Background
The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) was first identified in Wuhan of Hubei Province, China in December, 2019. COVID-19 can result in severe and even fatal respiratory diseases such as acute respiratory distress syndrome [
1]. It is similar to Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) virus in its pathogenicity, clinical spectrum, and epidemiology [
2]. As of May 12, 2020, the virus has infected more than 10 countries and regions around the world, with a total of 4,088,848 cases and 283,153 deaths [
3]. Health care workers are at high risk of COVID-19 infection, a study by Wu et al. [
4] showed that a total of 72,314 cases have been reported nationwide by February 11, 2020, of which 44,672 cases have been confirmed. Of all the confirmed cases, there were 1716 health workers (3.8%), of which 14.8% of the confirmed cases were diagnosed as severe or critical cases, and 5 cases died. Another study showed that [
5] front-line health care workers are prone to psychological problems in public health emergencies. At present, the vaccine is still in the research stage, as the main force in the fight against the epidemic, lack of medical resources, health care workers are prone to all kinds of psychological problems in the face of high-intensity and high-risk work. Two recent studies in China both revealed that the incidence of anxiety and stress disorder is high among health care workers who were treating patients with COVID-19 infection during the epidemic period [
6,
7]. The National Health Commission issued a public document requiring [
8] that all localities should strengthen the psychological crisis intervention and guidance of health care workers.
The outbreak of COVID-19 has a negative impact on society and economy, leading to serious psychological problems [
9,
10]. Countries such as India and Bangladesh have reported suicides [
11‐
14], indicating an increase in suicidal tendency [
15]. Fear of infection was the second largest factor leading to suicide [
16]. Health care workers were faced with a high risk of disease exposure and worried about spreading the virus to family members, which may lead to psychological problems such as anxiety, depression and stress [
17].
At present, some scholars have paid attention to the psychological status of health care workers during the epidemic, mainly focused on worry, anxiety and other psychological problem, there is still a lack of further research to deal with mental health problems. Social support can relieve individual psychological pressure, eliminate psychological obstacles and promote mental health. A study have proposed various forms of support, such as counseling service and peer support [
18], to alleviate psychological problems. This study investigated the current situation of loneliness, depression and social support, and analyzed the mental health coping strategies, in order to improve the mental health level of medical staff and better carry out the fight against the epidemic situation. in order to improve the mental health level of health care workers and better carry out the work of fighting against the epidemic situation.
Methods
Participants
The method of random sampling was used to reduce the sampling error, and a questionnaire survey was conducted among health care workers from different positions from two provincial tuberculosis designated medical institutions in Anhui province, so that the survey results are more real and reliable. The questionnaire was distributed on the spot, the investigators checked the integrity of the questionnaire in time and followed it up, and took it back on the spot after filling it out, so as to avoid repetition and other possible negligence. The study subjects with a history of psychiatric illness were excluded.
Measures
A demographic survey was conducted among the selected health care workers, including gender, occupation, job title, education level, marital status, epidemic prevention and control post, and Depressive state. Questionnaire was provided in the form of supplementary file (Questionnaire).
The following contents were investigated: Awareness rate of health care workers, including the source of infection, route of transmission, susceptible population and main clinical symptoms. In addition, an in-depth survey was conducted on mental health needs, such as favorite psychological demand and service items and expected counseling time.
Perceived social support scale (PSSS)
The scale was compiled in 1987 [
19], revised by Chinese scholars and widely applied in China, Cronbach’s α = 0.88 [
20]. It consists of 12 items, each of which is rated on a scale ranging from 1 to 7, and each item is randomly arranged, which is divided into three dimensions: family support, friend support and other support. The total support is the sum of the three dimensions, the higher the score, the higher the perceived social support [
21]. Specific grading criteria: < 52 points: severe; 52–62: poor; 63–73: medium; 74–78: good; > 78: great [
22].
Self-rating depression scale (SDS)
The scale includes 4 groups: psycho-emotional symptoms, somatic disorders, psychomotor disorders and psychological disorders of depression. The specific scoring method is as follows: each item is scored according to grades 1, 2, 3 and 4. The higher the score is, the more serious the degree of depression is, and the cumulative score was more than 40 points, which was judged as depression [
23]. Specifically, 41–47: mild to moderate; 48–55: moderate to severe; ≥56: severe [
24].
ULCA loneliness scale
The scale was compiled and revised by Russell et al. [
25], including 11 “lonely” positive order items and nine “non-lonely” reverse order items, the items with asterisks should be in reverse order, and then each item should be added. The higher the score, the higher the degree of loneliness [
26]. A total of 20–80 points, which were equally divided into three groups: low, medium and high [
27].
Statistical analyses
The data were double input by EpiData 3.1 and analyzed by SPSS 23.0. The quantitative data were expressed as Mean ± Standard Deviation (Mean ± SD), the categorical data were expressed as cases (percentage), t-test was used to compare the quantitative data between the two groups, one-way ANOVA was used to compare the quantitative data among different groups, Pearson correlation analysis was used when the variables were in accordance with bivariate normal distribution. The test level was α = 0.05.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Since this was an observational study without any interventions, which had no any adverse effects on the study subjects, thus only oral informed consent was obtained, the procedure had been approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Anhui Chest Hospital (approval number: K2020–004).
