Current and future strategies to monitor and manage coagulation in ECMO patients

Firstly, anticoagulants utilized in ECMO are summarized, including their benefits and limitations to provide a comprehensive viewpoint for future research. In addition, this review takes a fresh view on anticoagulant monitoring strategies by classifying them according to their purpose (Fig. 2).

Anticoagulants commonly used for anticoagulation in ECMO patients include heparin, direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs) (bivalirudin, argatroban, lepirudin), factor Xa inhibitors (danaparoid and fondaparinux), direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) (DTI (dabigatran), Xabans (rivaroxaban, apixaban, darexaban, edoxaban, and betrixaban)), factor-XIIa inhibitors, nafamostat mesylate (NM), and warfarin so that heparin and DTIs are the most prevalent anticoagulants used in ECMO patients. Although heparin is the most commonly used in clinical applications, heparin resistance is a major concern in ECMO. It is defined as a situation where the ability of heparin to inhibit thrombin (factor IIa) and fibrin formation is reduced such that the correlation between dose and response is lost and increasing the heparin dosage will not result in the desired anticoagulation effect [7, 15]. Moreover, its usage is associated with the rare but life threatening immune-mediated disorder Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), specified by thrombocytopenia and a paradoxical prothrombotic state in heparin treatment [16]. Alternative anticoagulants, on the other hand, offer excellent potential for usage in HIT patients, but present some other challenges. The working mechanism, advantages, disadvantages, and other aspects of different anticoagulants used during ECMO support including heparin and its alternatives are provided in Table 1.

UFH is the most frequently used anticoagulant in patients undergoing ECMO due to its advantages including its low cost, titratability, and easy reversibility by protamine. Heparin inhibits thrombin by binding to antithrombin (AT). AT has low anticoagulation activity but when conjugated with heparin, its anticoagulation activity increases 1000–2000-fold [17]. Heparin resistance is the main concern in ECMO, which is defined as a situation where the heparin ability to inhibit thrombin and fibrin formation is reduced so that heparin dosage response is not correlated with the injected amount of heparin and increasing the heparin dosage will not result in the desired anticoagulation effect [7]. More heparin injections are required under these conditions to achieve desired activated clotting time (ACT) values, which may result in bleeding. The situation is significantly worse in newborns as their AT level is lower than that of adults [18].

Heparin use is associated with immune-mediated side effects known HIT and specified by thrombocytopenia and a paradoxical prothrombotic state in heparin treatment. While it has been reported that HIT is a rare phenomenon in neonates [19, 20], it occurs in 0.8–7% of the adult ECMO patients [21, 22]. It has been demonstrated that 30–60% of HIT patients experience thrombotic complications [23, 24]. Therefore, in order to address the aforementioned issues, it is necessary to provide alternative anticoagulants to heparin, such as bivalirudin [20].

DTIs, unlike UFH, do not rely on AT to act as an anticoagulant, but instead they directly inhibit both free circulating and fibrin-bound thrombin. Bivalirudin is a reversible thrombin-binding synthetic bivalent analogue of hirudin with excellent pharmacological profiles [25]. Since bivalirudin can inhibit plasma thrombin, clot-bound thrombin, and collagen-induced platelet activation without forming a complex with the cofactor AT III, it has a much higher bioavailability than heparin [26, 27]. It has a short half-life of approximately 25 min in patients with normal renal function, making it suitable for rapid titration [28, 29]. It is mostly metabolized by the liver through proteolytic cleavage, but it also partially cleared by the kidney (20%), so the dose should be adjusted during renal dysfunction as it prolongs its half-life [30, 31]. Bivalirudin has been used to prevent clotting during ECMO in both HIT patients and non-HIT patients [32‐34]. It is administered intravenously in doses ranging from 0.025 to 0.48 mg/kg/hour, with an action time of 2–4 min [35]. Bivalirudin efficacy has been shown to correlate well with both ACT and aPTT results [36, 37]. The researchers also compared the bivalirudin and UHF aPTT results and discovered that using bivalirudin yields more stable aPTT results [34, 38]. There is no unified approach for bivalirudin infusion, so it can be used with or without an initial bolus of bivalirudin with initial loading ranging from 0.04 to 2.5 mg/kg followed by continuous infusion [34, 39]. In particular, Koster et al. used bivalirudin for HIT patients with a bolus of 0.5 mg/kg followed by a continuous infusion of 0.5 mg/kg/h to maintain an ACT of 200–220 s [33]. In another study, Jyoti et al. [39], were able to achieve a target ACT of 200–220 s with an injection rate of 0.1–0.2 mg/kg/h and no bolus dosage of bivalirudin. The dose of bivalirudin is maintained at 0.03–0.2 mg/kg/h to maintain therapeutic targets, with [19, 32, 33] or without [34] an additional initial amount of 0.5 mg/kg. In a meta-analysis, it has been reported that in-hospital mortality, major bleeding events and pump-related thrombosis were less frequent in DTI compared to heparin [40].

