.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Morrow M, Mujahid M, Lantz PM, Janz NK, Fagerlin A, Schwartz K, et al. Correlates of breast reconstruction: results from a population-based study. Cancer. 2005;104:2340–6.CrossRefPubMed Morrow M, Mujahid M, Lantz PM, Janz NK, Fagerlin A, Schwartz K, et al. Correlates of breast reconstruction: results from a population-based study. Cancer. 2005;104:2340–6.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Christian CK, Niland J, Edge SB, Ottesen RA, Hughes ME, Theriault R, et al. A multi-institutional analysis of the socioeconomic determinants of breast reconstruction: a study of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Ann Surg. 2006;243:241–9.CrossRefPubMed Christian CK, Niland J, Edge SB, Ottesen RA, Hughes ME, Theriault R, et al. A multi-institutional analysis of the socioeconomic determinants of breast reconstruction: a study of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Ann Surg. 2006;243:241–9.CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Yueh JH, Slavin SA, Bar-Meir ED, Merali HS, Houlihan MJ, Gautam S, et al. Impact of regional referral centers for microsurgical breast reconstruction: the New England perforator flap program experience. J Am Coll Surg. 2009;208:246–54.CrossRefPubMed Yueh JH, Slavin SA, Bar-Meir ED, Merali HS, Houlihan MJ, Gautam S, et al. Impact of regional referral centers for microsurgical breast reconstruction: the New England perforator flap program experience. J Am Coll Surg. 2009;208:246–54.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Yermilov I, Chow W, Devgan L, Makary MA, Ko CY. What is the quality of surgery-related information on the internet? Lessons learned from a standardized evaluation of 10 common operations. J Am Coll Surg. 2008;207:580–6.CrossRefPubMed Yermilov I, Chow W, Devgan L, Makary MA, Ko CY. What is the quality of surgery-related information on the internet? Lessons learned from a standardized evaluation of 10 common operations. J Am Coll Surg. 2008;207:580–6.CrossRefPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Moumjid N, Gafni A, Bremond A, Carrere MO. Shared decision making in the medical encounter: are we all talking about the same thing? Med Decis Making. 2007;27:539–46.CrossRefPubMed Moumjid N, Gafni A, Bremond A, Carrere MO. Shared decision making in the medical encounter: are we all talking about the same thing? Med Decis Making. 2007;27:539–46.CrossRefPubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat O’Connor AM, Mulley AG, Jr., Wennberg JE. Standard consultations are not enough to ensure decision quality regarding preference-sensitive options. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003;95:570–1.PubMed O’Connor AM, Mulley AG, Jr., Wennberg JE. Standard consultations are not enough to ensure decision quality regarding preference-sensitive options. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003;95:570–1.PubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Graham ID, Logan J, O’Connor A, Weeks KE, Aaron S, Cranney A, et al. A qualitative study of physicians’ perceptions of three decision aids. Patient Educ Couns. 2003;50:279–83.CrossRefPubMed Graham ID, Logan J, O’Connor A, Weeks KE, Aaron S, Cranney A, et al. A qualitative study of physicians’ perceptions of three decision aids. Patient Educ Couns. 2003;50:279–83.CrossRefPubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Heller L, Parker PA, Youssef A, Miller MJ. Interactive digital education aid in breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;122:717–24.CrossRefPubMed Heller L, Parker PA, Youssef A, Miller MJ. Interactive digital education aid in breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;122:717–24.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Computer-Based Learning Module Increases Shared Decision Making in Breast Reconstruction
verfasst von
Bernard T. Lee, MD, FACS
Chen Chen, MS
Janet H. Yueh, MD
Minh-Doan Nguyen, MD, PhD
Samuel J. Lin, MD
Adam M. Tobias, MD
Publikationsdatum
01.03.2010
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Ausgabe 3/2010
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Elektronische ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-009-0869-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2010

Annals of Surgical Oncology 3/2010 Zur Ausgabe

Echinokokkose medikamentös behandeln oder operieren?

06.05.2024 DCK 2024 Kongressbericht

Die Therapie von Echinokokkosen sollte immer in spezialisierten Zentren erfolgen. Eine symptomlose Echinokokkose kann – egal ob von Hunde- oder Fuchsbandwurm ausgelöst – konservativ erfolgen. Wenn eine Op. nötig ist, kann es sinnvoll sein, vorher Zysten zu leeren und zu desinfizieren. 

Wie sieht der OP der Zukunft aus?

04.05.2024 DCK 2024 Kongressbericht

Der OP in der Zukunft wird mit weniger Personal auskommen – nicht, weil die Technik das medizinische Fachpersonal verdrängt, sondern weil der Personalmangel es nötig macht.

Umsetzung der POMGAT-Leitlinie läuft

03.05.2024 DCK 2024 Kongressbericht

Seit November 2023 gibt es evidenzbasierte Empfehlungen zum perioperativen Management bei gastrointestinalen Tumoren (POMGAT) auf S3-Niveau. Vieles wird schon entsprechend der Empfehlungen durchgeführt. Wo es im Alltag noch hapert, zeigt eine Umfrage in einem Klinikverbund.

Recycling im OP – möglich, aber teuer

02.05.2024 DCK 2024 Kongressbericht

Auch wenn sich Krankenhäuser nachhaltig und grün geben – sie tragen aktuell erheblich zu den CO2-Emissionen bei und produzieren jede Menge Müll. Ein Pilotprojekt aus Bonn zeigt, dass viele Op.-Abfälle wiederverwertet werden können.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.