Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Clinical Journal of Gastroenterology 4/2017

26.04.2017 | Clinical Review

CT colonography: role in FOBT-based screening programs for colorectal cancer

verfasst von: Lapo Sali, Grazia Grazzini, Mario Mascalchi

Erschienen in: Clinical Journal of Gastroenterology | Ausgabe 4/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Computed tomographic colonography (CTC) is a minimally invasive imaging examination for the colon, and is safe, well tolerated and accurate for the detection of colorectal cancer (CRC) and advanced adenoma. While the role of CTC as a primary test for population screening of CRC is under investigation, the fecal occult blood test (FOBT) has been recommended for population screening of CRC in Europe. Subjects with positive FOBT are invited to undergo total colonoscopy, which has some critical issues, such as suboptimal compliance, contraindications and the possibility of an incomplete exploration of the colon. Based on available data, the integration of CTC in FOBT-based population screening programs for CRC may fall into three scenarios. First, CTC is recommended in FOBT-positive subjects when colonoscopy is refused, incomplete or contraindicated. For these indications CTC should replace double-contrast barium enema. Second, conversely, CTC is not currently recommended as a second-level examination prior to colonoscopy in all FOBT-positive subjects, as this strategy is most probably not cost-effective. Finally, CTC may be considered instead of colonoscopy for surveillance after adenoma removal, but specific studies are needed.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Ferlay J, Steliarova-Foucher E, Lortet-Tieulent J, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality patterns in Europe: estimates for 40 countries in 2012. Eur J Cancer. 2013;49:1374–403.CrossRefPubMed Ferlay J, Steliarova-Foucher E, Lortet-Tieulent J, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality patterns in Europe: estimates for 40 countries in 2012. Eur J Cancer. 2013;49:1374–403.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Ciccolallo L, Capocaccia R, Coleman MP, et al. Survival differences between European and US patients with colorectal cancer: role of stage at diagnosis and surgery. Gut. 2005;54:268–73.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ciccolallo L, Capocaccia R, Coleman MP, et al. Survival differences between European and US patients with colorectal cancer: role of stage at diagnosis and surgery. Gut. 2005;54:268–73.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Winawer SJ, Fletcher RH, Miller L, et al. Colorectal cancer screening: clinical guidelines and rationale. Gastroenterology. 1997;112:594–642.CrossRefPubMed Winawer SJ, Fletcher RH, Miller L, et al. Colorectal cancer screening: clinical guidelines and rationale. Gastroenterology. 1997;112:594–642.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Segnan N, Patnik J, von Karsa L. European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis. 1st ed. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union; 2010. Segnan N, Patnik J, von Karsa L. European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis. 1st ed. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union; 2010.
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Mandel JS, Bond JH, Church TR, et al. Reducing mortality from colorectal cancer by screening for fecal occult blood. Minnesota colon cancer control study. N Engl J Med. 1993;328:1365–71.CrossRefPubMed Mandel JS, Bond JH, Church TR, et al. Reducing mortality from colorectal cancer by screening for fecal occult blood. Minnesota colon cancer control study. N Engl J Med. 1993;328:1365–71.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Hardcastle JD, Chamberlain JO, Robinson MH, et al. Randomised controlled trial of faecal-occult-blood screening for colorectal cancer. Lancet. 1996;348:1472–7.CrossRefPubMed Hardcastle JD, Chamberlain JO, Robinson MH, et al. Randomised controlled trial of faecal-occult-blood screening for colorectal cancer. Lancet. 1996;348:1472–7.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Kronborg O, Fenger C, Olsen J, et al. Randomised study of screening for colorectal cancer with faecal-occult-blood test. Lancet. 1996;348:1467–71.CrossRefPubMed Kronborg O, Fenger C, Olsen J, et al. Randomised study of screening for colorectal cancer with faecal-occult-blood test. Lancet. 1996;348:1467–71.