Discussion
COVID-19 has been listed as Class B infectious disease according to the Law of the People’s Republic of China on Prevention and Control of Infectious Diseases in China, and it was managed according to Class A infectious diseases, which is the strictest way of prevention and control management, and there are differences in prevention and control measures. When medical institution discovers a Class A infectious disease, it shall promptly take the following measures: (1) patients and pathogen carriers shall be isolated and treated, and the period of isolation shall be determined according to the results of medical examination; (2) for suspected patients, separate isolation treatment in a designated place before diagnosis. (3) patients, pathogen carriers and close contacts of suspected patients in medical institutions shall conduct medical observation and take other necessary preventive measures at designated places. When medical institution discovers a patient with a Class B infectious disease, it shall take necessary measures to treat and control the spread of the disease according to its condition. Disinfection and harmless disposal shall be carried out in accordance with the provisions of laws and regulations. As an emerging infectious disease, much is still unknown about how the COVID-19 spreads, so it is easy to cause panic and psychological problems. A population-based cross-sectional study [
28] explored the psychological reaction of people in China in the early stages of the COVID-19 outbreak, and found that the rates of moderate and severe anxiety among volunteers fighting the epidemic were 32.7 and 20.4% in Wuhan and Shanghai, respectively, suggesting that during the rising stage of the outbreak, the physical and mental reactions of the masses were significant.
There has been an increase in studies reporting a high incidence of depression among health care workers in Asia, the prevalence of depressive symptoms was 20.1% [
29] even 50.4% [
30], and calling on them to undergo screening and counseling [
18]. Studies have shown that 36.4% of health care workers had depression symptoms and there was a significant positive correlation between depression and loneliness, which was higher than that reported in a previous study by Qi et al. [
31], and the depression scores of health care workers with lower job title and educational background were higher. The loneliness of health care workers was generally at a low level. The score of loneliness of doctors was higher than that of medical technicians. The health care workers in isolation ward, fever clinic and pre-check triage had mild to moderate depression, and the scores of depression and loneliness were higher than those of other medical departments. It showed that the psychological problems of those with low job titles and academic qualifications, as well as those in isolation ward, fever clinic and pre-check triage were relatively serious, and more attention should be paid to the psychological problems of them. Shao et al. [
32] found that during the period of fighting against SARS, the mental health level of health care workers was lower than the domestic norm, and there were mental health problems such as anxiety, fear, etc. And health care workers in prevention and control posts such as isolation wards and fever clinics, rushed to the front line of the epidemic. Problems encountered in clinical work could not be solved in time, and there was no psychological comfort. In particular, some doctors were in a state of isolation for a long time and cannot be reunited with their families [
17], but also worried about the risk of family infection, making them feel lonely and helpless, extremely prone to psychological problems.
In addition, this study found that depression had differences in gender, occupation, professional title, education level and different positions. Among them, the depression score of nurses was higher than that of doctors. Qi et al. [
31] found that clinical nurses have psychological problems in the special period of facing COVID-19, another study by Jiao et al. [
33] shows that in the fight against the epidemic, nurses have a high intensity of tasks, and they have a high probability of contact with infected patients. Moreover, the drugs need to be verified by further clinical trials [
34]. Therefore, in the face of many uncertainties, clinical nurses are prone to varying degrees of psychological problems.
This study suggests that the social support of health care workers was in the middle level and negatively correlated with the scores of depression and loneliness. Further analysis of the social support of health care workers is particularly important for a comprehensive understanding of mental health status. Among them, the scores of social support of health care workers in prevention and control positions were lower. The reason is that they are more likely to come into contact with COVID-19 patients, and their family and friends may be worried about being infected, resulting in relatively low social support. Mental health factors may lead to suicide [
13]. In the absence of social support, health care workers tend to choose negative coping styles, such as self-attack and retreat, thus affecting their mental health [
35]. Therefore, close attention should be paid to improve the psychological coping ability of health care workers under stress [
10,
36], in order to enhance their mental health level, and then carry out epidemic prevention and control work more effectively.
In the face of the psychological problems that need to be solved urgently, this study continues to investigate the psychological needs of health care workers, in order to provide a better solution for hospital management and improve mental health. A study proposed forms of psychological support such as telemedicine and informal support groups [
37], and the following reference improvement measures were obtained from this study, such as mental health lectures, psychological counseling and psychological guidance for them, because healthy psychological counseling can maintain a positive and stable state of mind to deal with unexpected situations and reduce the risk of mental disorders such as anxiety and depression [
38]. In addition, it is also very important to actively care for the families of health care workers and make them feel at ease with their work. It is suggested that managers should communicate more, understand their difficulties encountered in work and life, give timely help, and reduce their life stress [
39].
Mental health is not only related to individual health, but also affects social function and professional ability [
40]. During the epidemic period of COVID-19, special attention should be paid to it. Health care workers, as front-line personnel in the fight against the epidemic, face both physical and mental pressure. The quality of their work is not only related to the life safety of patients, but also related to whether the epidemic can be effectively controlled and social stability. Therefore, we should actively take mental health intervention measures for health care workers according to the psychological needs of them. This study points out the health care workers who need to pay attention to during the epidemic, and provides reference for the prevention and management of public health emergencies.
Study limitations
This study has some limitations. First of all, despite the widespread spread of COVID-19, this study only investigates the mental health status of health care workers in two designated tuberculosis medical institutions during the epidemic period. The conclusions are limited, so multicenter studies should be considered. Secondly, the mental health status is dynamic, and the results of cross-sectional survey can only reflect the psychological information at a certain point in time. The design method of longitudinal study will make the research results more rigorous. Finally, the baseline depression status and socioeconomic status variation of study subjects were not investigated, which may be potential confounding factors.
Conclusion
During the epidemic period of COVID-19, the psychological problems of health care workers, especially women, nurses with low educational background, low professional title, and staff in the epidemic prevention and control positions are relatively serious, and the problem of loneliness was relatively mild, mainly in terms of depression. Targeted intervention measures should be taken according to their psychological needs to give more support and improve their mental health.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.