Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Skeletal Radiology 11/2021

15.06.2021 | Review Article

Current concepts of spondylosis and posterior spinal motion preservation for radiologists

verfasst von: Jack Porrino, Aditya Rao, Jay Moran, Annie Wang, Jonathan Grauer, Andrew Haims, Kimia Kani

Erschienen in: Skeletal Radiology | Ausgabe 11/2021

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Spinal fusion is performed to eliminate motion at a degenerated or unstable segment. However, this is associated with loss of motion at the fused levels and increased stress on adjacent levels. Motion-preserving implants have been designed in effort to mitigate the limitations of fusion. This review will focus on posterior spinal motion-preserving technologies. In the cervical spine, laminoplasty is a posterior motion-preserving procedure used in the management of myelopathy/cord compression. In the lumbar spine, motion-sparing systems include interspinous process devices (also referred to as interspinous process spacers or distraction devices), posterior dynamic stabilization devices (also referred to as pedicle screw/rod fixation-based systems), and posterior element replacement systems (also referred to as total facet replacement devices). Knowledge of the intended physiologic purpose, hardware utilized, and complications is important in the assessment of imaging in those who have undergone posterior motion preservation procedures.
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Murtagh R, Castellvi AE. Motion preservation surgery in the spine. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2014;24:287–94.PubMedCrossRef Murtagh R, Castellvi AE. Motion preservation surgery in the spine. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2014;24:287–94.PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Tyagi V, Strom R, Tanweer O, Frempong-Boadu AK. Posterior dynamic stabilization of the lumbar spine review of biomechanical and clinical studies. Bull Hosp Jt Dis. 2013;2018(76):100–4. Tyagi V, Strom R, Tanweer O, Frempong-Boadu AK. Posterior dynamic stabilization of the lumbar spine review of biomechanical and clinical studies. Bull Hosp Jt Dis. 2013;2018(76):100–4.
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Gomleksiz C, Sasani M, Oktenoglu T, Ozer AF. A short history of posterior dynamic stabilization. Adv Orthop. 2012;2012:629698. Gomleksiz C, Sasani M, Oktenoglu T, Ozer AF. A short history of posterior dynamic stabilization. Adv Orthop. 2012;2012:629698.
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Harrop JS, Youssef JA, Maltenfort M, Vorwald P, Jabbour P, Bono CM, et al. Lumbar adjacent segment degeneration and disease after arthrodesis and total disc arthroplasty. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008;33(15):1701–7.CrossRef Harrop JS, Youssef JA, Maltenfort M, Vorwald P, Jabbour P, Bono CM, et al. Lumbar adjacent segment degeneration and disease after arthrodesis and total disc arthroplasty. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008;33(15):1701–7.CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat McAfee P, Khoo LT, Pimenta L, Capuccino A, Sengoz A, Coric D, et al. Treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis with a total posterior arthroplasty prosthesis: implant description, surgical technique, and a prospective report on 29 patients. Neurosurg Focus. 2007;22:E13.PubMedCrossRef McAfee P, Khoo LT, Pimenta L, Capuccino A, Sengoz A, Coric D, et al. Treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis with a total posterior arthroplasty prosthesis: implant description, surgical technique, and a prospective report on 29 patients. Neurosurg Focus. 2007;22:E13.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Anekstein Y, Floman Y, Smorgick Y, Rand N, Millgram M, Mirovsky Y. Seven years follow-up for total lumbar facet joint replacement (TOPS) in the management of lumbar spinal stenosis and degenerative spondylolisthesis. Eur Spine J. 2015;24:2306–14.PubMedCrossRef Anekstein Y, Floman Y, Smorgick Y, Rand N, Millgram M, Mirovsky Y. Seven years follow-up for total lumbar facet joint replacement (TOPS) in the management of lumbar spinal stenosis and degenerative spondylolisthesis. Eur Spine J. 2015;24:2306–14.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Bydon M, De la Garza-Ramos R, Abt NB, Gokaslan ZL, Wolinsky J-P, Sciubba DM, et al. Impact of smoking on complication and pseudarthrosis rates after single- and 2-level posterolateral fusion of the lumbar spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014;39(21):1765–70.CrossRef Bydon M, De la Garza-Ramos R, Abt NB, Gokaslan ZL, Wolinsky J-P, Sciubba DM, et al. Impact of smoking on complication and pseudarthrosis rates after single- and 2-level posterolateral fusion of the lumbar spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014;39(21):1765–70.