nach oben

Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology

Erschienen in:

11.01.2022 | COVID-19 Zur Zeit gratis

Incorporating respondent-driven sampling into web-based discrete choice experiments: preferences for COVID-19 mitigation measures

verfasst von: Courtney A. Johnson, Dan N. Tran, Ann Mwangi, Sandra G. Sosa-Rubí, Carlos Chivardi, Martín Romero-Martínez, Sonak Pastakia, Elisha Robinson, Larissa Jennings Mayo-Wilson, Omar Galárraga

Erschienen in: Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology | Ausgabe 3/2022

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

To slow the spread of COVID-19, most countries implemented stay-at-home orders, social distancing, and other nonpharmaceutical mitigation strategies. To understand individual preferences for mitigation strategies, we piloted a web-based Respondent Driven Sampling (RDS) approach to recruit participants from four universities in three countries to complete a computer-based Discrete Choice Experiment (DCE). Use of these methods, in combination, can serve to increase the external validity of a study by enabling recruitment of populations underrepresented in sampling frames, thus allowing preference results to be more generalizable to targeted subpopulations. A total of 99 students or staff members were invited to complete the survey, of which 72% started the survey (n = 71). Sixty-three participants (89% of starters) completed all tasks in the DCE. A rank-ordered mixed logit model was used to estimate preferences for COVID-19 nonpharmaceutical mitigation strategies. The model estimates indicated that participants preferred mitigation strategies that resulted in lower COVID-19 risk (i.e. sheltering-in-place more days a week), financial compensation from the government, fewer health (mental and physical) problems, and fewer financial problems. The high response rate and survey engagement provide proof of concept that RDS and DCE can be implemented as web-based applications, with the potential for scale up to produce nationally-representative preference estimates.

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Abdul-Quader, A.S., Heckathorn, D.D., Sabin, K., Saidel, T.: Implementation and analysis of respondent driven sampling: lessons learned from the field. J. Urban Health Bull. New York Acad. Med. 83(6 Suppl), i1–i5 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-006-9108-8CrossRef

Albert, A., Anderson, J.A.: On the existence of maximum likelihood estimates in logistic regression models. Biometrika 71(1), 1–10 (1984). https://doi.org/10.2307/2336390CrossRef

Anderson, R.M., Vegvari, C., Truscott, J., Collyer, B.S.: Challenges in creating herd immunity to SARS-CoV-2 infection by mass vaccination. The Lancet 396(10263), 1614–1616 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32318-7CrossRef

Baker, F., Intagliata, J.: Quality of life in the evaluation of community support systems. Eval. Program. Plann. 5(1), 69–79 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1016/0149-7189(82)90059-3CrossRefPubMed

Bauermeister, J.A., Zimmerman, M.A., Johns, M.M., Glowacki, P., Stoddard, S., Volz, E.: Innovative recruitment using online networks: lessons learned from an online study of alcohol and other drug use utilizing a web-based, respondent-driven sampling (webRDS) strategy. J. Stud. Alcohol Drugs 73(5), 834–838 (2012). https://doi.org/10.15288/jsad.2012.73.834CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Bengtsson, L., Xin, Lu., Nguyen, Q.C., Camitz, M., Le Hoang, N., Nguyen, T.A., Liljeros, F., Thorson, A.: Implementation of web-based respondent-driven sampling among men who have sex with men in Vietnam. PLoS ONE 7(11), e49417 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0049417CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Carlsson, F., Martinsson, P.: Design techniques for stated preference methods in health economics. Health Econ. 12(4), 281–294 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.729CrossRefPubMed

Caron, J.: Predictors of quality of life in economically disadvantaged populations in Montreal. Soc. Indic. Res. 107(3), 411–427 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-011-9855-0CrossRef

Center for Systems Science and Engineering (CSSE) at Johns Hopkins University. “COVID-19 Dashboard” (2021). https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/map.html. Accessed 23 Sept

Clark, M.D., Determann, D., Petrou, S., Moro, D., de Bekker-Grob, E.W.: Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature. Pharmacoeconomics 32(9), 883–902 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40273-014-0170-xCrossRefPubMed

Coast, J., Horrocks, S.: Developing attributes and levels for discrete choice experiments using qualitative methods. J. Health Serv. Res. Pol. 12(1), 25–30 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1258/135581907779497602CrossRef

