Following the publication of the original article [1], the authors identified errors in Figs. 1 and 2 and Table 2. The correct figures and table are given below.
Fig. 1
(Panel A: H1 and H2) Conceptual framework of the Potential Mediating Effect of resilience and depression on the Relationship between hope and QOL. (Panel B: H3) Model of the potential moderating effects on the paths. *p<0.05; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001 QOL: quality of life; H: hypothesis
Fig. 2
The conceptual (panel A) and statistical (panel B) forms of the conditional process model (moderated mediation). *p<0.05; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001 QOL: quality of life. In this model, the indirect effect of hope on QOL through depression and resilience and the direct effect of hope on QOL are supposed to be moderated by sex
Table 2
Analysis of Simple Effects
Moderator variable
Effect
a1
b1
a2
b2
c’
a1b1
a2b2
Gender
Male
0.435***
−0.138*
− 0.25**
0.564***
− 0.25**
− 0.06
− 0.141**
Female
0.562***
− 0.075
−0.405**
0.335***
−0.451***
− 0.042
−0.144**
Difference
0.973
0.078
0.526
0.025
4.548*
0.005
0.253
*p<0.05; **p <0.01; ***p<0.001
Differences in simple effects were computed by subtracting the effects for women from the effects for men
Tests of differences for the indirect effect were based on bias-corrected confidence intervals derived from bootstrap estimates
Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
Wenn Demenzkranke aufgrund von Symptomen wie Agitation oder Aggressivität mit Antipsychotika behandelt werden, sind damit offenbar noch mehr Risiken verbunden als bislang angenommen.
Die Kombination aus Medikamenten und Psychotherapie gilt als effektivster Ansatz bei Depressionen. Das ist bei betagten Menschen nicht anders, trotz Besonderheiten.
Um Menschen nach der Flucht aus einem Krisengebiet bestmöglich medizinisch betreuen zu können, ist es gut zu wissen, welche Erkrankungen im jeweiligen Herkunftsland häufig sind. Dabei hilft eine Internetseite der CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention).
