Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 6/2019

05.04.2019 | General Gynecology

Current practice and physicians’ opinion about preoperative hair removal as a part of ERAS pathway implementation in gynecology and gynecology–oncology: a NOGGO-AGO survey of 148 gynecological departments in Germany

verfasst von: Helmut Plett, Enzo Ricciardi, Mareike Bommert, Hendrik Veldink, Alexander Traut, Klaus Pietzner, Mustafa Zelal Muallem, Jalid Sehouli

Erschienen in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | Ausgabe 6/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To gather standardized information about current practices and doctors’ opinions on preoperative hair removal (PHR) from the surgical site and to evaluate the extent of PHR as one of the elements of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways that is established in the clinical routine in gynecology and gynecology–oncology departments in Germany.

Methods

We performed a nationwide survey among 638 primary, secondary and tertiary health care gynecological departments in Germany. Data were obtained by sending a multiple-choice questionnaire about preoperative management of hair removal. The authors also evaluated the awareness of doctors regarding PHR as well as the method and time frames of PHR. The results were compared to the existing standard of procedure (SOP) and guidelines.

Results

148 units (23.2%) took part in the survey; participants in the survey were mostly chief physicians in 47.3% of the cases. Half (50.7%) of all the responses came from certified gynecological cancer centers. A SOP regarding PHR was reported as present in 113 clinics (76.4%). 83.8% of all units are performing PHR for midline laparotomy, 52.7% in laparoscopic operations, and 45.3% in vaginal operations. 48% used a clipper, while 43.2% utilized a single-use razor. 56.1% shaved instantly before the operation, whereas 35.8% did it the day before and earlier. 40.3% of chief physicians believe that PHR causes more surgical site infections (SSI) compared to only 11.5% of junior doctors.

