Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Calcified Tissue International 3/2019

06.06.2019 | Original Research

Cost-Effectiveness of the Screening for the Primary Prevention of Fragility Hip Fracture in Spain Using FRAX®

verfasst von: Mario Martin-Sanchez, Mercè Comas, Margarita Posso, Javier Louro, Laia Domingo, Cristian Tebé, Xavier Castells, Mireia Espallargues

Erschienen in: Calcified Tissue International | Ausgabe 3/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

To assess the cost-effectiveness of the primary prevention of fragility hip fractures through opportunistic risk-based screening using FRAX® among women aged 70 to 89 years, and the subsequent treatment with alendronate in women at high-risk, from the Spanish national health system perspective. We performed a discrete-event simulation model. Women were categorized in low, intermediate and high-risk of fragility hip fracture through screening based on the FRAX® risk assessment tool score (Spanish version). Low-risk women received lifestyle recommendations whereas the high-risk group was assigned to alendronate treatment. For women at intermediate-risk, treatment decision was based on a recalculated score considering bone mineral density (BMD). The cost-effectiveness analysis tested six scenarios defined by different FRAX® cut-off values assessing the incremental costs per averted fracture in 20 years. Deterministic sensitivity analysis was performed. We included a random sample of 5146 women obtained from a Spanish cohort of women referred for BMD. The most cost-effective intervention had an Incremental Cost-effectiveness Ratio (ICER) of 57,390 € per averted hip fracture and consisted of using the FRAX® score without BMD and treating women with a score higher than 5%. The ICER exceeded the acceptability threshold of 25,000 € in all the scenarios. Sensitivity analysis based on time to fracture, treatment efficacy, adherence to treatment and cost of dependence resulted in ICERs ranging from 39,216 € to 254,400 €. An ICER of 24,970 € was obtained when alendronate cost was reduced to 1.13 € per month. The use of FRAX® as screening tool followed by alendronate treatment is not cost-effective in senior women in Spain. Other primary preventions strategies are advisable.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Kanis JA, Borgström F, Compston J, Dreinhöfer K, Nolte E, Jonsson L et al (2013) SCOPE: a scorecard for osteoporosis in Europe. Arch Osteoporos 8(1–2):144CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kanis JA, Borgström F, Compston J, Dreinhöfer K, Nolte E, Jonsson L et al (2013) SCOPE: a scorecard for osteoporosis in Europe. Arch Osteoporos 8(1–2):144CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
Zurück zum Zitat González Y, Sicras A, Larraínzar R, Sorio F, Canals L, Lizán L et al (2015) Estimación de los costes sanitarios relacionados con las fracturas osteoporóticas en pacientes posmenopáusicas en España. Pharmacoeconomics Spanish Res Artic 12(1):1–9CrossRef González Y, Sicras A, Larraínzar R, Sorio F, Canals L, Lizán L et al (2015) Estimación de los costes sanitarios relacionados con las fracturas osteoporóticas en pacientes posmenopáusicas en España. Pharmacoeconomics Spanish Res Artic 12(1):1–9CrossRef
4.