There are some considerations before bivalirudin usage in ECMO. First, it affects the renal clearance process in patients with impaired renal function, resulting in drug accumulation. Therefore, lower dosage of bivalirudin is required for patients with renal dysfunction [41]. Moreover, since bivalirudin is rapidly metabolized where the blood is in stasis, it is not a viable option in venoarterial ECMO [42]. Another limitation of the bivalirudin is that there is no antidote in case of overdose or bleeding, which makes bleeding management challenging. Bivalirudin resistance may exist in the absence of a clear etiology [43]. APTT, ECT, and plasma-diluted thrombin time tests are typically used for monitoring anticoagulant effect of bivalirudin [44, 45].

Argatroban is a synthetic direct thrombin inhibitor with a half-life of 39–51 min [46] and is not recommended for patients with severe hepatic dysfunction since it is metabolized in the liver, therefore, renal failure is not a concern. One of the primary issues in ECLS that limits DTIs adoption is a lack of pharmacologic antidote. However, due to their short half-lives, if bleeding occurs, the injection of DTIs can be stopped or reduced to stop the bleeding. Argatroban has been utilised as an alternative to UHF in cases of suspected HIT in adults, pediatrics, and neonates on ECMO. Its maintenance dose is 0.1–0.65 \(\mathrm{\mu g}/\mathrm{kg}/\mathrm{min}\) [47, 48], and centres use a 100–200 \(\mathrm{\mu g}/\mathrm{kg}\) initial bolus dose [35].

Fondaparinux is a factor Xa inhibitor that has been indicated to be effective as an anticoagulant agent in severe acute HIT [49]. Parlar et al. [50] used fondaparinux daily subcutaneous injections (2.5 mg per day) in ECMO loop for a patient with HIT and found no adverse effects. Compared with DTIs which require the aPTT or the ECT monitoring methods, anti-FXa assays are more reliable for fondaparinux monitoring since anti-FXa assays do not rely on patient factors. To delineate, the aPTT and the ECT are influenced by the prothrombin level of the HIT patients which is often low and results in falsely long aPTT and, consequently, in inappropriate dose of the anticoagulant [51].

Nafamostat mesylate is a synthetic serine‐protease inhibitor that inhibits many procoagulant factors, including thrombin, plasmin, trypsin, kallikrein, factors XIIa and Xa [52]. In the literature, there are conflicting findings for the use of NM in ECMO. Lim et al. [53] investigated thromboembolic or bleeding complications during ECMO using heparin and NM. According to their findings, bleeding complications were more common in patients receiving NM, while thromboembolic problems were comparable in both cases. Other studies, on the other hand, claim that it is an appropriate alternative to heparin that reduces the risk of bleeding in ECMO patients [54, 55]. Like other anticoagulants, there is no unified approach for the dosage rate but typically it falls into the range of 0.26–0.93 mg/kg/hr [54‐56].

Warfarin is an oral anticoagulant that inhibits the utilisation of vitamin K (factors II, VII, IX, and X). The main advantage of this method is its ease of administration and reversibility [57]. When patients have been adequately anticoagulated with DTIs and require long-term anticoagulation after the acute period of HIT, they are typically switched to vitamin K antagonists (VKA) such as warfarin and phenprocoumon [58]. Warfarin dosage should be determined based on the patient's response to the drug, and it can be monitored using international normalised ratio (INR) analysis to keep its results in therapeutic range [2, 3, 59]. Lee et al. describe the successful use of ECMO as a bridge-to-recovery therapy in a patient suffering from fatal warfarin-exacerbated DAH [60].