Cook, S.J., Niehaus, J., Zuhlke, S.: A warning on separation in multinomial logistic models. Res. Pol. 5(2), 2053168018769510 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168018769510CrossRef

de Bekker-Grob, E.W., Donkers, B., Jonker, M.F., Stolk, E.A.: Sample size requirements for discrete-choice experiments in healthcare: a practical guide. The Patient Patient Cent. Outcomes Res. 8(5), 373–384 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40271-015-0118-zCrossRef

de Bekker-Grob, E.W., Ryan, M., Gerard, K.: Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature. Health Econ. 21(2), 145–172 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.1697CrossRefPubMed

de Jong, V.M.T., Eijkemans, M.J.C., van Calster, B., Timmerman, D., Moons, K.G.M., Steyerberg, E.W., van Smeden, M.: Sample size considerations and predictive performance of multinomial logistic prediction models. Stat. Med. 38(9), 1601–1619 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.8063CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Flaxman, Seth, Swapnil Mishra, Axel Gandy, H. Juliette T. Unwin, Thomas A. Mellan, Helen Coupland, Charles Whittaker, Harrison Zhu, Tresnia Berah, Jeffrey W. Eaton, Mélodie Monod, Pablo N. Perez-Guzman, Nora Schmit, Lucia Cilloni, Kylie E. C. Ainslie, Marc Baguelin, Adhiratha Boonyasiri, Olivia Boyd, Lorenzo Cattarino, Laura V. Cooper, Zulma Cucunubá, Gina Cuomo-Dannenburg, Amy Dighe, Bimandra Djaafara, Ilaria Dorigatti, Sabine L. van Elsland, Richard G. FitzJohn, Katy A. M. Gaythorpe, Lily Geidelberg, Nicholas C. Grassly, William D. Green, Timothy Hallett, Arran Hamlet, Wes Hinsley, Ben Jeffrey, Edward Knock, Daniel J. Laydon, Gemma Nedjati-Gilani, Pierre Nouvellet, Kris V. Parag, Igor Siveroni, Hayley A. Thompson, Robert Verity, Erik Volz, Caroline E. Walters, Haowei Wang, Yuanrong Wang, Oliver J. Watson, Peter Winskill, Xiaoyue Xi, Patrick G. T. Walker, Azra C. Ghani, Christl A. Donnelly, Steven Riley, Michaela A. C. Vollmer, Neil M. Ferguson, Lucy C. Okell, Samir Bhatt, and Covid-Response Team Imperial College: Estimating the effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions on COVID-19 in Europe. Nature 584(7820), 257–261 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2405-7CrossRef

Fleury, M.-J., Grenier, G., Bamvita, J.-M., Tremblay, J., Schmitz, N., Caron, J.: Predictors of quality of life in a longitudinal study of users with severe mental disorders. Health Qual. Life Outcomes 11(1), 92 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-11-92CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Flynn, T.N.: Using conjoint analysis and choice experiments to estimate QALY values. Pharmacoeconomics 28(9), 711–722 (2010). https://doi.org/10.2165/11535660-000000000-00000CrossRefPubMed

Galárraga, O., Kuo, C., Mtukushe, B., Maughan-Brown, B., Harrison, A., Hoare, J.: iSAY (incentives for South African youth): Stated preferences of young people living with HIV. Soc. Sci. Med. 265, 113333 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113333CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Galárraga, O., Sosa-Rubí, S.G., Infante, C., Gertler, P.J., Bertozzi, S.M.: Willingness-to-accept reductions in HIV risks: conditional economic incentives in Mexico. The Eur. J. Health Econ. HEPAC Health Econ. Prev. Care 15(1), 41–55 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-012-0447-yCrossRef

Ghijben, P., Lancsar, E., Zavarsek, S.: Preferences for oral anticoagulants in atrial fibrillation: a best-best discrete choice experiment. Pharmacoeconomics 32(11), 1115–1127 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40273-014-0188-0CrossRefPubMed

Heckathorn, D.D.: Respondent-driven sampling: a new approach to the study of hidden populations*. Soc. Probl. 44(2), 174–199 (1997). https://doi.org/10.2307/3096941CrossRef

