Association between health locus of control and perceived stress in college student during the COVID-19 outbreak: a cross-sectional study in Iran

The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between health locus of control and perceived stress in students of Bushehr University of Medical Sciences (southern Iran) during the COVID-19 outbreak.

The data of the completed questionnaires were placed on the server of the website for the online questionnaire, for which the researcher had access. Therefore, there was no need for students to email the questionnaire information. After completing and registering the questionnaire, the website prevented the completion of a questionnaire more than once according to its capabilities and detection of the same IPs.

We used the demographic and clinical data collection form, the Multidimensional Health Locus of Control scale (MHLCS) by Wallston, and the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) by Cohen to collect data.

Demographic and clinical information form included age, gender, marital status, academic year, current residence, family income, employment at the hospital, following coronavirus news, up-to-date information about coronavirus, death of relatives and friends due to coronavirus, feelings when quarantined at home, infection with coronavirus, history of psychiatric illness, concern about coronavirus infection, family employment at the hospital, history of coronavirus infection in family, relatives, and friends, living in high-risk areas in terms of the spread of coronavirus, and taking adequate measures against the coronavirus. All the information was collected through self-report.

The present study was reviewed and approved by the ethics committee of Bushehr University of Medical Sciences with an ethics code (IR.BPUMS.REC.1399.141). The participants were ensured that their participation in the study was voluntary and their names would not be included in the questionnaire for the confidentiality of the individuals’ information. Informed consent was also obtained from the participants under the Helsinki Accords.

We analyzed data using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS 22) (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). For descriptive analysis of data, we used descriptive statistics such as mean, and standard deviation for quantitative variables, and frequency and percentage for qualitative variables. The normality of data distribution was confirmed using Kolmogorov-Smirnov statistical test. T-test and ANOVA test were used to compare the mean of stress, and Pearson correlation coefficient was used and to examine the relationship between health locus of control and perceived stress. Using a hierarchical regression model and including all the demographic and clinical variables in the study, we examined the role of health locus of control on predicting perceived stress in students. The significance levels of all analyses were considered as 0.05.

In the present study, 23 out of 273 questionnaires were excluded owing to non-completion, and finally, questionnaires of 250 students were included in the study (response rate = 91.5%). The mean age of the students participating in the study was 22.23 ± 3.60 in the age range of 18 to 45 years. The majority of the participants were women (58.4%), single (90.8%), living in a father’s house with their family (88%), with a feeling of bored due to being quarantined at home (41.2%), following coronavirus news most often (40.4%), no personal history of coronavirus (83.2%), having a history of coronavirus in friends and relatives (86%), no history of the death of relatives and friends due to coronavirus (61.6%), and being concerned about coronavirus infection (62.8%). Among the participating students, 90.8% reported no history of psychological problems under treatment, and 87.2% believed that their measures taken to prevent the coronavirus, were sufficient and appropriate (Table 1).

As you can see in Table 1, academic year, income level, feeling quarantined at home, up-to-date information about coronavirus, a history of mental illness, and living in high-risk environments have a significant relationship with perceived stress levels.

The results of a one-way analysis of variance showed that there was a significant difference between the perceived stress scores between the academic years (P = 0.013). Scheffe post hoc test showed that the perceived stress score in seventh-year students was significantly higher than first-year students (P = 0.034).

The results of a one-way analysis of variance showed that there was a significant difference between the perceived stress between the 4 groups of families’ incomes (P = 0.042). In the LSD post hoc test, the average stress score among families earning between $50 and $100 (27.11 ± 9.22) and families earning more than $200 per month (23.84 ± 7.56) was significant (P = 0.026). Also, there was a significant difference (P = 0.013), between families whose income was between $100 and $200 (26.90 ± 7.90) and families whose income was more than $ 200 per month.

The results of a one-way analysis of variance showed that there was a significant relationship between perceived stress and the feeling of quarantined (P < 0.001). Scheffe post hoc test showed that there was a significant relationship between the perceived stress score of people who experienced “other emotions” with the experience of feeling anxious (P = 0.048) and feeling angry (P = 0.003). The findings also showed that people who felt “angry” and “worried” at the time of quarantine had more perceived stress.