Given the importance of anticoagulant monitoring and dose adjustment, it is vital to determine the appropriate approach for each anticoagulant and its dosage. Partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), anti-factor Xa assay, D-dimer, PT/INR, Full blood counts (FBC), Fibrinogen, ECT, activated clotting time (ACT), and viscoelastic tests (ROTEM/TEG) are discussed in this section. Also, recently developed novel real-time monitoring methods including sound, optical, fluorescent, and electrical measurements methods are presented. Table 2 summarises the sample type, purpose, target range, advantages, and disadvantages of different techniques.

APTT is an anticoagulant monitoring technique that is most commonly used to assess the effect of heparin and bivalirudin [76]. It is defined as the time required for calcium-free plasma to generate clots after being exposed to fibrin-activating reagents and calcium. Clot formation can be detected using a variety of analytical methods, including optical, mechanical, and electrochemical techniques [77]. This method involves combining citrated plasma, a phospholipid, calcium, and a contact pathway activator (silica, celite, kaolin, ellagic acid, polyphenolic acid) to trigger clot formation [78]. The normal range is defined in most laboratories as 25–90 s (an aPTT level of 1.5–2.5 times baseline is recommended for anticoagulation monitoring) but it varies from clinic to clinic and is determined by the instrument and reagents used and it is critical not to extrapolate data from one ECMO centre to another without knowing the method and assay used [79, 80]. Bates et al. investigated the relationship between aPTT and anti-factor Xa assay heparin level using four different automated coagulometers and six commercial aPTT reagents. Their findings revealed that, while there is a good correlation (r = 0.64 to 0.95) between aPTT anti-factor Xa assay results, the aPTT values at 0.3 IU/mL plasma heparin concentration determined by anti-factor Xa assay will range from 48 to 108 s, depending on the instrument and reagent utilised [81].

Another concern with this method is that it can be influenced by parameters, including drugs, hematocrit, acute phase reactants, abnormalities in coagulation factors, high C-reactive protein, hyperbilirubinemia, hyperlipidemia and lupus anticoagulant [82] so that deficiencies in common pathway factors I, II, V, and X, as well as contact pathway components such as high-molecular-weight kininogen, prekallikrein, and factors VIII, IX, XI, and XII, and lupus anticoagulants can prolong the aPTT results [78].

Anti-factor Xa is a functional chromogenic assay for coagulation monitoring and evaluating the effective anticoagulant concentration. The anti-Xa assay is specific to heparinoid’s action and is unaffected by deficits in other coagulation factors and can be used with or without exogenous AT. In the former method, the sample is treated with sufficient AT, so that the rate-limiting reagent, which is heparin, can inhibit Xa and produce a precise measurement of heparin in the patient sample. In this method, a specific amount of coagulation factor Xa conjugated with chromophore and AT is added to patient plasma containing heparin [83]. Following that, as a result of the chromogenic reaction, AT and heparin form an inhibitory complex that inactivates factor Xa. The activated factor X is then introduced to the sample, which cleaves the chromophore compound, and the amount of released chromophore is measured using spectroscopy. As the amount of remaining factor Xa in the sample is inversely proportional to the original amount of heparin, the colour change will be greater as less heparin/AT complex interacts with factor Xa, indicating a lower drug level. The relationship between AT and heparin is critical because, even with a high level of heparin, a deficiency in AT causes more unbound factor Xa, implying lower heparin levels. On the other hand, kits without AT do not add extra AT and give a more precise measurement of in-vivo anticoagulation because the patient's AT and heparin levels are both rate-limiting reagents. However, this approach has the problem of being unable to differentiate between AT deficiency and inadequate heparin [84, 85].