Heckathorn, D.D.: Extensions Of respondent-driven sampling: analyzing continuous variables and controlling for differential recruitment. Sociol. Methodol. 37(1), 151–207 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9531.2007.00188.xCrossRef

Hensher, D.A., Rose, J.M., Greene, W.H.: Applied Choice Analysis: A Primer. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2005)CrossRef

Hequembourg, A.L., Panagakis, C.: Maximizing respondent-driven sampling field procedures in the recruitment of sexual minorities for health research. SAGE Open Med 7, 2050312119829983 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1177/2050312119829983CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Hildebrand, J., Burns, S., Zhao, Y., Lobo, R., Howat, P., Allsop, S., Maycock, B.: Potential and challenges in collecting social and behavioral data on adolescent alcohol norms: comparing respondent-driven sampling and web-based respondent-driven sampling. J. Med. Internet Res. 17(12), e285–e285 (2015). https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4762CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Hobden, B., Turon, H., Bryant, J., Wall, L., Brown, S., Sanson-Fisher, R.: Oncology patient preferences for depression care: a discrete choice experiment. Psychooncology 28(4), 807–814 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.5024CrossRefPubMed

Hole, A. R.: “DCREATE: stata module to create efficient designs for discrete choice experiments”. Statistical Software Components S458059, Boston College Department of Economics (2015)

Jennings Mayo-Wilson, Larissa, Muthoni Mathai, Grace Yi, Margaret O. Mak’anyengo, Melissa Davoust, Massah L. Massaquoi, Stefan Baral, Fred M. Ssewamala, Nancy E. Glass, and Nahedo Study Group: Lessons learned from using respondent-driven sampling (RDS) to assess sexual risk behaviors among Kenyan young adults living in urban slum settlements: a process evaluation. PLoS ONE 15(4), e0231248 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231248CrossRef

Kendall, C., Kerr, L.R.F.S., Gondim, R.C., Werneck, G.L., Macena, R.H.M., Pontes, M.K., Johnston, L.G., Sabin, K., McFarland, W.: An Empirical comparison of respondent-driven sampling, time location sampling, and snowball sampling for behavioral surveillance in men who have sex with men, Fortaleza, Brazil. AIDS Behav. 12(1), 97 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-008-9390-4CrossRef

Kroenke, K. Spitzer, R.L., Williams, J.B.W.: The patient health questionnaire-2: validity of a two-item depression screener. Med. Care 41 (11) (2003)

Lancsar, E., Fiebig, D.G., Hole, A.R.: Discrete choice experiments: a guide to model specification, estimation and software. Pharmacoeconomics 35(7), 697–716 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40273-017-0506-4CrossRefPubMed

Lancsar, E., Louviere, J.: Conducting discrete choice experiments to inform healthcare decision making. Pharmacoeconomics 26(8), 661–677 (2008). https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-200826080-00004CrossRefPubMed

Lerner, J.S., Li, Ye., Valdesolo, P., Kassam, K.S.: Emotion and decision making. Ann. Rev. Psychol. 66(1), 799–823 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115043CrossRef

Lokkerbol, J., van Voorthuijsen, J.M., Geomini, A., Tiemens, B., van Straten, A., Smit, F., Risseeuw, A., van Balkom, A., Hiligsmann, M.: A discrete-choice experiment to assess treatment modality preferences of patients with anxiety disorder. J. Med. Econ. 22(2), 169–177 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/13696998.2018.1555403CrossRefPubMed

Lyu, W., Wehby, G.L.: Shelter-in-place orders reduced COVID-19 Mortality and reduced the rate of growth in hospitalizations. Health Aff. (millwood) 39(9), 1615–1623 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2020.00719CrossRef

Magnani, R., Sabin, K., Saidel, T., Heckathorn, D.: Review of sampling hard-to-reach and hidden populations for HIV surveillance. AIDS 19, S67–S72 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aids.0000172879.20628.e1CrossRefPubMed

Mangham, L.J., Hanson, K., McPake, B.: How to do (or not to do) … Designing a discrete choice experiment for application in a low-income country. Health Pol. Plan. 24(2), 151–158 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czn047CrossRef

Medline, A., Hayes, L., Valdez, K., Hayashi, A., Vahedi, F., Capell, W., Sonnenberg, J., Glick, Z., Klausner, J.D.: Evaluating the impact of stay-at-home orders on the time to reach the peak burden of Covid-19 cases and deaths: Does timing matter? BMC Pub. Health 20(1), 1750 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09817-9CrossRef