Among the components of the health locus of control, the internal health locus of control (27.55 ± 3.81), the powerful others health locus of control (21.27 ± 5.21), and the internal health locus of control (16.78 ± 5.17) had the highest mean respectively. The mean perceived stress was 25.74 ± 8.09. According to the results of the present study, 7.6% showed low stress, 58.4% had moderate stress, and 34% had high stress. It was indicated that 92.4% of the students had moderate and high stress levels (Table 2).

Table 3 presents the correlation between the health locus of control and perceived stress. According to the findings, the internal health locus of control (R = − 0.30, P < 0.001), and the chance health locus of control (R = 0.30, P < 0.001) had a significant correlation with the perceived stress. The correlation between the powerful others’ health locus of control and perceived stress was not significant (Table 3).

Table 4 presents the correlation between the health locus of control and perceived stress in students based on the hierarchical regression model. In the first model, the two dimensions of internal health control and chance-related control focus predict 16.6% of perceived stress in students. After entering the demographic variables (family’s income) in model 2, the power of predicting perceived stress increased by 2.9%. In the final model, by adding the variables relating to clinical status and coronavirus-related conditions, 3.3% is added to the prediction power. In the final model, all the variables predict 22.7% of the perceived stress changes in students during the coronavirus outbreak. Among the demographic and clinical variables, included in the model as confounders, only the amount of family’s income (B = − 0.137, P = 0.019) showed a significant correlation (Table 4).

The results of the present study indicated that a high percentage of students (92.4%) had moderate and high stress levels. Considering the participants’ average age and since most students were in their youth, they sought to explore identity, strived to achieve independence, and had different roles to play [32]. Moreover, given other stresses, high levels of perceived stress might be caused by holding online exams and relevant strictures, extensive and online curricula, constantly changing programs for internships in clinical courses, designating the only teaching hospital affiliated with the university as a hospital dedicated to the treatment of patients with COVID-19, and concerns about coronavirus infection according to demographic data. Most of the participants in the present study were female. According to similar reports and studies, high levels of stress in women were attributed to various factors, such as hormonal changes and the expression of feelings and thoughts about their social status that could be other causes of higher perceived stress in the participants [33, 34].

According to the results, increasing the education years enhanced the students’ perceived stress. In other words, increasing the education years enhanced the students’ mental concerns regarding the uncertainty of their academic and professional future owing to the coronavirus pandemic [16].

Recent studies also confirmed the results of the present study. Wang et al. (2021) and Moghanibashi-Mansourieh et al. (2020) found that there was a direct and significant correlation between education level and stress and anxiety level during the COVID-19 pandemic [35, 36]. According to a study in China, the higher prevalence of mental symptoms was reported among individuals with higher education, which was probably due to their high self-awareness about their health [37].

Furthermore, all theoretical and practical courses for freshmen were online and they were not present in high-risk and clinical places. However, since the only teaching hospital under the supervision of Bushehr University of Medical Sciences was allocated as a reference hospital for the hospitalization and treatment of such patients during the coronavirus epidemic, clinical students had to attend the hospital to pass their clinical courses, which could be effective in increasing their stress.

Another result of the study indicated the inverse and negative correlation of family income and perceived stress. As the family income decreased, perceived stress levels increased. Also, the present study showed that after entering the demographic and clinical variables, 6.1% was added to the predictive power of perceived stress, which among the demographic variables, only the amount of family’s income had the power to predict the perceived stress. Due to the closure of some self-employed businesses, and the lack of formal government support for informal jobs to compensate for coronavirus during the pandemic, students with guardians working in such jobs with no sufficient financial resources, were in dire financial straits. Hence, they had serious difficulty even in the provision of virtual education tools and facilities such as smartphones, tablets, or the cost of the Internet. They also did not officially receive support from the university, thereby increasing their stress.

Reports indicate that families with children who were studying (at school or university) were experiencing a financial crisis in the COVID epidemic. Aslan et al. (2020) also found that declining income leads to increased perceived stress levels [16], while Chen et al. (2021) reported that high-income families with school children experienced more stress than low-income families with school children [38]. One of the reasons for the discrepancy between the results of their study and the present study is the society under study. In their study, Chen et al. surveyed families with children from preschool to high school. On the other hand, high-income families can be stressed for their children due to sudden exposure to educational problems as well as feeling additional responsibilities of being involved in their children’s education. But low-income families are more concerned about their family’s basic needs, such as food, clothing, and shelter, than arranging their children’s education and planning home-based education programs for their children. In the present study, the university student population has been investigated. The difference is that university students are less dependent on family planning programs than their school-age children.