The widely accepted target range for anti-factor Xa levels during ECMO is 0.3–0.7 IU/mL [86, 87]. Unlike the ACT and aPTT methods, this method is unaffected by coagulopathy, thrombocytopenia, or dilution and best represents the overall heparin anticoagulation level. However, some parameters which can occur in patients on ECMO, such as hyperbilirubinemia, haemolysis, lipaemia, hyperlipidemia, and plasma-free haemoglobin affect anti-Xa assay results [88, 89]. Anti-Xa activity was observed to be significantly lower in ECMO samples with plasma free haemoglobin levels of 50 mg/dL or above when compared to normal samples: 0.33 (0.25–0.42) versus 0.4 (0.31–0.48) IU/mL [86, 87, 90]. It was stated that anti-Xa assay correlates better with heparin concentration than ACT and aPTT [91‐93]. Nankervis et al. studied 12 neonates on ECMO to determine the appropriate heparin dosage based on ACT and anti-Xa results. Their findings show a strong correlation between anti-Xa test and heparin dosage (r = 0.75; p < 0.0001), however ACT results do not correlate with either anti-Xa or heparin dosage [94]. Also, in a cohort study, Bembea et al. [95] discovered a moderate correlation between anti-factor Xa results and heparin injection dosage (r = 0.33) in 34 extracorporeal life support (ECLS) pediatric patients, but a poor correlation with ACT (r = 0.02) and aPTT (r = 0.17) for all patients. It is worth noting that patients on ECMO who are being monitored by anti-Xa levels compared to ACT have fewer blood draws for monitoring, a longer duration between circuit changes, and lower transfusions and dosages of activated factor VII [93, 96].

While anti-factor Xa assay can measure the heparin effect, it cannot reflect other coagulation parameters or the patient's overall hemostatic condition [97]. In fact, the anti-Xa method only measures inhibition, not the amount of fibrin and thrombin produced in the patient's body. Moreover, compared with ACT and aPTT, anti-factor Xa assay more expensive and not easily accessible in all laboratories and hospitals and its results are affected by hypertriglyceridemia (triglyceride level > 360 mg/dL) and hyperbilirubinemia (bilirubin level > 6.6 mg/dL) [98].

ACT is the widely used and well-established point-of-care (POC) method for anticoagulation monitoring. In this method, whole blood is transferred to a tube coated with various activators, such as glass, celite or kaoline, ellagic acid, diatomaceous earth, silica, calcium, and phospholipids, to stimulate the contact activation pathway and the coagulation response (fibrin clot formation) is measured over time in seconds. The mobility of a magnet during clot formation, or the variations in the velocity of blood movement as it begins to clot, is measured and recorded over time. When compared to laboratory-based methods, the advantage of ACT is that it can be conducted as a whole-blood test on a bedside machine, requires a little sample volume, is low-cost, and can be done by unacquainted individuals [99]. The amount of sample required for testing varies between 10 \(\mathrm{\mu L}\) and 2 mL depending on the ACT machine. However, several factors including hemodilution, platelet dysfunction, hypothermia, anemia, hypofibrinogenemia, thrombocytopenia, platelet inhibitors (e.g., GP IIb/IIIa), and coagulation factor deficiencies can affect ACT results [100, 101].

There are currently no standardized target range for ACT, however the range of 140–240 s are commonly used in clinical practice [7, 102]. The aPTT approach works well for Unfractionated heparin (UFH) values between 0.1 and 1 U/mL, but the ACT method works better for UFH concentrations between 1 and 5 U/mL. Therefore, based on the heparin level used in ECMO, ACT shows a poor correlation with heparin concentration, while aPTT yields acceptable results in neonates and adults [103‐105]. Several studies have been conducted to investigate the relationship between ACT, aPTT, and anti-Xa activity [106, 107]. Khaja et al. discovered that in neonates, aPTT has a stronger correlation with anti-XA than ACT [105]. Although ACT is a good indicator for high heparin concentrations in cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), low-range ACT (ACT-LR) was proposed for use in the lower heparin dosage range (150–200 IU/kg) used in ECMO [61, 105]. It is worth noting that most hospitals use ACT or ACT-LR methods for routine coagulation monitoring in ECMO.

The D-dimer protein is the cleaved product of the fibrinolysis process. Therefore, the presence of D-dimers in the blood signals clot lysis. D-dimer levels are higher in patients with disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) caused by sepsis, deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism, or other thrombotic disorders. The D-dimer level, which describes the cross-linked fibrin degradation products generated by reactive fibrinolysis, has also been shown to be a marker for determining oxygenator functionality and tracking oxygenator malfunction [108]. In a retrospective study it was found that D-dimer level increased significantly within 3 days before exchange from 15 [9‐20] to 30 [21‐35] mg/dL (P = 0.002) and declined significantly within 1 day thereafter to 13 [7‐17] mg/dL (P = 0.003) [109]. Although the oxygen transferred rate is commonly used to calculate the exchange time for the oxygenator, the D-dimer level, and particularly a steadily increasing level in the absence of an alternative explanation, is an alternative method for calculating the appropriate time for membrane exchange.