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Nayak S, Edwards DL, Saleh AA, Greenspan SL (2014) Performance of risk assessment instruments for predicting osteoporotic fracture risk: a systematic review. Osteoporos Int 25(1):23–49CrossRefPubMed Nayak S, Edwards DL, Saleh AA, Greenspan SL (2014) Performance of risk assessment instruments for predicting osteoporotic fracture risk: a systematic review. Osteoporos Int 25(1):23–49CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Kanis JA, Oden A, Johansson H, Borgström F, Ström O, McCloskey E (2009) FRAX® and its applications to clinical practice. Bone 44(5):734–743CrossRefPubMed Kanis JA, Oden A, Johansson H, Borgström F, Ström O, McCloskey E (2009) FRAX® and its applications to clinical practice. Bone 44(5):734–743CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat González-Macías J, Marin F, Vila J, Díez-Pérez A (2012) Probability of fractures predicted by FRAX® and observed incidence in the Spanish ECOSAP study cohort. Bone 50(1):373–377CrossRefPubMed González-Macías J, Marin F, Vila J, Díez-Pérez A (2012) Probability of fractures predicted by FRAX® and observed incidence in the Spanish ECOSAP study cohort. Bone 50(1):373–377CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Azagra R, Roca G, Encabo G, Aguyé A, Zwart M, Güell S et al (2012) FRAX® tool, the WHO algorithm to predict osteoporotic fractures: the first analysis of its discriminative and predictive ability in the Spanish FRIDEX cohort. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 13:204CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Azagra R, Roca G, Encabo G, Aguyé A, Zwart M, Güell S et al (2012) FRAX® tool, the WHO algorithm to predict osteoporotic fractures: the first analysis of its discriminative and predictive ability in the Spanish FRIDEX cohort. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 13:204CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Cordomí CT, del Río LM, Di Gregorio S, Casas L, Estrada MD, Kotzeva A et al (2013) Validation of the FRAX predictive model for major osteoporotic fracture in a historical cohort of Spanish women. J Clin Densitom 16(2):231–237CrossRef Cordomí CT, del Río LM, Di Gregorio S, Casas L, Estrada MD, Kotzeva A et al (2013) Validation of the FRAX predictive model for major osteoporotic fracture in a historical cohort of Spanish women. J Clin Densitom 16(2):231–237CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Shepstone L, Lenaghan E, Cooper C, Clarke S, Fong-Soe-Khioe R, Fordham R et al (2017) Screening in the community to reduce fractures in older women (SCOOP): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 391:741–747CrossRefPubMed Shepstone L, Lenaghan E, Cooper C, Clarke S, Fong-Soe-Khioe R, Fordham R et al (2017) Screening in the community to reduce fractures in older women (SCOOP): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 391:741–747CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Hernlund E, Svedbom A, Ivergård M, Compston J, Cooper C, Stenmark J et al (2013) Osteoporosis in the European Union: medical management, epidemiology and economic burden: a report prepared in collaboration with the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) and the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industry Associations (EFPIA). Arch Osteoporos 8(1–2):136CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hernlund E, Svedbom A, Ivergård M, Compston J, Cooper C, Stenmark J et al (2013) Osteoporosis in the European Union: medical management, epidemiology and economic burden: a report prepared in collaboration with the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) and the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industry Associations (EFPIA). Arch Osteoporos 8(1–2):136CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Silverman SL, Schousboe JT, Gold DT (2011) Oral bisphosphonate compliance and persistence: a matter of choice? Osteoporos Int 22(1):21–26CrossRefPubMed Silverman SL, Schousboe JT, Gold DT (2011) Oral bisphosphonate compliance and persistence: a matter of choice? Osteoporos Int 22(1):21–26CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Järvinen TLN, Jokihaara J, Guy P, Alonso-Coello P, Collins GS, Michaëlsson K et al (2014) Conflicts at the heart of the FRAX tool. CMAJ 186(3):165–167CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Järvinen TLN, Jokihaara J, Guy P, Alonso-Coello P, Collins GS, Michaëlsson K et al (2014) Conflicts at the heart of the FRAX tool. CMAJ 186(3):165–167CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Turner DA, Khioe RFS, Shepstone L, Lenaghan E, Cooper C, Gittoes N et al (2018) The cost-effectiveness of screening in the community to reduce osteoporotic fractures in older women in the UK: economic evaluation of the SCOOP study. J Bone Miner Res 33(5):845–851CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Turner DA, Khioe RFS, Shepstone L, Lenaghan E, Cooper C, Gittoes