Pei, S., Kandula, S., Shaman, J.: Differential effects of intervention timing on COVID-19 spread in the United States. Sci. Adv. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abd6370CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Ryan, M., Bate, A., Eastmond, C.J., Ludbrook, A.: Use of discrete choice experiments to elicit preferences. Qual. Health Care QHC (2001). https://doi.org/10.1136/qhc.0100055CrossRefPubMed

Ryan, M., Netten, A., Skåtun, D., Smith, P.: Using discrete choice experiments to estimate a preference-based measure of outcome—an application to social care for older people. J. Health Econ. 25(5), 927–944 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2006.01.001CrossRefPubMed

Salganik, M.J., Heckathorn, D.D.: Sampling and estimation in hidden populations using respondent-driven sampling. Sociol. Methodol. 34(1), 193–240 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0081-1750.2004.00152.xCrossRef

Sharma, M., Ong, J.J., Celum, C., Terris-Prestholt, F.: Heterogeneity in individual preferences for HIV testing: a systematic literature review of discrete choice experiments. Eclin. Med. 29–30, 100653 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100653CrossRef

Teslya, A., Pham, T.M., Godijk, N.G., Kretzschmar, M.E., Bootsma, M.C.J., Rozhnova, G.: Impact of self-imposed prevention measures and short-term government-imposed social distancing on mitigating and delaying a COVID-19 epidemic: a modelling study. PLoS Med. 17(7), e1003166–e1003166 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003166CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

The Economist: Covid-19 is now in 50 countries, and things will get worse. accessed January 19 (2020). https://www.economist.com/briefing/2020/02/29/covid-19-is-now-in-50-countries-and-things-will-get-worse

The EuroQol Group: EuroQol - a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Pol. 16(3), 199–208 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-8510(90)90421-9CrossRef

Train, K.E.: Discrete choice methods with simulation: Cambridge university press (2009)

University of Essex Institute for Social and Economic Research. 2020. Understanding Society: COVID-19 Study, 2020. [data collection]

Vallejo-Torres, L., Melnychuk, M., Vindrola-Padros, C., Aitchison, M., Clarke, C.S., Fulop, N.J., Hines, J., Levermore, C., Maddineni, S.B., Perry, C., Pritchard-Jones, K., Ramsay, A.I.G., Shackley, D.C., Morris, S.: Discrete-choice experiment to analyse preferences for centralizing specialist cancer surgery services. BJS (br. J. Surg.) 105(5), 587–596 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.10761CrossRef

VanderWeele, T.J., Mathur, M.B.: Some desirable properties of the bonferroni correction: Is the bonferroni correction really so bad? Am. J. Epidemiol. 188(3), 617–618 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwy250CrossRefPubMedCentral

Walker, P., Whittaker, C., Watson, O., Baguelin, M., Ainslie, K., Bhatia, S., Bhatt, S., Boonyasiri, A., Boyd, O., Cattarino, L., Cucunuba Perez, Z., Cuomo-Dannenburg, G., Dighe, A., Donnelly, C., Dorigatti, I., Van Elsland, S., Fitzjohn, R., Flaxman, S., Fu, H., Gaythorpe, K., Geidelberg, L., Grassly, N., Green, W., Hamlet, A., Hauck, K., Haw, D., Hayes, S., Hinsley, W., Imai, N., Jorgensen, D., Knock, E., Laydon, D., Mishra, S., Nedjati Gilani, G., Okell, L., Riley, S., Thompson, H., Unwin, H., Verity, R., Vollmer, M., Walters, C., Wang, H., Wang, Y., Winskill, P., Xi, X., Fergusonn, N. and Ghani, A.: Report 12: The global impact of COVID-19 and strategies for mitigation and suppression (2020a)