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Saito H, Soma Y, Koeda J, et al. Reduction in risk of mortality by fecal occult blood screening with immunochemical hemagglutination test. A case-control study. Int J Cancer. 1995;61:465–9.CrossRefPubMed Saito H, Soma Y, Koeda J, et al. Reduction in risk of mortality by fecal occult blood screening with immunochemical hemagglutination test. A case-control study. Int J Cancer. 1995;61:465–9.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Ventura L, Mantellini P, Grazzini G, et al. The impact of immunochemical faecal occult blood testing on colorectal cancer incidence. Dig Liver Dis. 2014;46:82–6.CrossRefPubMed Ventura L, Mantellini P, Grazzini G, et al. The impact of immunochemical faecal occult blood testing on colorectal cancer incidence. Dig Liver Dis. 2014;46:82–6.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Giorgi Rossi P, Vicentini M, Sacchettini C, et al. Impact of screening program on incidence of colorectal cancer: a cohort study in Italy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2015;110:1359–66.CrossRefPubMed Giorgi Rossi P, Vicentini M, Sacchettini C, et al. Impact of screening program on incidence of colorectal cancer: a cohort study in Italy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2015;110:1359–66.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Castiglione G, Zappa M, Grazzini G, et al. Immunochemical vs guaiac faecal occult blood tests in a population-based screening programme for colorectal cancer. Br J Cancer. 1996;74:141–4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Castiglione G, Zappa M, Grazzini G, et al. Immunochemical vs guaiac faecal occult blood tests in a population-based screening programme for colorectal cancer. Br J Cancer. 1996;74:141–4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Van Rossum LG, van Rijn AF, Laheij RJ, et al. Random comparison of guaiac and immunochemical fecal occult blood tests for colorectal cancer in a screening population. Gastroenterology. 2008;135:82–90.CrossRefPubMed Van Rossum LG, van Rijn AF, Laheij RJ, et al. Random comparison of guaiac and immunochemical fecal occult blood tests for colorectal cancer in a screening population. Gastroenterology. 2008;135:82–90.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Zorzi M, Baracco S, Fedato C, et al. Screening for colorectal cancer in Italy, 2009 survey. Epidemiol Prev. 2011;35:55–77.PubMed Zorzi M, Baracco S, Fedato C, et al. Screening for colorectal cancer in Italy, 2009 survey. Epidemiol Prev. 2011;35:55–77.PubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Weller D, Coleman D, Robertson R, et al. The UK colorectal cancer screening pilot: results of the second round of screening in England. Br J Cancer. 2007;97:1601–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Weller D, Coleman D, Robertson R, et al. The UK colorectal cancer screening pilot: results of the second round of screening in England. Br J Cancer. 2007;97:1601–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Pickhardt PJ, Hassan C, Halligan S, et al. Colorectal cancer: CT colonography and colonoscopy for detection—systematic review and meta-analysis. Radiology. 2011;259:393–405.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Pickhardt PJ, Hassan C, Halligan S, et al. Colorectal cancer: CT colonography and colonoscopy for detection—systematic review and meta-analysis. Radiology. 2011;259:393–405.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Sosna J, Morrin MM, Kruskal JB, et al. CT colonography of colorectal polyps: a metaanalysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003;181:1593–8.CrossRefPubMed Sosna J, Morrin MM, Kruskal JB, et al. CT colonography of colorectal polyps: a metaanalysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003;181:1593–8.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Mulhall BP, Veerappan GR, Jackson JL. Meta-analysis: computed tomographic colonography. Ann Intern Med. 2005;142:635–50.CrossRefPubMed Mulhall BP, Veerappan GR, Jackson JL. Meta-analysis: computed tomographic colonography. Ann Intern Med. 2005;142:635–50.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Rosman AS, Korsten MA. Meta-analysis comparing CT colonography, air contrast barium enema, and colonoscopy. Am J Med. 2007;120:203–10.CrossRefPubMed Rosman AS, Korsten MA. Meta-analysis comparing CT colonography, air contrast barium enema, and colonoscopy. Am J Med. 2007;120:203–10.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Halligan S, Altman DG, Taylor SA, et al. CT colonography in the detection of colorectal polyps and cancer: systematic review, meta-analysis, and proposed minimum data set for study level reporting. Radiology. 