A progressively increasing life expectancy after liver transplantation (LT) leads to previously underestimated long-term complications, in particular renal damage as well as metabolic and cardiovascular disease [
1]. Although the etiology of kidney damage in LT patients may be multifactorial, calcineurin-inhibitor (CNI)-induced nephrotoxicity significantly contributes to the development of renal dysfunction after LT [
2]. CNIs may cause acute and chronic nephrotoxicity, with the latter usually being associated with structural changes in the kidney [
3]. Acute nephrotoxicity comprises vascular effects such as vasoconstriction of the afferent arterioles, an increased secretion of vasoconstrictor factors including endothelin and thromboxane, activation of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS), and reduction of vasodilatation factors such as nitric oxide, prostacyclin and prostaglandin E2. Acute CNI-induced nephrotoxicity may further lead to tubular damage and/or dysfunction and thrombotic microangiopathy. Chronic CNI-related nephrotoxicity including arteriolar hyalinosis, tubular atrophy, interstitial fibrosis, and glomerular sclerosis is observed in most LT recipients with long-term CNI therapy [
2]. Chronic CNI-related renal damage is thought to be a consequence of both CNI-induced hemodynamic changes and direct toxic effects on renal tubular epithelium. Despite the fact that chronic CNI-related nephrotoxicity is associated with parenchymal damage, various clinical studies have shown that CNI dose reduction or discontinuation results in an improvement of renal function in the majority of LT patients, thus suggesting a partly dose-dependent nephrotoxic effect and reversible functional kidney impairment [
4]. In addition, CNI reduction or withdrawal is also associated with decreased cardiovascular risk in LT patients [
5].
CNI sparing protocols in LT patients are usually based on introduction of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) or mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors (e.g. sirolimus and everolimus) into the immunosuppressive regimen. While the latter drug group is still awaiting approval for clinical use in LT patients, MMF has been has been clinically established since 1995. MMF is a morpholinoethyl ester prodrug of mycophenolic acid (MPA), an inhibitor of inositol-monophosphate dehydrogenase that catalyzes the rate limiting step in de novo purine biosynthesis, thereby specifically suppressing the proliferation of T and B lymphocytes. MMF virtually lacks drug-related nephrotoxicity and does not increase cardiovascular risk. Complete replacement of CNI with MMF though bears an increased risk of acute rejection; although, combined MMF and low dose CNI therapy has been shown to be safe within this regard in several studies [
4]. Gastrointestinal (e.g. diarrhea) and hematological (e.g. anemia and neutropenia) disorders are the most important and frequent side effects associated with MMF therapy, but they seldom require drug discontinuation [
6].
Pageaux et al. [
7] were the first to report results of a prospective randomized trial in LT patients comparing a combined low-dose CNI and MMF regimen with CNI monotherapy. Median time after LT was approximately 60 months in both groups at start of the trial. In the MMF group, CNI doses were reduced by at least 50% regardless of the baseline titer, whereas in MMF-free controls CNI doses could be reduced up to 25% of the initial dose. As compared to the control group, in the MMF/CNI group a significant amelioration of renal function became evident. In a more recent study from our group [
8], LT patients with renal dysfunction were randomized either to receive MMF followed by stepwise reduction of CNI with defined minimal CNI-trough levels (MMF group), or to continue their maintenance CNI dose (control group). Time between LT and enrollment of patients into the study ranged from 12 to 199 months with a mean of 60 months. In our study, CNI dose was progressively tapered to achieve defined target trough levels as low as 2–4 ng/ml for tacrolimus and 25–50 ng/ml for cyclosporine A. In the MMF group renal function improved in 62% of patients, remained stable in 36% and deteriorated in only 2% after 12 months compared with baseline values. In the control group renal function tended to deteriorate during the study period. Of all tested variables, younger age at study entry was the only predictive factor for renal improvement in the MMF group. This, however, might simply reflect an increase in atherosclerotic vascular disease with older age.
Some studies have demonstrated that MMF directly exerts protective effects against inflammation and fibrosis progression. Suggested protective mechanisms include the inhibition of adhesion molecules involved in the migration of immune cells towards the allograft, reduced nitric oxide production with subsequent suppressed allograft injury via interactions with superoxides, elimination of antigen-specific T cells and reduced inflammatory cytokine synthesis [
9]. MMF in combination with CNI taper has been shown to ameliorate fibrosis progression, graft inflammation and aminotransferase levels in LT patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection [
10]. In a retrospective study including 168 LT recipients with chronic HCV infection, our group showed that long-term MMF is associated with superior graft and patient survival rates compared with patients who received no or short-term (<6 months) MMF immunosuppressive regimens [
11].