Prothrombin time (PT) is one of the main clinical coagulation monitoring methods. Prothrombin is a protein made by the liver that aids in blood clotting formation. This method involves adding thromboplastin (a mixture of tissue factor, calcium, and phospholipid) to patient plasma and measuring the time it takes for the plasma to clot [110]. The PT results are sensitive to thromboplastin components so using different thromboplastin reagents results in different Prothrombin times, even with the same plasma sample. Therefore, to have consistent and unified results, the World Health Organization (WHO) proposed the international normalized ratio (INR), which has since become the standard method for PT reporting [111]. In this way, INR represents the ratio of PT divided by a control PT value determined by using a WHO-developed international reference thromboplastin reagent. The target INR for a heparin-treated patient should be less than 1.5. Researchers also discovered that the PT/INR value for other anticoagulants including VKA (e.g., warfarin), DTIs, or the oral Factor Xa inhibitors, is in the range of 2–3 or higher [112]. DTIs interfere with the prothrombin time and deficits in common factors I, II, V, and X can prolong PT results [113]. INR was developed to account for discrepancies in laboratory PT reagents and to standardise vitamin K antagonists (VKA), such as warfarin therapy monitoring [78].

Ecarin is a metalloprotease isolated from the venom of a saw-scaled viper echis carinatus and a specific activator of prothrombin that can be used to measure the activity of DTIs, such as argatroban and dabigatran [114, 115]. In this method, clotting time is measured after the addition of ecarin solution to diluted plasma. The conversion of fibrinogen to fibrin is used to measure the proteolytic activity of non-inhibited meizothrombin. ECT was successfully implemented by Teruya et al. for bivalirudin concentration monitoring in ECMO [62]. Although this method is not widely used in ECMO, it has been demonstrated that ECT results have a strong correlation with bivalirudin concentration [37]. Furthermore, Alouidor et al. recently proposed a point-of-care ECT analysis device with a good correlation with bivalirudin and dabigatran concentrations that only requires 5 \(\mathrm{\mu L}\) of whole blood [116]. Finally, it seems that more research into this approach in ECMO settings with various anticoagulants is required.

Thromboelastography (TEG) and rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) are point-of-care viscoelastic tests used in ECMO patients to monitor coagulation in the presence of a various stimulating agents [117‐119]. Unlike other methods, such as ACT, aPTT, and PT/INR, which only show the endpoint (whether or not a thrombus has formed), this assay can reveal information about different aspects of the coagulation cascade, the clot formation dynamics, clot strength and clot lysis, and fibrinolysis [120‐122]. The dynamic changes in the viscoelasticity of whole blood during clotting under low shear stress are recorded. A torsion wire or pin is used to measure the strength of the formed clot. The wire in TEG is stationary and the cup oscillates while in ROTEM, the cup is stationary while the pin oscillates [123]. The oscillations are hampered as the clot forms, and both the TEG and ROTEM devices detect and convert changes in oscillations into the numerous measurements evaluated. In this method, a pair of samples with and without heparinase addition are tested to investigate hemostasis in the presence of UFH [124]. The effectiveness of UFH is then determined by comparing the clotting time in both samples, which is a good indicator in cases where heparin resistance is a concern. The analysis duration for different parameters varies, so coagulation factors can be assessed in 5 min, and fibrinolysis analysis takes 60–90 min. While viscoelastic tests provide useful information about the coagulation system, it does not provide data on the level of von Willebrand factor (VWF), which is a good indicator of potential bleeding or hemostasis condition [125]. Although the use of viscoelastic tests in ECMO patients has increased in recent years, it is still not widely available in most centres [126] which can be due to a lack of generalised therapeutic ranges in the neonatal population [17].

This section presents recently developed novel real-time monitoring methods such as sound, optical, fluorescent, and electrical measurements. Furthermore, a brief explanation of each approach and its application in ECMO circuits is provided.