2005;237:893–904.CrossRefPubMed Halligan S, Altman DG, Taylor SA, et al. CT colonography in the detection of colorectal polyps and cancer: systematic review, meta-analysis, and proposed minimum data set for study level reporting. Radiology. 2005;237:893–904.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Chaparro M, Gisbert JP, Del Campo L, et al. Accuracy of computed tomographic colonography for the detection of polyps and colorectal tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Digestion. 2009;80:1–17.CrossRefPubMed Chaparro M, Gisbert JP, Del Campo L, et al. Accuracy of computed tomographic colonography for the detection of polyps and colorectal tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Digestion. 2009;80:1–17.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Halligan S, Wooldrage K, Dadswell E, et al. Computed tomographic colonography versus barium enema for diagnosis of colorectal cancer or large polyps in symptomatic patients (SIGGAR): a multicentre randomised trial. Lancet. 2013;381:1185–92.CrossRefPubMed Halligan S, Wooldrage K, Dadswell E, et al. Computed tomographic colonography versus barium enema for diagnosis of colorectal cancer or large polyps in symptomatic patients (SIGGAR): a multicentre randomised trial. Lancet. 2013;381:1185–92.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat von Wagner C, Smith S, Halligan S, et al. Patient acceptability of CT colonography compared with double contrast barium enema: results from a multicentre randomised controlled trial of symptomatic patients. Eur Radiol. 2011;21:2046–55.CrossRef von Wagner C, Smith S, Halligan S, et al. Patient acceptability of CT colonography compared with double contrast barium enema: results from a multicentre randomised controlled trial of symptomatic patients. Eur Radiol. 2011;21:2046–55.CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Liedenbaum MH, de Vries AH, Gouw CI, et al. CT colonography with minimal bowel preparation: evaluation of tagging quality, patient acceptance and diagnostic accuracy in two iodine-based preparation schemes. Eur Radiol. 2010;20:367–76.CrossRefPubMed Liedenbaum MH, de Vries AH, Gouw CI, et al. CT colonography with minimal bowel preparation: evaluation of tagging quality, patient acceptance and diagnostic accuracy in two iodine-based preparation schemes. Eur Radiol. 2010;20:367–76.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Gluecker TM, Johnson CD, Harmsen WS, et al. Colorectal cancer screening with CT colonography, colonoscopy, and double-contrast barium enema examination: prospective assessment of patient perceptions and preferences. Radiology. 2003;227:378–84.CrossRefPubMed Gluecker TM, Johnson CD, Harmsen WS, et al. Colorectal cancer screening with CT colonography, colonoscopy, and double-contrast barium enema examination: prospective assessment of patient perceptions and preferences. Radiology. 2003;227:378–84.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Bellini D, Rengo M, De Cecco CN, et al. Perforation rate in CT colonography: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. Eur Radiol. 2014;24:1487–96.CrossRefPubMed Bellini D, Rengo M, De Cecco CN, et al. Perforation rate in CT colonography: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. Eur Radiol. 2014;24:1487–96.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Stoop EM, de Haan MC, de Wijkerslooth TR, et al. Participation and yield of colonoscopy versus non-cathartic CT colonography in population-based screening for colorectal cancer: a multicenter controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13:55–64.CrossRefPubMed Stoop EM, de Haan MC, de Wijkerslooth TR, et al. Participation and yield of colonoscopy versus non-cathartic CT colonography in population-based screening for colorectal cancer: a multicenter controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13:55–64.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Sali L, Mascalchi M, Falchini M, et al. Reduced and full-preparation CT colonography, fecal immunochemical test, and colonoscopy for population screening of colorectal cancer: a randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2016;108:djv319. doi:10.1093/jnci/djv319.CrossRefPubMed Sali L, Mascalchi M, Falchini M, et al. Reduced and full-preparation CT colonography, fecal immunochemical test, and colonoscopy for population screening of colorectal cancer: a randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2016;108:djv319. doi:10.​1093/​jnci/​djv319.CrossRefPubMed
28.
29.