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Nachanakian A, El Helou A, Alaywan M. Posterior dynamic stabilization: the interspinous spacer from treatment to prevention. Asian J Neurosurg. 2016;11:87–93.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Nachanakian A, El Helou A, Alaywan M. Posterior dynamic stabilization: the interspinous spacer from treatment to prevention. Asian J Neurosurg. 2016;11:87–93.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Sengupta DK. Dynamic stabilization devices in the treatment of low back pain. Neurol India. 2005;53:466–74.PubMedCrossRef Sengupta DK. Dynamic stabilization devices in the treatment of low back pain. Neurol India. 2005;53:466–74.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Kaner T, Sasani M, Oktenoglu T, Ozer AF. Dynamic stabilization of the spine: a new classification system. Turk Neurosurg. 2010;20:205–15.PubMed Kaner T, Sasani M, Oktenoglu T, Ozer AF. Dynamic stabilization of the spine: a new classification system. Turk Neurosurg. 2010;20:205–15.PubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Audat ZA, Fawareh MD, Radydeh AM, Obeidat MM, Odat MA, Bashaireh KM, et al. Anterior versus posterior approach to treat cervical spondylotic myelopathy, clinical and radiological results with long period of follow-up. SAGE Open Med. 2018;6:2050312118766199.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Audat ZA, Fawareh MD, Radydeh AM, Obeidat MM, Odat MA, Bashaireh KM, et al. Anterior versus posterior approach to treat cervical spondylotic myelopathy, clinical and radiological results with long period of follow-up. SAGE Open Med. 2018;6:2050312118766199.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Pal GP, Sherk HH. The vertical stability of the cervical spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1988;13(5):447–9.CrossRef Pal GP, Sherk HH. The vertical stability of the cervical spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1988;13(5):447–9.CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Koda M, Mochizuki M, Konishi H, Aiba A, Kadota R, Inada T, et al. Comparison of clinical outcomes between laminoplasty, posterior decompression with instrumented fusion, and anterior decompression with fusion for K-line (-) cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Eur Spine J. 2016;25:2294–301.PubMedCrossRef Koda M, Mochizuki M, Konishi H, Aiba A, Kadota R, Inada T, et al. Comparison of clinical outcomes between laminoplasty, posterior decompression with instrumented fusion, and anterior decompression with fusion for K-line (-) cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Eur Spine J. 2016;25:2294–301.PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Hirano Y, Ohara Y, Mizuno J, Itoh Y. History and evolution of laminoplasty. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2018;29:107–13.PubMedCrossRef Hirano Y, Ohara Y, Mizuno J, Itoh Y. History and evolution of laminoplasty. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2018;29:107–13.PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim D, Vaccaro A, Dickman C, Cho D, Lee S, Kim I. Surgical anatomy and techniques to the spine. Second: Saunders; 2013. Kim D, Vaccaro A, Dickman C, Cho D, Lee S, Kim I. Surgical anatomy and techniques to the spine. Second: Saunders; 2013.
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Shen F, Samartzis D, Fessler R. Textbook of the cervical spine. First: Saunders; 2014. Shen F, Samartzis D, Fessler R. Textbook of the cervical spine. First: Saunders; 2014.
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Jandial R. Core techniques in operative neurosurgery. 2nd ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2019. p. 720. Jandial R. Core techniques in operative neurosurgery. 2nd ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2019. p. 720.