Walker, P.G.T., Whittaker, C., Watson, O.J., Baguelin, M., Winskill, P., Hamlet, A., Djafaara, B.A., Cucunubá, Z., Mesa, D.O., Green, W., Thompson, H., Nayagam, S., Ainslie, K.E.C., Bhatia, S., Bhatt, S., Boonyasiri, A., Boyd, O., Brazeau, N.F., Cattarino, L., Cuomo-Dannenburg, G., Dighe, A., Donnelly, C.A., Dorigatti, I., van Elsland, S.L., FitzJohn, R., Han, Fu., Gaythorpe, K.A.M., Geidelberg, L., Grassly, N., Haw, D., Hayes, S., Hinsley, W., Imai, N., Jorgensen, D., Knock, E., Laydon, D., Mishra, S., Nedjati-Gilani, G., Okell, L.C., Juliette Unwin, H., Verity, R., Vollmer, M., Walters, C.E., Wang, H., Wang, Y., Xi, X., Lalloo, D.G., Ferguson, N.M., Ghani, A.C.: The impact of COVID-19 and strategies for mitigation and suppression in low- and middle-income countries. Science 369(6502), 413 (2020b). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abc0035CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Wang, J., Carlson, R.G., Falck, R.S., Siegal, H.A., Rahman, A., Li, L.: Respondent-driven sampling to recruit MDMA users: a methodological assessment. Drug Alcohol Depend. 78(2), 147–157 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2004.10.011CrossRefPubMed

Wang, J., Falck, R.S., Li, L., Rahman, A., Carlson, R.G.: Respondent-driven sampling in the recruitment of illicit stimulant drug users in a rural setting: findings and technical issues. Addict. Behav. 32(5), 924–937 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2006.06.031CrossRefPubMed

Watson, V., Becker, F., de Bekker-Grob, E.: Discrete choice experiment response rates: a meta-analysis. Health Econ. 26(6), 810–817 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.3354CrossRefPubMed

Weber, S.: A step-by-step procedure to implement discrete choice experiments in qualtrics. Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439319885317CrossRef

Wejnert, C., Heckathorn, D.D.: Web-based network sampling: efficiency and efficacy of respondent-driven sampling for online research. Sociol. Methods Res. 37(1), 105–134 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124108318333CrossRef

Wilson, L., Loucks, A., Bui, C., Gipson, G., Zhong, L., Schwartzburg, A., Crabtree, E., Goodin, D., Waubant, E., McCulloch, C.: Patient centered decision making: use of conjoint analysis to determine risk–benefit trade-offs for preference sensitive treatment choices. J. Neurol. Sci. 344(1), 80–87 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2014.06.030CrossRefPubMed

Young, K.P., Kolcz, D.L., O’Sullivan, D.M., Ferrand, J., Fried, J., Robinson, K.: Health care workers’ mental health and quality of life during COVID-19: results from a mid-pandemic, national survey. Psychiatr. Serv. 72(2), 122–128 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.202000424CrossRefPubMed

Zhang, Y., Ma, Z.F.: Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health and quality of life among local residents in Liaoning Province, China: a cross-sectional study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Pub. Health (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17072381CrossRef

Zimmer C., Corum J., Wee S.-L.: Coronavirus vaccine tracker (2020). https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/science/coronavirus-vaccine-tracker.html. Accessed 19 Jan

Titel: Incorporating respondent-driven sampling into web-based discrete choice experiments: preferences for COVID-19 mitigation measures
verfasst von: Courtney A. Johnson
Dan N. Tran
Ann Mwangi
Sandra G. Sosa-Rubí
Carlos Chivardi
Martín Romero-Martínez
Sonak Pastakia
Elisha Robinson
Larissa Jennings Mayo-Wilson
Omar Galárraga
Publikationsdatum: 11.01.2022
Verlag: Springer US
Schlagwort: COVID-19
Erschienen in: Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology / Ausgabe 3/2022
Print ISSN: 1387-3741
Elektronische ISSN: 1572-9400
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10742-021-00266-4

Die Highlights vom Kongress des American College of Cardiology 2024

Springer Medizin

Incorporating respondent-driven sampling into web-based discrete choice experiments: preferences for COVID-19 mitigation measures

Abstract

Die Highlights vom Kongress des American College of Cardiology 2024

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2022

Comparison of estimation methods and sample size calculation for parameter-driven interrupted time series models with count outcomes

Incorporating external trial data to improve survival extrapolations: a pilot study of the COU-AA-301 trial

The Barkin Index of Maternal Functioning: an evaluation and foundations for a new parental functioning scale

Rasch analysis reveals multidimensionality in the public speaking anxiety scale

Ephemeral pseudonym based de-identification system to reduce impact of inference attacks in healthcare information system