Conclusion

PHR in gynecological departments in Germany is performed very heterogeneously and SOPs are often not based on guidelines and ERAS principles. Around one-third of the German gynecological clinics keep strictly to the guidelines. The awareness on PHR and SSI among junior doctors is very low.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Kehlet H, Wilmore DW (2008) Evidence-based surgical care and the evolution of fast-track surgery. Ann Surg. 248(2):189–198CrossRefPubMed Kehlet H, Wilmore DW (2008) Evidence-based surgical care and the evolution of fast-track surgery. Ann Surg. 248(2):189–198CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Ansari D, Gianotti L, Schröder J, Andersson R (2013) Fast-track surgery: procedure-specific aspects and future direction. Langenbecks Arch Surg. Januar 398(1):29–37CrossRef Ansari D, Gianotti L, Schröder J, Andersson R (2013) Fast-track surgery: procedure-specific aspects and future direction. Langenbecks Arch Surg. Januar 398(1):29–37CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhuang C-L, Ye X-Z, Zhang X-D, Chen B-C, Yu Z (2013) Enhanced recovery after surgery programs versus traditional care for colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Dis Colon Rectum 56(5):667–678CrossRefPubMed Zhuang C-L, Ye X-Z, Zhang X-D, Chen B-C, Yu Z (2013) Enhanced recovery after surgery programs versus traditional care for colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Dis Colon Rectum 56(5):667–678CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Muallem MZ, Dimitrova D, Pietzner K, Richter R, Feldheiser A, Scharfe I (2016) Implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways in gynecologic oncology. A NOGGO-AGO* survey of 144 Gynecological Departments in Germany. Anticancer Res 36(8):4227–4232. Muallem MZ, Dimitrova D, Pietzner K, Richter R, Feldheiser A, Scharfe I (2016) Implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways in gynecologic oncology. A NOGGO-AGO* survey of 144 Gynecological Departments in Germany. Anticancer Res 36(8):4227–4232.
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Kehlet H (1997) Multimodal approach to control postoperative pathophysiology and rehabilitation. Br J Anaesth 78(5):606–617CrossRef Kehlet H (1997) Multimodal approach to control postoperative pathophysiology and rehabilitation. Br J Anaesth 78(5):606–617CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Kehlet H, Wilmore DW (2002) Multimodal strategies to improve surgical outcome. Am J Surg 183(6):630–641CrossRef Kehlet H, Wilmore DW (2002) Multimodal strategies to improve surgical outcome. Am J Surg 183(6):630–641CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Aimaq R, Akopian G, Kaufman HS (2011) Surgical site infection rates in laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery. Am Surg 77(10):1290–1294PubMed Aimaq R, Akopian G, Kaufman HS (2011) Surgical site infection rates in laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery. Am Surg 77(10):1290–1294PubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Sauerland S, Jaschinski T, Neugebauer EA (2010) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 10:CD001546. Sauerland S, Jaschinski T, Neugebauer EA (2010) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 10:CD001546.
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Mangano DT (2004) Perioperative medicine: NHLBI working group deliberations and recommendations. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 18(1):1–6CrossRefPubMed Mangano DT (2004) Perioperative medicine: NHLBI working group deliberations and recommendations. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 18(1):1–6CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Ott E, Saathoff S, Graf K, Schwab F, Chaberny IF (2013) The prevalence of nosocomial and community acquired infections in a university hospital: an observational study. Dtsch Arzteblatt Int 110(31–32):533–540 Ott E, Saathoff S, Graf K, Schwab F, Chaberny IF (2013) The prevalence of nosocomial and community acquired infections in a university hospital: an observational study. Dtsch Arzteblatt Int 110(31–32):533–540
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Poirot K, Le Roy B, Badrikian L, Slim K (2018) Skin preparation for abdominal surgery. J Visc Surg 155(3):211–217CrossRefPubMed Poirot K, Le Roy B, Badrikian L, Slim K (2018) Skin preparation for abdominal surgery. J Visc Surg 155(3):211–217CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Hoe NY, Nambiar R (1985) Is preoperative shaving really necessary? Ann Acad Med Singapore 14(4):700–704PubMed Hoe NY, Nambiar R (1985) Is preoperative shaving really necessary? Ann Acad Med Singapore 14(4):700–704PubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Alexander JW, Fischer JE, Boyajian M, Palmquist J, Morris MJ (1983) The influence of hair-removal methods on wound infections. Arch Surg Chic Ill 1960. 118(3):347–352 Alexander JW, Fischer JE, Boyajian M, Palmquist J, Morris MJ (1983) The influence of hair-removal methods on wound infections. Arch Surg Chic Ill 1960. 118(3):347–352
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Kjønniksen I, Andersen BM, Søndenaa VG, Segadal L (2002) Preoperative hair removal--a systematic literature review. AORN J 75(5):928–938, 940. Kjønniksen I, Andersen BM, Søndenaa VG, Segadal L (2002) Preoperative hair removal--a systematic literature review. AORN J 75(5):928–938, 940.
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Tanner J, Norrie P, Melen K (2011) Preoperative hair removal to reduce surgical site infection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 11:CD004122 Tanner J, Norrie P, Melen K (2011) Preoperative hair removal to reduce surgical site infection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 11:CD004122
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Anderson DJ, Podgorny K, Berríos-Torres SI, Bratzler DW, Dellinger EP, Greene L (2014) Strategies to prevent surgical site infections in acute care hospitals: 2014 update. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 35(6):605–627. Anderson DJ, Podgorny K, Berríos-Torres SI, Bratzler DW, Dellinger EP, Greene L (2014) Strategies to prevent surgical site infections in acute care hospitals: 2014 update. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 35(6):605–627.
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Chaberny IF, Graf K (2011) Strategien zur Prävention von postoperativen Wundinfektionen. Unfallchirurg 114(3):236–240CrossRefPubMed Chaberny IF, Graf K (2011) Strategien zur Prävention von postoperativen Wundinfektionen. Unfallchirurg 114(3):236–240CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins-Gynecology (2009) ACOG practice bulletin No. 104: antibiotic prophylaxis for gynecologic procedures. Obstet Gynecol 113(5):1180–1189. ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins-Gynecology (2009) ACOG practice bulletin No. 104: antibiotic prophylaxis for gynecologic procedures. Obstet Gynecol 113(5):1180–1189.
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Lazenby GB, Soper DE (2010) Prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of gynecologic surgical site infections. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 37(3):379–386 Lazenby GB, Soper DE (2010) Prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of gynecologic surgical site infections. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 37(3):379–386