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Hale JJ, Gruson KI, Spivak JM. Laminoplasty: a review of its role in compressive cervical myelopathy. Spine J. 2006;6:289S-298S.PubMedCrossRef Hale JJ, Gruson KI, Spivak JM. Laminoplasty: a review of its role in compressive cervical myelopathy. Spine J. 2006;6:289S-298S.PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Seng C, Tow BPB, Siddiqui MA, Srivastava A, Wang L, Yew AKS, et al. Surgically treated cervical myelopathy: a functional outcome comparison study between multilevel anterior cervical decompression fusion with instrumentation and posterior laminoplasty. Spine J. 2013;13:723–31.PubMedCrossRef Seng C, Tow BPB, Siddiqui MA, Srivastava A, Wang L, Yew AKS, et al. Surgically treated cervical myelopathy: a functional outcome comparison study between multilevel anterior cervical decompression fusion with instrumentation and posterior laminoplasty. Spine J. 2013;13:723–31.PubMedCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Xu L, Sun H, Li Z, Liu X, Xu G. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus posterior laminoplasty for multilevel cervical myelopathy: a meta-analysis. Int J Surg. 2017;48:247–53.PubMedCrossRef Xu L, Sun H, Li Z, Liu X, Xu G. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus posterior laminoplasty for multilevel cervical myelopathy: a meta-analysis. Int J Surg. 2017;48:247–53.PubMedCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Imagama S, Matsuyama Y, Yukawa Y, Kawakami N, Kamiya M, Kanemura T, et al. C5 palsy after cervical laminoplasty: a multicentre study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010;92:393–400.PubMedCrossRef Imagama S, Matsuyama Y, Yukawa Y, Kawakami N, Kamiya M, Kanemura T, et al. C5 palsy after cervical laminoplasty: a multicentre study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010;92:393–400.PubMedCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee JS, Son DW, Lee SH, Kim DH, Lee SW, Song GS. The predictable factors of the postoperative kyphotic change of sagittal alignment of the cervical spine after the laminoplasty. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2017;60:577–83.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Lee JS, Son DW, Lee SH, Kim DH, Lee SW, Song GS. The predictable factors of the postoperative kyphotic change of sagittal alignment of the cervical spine after the laminoplasty. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2017;60:577–83.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Cao J, Zhang J, Yang D, Yang L, Shen Y. Multivariate analysis of factors associated with kyphotic deformity after laminoplasty in cervical spondylotic myelopathy patients without preoperative kyphotic alignment. Sci Rep. 2017;7:43443.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Cao J, Zhang J, Yang D, Yang L, Shen Y. Multivariate analysis of factors associated with kyphotic deformity after laminoplasty in cervical spondylotic myelopathy patients without preoperative kyphotic alignment. Sci Rep. 2017;7:43443.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Dugoni DE, Mancarella C, Landi A, Tarantino R, Ruggeri AG, Delfini R. Post laminoplasty cervical kyphosis-Case report. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2014;5:853–7.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Dugoni DE, Mancarella C, Landi A, Tarantino R, Ruggeri AG, Delfini R. Post laminoplasty cervical kyphosis-Case report. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2014;5:853–7.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Hosono N, Yonenobu K, Ono K. Neck and shoulder pain after laminoplasty. A noticeable complication Spine. 1996;21:1969–73.PubMed Hosono N, Yonenobu K, Ono K. Neck and shoulder pain after laminoplasty. A noticeable complication Spine. 1996;21:1969–73.PubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Hosono N, Sakaura H, Mukai Y, Yoshikawa H. The source of axial pain after cervical laminoplasty-C7 is more crucial than deep extensor muscles. Spine. 2007;32:2985–8.PubMedCrossRef Hosono N, Sakaura H, Mukai Y, Yoshikawa H. The source of axial pain after cervical laminoplasty-C7 is more crucial than deep extensor muscles. Spine. 2007;32:2985–8.PubMedCrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Iizuka H, Iizuka Y, Nakagawa Y, Nakajima T, Toda N, Shimegi A, et al. Interlaminar bony fusion after cervical laminoplasty: its characteristics and relationship with clinical results. Spine. 2006;31:644–7.PubMedCrossRef Iizuka H, Iizuka Y, Nakagawa Y, Nakajima T, Toda N, Shimegi A, et al. Interlaminar bony fusion after cervical laminoplasty: its characteristics and relationship with clinical results. Spine. 2006;31:644–7.PubMedCrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Heller JG, Edwards CC, Murakami H, Rodts GE. Laminoplasty versus laminectomy and fusion for multilevel cervical myelopathy: an independent matched cohort analysis. Spine. 2001;26:1330–6.PubMedCrossRef Heller JG, Edwards CC, Murakami H, Rodts GE. Laminoplasty versus laminectomy and fusion for multilevel cervical myelopathy: an independent matched cohort analysis. Spine. 