Zurück zum Zitat van Roosbroeck S, Hoeck S, Van Hal G. Population-based screening for colorectal cancer using an immunochemical faecal occult blood test: a comparison of two invitation strategies. Cancer Epidemiol. 2012;36:e317–24.CrossRefPubMed van Roosbroeck S, Hoeck S, Van Hal G. Population-based screening for colorectal cancer using an immunochemical faecal occult blood test: a comparison of two invitation strategies. Cancer Epidemiol. 2012;36:e317–24.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat van Roon AHC, Hol L, van Vuuren AJ, et al. Are fecal immunochemical test characteristics influenced by sample return time? A population-based colorectal cancer screening trial. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012;107:99–107.CrossRefPubMed van Roon AHC, Hol L, van Vuuren AJ, et al. Are fecal immunochemical test characteristics influenced by sample return time? A population-based colorectal cancer screening trial. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012;107:99–107.CrossRefPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Moss SM, Campbell C, Melia J, et al. Performance measures in three rounds of the English bowel cancer screening pilot. Gut. 2012;61:101–7.CrossRefPubMed Moss SM, Campbell C, Melia J, et al. Performance measures in three rounds of the English bowel cancer screening pilot. Gut. 2012;61:101–7.CrossRefPubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Peris M, Espinàs JA, Muñoz L, et al. Lessons learnt from a population-based pilot programme for colorectal cancer screening in Catalonia (Spain). J Med Screen. 2007;14:81–6.CrossRefPubMed Peris M, Espinàs JA, Muñoz L, et al. Lessons learnt from a population-based pilot programme for colorectal cancer screening in Catalonia (Spain). J Med Screen. 2007;14:81–6.CrossRefPubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Baig N, Myers RE, Turner BR, et al. Physician-reported reasons for limited follow-up of patients with a positive fecal occult blood test screening results. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003;98:2078–81.CrossRefPubMed Baig N, Myers RE, Turner BR, et al. Physician-reported reasons for limited follow-up of patients with a positive fecal occult blood test screening results. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003;98:2078–81.CrossRefPubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Li CM, Shiu MN, Chia SL, et al. Factors associated with referral compliance of abnormal immunochemical faecal occult blood test. J Med Screen. 2007;14:186–90.CrossRefPubMed Li CM, Shiu MN, Chia SL, et al. Factors associated with referral compliance of abnormal immunochemical faecal occult blood test. J Med Screen. 2007;14:186–90.CrossRefPubMed
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Zheng YF, Saito T, Takahashi M, et al. Factors associated with intentions to adhere to colorectal cancer screening follow-up exams. BMC Public Health. 2006;6:272.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Zheng YF, Saito T, Takahashi M, et al. Factors associated with intentions to adhere to colorectal cancer screening follow-up exams. BMC Public Health. 2006;6:272.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Sali L, Grazzini G, Ventura L, et al. Computed tomographic colonography in subjects with positive faecal occult blood test refusing optical colonoscopy. Dig Liver Dis. 2013;45:285–9.CrossRefPubMed Sali L, Grazzini G, Ventura L, et al. Computed tomographic colonography in subjects with positive faecal occult blood test refusing optical colonoscopy. Dig Liver Dis. 2013;45:285–9.CrossRefPubMed
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Bowles CJ, Leicester R, Romaya C, et al. A prospective study of colonoscopy practice in the UK today: are we adequately prepared for national colorectal cancer screening tomorrow? Gut. 2004;53:277–83.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bowles CJ, Leicester R, Romaya C, et al. A prospective study of colonoscopy practice in the UK today: are we adequately prepared for national colorectal cancer screening tomorrow? Gut. 2004;53:277–83.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Rathgaber SW, Wick TM. Colonoscopy completion and complication rates in a community gastroenterology practice. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;64:556–62.CrossRefPubMed Rathgaber SW, Wick TM. Colonoscopy completion and complication rates in a community gastroenterology practice. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;64:556–62.CrossRefPubMed
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Shah HA, Paszat LF, Saskin R, et al. Factors associated with incomplete colonoscopy: a population-based study. Gastroenterology. 2007;132:2297–303.CrossRefPubMed Shah HA, Paszat LF, Saskin R, et al. Factors associated with incomplete colonoscopy: a population-based study. Gastroenterology. 2007;132:2297–303.CrossRefPubMed
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Neerincx M, sive Terhaar Droste JS, Mulder JJ, et al. Colonic work-up after incomplete colonoscopy: significant new findings during follow-up. Endoscopy. 2010;42:730–5.CrossRefPubMed Neerincx M, sive Terhaar Droste JS, Mulder JJ, et al. Colonic work-up after incomplete colonoscopy: significant new findings during follow-up. Endoscopy. 2010;42:730–5.CrossRefPubMed