The results showed that people who kept their scientific knowledge about coronavirus up to date experienced lower perceived stress levels. The World Health Organization (WHO) also states that daily follow-up of bad news about coronavirus is one of the factors that increase the level of stress and anxiety [39]. The statement also emphasizes that information about this disease should be available to everyone through reliable sources. In the present study, however, following the COVID-19 news had no effect on students’ stress levels. Explaining this finding, it can be said that due to the fact that the study population of the present study is students of the University of Medical Sciences, students have more access to credible references to provide news and information about the coronavirus through professors and course resources than the general public. The results of a study by Teshome et al. (2021) also showed that people who do not keep their information about coronavirus up to date experience twice as much stress levels as people who keep their information up to date [40]. These results confirm the results of the present study.

The results of the present study also showed that people with a history of psychological disorders experience more perceived stress. Explaining these results, it can be said that people who have previous psychological problems are usually less able to cope with stressful situations [41]. Similarly, Oppenauer et al. (2021) reported in their study that stress, anxiety, and depressive symptoms associated with coronavirus were four times more common in patients with psychological disorders [42].

Another factor in the prevalence of perceived stress is living in high-risk areas due to the prevalence of COVID-19, where living in these areas increases the level of perceived stress. The high prevalence of coronavirus throughout the country, including Bushehr province, at the time of sampling, leading to cases of hospitalization and mortality of friends, more restrictions on quarantine regulations and traffic bans, as well as public recreational places being closed, all can justify some of the meaningful increase of perceived stress.

The present results indicated that the health locus of control (internal health locus of control and chance health locus of control) had a significant correlation with perceived stress in students. Hence, the perceived stress showed a significant inverse correlation with internal health locus of control and a significant direct correlation with chance health locus of control. Karkoulian et al. (2016) studied gender perspective on work-life balance, perceived stress, and locus of control. They found that perceived stress had an inverse and significant correlation with the internal health locus of control [43]. The results were consistent with the results of the present study. Other results of the study by Karkoulian et al. indicated the inverse and significant correlation of perceived stress and external health locus of control, such as powerful others and chance health locus of control [43]. The results were inconsistent with the results of the present study because the study by Karkoulian et al. examined bank employees before the coronavirus pandemic, however, the present study investigated medical students in the coronavirus pandemic, which could affect the results. The importance of self-care and observing the health protocols by individuals was constantly emphasized by the mass media during the coronavirus pandemic. Moreover, the participants mostly followed the health protocols to prevent coronavirus. Owing to their field of study and knowledge about health aspects, they always emphasized their internal health locus of control and placed less emphasis on locus of control by others and chance. Hence, they were different from other groups.

In the present study, the internal health locus of control, among the three components of the health locus of control, obtained the highest mean in the participants. The prevalence of psychological disorders during the coronavirus outbreak was considered in students [18] along with their tendency with psychological disorders to powerful others health locus of control [25]. Moreover, the source of internal health locus of control was associated with a better performance in health instructions [44]. Thus, the higher mean of internal health locus of control in students probably indicated the appropriate activity of various media in informing about the announcement of coronavirus health protocols and their strong emphasis on the impact of self-care on the prevention of the virus. Furthermore, their education in medical science was emphasized along with higher knowledge about health care, as well as an emphasis on adhering to individual protocols.

Like most research studies, the present study had also limitations. Since the study was cross-sectional, it is not possible to conclude a cause-and-effect relationship between the variables. Therefore, we recommend conducting longitudinal studies to eliminate this limitation. The data of the present were collected by a self-report. Due to the special circumstances during the COVID-19 pandemic, the information could be affected by a self-reporting bias. Further qualitative studies can be helpful to achieve more complete information. The existence of a dependent variable was another limitation of the study. We suggest examining other psychological aspects in future studies. Since the study investigated the students at only a university of medical sciences, there was a limitation in the generalizability of the results.