2001;26:1330–6.PubMedCrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Richards JC, Majumdar S, Lindsey DP, Beaupré GS, Yerby SA. The treatment mechanism of an interspinous process implant for lumbar neurogenic intermittent claudication. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005;30(7):744–9.CrossRef Richards JC, Majumdar S, Lindsey DP, Beaupré GS, Yerby SA. The treatment mechanism of an interspinous process implant for lumbar neurogenic intermittent claudication. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005;30(7):744–9.CrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Bono CM, Vaccaro AR. Interspinous process devices in the lumbar spine. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2007;20:255–61.PubMedCrossRef Bono CM, Vaccaro AR. Interspinous process devices in the lumbar spine. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2007;20:255–61.PubMedCrossRef
38.
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Tuschel A, Chavanne A, Eder C, Meissl M, Becker P, Ogon M. Implant survival analysis and failure modes of the X-Stop interspinous distraction device. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013;38(21):1826–31.CrossRef Tuschel A, Chavanne A, Eder C, Meissl M, Becker P, Ogon M. Implant survival analysis and failure modes of the X-Stop interspinous distraction device. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013;38(21):1826–31.CrossRef
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen X-L, Guan L, Liu Y-Z, Yang J-C, Wang W-L, Hai Y. Interspinous dynamic stabilization adjacent to fusion versus double-segment fusion for treatment of lumbar degenerative disease with a minimum follow-up of three years. Int Orthop. 2016;40:1275–83.PubMedCrossRef Chen X-L, Guan L, Liu Y-Z, Yang J-C, Wang W-L, Hai Y. Interspinous dynamic stabilization adjacent to fusion versus double-segment fusion for treatment of lumbar degenerative disease with a minimum follow-up of three years. Int Orthop. 2016;40:1275–83.PubMedCrossRef
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Kong C, Lu S, Hai Y, Zang L. Biomechanical effect of interspinous dynamic stabilization adjacent to single-level fusion on range of motion of the transition segment and the adjacent segment. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2015;30:355–9.CrossRef Kong C, Lu S, Hai Y, Zang L. Biomechanical effect of interspinous dynamic stabilization adjacent to single-level fusion on range of motion of the transition segment and the adjacent segment. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2015;30:355–9.CrossRef
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Che W, Chen Q, Ma Y-Q, Jiang Y-Q, Yuan W, Zhou X-G, et al. Single-level rigid fixation combined with coflex: a biomechanical study. Med Sci Monit. 2016;22:1022–7.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Che W, Chen Q, Ma Y-Q, Jiang Y-Q, Yuan W, Zhou X-G, et al. Single-level rigid fixation combined with coflex: a biomechanical study. Med Sci Monit. 2016;22:1022–7.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Kumar N, Shah SM, Ng YH, Pannierselvam VK, Dasde S, Shen L. Role of coflex as an adjunct to decompression for symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis. Asian Spine J. 2014;8:161–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Kumar N, Shah SM, Ng YH, Pannierselvam VK, Dasde S, Shen L. Role of coflex as an adjunct to decompression for symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis. Asian Spine J. 2014;8:161–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Bae HW, Davis RJ, Lauryssen C, Leary S, Maislin G, Musacchio MJ. Three-year follow-up of the prospective, randomized, controlled trial of coflex interlaminar stabilization vs instrumented fusion in patients with lumbar stenosis. Neurosurgery. 2016;79:169–81.PubMedCrossRef Bae HW, Davis RJ, Lauryssen C, Leary S, Maislin G, Musacchio MJ. Three-year follow-up of the prospective, randomized, controlled trial of coflex interlaminar stabilization vs instrumented fusion in patients with lumbar stenosis. Neurosurgery. 2016;79:169–81.PubMedCrossRef
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Yuan W, Su Q-J, Liu T, Yang J-C, Kang N, Guan L, et al. Evaluation of coflex interspinous stabilization following decompression compared with decompression and posterior lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of lumbar degenerative disease: a minimum 5-year follow-up study. J Clin Neurosci. 2017;35:24–9.PubMedCrossRef Yuan W, Su Q-J, Liu T, Yang J-C, Kang N, Guan L, et al. Evaluation of coflex interspinous stabilization following decompression compared with decompression and posterior lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of lumbar degenerative disease: a minimum 5-year follow-up study. J Clin Neurosci. 2017;35:24–9.PubMedCrossRef
