Skip to main content
Erschienen in: BMC Public Health 1/2024

Open Access 01.12.2024 | Correction

Correction: A participatory and comprehensive intervention to improve violence prevention in two high-risk occupations: effect and process evaluation of a stepped wedge cluster randomised trial

verfasst von: Lars Peter Andersen, S. Jaspers, D. Andersen, I. Karlsen, B. Aust

Erschienen in: BMC Public Health | Ausgabe 1/2024

download
DOWNLOAD
print
DRUCKEN
insite
SUCHEN
Hinweise
The original article can be found online at https://​doi.​org/​10.​1186/​s12889-024-18527-5.
Correction: BMC Public Health 24, 1043 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-18527-5
The original publication of this article [1] contained an incorrect version of Table 5, which was a duplicate of Table 6. The incorrect and correct version of Table 5 are published in this correction article. The original article has been updated.
Incorrect table 5
Construct and topics related violence prevention
Measure
Number of observations
Mean control phase
Mean intervention phase
Mean follow-up phase
Mean differences between follow up and control phase (confidence intervals)
P-value
Primary outcome
       
Data based continuous violence prevention collaboration
To what extent are our violence prevention efforts continuously adjusted as a result of registrations and shared experiences?
755
5.47
6.01
6.19
0.72 (-0.11;1.53)
0.09
Secondary outcomes
       
Cooperation between line managers and employees
To what extent does the line manager and employees cooperate on the prevention of violence and threats?
782
5.70
6.20
6.34
0.64 (-0.19;1.45)
0.13
Attention to violence prevention
To what extent does your line manager prioritize violence prevention
849
7.49
7.49
6.93
-0.57 (-1.88;0.75)
0.34
To what extent does the working environment group prioritize violence prevention?
779
7.80
8.16
7.69
-0.11 (-1.23;0.10)
0.84
Actions taken to prevent violence and threats
Has there been improvements related to the prevention of violence and threats during the last three months?
723
4.41
5.06
4.97
0.56 (-0.54;1.65)
0.32
Violence prevention practices in your work unit
To what extent are guidelines for the prevention of violence and threats carried out in practice at your workplace by your line manager?
781
7.63
7.45
6.81
-0.82 (-1.10;0.36)
0.76
To what extent are guidelines for the prevention of violence and threats carried out in practice at your workplace by the employees?
832
7.12
7.48
7.82
0.70(-0.23;1.64)
0.14
Violence prevention climate scale
Violence Prevention Climate Scale
839
25.35
26.17
25.24
-0.11 (-1.69;1.45)
0.88
Additional item about violence prevention climate
We are a unit that continuously makes an effort to prevent violence and threats.
800
4.18
4.72
5.15
0.96 (0.53;1.41)
0.00*
Self-efficacy in violence prevention
To what extent do you have confidence in your colleagues’ competences to prevent violence and threats.
851
7.39
7.80
7.98
0.59 (0.01:1.16)
0.04*
Sense of safety at work
Do you feel safe when you are at work?
854
7.63
7.99
8.23
0.60 (0.56;1.15)
0.03*
Prevalence of violence and threats
Exposure to violence during the last three months
843
1.44
1.29
1.28
-0.14 (-0.34;0.6)
0.16
Exposure to threats during the last three months
845
1.92
1.84
1.88
-0.04 (-0.30;0.23)
0.79
All analyses are adjusted for gender, age and profession
*p<0.05
Correct table 5
Construct and topics related violence prevention
Measure
Number of observations
Mean control phase
Mean intervention phase
Mean follow-up phase
Mean differences between follow up and control phase (confidence intervals)
P-value
Primary outcome
       
Data based continuous violence prevention collaboration
To what extent are our violence prevention efforts continuously adjusted as a result of registrations and shared experiences?
847
6.48
6.91
7.16
0.68 (0.07;1.26)
0.03*
Secondary outcomes
       
Cooperation between line managers and employees
To what extent does the line manager and employees cooperate on the prevention of violence and threats?
844
7.50
7.63
7.48
-0.02 (-0.61;0.57)
0.95
Attention to violence prevention
To what extent does your line manager prioritize violence prevention
879
8.07
8.27
8.30
0.23 (-0.32;0.78)
0.41
To what extent does the working environment group prioritize violence prevention?
880
7.90
8.04
8.03
0.13 (-0.39;0.66)
0.63
Actions taken to prevent violence and threats
Has there been improvements related to the prevention of violence and threats during the last three months?
841
6.04
6.54
6.13
0.09 (-0.69;0.87)
0.82
Violence prevention practices in your work unit
To what extent are guidelines for the prevention of violence and threats carried out in practice at your workplace by your line manager?
874
7.44
7.62
7.63
0.19 (-0.39;0.77)
0.52
To what extent are guidelines for the prevention of violence and threats carried out in practice at your workplace by the employees?
872
7.21
7.50
7.62
0.42 (-0.07)
0.10
Violence prevention climate scale
Violence Prevention Climate Scale
830
27.79
27.72
28.06
0.27 (-0.98;1.50)
0.68
Additional item about violence prevention climate
We are a unit that continuously makes an effort to prevent violence and threats.
827
5.26
5.41
5.43
0.17(-0.11;0.46)
0.22
Self-efficacy in violence prevention
To what extent do you have confidence in your colleagues’ competences to prevent violence and threats.
832
7.68
7.69
7.85
0.17 (-0.29;0.63)
0.46
Sense of safety at work
Do you feel safe when you are at work?
834
7.89
7.76
7.80
-0.09(-0.57;0.39)
0.72
Prevalence of violence and threats
Exposure to violence during the last three months
824
1.52
1.40
1.50
-0.02 (-0.22;0.20)
0.92
Exposure to threats during the last three months
828
2.42
2.33
2.38
-0.04 (-0.33;0.25)
0.79
All analyses are adjusted for gender, age and profession
*p<0.05
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0/​. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://​creativecommons.​org/​publicdomain/​zero/​1.​0/​) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
download
DOWNLOAD
print
DRUCKEN
Metadaten
Titel
Correction: A participatory and comprehensive intervention to improve violence prevention in two high-risk occupations: effect and process evaluation of a stepped wedge cluster randomised trial
verfasst von
Lars Peter Andersen
S. Jaspers
D. Andersen
I. Karlsen
B. Aust
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2024
Verlag
BioMed Central
Erschienen in
BMC Public Health / Ausgabe 1/2024
Elektronische ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-18632-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2024

BMC Public Health 1/2024 Zur Ausgabe