Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Clinical Rheumatology 11/2019

06.07.2019 | Original Article

Cross-cultural adaptation, validity, and reliability of the Turkish version of the Patient-Rated Elbow Evaluation

verfasst von: Zeynep Hazar Kanik, Omer Osman Pala, Gul Oznur Karabicak, Seyit Citaker

Erschienen in: Clinical Rheumatology | Ausgabe 11/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction

The Patient-Rated Elbow Evaluation (PREE) is a joint-specific, self-administered outcome measure used to determine the level of pain and disability in patients with various elbow pathologies. The aim of this study was to cross-culturally adapt the PREE into Turkish (PREE-T) and to test its reliability and validity.

Methods

Fifty-nine patients with elbow disorders were included in the present study. The original version of the PREE was translated and culturally adapted into Turkish by following standard procedure. Test-retest reliability and internal consistency were determined using intraclass correlation coefficient and Cronbach’s alpha, respectively. Construct validity of PREE-T was determined with Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) and Short Form-36 (SF-36) questionnaires by using Pearson’s correlation coefficient analysis. Floor and ceiling effects were also analyzed.

Results

A high internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha of 0.959) and an excellent test-retest reliability (the intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.970) indicated that the PREE-T was reliable. Neither floor nor ceiling effects were observed in sub-parameters (0–1.7%) and the total score (0%) of PREE-T. Correlation coefficients between the PREE-T total score and DASH disability/symptom and work sub-parameters were 0.636 and 0.461, respectively. PREE-T pain and function sub-parameters correlated with related sub-parameters of the SF-36 bodily pain (r = − 0.721) and physical functioning (r = − 0.263).

Conclusion

The Turkish version of the PREE is a valid and reliable outcome measure for assessing patients with elbow disorders. It is recommended to be used in research and clinical settings.
Key Points
The Turkish version of the Patient-Rated Elbow Evaluation was successfully translated into Turkish and validated in a population with various elbow pathologies according to established guidelines
The Turkish version of the Patient-Rated Elbow Evaluation has high internal consistency and test-retest values
The Turkish version of the Patient-Rated Elbow Evaluation is valid and reliable
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Patrick DL, Burke LB, Powers JH, Scott JA, Rock EP, Dawisha S, O’Neill R, Kennedy DL (2007) Patient-reported outcomes to support medical product labeling claims: FDA perspective. Value Health 10(Suppl 2):125–137CrossRef Patrick DL, Burke LB, Powers JH, Scott JA, Rock EP, Dawisha S, O’Neill R, Kennedy DL (2007) Patient-reported outcomes to support medical product labeling claims: FDA perspective. Value Health 10(Suppl 2):125–137CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Longo UG, Franceschi F, Loppini M, Maffulli N, Denaro V (2008) Rating systems for evaluation of the elbow. Br Med Bull 87(1):131–161CrossRef Longo UG, Franceschi F, Loppini M, Maffulli N, Denaro V (2008) Rating systems for evaluation of the elbow. Br Med Bull 87(1):131–161CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Vincent JI, MacDermid JC, King GJ, Grewal R (2013) Validity and sensitivity to change of patient-reported pain and disability measures for elbow pathologies. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 43(4):263–274CrossRef Vincent JI, MacDermid JC, King GJ, Grewal R (2013) Validity and sensitivity to change of patient-reported pain and disability measures for elbow pathologies. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 43(4):263–274CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat MacDermid JC (2001) Outcome evaluation in patients with elbow pathology: issues in instrument development and evaluation. J Hand Ther 14(2):105–114CrossRef MacDermid JC (2001) Outcome evaluation in patients with elbow pathology: issues in instrument development and evaluation. J Hand Ther 14(2):105–114CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Vincent JI, MacDermid JC, King GJ, Grewal R (2015) Linking of the Patient Rated Elbow Evaluation (PREE) and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons-Elbow questionnaire (pASES-e) to the International Classification of Functioning Disability and Health (ICF) and Hand Core Sets. J Hand Ther 28(1):61–67CrossRef Vincent JI, MacDermid JC, King GJ, Grewal R (2015) Linking of the Patient Rated Elbow Evaluation (PREE) and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons-Elbow questionnaire (pASES-e) to the International Classification of Functioning Disability and Health (ICF) and Hand Core Sets. J Hand Ther 28(1):61–67CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat John M, Angst F, Pap G, Junge A, Mannion AF (2007) Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Patient Rated Elbow Evaluation (PREE) for German-speaking patients. Clin Exp Rheumatol 25(2):195–205PubMed John M, Angst F, Pap G, Junge A, Mannion AF (2007) Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Patient Rated Elbow Evaluation (PREE) for German-speaking patients. Clin Exp Rheumatol 25(2):195–205PubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Beauchemin G, MacDermid JC, Bourduas K, Poirier MF, Gaudelli C, Rouleau DM (2015) Translation and validation of the PREE (Patient Rated Elbow Evaluation) to a French version. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 101(4):405–409CrossRef Beauchemin G, MacDermid JC, Bourduas K, Poirier MF, Gaudelli C, Rouleau DM (2015) Translation and validation of the PREE (Patient Rated Elbow Evaluation) to a French version. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 101(4):405–409CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Hanyu T, Watanabe M, Masatomi T, Nishida K, Nakagawa T, Nishiura Y, Ohi H (2013) Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Japanese version of the Patient-Rated Elbow Evaluation. J Orthop Sci 18(5):712–719CrossRef Hanyu T, Watanabe M, Masatomi T, Nishida K, Nakagawa T, Nishiura Y, Ohi H (2013) Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Japanese version of the Patient-Rated Elbow Evaluation. J Orthop Sci 18(5):712–719CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Farazdaghi MR, Mansoori A, Vosoughi O, Kordi Yoosefinejad A (2017) Evaluation of the reliability and validity of the Persian version of Patient-Rated Elbow Evaluation questionnaire. Rheumatol Int 37(5):743–750CrossRef Farazdaghi MR, Mansoori A, Vosoughi O, Kordi Yoosefinejad A (2017) Evaluation of the reliability and validity of the Persian version of Patient-Rated Elbow Evaluation questionnaire. Rheumatol Int 37(5):743–750CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB (2000) Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25(24):3186–3191CrossRef Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB (2000) Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25(24):3186–3191CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Düger T, Yakut E, Öksüz Ç, Yörükan S, Bilgütay BS, Ayhan Ç, Leblebicioğlu G, Kayıhan H, Kırdı N, Yakut Y, Güler Ç (2006) Kol, omuz ve el sorunları (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand-DASH) anketi Türkçe uyarlamasının güvenirliği ve geçerliği. Türk Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi 17(3):99–107 Düger T, Yakut E, Öksüz Ç, Yörükan S, Bilgütay BS, Ayhan Ç, Leblebicioğlu G, Kayıhan H, Kırdı N, Yakut Y, Güler Ç (2006) Kol, omuz ve el sorunları (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand-DASH) anketi Türkçe uyarlamasının güvenirliği ve geçerliği. Türk Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi 17(3):99–107
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Ware JE, Sherbourne CD (1992) The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 30(6):473–483CrossRef Ware JE, Sherbourne CD (1992) The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 30(6):473–483CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Pinar R (2005) Reliability and construct validity of the SF-36 in Turkish cancer patients. Qual Life Res 14(1):259–264CrossRef Pinar R (2005) Reliability and construct validity of the SF-36 in Turkish cancer patients. Qual Life Res 14(1):259–264CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Fleiss JL (1986) Reliability of measurement. In: Fleiss JL (ed) The Design and Analysis of Clinical Experiments. John Wiley & Sons, New York, pp 1–32 Fleiss JL (1986) Reliability of measurement. In: Fleiss JL (ed) The Design and Analysis of Clinical Experiments. John Wiley & Sons, New York, pp 1–32
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Feise RJ, Michael Menke J (2001) Functional rating index: a new valid and reliable instrument to measure the magnitude of clinical change in spinal conditions. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 26(1):78–86CrossRef Feise RJ, Michael Menke J (2001) Functional rating index: a new valid and reliable instrument to measure the magnitude of clinical change in spinal conditions. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 26(1):78–86CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Hazar Kanik Z, Gunaydin G, Pala OO, Sozlu U, Alkan ZB, Citaker S, Basar S, Kanatli U (2018) Translation, cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the Turkish version of the Penn Shoulder Score. Disabil Rehabil 40(10):1214–1219 Hazar Kanik Z, Gunaydin G, Pala OO, Sozlu U, Alkan ZB, Citaker S, Basar S, Kanatli U (2018) Translation, cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the Turkish version of the Penn Shoulder Score. Disabil Rehabil 40(10):1214–1219​
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, van der Windt DA, Knol DL, Dekker J, Bouter LM, de Vet HC (2007) Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 60(1):34–42CrossRef Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, van der Windt DA, Knol DL, Dekker J, Bouter LM, de Vet HC (2007) Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 60(1):34–42CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Cross-cultural adaptation, validity, and reliability of the Turkish version of the Patient-Rated Elbow Evaluation
verfasst von
Zeynep Hazar Kanik
Omer Osman Pala
Gul Oznur Karabicak
Seyit Citaker
Publikationsdatum
06.07.2019
Verlag
Springer London
Erschienen in
Clinical Rheumatology / Ausgabe 11/2019
Print ISSN: 0770-3198
Elektronische ISSN: 1434-9949
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-019-04665-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 11/2019