48.
Zurück zum Zitat Richter A, Schütz C, Hauck M, Halm H. Does an interspinous device (coflex) improve the outcome of decompressive surgery in lumbar spinal stenosis? One-year follow up of a prospective case control study of 60 patients. Eur Spine J. 2010;19:283–9.PubMedCrossRef Richter A, Schütz C, Hauck M, Halm H. Does an interspinous device (coflex) improve the outcome of decompressive surgery in lumbar spinal stenosis? One-year follow up of a prospective case control study of 60 patients. Eur Spine J. 2010;19:283–9.PubMedCrossRef
49.
Zurück zum Zitat Shabat S, Miller LE, Block JE, Gepstein R. Minimally invasive treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis with a novel interspinous spacer. Clin Interv Aging. 2011;6:227–33.PubMedPubMedCentral Shabat S, Miller LE, Block JE, Gepstein R. Minimally invasive treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis with a novel interspinous spacer. Clin Interv Aging. 2011;6:227–33.PubMedPubMedCentral
50.
Zurück zum Zitat Tekmyster G, Sayed D, Cairns KD, Raso LJ, Kim C, Block JE. Interspinous process decompression with the superion® spacer for lumbar spinal stenosis: real-world experience from a device registry. Med Devices (Auckl). 2019;12:423–7. Tekmyster G, Sayed D, Cairns KD, Raso LJ, Kim C, Block JE. Interspinous process decompression with the superion® spacer for lumbar spinal stenosis: real-world experience from a device registry. Med Devices (Auckl). 2019;12:423–7.
52.
Zurück zum Zitat Patel VV, Nunley PD, Whang PG, Haley TR, Bradley WD, Davis RP, et al. Superion(®) interspinous spacer for treatment of moderate degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: durable three-year results of a randomized controlled trial. J Pain Res. 2015;8:657–62.PubMedPubMedCentral Patel VV, Nunley PD, Whang PG, Haley TR, Bradley WD, Davis RP, et al. Superion(®) interspinous spacer for treatment of moderate degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: durable three-year results of a randomized controlled trial. J Pain Res. 2015;8:657–62.PubMedPubMedCentral
53.
Zurück zum Zitat Lauryssen C, Jackson RJ, Baron JM, Tallarico RA, Lavelle WF, Deutsch H, et al. Stand-alone interspinous spacer versus decompressive laminectomy for treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2015;12:763–9.PubMedCrossRef Lauryssen C, Jackson RJ, Baron JM, Tallarico RA, Lavelle WF, Deutsch H, et al. Stand-alone interspinous spacer versus decompressive laminectomy for treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2015;12:763–9.PubMedCrossRef
54.
Zurück zum Zitat Nunley PD, Patel VV, Orndorff DG, Lavelle WF, Block JE, Geisler FH. Five-year durability of stand-alone interspinous process decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis. Clin Interv Aging. 2017;12:1409–17.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Nunley PD, Patel VV, Orndorff DG, Lavelle WF, Block JE, Geisler FH. Five-year durability of stand-alone interspinous process decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis. Clin Interv Aging. 2017;12:1409–17.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
55.
Zurück zum Zitat Gazzeri R, Galarza M, Neroni M, Fiore C, Faiola A, Puzzilli F, et al. Failure rates and complications of interspinous process decompression devices: a European multicenter study. Neurosurg Focus. 2015;39:E14.PubMedCrossRef Gazzeri R, Galarza M, Neroni M, Fiore C, Faiola A, Puzzilli F, et al. Failure rates and complications of interspinous process decompression devices: a European multicenter study. Neurosurg Focus. 2015;39:E14.PubMedCrossRef
56.
Zurück zum Zitat Barbagallo GMV, Olindo G, Corbino L, Albanese V. Analysis of complications in patients treated with the X-Stop Interspinous process decompression system: proposal for a novel anatomic scoring system for patient selection and review of the literature. Neurosurgery. 2009;65(1):111–9–120.PubMedCrossRef Barbagallo GMV, Olindo G, Corbino L, Albanese V. Analysis of complications in patients treated with the X-Stop Interspinous process decompression system: proposal for a novel anatomic scoring system for patient selection and review of the literature. Neurosurgery. 2009;65(1):111–9–120.PubMedCrossRef
