Letter to the editor
We read with interest the review on the pathophysiology of ‘happy’ hypoxemia in COVID-19 by Dhont et al. published in BMC Respiratory Research [1]. This exhaustive review, describing the pathophysiological abnormalities in COVID-19 that might explain the disconnect between the severity of hypoxemia and the relatively mild respiratory discomfort reported by the patients, aims at improving decision-making and management among the physicians treating COVID-19. Very recent articles and reviews on the neurological manifestations of COVID-19 report patients with severe COVID-19 at risk for multifocal microvascular hemorrhagic and ischemic lesions [2‐7]. Therefore, it would be very valuable to monitor the brain oxygenation state in mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19.
Anzeige
In the last decades, brain oxygenation has been successfully monitored noninvasively and transcranially in the operative room and in the intensive care unit by commercial near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) brain oximeters [8‐11]. These oximeters provide the intensivists with a continuous measure of the prefrontal cortex oxyhemoglobin saturation (ScO2, %). Unlike conventional fingertip pulse oximetry, ScO2 does not rely on a pulsating flow, and reflects the balance between oxygen supply and demand in the arteriolar, capillary and venular beds of the brain cortex underlying the prefrontal area over the sensor is located. Detailed cerebral oximetry guidelines have recently been drawn up by the Japanese Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists [12].
To the best of our knowledge, so far the use of cerebral oximetry on ventilated COVID-19 patients has never been reported. In this framework, we suggest that the ScO2 monitoring in these patients might serve as an “early warning indicator” of the decreased brain oxygen delivery. The ScO2 data can be utilized to optimize cerebral oxygen supply and demand, inversing the decreased cerebral perfusion and/or preventing protracted brain ischemia.
Interestingly, cortical oximetry is utilized in an ongoing clinical trial of the Hvidovre University Hospital (Denmark) aiming to examine whether ScO2 could be a more useful parameter than peripheral arterial oxygen saturation, measured by fingertip pulse oximetry, to guide clinical titration of permissive hypoxemia in COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome patients [13].
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Anzeige
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
MF: no funding to declare or any conflicts of interest related to this work.
VQ: no funding to declare or any conflicts of interest related to this topic.
Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.