N et al (2018) The cost-effectiveness of screening in the community to reduce osteoporotic fractures in older women in the UK: economic evaluation of the SCOOP study. J Bone Miner Res 33(5):845–851CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Sanfélix-Gimeno G, Hurtado I, Sanfélix-Genovés J, Baixauli-Pérez C, Rodríguez-Bernal CL, Peiró S (2015) Overuse and underuse of antiosteoporotic treatments according to highly influential osteoporosis guidelines: a population-based cross-sectional study in Spain. PLoS ONE 10(8):1–13CrossRef Sanfélix-Gimeno G, Hurtado I, Sanfélix-Genovés J, Baixauli-Pérez C, Rodríguez-Bernal CL, Peiró S (2015) Overuse and underuse of antiosteoporotic treatments according to highly influential osteoporosis guidelines: a population-based cross-sectional study in Spain. PLoS ONE 10(8):1–13CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Tebé C, del Río LM, Casas L, Estrada MD, Kotzeva A, Di Gregorio S et al (2011) Factores de riesgo de fracturas por fragilidad en una cohorte de mujeres españolas. Gac Sanit 25(6):507–512CrossRefPubMed Tebé C, del Río LM, Casas L, Estrada MD, Kotzeva A, Di Gregorio S et al (2011) Factores de riesgo de fracturas por fragilidad en una cohorte de mujeres españolas. Gac Sanit 25(6):507–512CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Cummings SR, Black DM, Thompson DE, Applegate WB, Barrett-Connor E, Musliner TA et al (1998) Effect of alendronate on risk of fracture in women with low bone density but without vertebral fractures. J Am Med Assoc 280(24):2077–2082CrossRef Cummings SR, Black DM, Thompson DE, Applegate WB, Barrett-Connor E, Musliner TA et al (1998) Effect of alendronate on risk of fracture in women with low bone density but without vertebral fractures. J Am Med Assoc 280(24):2077–2082CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Landfeldt E, Ström O, Robbins S, Borgström F (2012) Adherence to treatment of primary osteoporosis and its association to fractures-the Swedish adherence register analysis (SARA). Osteoporos Int 23(2):433–443CrossRefPubMed Landfeldt E, Ström O, Robbins S, Borgström F (2012) Adherence to treatment of primary osteoporosis and its association to fractures-the Swedish adherence register analysis (SARA). Osteoporos Int 23(2):433–443CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Severens JL, Milne RJ, Severens H (2004) Discounting health outcomes in economic evaluation: the ongoing debate. Value Health 7(4):397–401CrossRefPubMed Severens JL, Milne RJ, Severens H (2004) Discounting health outcomes in economic evaluation: the ongoing debate. Value Health 7(4):397–401CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Ley 39/2006, de 14 de diciembre, de Promoción de la Autonomía Personal y Atención a las personas en situación de dependencia de España Ley 39/2006, de 14 de diciembre, de Promoción de la Autonomía Personal y Atención a las personas en situación de dependencia de España
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Puig-Junoy J, Oliva-Moreno J, Trapero-Bertrán M, Abellán-Perpiñán JM et al (2014) Guía y recomendaciones para la realización y presentación de evaluaciones económicas y análisis de impacto presupuestario de medicamentos en el ámbito del CatSalut. General Catalunya Dep Salut Serv Català la Salut Barcelona 2014:9–11 Puig-Junoy J, Oliva-Moreno J, Trapero-Bertrán M, Abellán-Perpiñán JM et al (2014) Guía y recomendaciones para la realización y presentación de evaluaciones económicas y análisis de impacto presupuestario de medicamentos en el ámbito del CatSalut. General Catalunya Dep Salut Serv Català la Salut Barcelona 2014:9–11
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Alzahouri K, Bahrami S, Durand-Zaleski I, Guillemin F, Roux C (2013) Cost-effectiveness of osteoporosis treatments in postmenopausal women using FRAXTM Thresholds for decision. Jt Bone Spine 80(1):64–69CrossRef Alzahouri K, Bahrami S, Durand-Zaleski I, Guillemin F, Roux C (2013) Cost-effectiveness of osteoporosis treatments in postmenopausal women using FRAXTM Thresholds for decision. Jt Bone Spine 80(1):64–69CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Kanis JA, Cooper C, Hiligsmann M, Rabenda V, Reginster JY, Rizzoli R (2011) Partial adherence: a new perspective on health economic assessment in osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 22(10):2565–2573CrossRefPubMed Kanis JA, Cooper C, Hiligsmann M, Rabenda V, Reginster JY, Rizzoli R (2011) Partial adherence: a new perspective on health economic assessment in osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 22(10):2565–2573CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Kanis JA, Borgstrom F, Zethraeus N, Johnell O, Oden A, Jönsson B (2005) Intervention thresholds for osteoporosis in the UK. Bone 36(1):22–32CrossRefPubMed Kanis JA, Borgstrom F, Zethraeus N, Johnell O, Oden A, Jönsson B (2005) Intervention thresholds for osteoporosis in the UK. Bone 36(1):22–32CrossRefPubMed
31.