Due to the high shear rates in the ECMO pump, it is one of the suspect points for clot formation. Measuring the sound generated by the pump is a promising method for detecting clot formation in the pump and preventing potential patient and pump damage. Fuchs et al. [127] discovered a link between sound signals and clots in the pump's inlet and outlet while using ECMO. The frequency spectrum changes while blood clots move through the pump at different pump speeds, which is a reliable indicator of clot formation inside the pump (Fig. 3). It has been illustrated that the acoustic analysis method is a low-cost, simple, and easy-to-access method that can provide reliable results and detect thrombosis formation in the pump in the early stages of thrombosis formation. Although this is a non-invasive technology, it can only be used to monitor thrombosis in the pump because the analysis is based on the sound made by the pump [128].

Optical methods are non-invasive and real-time thrombus monitoring techniques that detect the light intensity scattered by blood at different wavelengths [129]. Fujiwara et al. [130] utilized a hyperspectral imaging (HSI) technique to visualize thrombosis formation within a levitated centrifugal pump, which is commonly used in ECMO devices (Fig. 4). Two groups of pigs were employed in this study undergoing ECMO and LVAD. The purpose of this study was to detect thrombosis inside the centrifugal ECMO pump and the source of the thrombosis. In this way, multiple real-time images of the inside of the pump were acquired with the HS camera over the wavelength range of 608–752 nm. Within 24 h of blood circulation, thrombosis was discovered, arising from both the inside and outside of the pump. Thrombosis generated outside the pump was identified to form around the inlet cannula and junction between the pump inlet and tubing. It is worth noting that optical methods have some limitations. First, the installation and adjustment of the distance for hyperspectral camera focusing should be considered. Furthermore, due to the limitations on bending radius, optical fibres are fragile.

In another study, Morita et al. [129] used a micro-optical monitoring method with an extracorporeal circuit to detect thrombus in fresh porcine blood. Their setup composed of two micro-optical thrombus sensors which detect scattered light at two wavelengths, 660 and 855 nm. One optical sensor was placed on the rotary pump (to monitor clotting) and the other on the flow channel (less suspicious thrombus formation point, as reference point). In this vein, each LED emits 660 and 855 nm light into the blood flow, which is absorbed or scattered by blood components (most notably red blood cells (RBCs)) and then detected by a photodiode. To monitor thrombus formation in the pump, the ratio of light intensity at each wavelength for both sensors was eventually measured. They also depicted that the proposed micro-optical sensor has no installation limitations and allows researchers to install additional micro-sensors at various points where thrombus formation is suspected.

Fluorescence microscopy is another monitoring method for thrombin formation, which measures the onset of thrombus formation, which produces fibrin in the blood. By fluorescently labelling fibrinogen, it is possible to evaluate the microscopic clot formation process [131]. Therefore, the clotting time can be calculated by measuring the variation and distribution of fluorescent intensity over time and, consequently, the influence of heparin concentration on blood clotting time. Considering that high shear rate regions are more suspect for clot formation, Sun et al. [132] utilized a whole blood flow cytometry assay to measure platelet activation in a fresh human blood sample in the centrifugal pump and oxygenator in the ECMO circuit. It was found that platelet activation and adhesion on fibrinogen increases after 4 h of running ECMO which can result in thrombosis formation. On the other hand, GPIbα and GPVI platelet receptors population decreases over time weakening platelet adhesion to collagen and VWF, resulting in bleeding complications (Fig. 5).

Electrical impedance measurements can be used to monitor blood coagulation in ECMO systems. Based on single or multiple-frequency electrical impedance measurements, it has been demonstrated that there is a relationship between thrombus formation and electrical resistivity/permittivity [133]. Red blood cells (RBCs) have phospholipid on their surfaces, they can activate factor IX causing coagulation. Therefore, it can be deduced that RBC aggregability is related to thrombus formation. Using multiple-frequency electrical impedance spectroscopy, Li et al. [134] investigated RBC aggregability in an extracorporeal circulation system with pulsatile flow. Their results revealed that in coagulating blood, RBCs aggregability decreases, indicating thrombus formation. ACT and fibrinogen were examined to assess the relationship between aggregability and blood coagulation, and their results show a decrease in their level over time, similar to RBC aggregability (Fig. 6). It is also worth noting that electrical impedance measurement can be readily applied to low-cost, compact, and simple POC blood coagulation testing devices. However, the limitation of this method is that it is invasive because the electrodes must come into contact with the blood.