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Sosna J, Sella T, Sy O, et al. Critical analysis of the performance of double-contrast barium enema for detecting colorectal polyps ≥6 mm in the era of CT colonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;190:374–85.CrossRefPubMed Sosna J, Sella T, Sy O, et al. Critical analysis of the performance of double-contrast barium enema for detecting colorectal polyps ≥6 mm in the era of CT colonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;190:374–85.CrossRefPubMed
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Sali L, Falchini M, Bonanomi AG, et al. CT colonography after incomplete colonoscopy in subjects with positive faecal occult blood test. World J Gastroenterol. 2008;14:4499–504.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sali L, Falchini M, Bonanomi AG, et al. CT colonography after incomplete colonoscopy in subjects with positive faecal occult blood test. World J Gastroenterol. 2008;14:4499–504.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Yucel C, Lev-Toaff AS, Moussa N, et al. CT colonography for incomplete or contraindicated optical colonoscopy in older patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;190:145–50.CrossRefPubMed Yucel C, Lev-Toaff AS, Moussa N, et al. CT colonography for incomplete or contraindicated optical colonoscopy in older patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;190:145–50.CrossRefPubMed
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Anderson ML, Pasha TM, Leighton JA. Endoscopic perforation of the colon: lessons from a 10-year study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2000;95:3418–22.CrossRefPubMed Anderson ML, Pasha TM, Leighton JA. Endoscopic perforation of the colon: lessons from a 10-year study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2000;95:3418–22.CrossRefPubMed
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Jensch S, Bipat S, Peringa J, et al. CT colonography with limited bowel preparation: prospective assessment of patient experience and preference in comparison to optical colonoscopy with cathartic bowel preparation. Eur Radiol. 2010;20:146–56.CrossRefPubMed Jensch S, Bipat S, Peringa J, et al. CT colonography with limited bowel preparation: prospective assessment of patient experience and preference in comparison to optical colonoscopy with cathartic bowel preparation. Eur Radiol. 2010;20:146–56.CrossRefPubMed
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Liedenbaum MH, van Rijn AF, de Vries AH, et al. Using CT colonography as a triage technique after a positive faecal occult blood test in colorectal cancer screening. Gut. 2009;58:1242–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Liedenbaum MH, van Rijn AF, de Vries AH, et al. Using CT colonography as a triage technique after a positive faecal occult blood test in colorectal cancer screening. Gut. 2009;58:1242–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
47.
Zurück zum Zitat Regge D, Laudi C, Galatola G, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of computed tomographic colonography for the detection of advanced neoplasia in individuals at increased risk of colorectal cancer. JAMA. 2009;301:2453–61.CrossRefPubMed Regge D, Laudi C, Galatola G, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of computed tomographic colonography for the detection of advanced neoplasia in individuals at increased risk of colorectal cancer. JAMA. 2009;301:2453–61.CrossRefPubMed
48.
Zurück zum Zitat Sali L, Falchini M, Della Monica P, et al. CT colonography before colonoscopy in subjects with positive faecal occult blood test. Preliminary experience. Radiol Med. 2010;115:1267–78.CrossRefPubMed Sali L, Falchini M, Della Monica P, et al. CT colonography before colonoscopy in subjects with positive faecal occult blood test. Preliminary experience. Radiol Med. 2010;115:1267–78.CrossRefPubMed
49.
Zurück zum Zitat Heresbach D, Djabbari M, Riou F, et al. Accuracy of computed tomographic colonography in nationwide multicenter trial, and its relation to radiologist expertise. Gut. 2011;60:658–65.CrossRefPubMed Heresbach D, Djabbari M, Riou F, et al. Accuracy of computed tomographic colonography in nationwide multicenter trial, and its relation to radiologist expertise. Gut. 2011;60:658–65.CrossRefPubMed
50.
Zurück zum Zitat Plumb AA, Halligan S, Pendsé DA, et al. Sensitivity and specificity of CT colonography for the detection of colonic neoplasia after positive faecal occult blood testing: systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Radiol. 2014;24:1049–58.CrossRefPubMed Plumb AA, Halligan S, Pendsé DA, et al. Sensitivity and specificity of CT colonography for the detection of colonic neoplasia after positive faecal occult blood testing: systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Radiol. 2014;24:1049–58.CrossRefPubMed
51.
Zurück zum Zitat Plumb AA, Halligan S, Nickerson C, et al. Use of CT colonography in the English Bowel Cancer Screening Programme. Gut. 2014;63:964–73.CrossRefPubMed Plumb AA, Halligan S, Nickerson C, et al. Use of CT colonography in the English Bowel Cancer Screening Programme. Gut. 2014;63:964–73.CrossRefPubMed
52.