57.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee N, Shin DA, Kim KN, Yoon DH, Ha Y, Shin HC, et al. Paradoxical radiographic changes of coflex interspinous device with minimum 2-year follow-up in lumbar spinal stenosis. World Neurosurg. 2016;85:177–84.PubMedCrossRef Lee N, Shin DA, Kim KN, Yoon DH, Ha Y, Shin HC, et al. Paradoxical radiographic changes of coflex interspinous device with minimum 2-year follow-up in lumbar spinal stenosis. World Neurosurg. 2016;85:177–84.PubMedCrossRef
59.
Zurück zum Zitat Schwarzenbach O, Berlemann U, Stoll TM, Dubois G. Posterior dynamic stabilization systems: DYNESYS. Orthop Clin North Am. 2005;36:363–72.PubMedCrossRef Schwarzenbach O, Berlemann U, Stoll TM, Dubois G. Posterior dynamic stabilization systems: DYNESYS. Orthop Clin North Am. 2005;36:363–72.PubMedCrossRef
60.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang H, Peng J, Zeng Q, Zhong Y, Xiao C, Ye Y, et al. Dynesys system vs posterior decompression and fusion for the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020;99(21):e19784.CrossRef Wang H, Peng J, Zeng Q, Zhong Y, Xiao C, Ye Y, et al. Dynesys system vs posterior decompression and fusion for the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020;99(21):e19784.CrossRef
61.
Zurück zum Zitat Khoueir P, Kim KA, Wang MY. Classification of posterior dynamic stabilization devices. Neurosurg Focus. 2007;22:E3.PubMedCrossRef Khoueir P, Kim KA, Wang MY. Classification of posterior dynamic stabilization devices. Neurosurg Focus. 2007;22:E3.PubMedCrossRef
62.
Zurück zum Zitat Grob D, Benini A, Junge A, Mannion AF. Clinical experience with the Dynesys semirigid fixation system for the lumbar spine: surgical and patient-oriented outcome in 50 cases after an average of 2 years. Spine. 2005;30:324–31.PubMedCrossRef Grob D, Benini A, Junge A, Mannion AF. Clinical experience with the Dynesys semirigid fixation system for the lumbar spine: surgical and patient-oriented outcome in 50 cases after an average of 2 years. Spine. 2005;30:324–31.PubMedCrossRef
64.
Zurück zum Zitat Bothmann M, Kast E, Boldt GJ, Oberle J. Dynesys fixation for lumbar spine degeneration. Neurosurg Rev. 2008;31:189–96.PubMedCrossRef Bothmann M, Kast E, Boldt GJ, Oberle J. Dynesys fixation for lumbar spine degeneration. Neurosurg Rev. 2008;31:189–96.PubMedCrossRef
65.
Zurück zum Zitat Pham MH, Mehta VA, Patel NN, Jakoi AM, Hsieh PC, Liu JC, et al. Complications associated with the Dynesys dynamic stabilization system: a comprehensive review of the literature. Neurosurg Focus. 2016;40:E2.PubMedCrossRef Pham MH, Mehta VA, Patel NN, Jakoi AM, Hsieh PC, Liu JC, et al. Complications associated with the Dynesys dynamic stabilization system: a comprehensive review of the literature. Neurosurg Focus. 2016;40:E2.PubMedCrossRef
67.
Zurück zum Zitat Laratta JL, Gupta K, Smith WD. Tissue-sparing posterior cervical fusion with interfacet cages: a systematic review of the literature. Global Spine J. 2020;10:230–6.PubMedCrossRef Laratta JL, Gupta K, Smith WD. Tissue-sparing posterior cervical fusion with interfacet cages: a systematic review of the literature. Global Spine J. 2020;10:230–6.PubMedCrossRef
68.
Zurück zum Zitat Siemionow K, Janusz P, Phillips FM, Youssef JA, Isaacs R, Tyrakowski M, et al. Clinical and radiographic results of indirect decompression and posterior cervical fusion for single-level cervical radiculopathy using an expandable implant with 2-year follow-up. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg. 2016;77:482–8.PubMedCrossRef Siemionow K, Janusz P, Phillips FM, Youssef JA, Isaacs R, Tyrakowski M, et al. Clinical and radiographic results of indirect decompression and posterior cervical fusion for single-level cervical radiculopathy using an expandable implant with 2-year follow-up. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg. 2016;77:482–8.PubMedCrossRef
70.
Zurück zum Zitat NIH: US National Library of Medicine. ClinicalTrias.gov [Internet]. 2020. Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04229316 NIH: US National Library of Medicine. ClinicalTrias.gov [Internet]. 2020. Available from: https://​clinicaltrials.​gov/​ct2/​show/​NCT04229316
Metadaten
Titel
Current concepts of spondylosis and posterior spinal motion preservation for radiologists
verfasst von
Jack Porrino
Aditya Rao
Jay Moran
Annie Wang
Jonathan Grauer
Andrew Haims
Kimia Kani
Publikationsdatum
15.06.2021
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Skeletal Radiology / Ausgabe 11/2021
Print ISSN: 0364-2348
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2161
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-021-03840-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 11/2021