Several studies comprising immune and nonimmune-mediated renal disease have provided evidence that MMF is effective in reversing structural changes in the kidney. CNI-associated RAS activation promotes renal interstitial fibrosis due to inhibition of matrix-metalloproteinase (MMP) activity leading to enhanced extracellular matrix accumulation [
3]. While most of the favorable renal effects observed in CNI minimization protocols have been attributed to the lower or absent CNI exposure, there is some evidence that MMF may be directly nephroprotective. For instance, MPA has been shown in vitro to transcriptionally inhibit collagen expression, enhance the expression of MMP-1 and to modify the migratory and functional properties of fibroblasts, thus directly exerting antifibrotic activities [
12]. In an animal model MPA has been demonstrated to significantly reduce glomerular and interstitial injury with pronounced decreases in myofibroblast infiltration and collagen accumulation [
13]. A potential anti-atherosclerotic effect due to the immunomodulatory function of MMF has also been proposed [
14]. In a clinical study with pancreas–kidney recipients, Nankivell et al. [
15] showed that MMF treatment was associated with notable reduction in tubulo-interstitial, striped and periglomerular fibrosis, glomerulosclerosis, mesangial matrix deposition and arteriolar hyalinosis. In a more recent retrospective study, Karie-Guigues et al. [
16] indicated that introduction of MMF without decreasing the CNI dose was associated with an improvement of renal function in the long term. There is thus accumulating evidence that MMF may directly exert nephroprotective effects. To date, however, it is not clear in which patients CNI-related renal dysfunction is reversible and in which morphological changes persist despite reduction or withdrawal of CNI. In addition, published data about the impact of conversion to MMF and low-dose CNI on long-term renal function and patient survival are still limited [
17,
18]. Recently, Kornberg et al. [
19] addressed this issue in a prospective study with 63 LT patients with CNI-induced renal dysfunction. The authors showed that at 60 months post-conversion, mean creatinine levels had significantly declined and mean glomerular filtration rate had significantly increased. Nearly half of the converted patients had CNI-related renal dysfunction for more than 2 years. Sustained renal response was observed in 73.1% of patients; full-dose MMF medication and early conversion were identified as independent predictors of persistent renal function improvement. Sustained renal response after drug conversion was the most relevant independent promoter of long-term survival in patients receiving MMF therapy. Although the study is flawed by the absence of a comparable control group of patients receiving CNI monotherapy, the reported results intuitively suggest a favorable long-term outcome for LT patients receiving MMF-based immunosuppression.
Based on a review of the literature, combined low-dose CNI and MMF therapy appears to be safe with regard to incidence of allograft rejection [
4]. However, individual risk estimation of acute rejection by genetic and/or immunological factors is not yet clinically established. There is some evidence indicating that CNI treatment reduces the percentages of circulating regulatory T cells (Treg) which play a pivotal role in establishment of immunologic allograft tolerance [
20]. Treg function critically depends on calcineurin-dependent interleukin-2 production and CNI have been shown to interfere with Treg induction in a dose-dependent manner [
21]. Two prospective clinical studies so far specifically investigated the immunological risk in LT patients receiving MMF therapy. Our group previously showed that the circulating cytotoxic T lymphocyte effector pool diminished, whereas the number of CD4 + CD25 + Foxp3 + Treg significantly increased over time in LT patients receiving combined low-dose CNI and MMF therapy as compared to CNI monotherapy [
8]. More recently, Demirkiran et al. [
22] indicated that conversion from CNI to MMF therapy increases both percentage and CD25 expression of CD4 + CD25 + Foxp3 + Treg. These clinical findings suggest that introduction of MMF into the immunosuppressive regimen may promote immunological tolerance to allogeneic transplants.
In recent years, prospective controlled trials have established the clinical safety and efficacy of combined MMF and low-dose CNI therapy in LT patients, as documented by low incidence of allograft rejection, and progressive improvement in renal function as well as in cardiovascular risk factors [
7,
8,
23,
24]. Although most enrolled patients suffered from chronic CNI-related nephrotoxicity for several years, renal function improved in a significant number of converted LT patients. Thus, improvement of CNI-related nephrotoxicity may still occur after long lasting CNI exposure. Tentative conversion to MMF-based immunosuppression should therefore be encouraged whenever CNI-related renal impairment is suspected in LT patients. In conclusion, there is emerging evidence that introduction of MMF into the immunosuppressive regimen may improve patient and graft survival after LT. Further prospective controlled studies are nevertheless needed to determine the therapeutic impact of MMF on outcome of LT patients in the long term.
Open Access
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
Open AccessThis is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.