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Lems WF, Raterman HG (2017) Critical issues and current challenges in osteoporosis and fracture prevention. An overview of unmet needs. Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis 9(12):299–316CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lems WF, Raterman HG (2017) Critical issues and current challenges in osteoporosis and fracture prevention. An overview of unmet needs. Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis 9(12):299–316CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Marques A, Lourenço Ó, Ortsäter G, Borgström F, Kanis JA, da Silva JAP (2016) Cost-effectiveness of intervention thresholds for the treatment of osteoporosis based on FRAX® in Portugal. Calcif Tissue Int 99(2):131–141CrossRefPubMed Marques A, Lourenço Ó, Ortsäter G, Borgström F, Kanis JA, da Silva JAP (2016) Cost-effectiveness of intervention thresholds for the treatment of osteoporosis based on FRAX® in Portugal. Calcif Tissue Int 99(2):131–141CrossRefPubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Nayak S, Roberts MS, Greenspan SL (2011) Cost-effectiveness of different screening strategies for osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. Ann Intern Med 155(11):751–761CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Nayak S, Roberts MS, Greenspan SL (2011) Cost-effectiveness of different screening strategies for osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. Ann Intern Med 155(11):751–761CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Lippuner K, Johansson H, Borgström F, Kanis JA, Rizzoli R (2012) Cost-effective intervention thresholds against osteoporotic fractures based on FRAX® in Switzerland. Osteoporos Int 23(11):2579–2589CrossRefPubMed Lippuner K, Johansson H, Borgström F, Kanis JA, Rizzoli R (2012) Cost-effective intervention thresholds against osteoporotic fractures based on FRAX® in Switzerland. Osteoporos Int 23(11):2579–2589CrossRefPubMed
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Zarca K, Durand-Zaleski I, Roux C, Souberbielle JC, Schott AM, Thomas T et al (2014) Cost-effectiveness analysis of hip fracture prevention with vitamin D supplementation: A Markov micro-simulation model applied to the French population over 65 years old without previous hip fracture. Osteoporos Int 25(6):1797–1806CrossRefPubMed Zarca K, Durand-Zaleski I, Roux C, Souberbielle JC, Schott AM, Thomas T et al (2014) Cost-effectiveness analysis of hip fracture prevention with vitamin D supplementation: A Markov micro-simulation model applied to the French population over 65 years old without previous hip fracture. Osteoporos Int 25(6):1797–1806CrossRefPubMed
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Nshimyumukiza L, Durand A, Gagnon M, Douville X, Morin S, Lindsay C et al (2013) An economic evaluation: simulation of the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of universal prevention strategies against osteoporosis-related fractures. J Bone Miner Res 28(2):383–394CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Nshimyumukiza L, Durand A, Gagnon M, Douville X, Morin S, Lindsay C et al (2013) An economic evaluation: simulation of the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of universal prevention strategies against osteoporosis-related fractures. J Bone Miner Res 28(2):383–394CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadaten
Titel
Cost-Effectiveness of the Screening for the Primary Prevention of Fragility Hip Fracture in Spain Using FRAX®
verfasst von
Mario Martin-Sanchez
Mercè Comas
Margarita Posso
Javier Louro
Laia Domingo
Cristian Tebé
Xavier Castells
Mireia Espallargues
Publikationsdatum
06.06.2019
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Calcified Tissue International / Ausgabe 3/2019
Print ISSN: 0171-967X
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-0827
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00223-019-00570-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2019

Calcified Tissue International 3/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.