Skeletal Radiology 11/2021 Zur Ausgabe

Darf man die Behandlung eines Neonazis ablehnen?

08.05.2024 Gesellschaft Nachrichten

In einer Leseranfrage in der Zeitschrift Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology möchte ein anonymer Dermatologe bzw. eine anonyme Dermatologin wissen, ob er oder sie einen Patienten behandeln muss, der eine rassistische Tätowierung trägt.

Ein Drittel der jungen Ärztinnen und Ärzte erwägt abzuwandern

07.05.2024 Klinik aktuell Nachrichten

Extreme Arbeitsverdichtung und kaum Supervision: Dr. Andrea Martini, Sprecherin des Bündnisses Junge Ärztinnen und Ärzte (BJÄ) über den Frust des ärztlichen Nachwuchses und die Vorteile des Rucksack-Modells.

Endlich: Zi zeigt, mit welchen PVS Praxen zufrieden sind

IT für Ärzte Nachrichten

Darauf haben viele Praxen gewartet: Das Zi hat eine Liste von Praxisverwaltungssystemen veröffentlicht, die von Nutzern positiv bewertet werden. Eine gute Grundlage für wechselwillige Ärztinnen und Psychotherapeuten.

Akuter Schwindel: Wann lohnt sich eine MRT?

28.04.2024 Schwindel Nachrichten

Akuter Schwindel stellt oft eine diagnostische Herausforderung dar. Wie nützlich dabei eine MRT ist, hat eine Studie aus Finnland untersucht. Immerhin einer von sechs Patienten wurde mit akutem ischämischem Schlaganfall diagnostiziert.

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.