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Lake AG, McPencow AM, Dick-Biascoechea MA, Martin DK, Erekson EA (2013). Surgical site infection after hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 209(5):490.e1–490.e9 Lake AG, McPencow AM, Dick-Biascoechea MA, Martin DK, Erekson EA (2013). Surgical site infection after hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 209(5):490.e1–490.e9
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Bakkum-Gamez JN, Dowdy SC, Borah BJ, Haas LR, Mariani A, Martin JR (2013) Predictors and costs of surgical site infections in patients with endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 130(1):100–106 Bakkum-Gamez JN, Dowdy SC, Borah BJ, Haas LR, Mariani A, Martin JR (2013) Predictors and costs of surgical site infections in patients with endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 130(1):100–106
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Mahdi H, Gojayev A, Buechel M, Knight J, SanMarco J, Lockhart D (2014) Surgical site infection in women undergoing surgery for gynecologic cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer Off J Int Gynecol Cancer Soc 24(4):779–786 Mahdi H, Gojayev A, Buechel M, Knight J, SanMarco J, Lockhart D (2014) Surgical site infection in women undergoing surgery for gynecologic cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer Off J Int Gynecol Cancer Soc 24(4):779–786
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Gerestein CG, Damhuis RAM, Burger CW, Kooi GS (2009) Postoperative mortality after primary cytoreductive surgery for advanced stage epithelial ovarian cancer: a systematic review. Gynecol Oncol 114(3):523–527CrossRefPubMed Gerestein CG, Damhuis RAM, Burger CW, Kooi GS (2009) Postoperative mortality after primary cytoreductive surgery for advanced stage epithelial ovarian cancer: a systematic review. Gynecol Oncol 114(3):523–527CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Matsuo K, Prather CP, Ahn EH, Eno ML, Tierney KE, Yessaian AA (2012) Significance of perioperative infection in survival of patients with ovarian cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer Off J Int Gynecol Cancer Soc 22(2):245–253 Matsuo K, Prather CP, Ahn EH, Eno ML, Tierney KE, Yessaian AA (2012) Significance of perioperative infection in survival of patients with ovarian cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer Off J Int Gynecol Cancer Soc 22(2):245–253
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Saeed MJ, Dubberke ER, Fraser VJ, Olsen MA (2015) Procedure-specific surgical site infection incidence varies widely within certain National Healthcare Safety Network surgery groups. Am J Infect Control 43(6):617–623CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Saeed MJ, Dubberke ER, Fraser VJ, Olsen MA (2015) Procedure-specific surgical site infection incidence varies widely within certain National Healthcare Safety Network surgery groups. Am J Infect Control 43(6):617–623CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Wick EC, Hobson DB, Bennett JL, Demski R, Maragakis L, Gearhart SL (2012) Implementation of a surgical comprehensive unit-based safety program to reduce surgical site infections. J Am Coll Surg 215(2):193–200 Wick EC, Hobson DB, Bennett JL, Demski R, Maragakis L, Gearhart SL (2012) Implementation of a surgical comprehensive unit-based safety program to reduce surgical site infections. J Am Coll Surg 215(2):193–200
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Viney C, Cheater F (1992) Pre-operative shaving in gynaecology. Nurs Stand R Coll Nurs G B 1987 7(8):25–27 Viney C, Cheater F (1992) Pre-operative shaving in gynaecology. Nurs Stand R Coll Nurs G B 1987 7(8):25–27
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Lui PS, Ching KC, Salmon YM, Choo HT, Yeo GC, Sng EH (1984) Post-operative wound infection following gynaecological operations. Singapore Med J 25(1):46–47PubMed Lui PS, Ching KC, Salmon YM, Choo HT, Yeo GC, Sng EH (1984) Post-operative wound infection following gynaecological operations. Singapore Med J 25(1):46–47PubMed
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Jensen AT, Nielsen KR (1984) Preoperative chemical depilation. Results at a gynecological department. Ugeskr Laeger 146(11):813–815 Jensen AT, Nielsen KR (1984) Preoperative chemical depilation. Results at a gynecological department. Ugeskr Laeger 146(11):813–815
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Wyrzykiewicz T (1982) Shaving pubic hair before minor gynecological and obstetrical procedures—necessity or routine? Ginekol Pol 53(5–6):385–387PubMed Wyrzykiewicz T (1982) Shaving pubic hair before minor gynecological and obstetrical procedures—necessity or routine? Ginekol Pol 53(5–6):385–387PubMed
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Badia JM, Casey AL, Rubio-Pérez I, Crosby C, Arroyo-García N, Balibrea JM (2018) A survey to identify the breach between evidence and practice in the prevention of surgical infection: time to take action. Int J Surg Lond Engl 54(Pt A):290–297CrossRef Badia JM, Casey AL, Rubio-Pérez I, Crosby C, Arroyo-García N, Balibrea JM (2018) A survey to identify the breach between evidence and practice in the prevention of surgical infection: time to take action. Int J Surg Lond Engl 54(Pt A):290–297CrossRef
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Ng W, Alexander D, Kerr B, Ho MF, Amato M, Katz K (2013) A hairy tale: successful patient education strategies to reduce prehospital hair removal by patients undergoing elective caesarean section. J Hosp Infect 83(1):64–67CrossRefPubMed Ng W, Alexander D, Kerr B, Ho MF, Amato M, Katz K (2013) A hairy tale: successful patient education strategies to reduce prehospital hair removal by patients undergoing elective caesarean section. J Hosp Infect 83(1):64–67CrossRefPubMed
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Kamei J, Yazawa S, Yamamoto S, Kaburaki N, Takahashi S, Takeyama M (2018) Risk factors for surgical site infection after transvaginal mesh placement in a nationwide Japanese cohort. Neurourol Urodyn 37(3):1074–1081 Kamei J, Yazawa S, Yamamoto S, Kaburaki N, Takahashi S, Takeyama M (2018) Risk factors for surgical site infection after transvaginal mesh placement in a nationwide Japanese cohort. Neurourol Urodyn 37(3):1074–1081
Metadaten
Titel
Current practice and physicians’ opinion about preoperative hair removal as a part of ERAS pathway implementation in gynecology and gynecology–oncology: a NOGGO-AGO survey of 148 gynecological departments in Germany
verfasst von
Helmut Plett
Enzo Ricciardi
Mareike Bommert
Hendrik Veldink
Alexander Traut
Klaus Pietzner
Mustafa Zelal Muallem
Jalid Sehouli
Publikationsdatum
05.04.2019
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics / Ausgabe 6/2019
Print ISSN: 0932-0067
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-0711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-019-05132-w

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2019

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 6/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.