It is essential to find appropriate anticoagulants and related monitoring methods to balance between thrombosis and bleeding with ECMO. Factor XII inhibitors are promising anticoagulant agents which are currently under investigation in in-vivo ECMO models. It has been demonstrated that coating the surface with FXIIa‐directed corn trypsin inhibitor prevents blood clotting when catheters are inserted into rabbit jugular veins [135]. Also, it has been illustrated that knocking out FXII enhances the time to catheter occlusion. Recently, researchers found that human antibody 3F7 binds to FXIIa, preventing blood clotting within the ECMO circuit [136]. Antibodies have an advantage over other anticoagulants in that they do not increase the risk of bleeding. Although it has only been tested in animal ECMO circuits, FXII-directed therapy appears to be a promising method for clot prevention on ECMO support [137].

It has recently been demonstrated in a variety of clinical settings that using low-dose anticoagulation is an effective strategy to decrease bleeding complications and enhance survival rate while patients are receiving ECMO, as opposed to when a standard dosage is used [138, 139]. Although thrombosis is still a concern, recent studies suggest that there is no difference in thrombosis complications and hospital mortality between low-dose and therapeutic anticoagulant dosage [140]. While several studies have now demonstrated the benefits of using low-dose anticoagulation in adults to reduce bleeding while still preventing major thrombosis, there is still a lack of research on the efficacy and safety of using low-dose anticoagulation in pediatric patients undergoing ECMO. As a result, extensive clinical research and trials are required to determine the optimal low anticoagulant dosage in both adults and pediatric patients.

In another approach, shear-sensitive drug delivery systems may protect the ECMO circuit from coagulation and thrombosis formation by modifying commonly used generalized drug delivery which results in bleeding complications. Localized drug delivery method is a novel approach which relies on material deformation or disaggregation to elicit drug release [141]. Nanoparticles can be used for nanotherapeutic targeting drug delivery systems that, like platelets, can activate (rupture) under high shear stress and release the drug at the site of action to prevent blood clotting [142]. This characteristic enables the development of shear-sensitive nanoparticles capable of releasing antithrombosis drugs only at high shear stress points, such as the cannulas, pump and oxygenator while remaining intact at lower shear rates. This is beneficial because it not only reduces the amount of anticoagulant used but also aids in localized drug delivery, which only releases the drug where it is required, potentially resulting in less bleeding.

Recently, an anticoagulant-free method based on surface modification of the ECMO circuit was developed to decrease bleeding and thrombosis complications [143]. This method is based on the application of appropriate surface coating techniques to make the surface of the tubing, membrane oxygenator, and pump biocompatible and avoid thrombosis formation. Several innovative approaches, such as polymer coating, nitric oxide (NO) coating, and tethered liquid perfluorocarbon coating, are presented that can improve ECMO hemocompatibility. When considering surface coating technologies, it is also crucial to consider gas exchange rate, pressure drop, and shear stress inside the membrane oxygenator. These features must be incorporated to increase the stability and durability of the materials suitable for biocompatible surface coatings.

Various real-time analysis methods for thrombosis monitoring are presented in this review. Although these techniques do not often show the coagulation status quantitatively, there are low-cost, compact, and user-friendly POC equipment available that can be used at the patient's bedside. POC diagnostics are promising techniques for evaluating anticoagulation impact when compared to conventional standard laboratory-based assays [144]. Laboratory-based testing is time-consuming, costly, and user-dependent. POC devices have several advantages, including reliability, quick response, and reduced sample consumption [145]. Some conventional coagulation monitoring methods, such as d-dimer, aPTT, PT/INR, and ECT, have recently been developed as POC devices [146]. Although the benefits of POC devices are well established, and various POC devices have been introduced, there is always a need to study novel devices to improve the accuracy and reliability of the results. Microfluidic devices, in particular, can be exploited for anticoagulation monitoring due to benefits such as low cost, simple operation, quick analysis, and reduced sample consumption. Furthermore, because microfluidic systems are high throughput, several samples can be analysed simultaneously with a small amount of sample in a single integrated platform [147]. Although microfluidic platforms have been developed and are currently being used in research laboratories, they are rarely marketed. Commercialisation of low-cost and high-throughput microfluidic devices for monitoring the coagulation pathway would provide unique advantages in the clinical management of patients receiving ECMO.