Clinical Rheumatology 11/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Echinokokkose medikamentös behandeln oder operieren?

06.05.2024 DCK 2024 Kongressbericht

Die Therapie von Echinokokkosen sollte immer in spezialisierten Zentren erfolgen. Eine symptomlose Echinokokkose kann – egal ob von Hunde- oder Fuchsbandwurm ausgelöst – konservativ erfolgen. Wenn eine Op. nötig ist, kann es sinnvoll sein, vorher Zysten zu leeren und zu desinfizieren. 

Umsetzung der POMGAT-Leitlinie läuft

03.05.2024 DCK 2024 Kongressbericht

Seit November 2023 gibt es evidenzbasierte Empfehlungen zum perioperativen Management bei gastrointestinalen Tumoren (POMGAT) auf S3-Niveau. Vieles wird schon entsprechend der Empfehlungen durchgeführt. Wo es im Alltag noch hapert, zeigt eine Umfrage in einem Klinikverbund.

Proximale Humerusfraktur: Auch 100-Jährige operieren?

01.05.2024 DCK 2024 Kongressbericht

Mit dem demographischen Wandel versorgt auch die Chirurgie immer mehr betagte Menschen. Von Entwicklungen wie Fast-Track können auch ältere Menschen profitieren und bei proximaler Humerusfraktur können selbst manche 100-Jährige noch sicher operiert werden.

Die „Zehn Gebote“ des Endokarditis-Managements

30.04.2024 Endokarditis Leitlinie kompakt

Worauf kommt es beim Management von Personen mit infektiöser Endokarditis an? Eine Kardiologin und ein Kardiologe fassen die zehn wichtigsten Punkte der neuen ESC-Leitlinie zusammen.

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.