Zurück zum Zitat Pickhardt PJ, Hanson ME, Vanness DJ, et al. Unsuspected extracolonic findings at screening CT colonography: clinical and economic impact. Radiology. 2008;249:151–9.CrossRefPubMed Pickhardt PJ, Hanson ME, Vanness DJ, et al. Unsuspected extracolonic findings at screening CT colonography: clinical and economic impact. Radiology. 2008;249:151–9.CrossRefPubMed
53.
Zurück zum Zitat Martínez ME, Baron JA, Lieberman DA, et al. A pooled analysis of advanced colorectal neoplasia diagnoses after colonoscopic polypectomy. Gastroenterology. 2009;136:832–41.CrossRefPubMed Martínez ME, Baron JA, Lieberman DA, et al. A pooled analysis of advanced colorectal neoplasia diagnoses after colonoscopic polypectomy. Gastroenterology. 2009;136:832–41.CrossRefPubMed
54.
Zurück zum Zitat Rex DK, Cutler CS, Lemmel GT, et al. Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back-to-back colonoscopies. Gastroenterology. 1997;112:24–8.CrossRefPubMed Rex DK, Cutler CS, Lemmel GT, et al. Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back-to-back colonoscopies. Gastroenterology. 1997;112:24–8.CrossRefPubMed
55.
Zurück zum Zitat Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, O’Brien MJ, et al. Randomized comparison of surveillance intervals after colonoscopic removal of newly diagnosed adenomatous polyps. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. N Engl J Med. 1993;328:901–6.CrossRefPubMed Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, O’Brien MJ, et al. Randomized comparison of surveillance intervals after colonoscopic removal of newly diagnosed adenomatous polyps. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. N Engl J Med. 1993;328:901–6.CrossRefPubMed
56.
Zurück zum Zitat Yood MU, Oliveria S, Boyer JG, et al. Colon polyp recurrence in a managed care population. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163:422–6.CrossRefPubMed Yood MU, Oliveria S, Boyer JG, et al. Colon polyp recurrence in a managed care population. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163:422–6.CrossRefPubMed
57.
Zurück zum Zitat Lieberman DA, Holub J, Eisen G, et al. Utilization of colonoscopy in the United States: results from a national consortium. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;62:875–83.CrossRefPubMed Lieberman DA, Holub J, Eisen G, et al. Utilization of colonoscopy in the United States: results from a national consortium. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;62:875–83.CrossRefPubMed
58.
Zurück zum Zitat Tutein Nolthenius CJ, Boellaard TN, de Haan MC, et al. Evolution of screen detected small (6–9 mm) polyps after a 3-year surveillance interval: assessment of growth with CT colonography compared with histopathology. Am J Gastroenterol. 2015;110:1682–90.CrossRefPubMed Tutein Nolthenius CJ, Boellaard TN, de Haan MC, et al. Evolution of screen detected small (6–9 mm) polyps after a 3-year surveillance interval: assessment of growth with CT colonography compared with histopathology. Am J Gastroenterol. 2015;110:1682–90.CrossRefPubMed
60.
Zurück zum Zitat Spada C, Stoker J, Alarcon O, et al. Clinical indications for computed tomographic colonography: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) Guideline. Eur Radiol. 2015;25:331–45.CrossRefPubMed Spada C, Stoker J, Alarcon O, et al. Clinical indications for computed tomographic colonography: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) Guideline. Eur Radiol. 2015;25:331–45.CrossRefPubMed
61.
Zurück zum Zitat Knudsen AB, Zauber AG, Rutter CM, et al. Estimation of benefits, burden, and harms of colorectal cancer screening strategies: modeling study for the US Preventive Services Task Force. JAMA. 2016;315:2595–609.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Knudsen AB, Zauber AG, Rutter CM, et al. Estimation of benefits, burden, and harms of colorectal cancer screening strategies: modeling study for the US Preventive Services Task Force. JAMA. 2016;315:2595–609.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadaten
Titel
CT colonography: role in FOBT-based screening programs for colorectal cancer
verfasst von
Lapo Sali
Grazia Grazzini
Mario Mascalchi
Publikationsdatum
26.04.2017
Verlag
Springer Japan
Erschienen in
Clinical Journal of Gastroenterology / Ausgabe 4/2017
Print ISSN: 1865-7257
Elektronische ISSN: 1865-7265
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12328-017-0744-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2017

Clinical Journal of Gastroenterology 4/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.