This study aimed to determine the prevalence, risk factors and aetiologies of postpartum pyrexia in the DGH. We found out that approximately 1 of every 12 women (8.82%) had postpartum pyrexia, slightly edging the global prevalence of 5–7% [
3]. A similar study done in Ethiopia in 2014 [
12], revealed a similar prevalence of 8.4%. The prevalence gotten in this study was far less, compared to that of a study carried out in Nigeria [
5], which revealed a prevalence of 64.44%. The latter’s exceptionally high prevalence could have been because the study was limited to a small sample size consisting of already sick postpartum women, unlike in our study where all postpartum women were included. In a similar study carried out in Uganda in 2018 [
6], the prevalence of postpartum pyrexia was 2.9%, much less compared to our study. Of note is the fact that wound infection and non-infectious causes of postpartum pyrexia were excluded in the Ugandan study, and this could explain the lower prevalence gotten compared to our study, which explored all aetiologies. A study in the USA [
13] reviewed ambulatory medical records and relevant hospital records postpartum and computed an overall postpartum pyrexia incidence of 6.0%, with rates of 7.4% following caesarean section and 5.5% following vaginal delivery. Similar rates of 6.3% following caesarean section were gotten in another US study [
14]. Also, large-scale post discharge surveillance in an American hospital following vaginal delivery and caesarean section, identified a 4% postpartum pyrexia rate [
15]. These findings are lower compared to the ones gotten in this study; 9.16% following caesarean section and 8.64% following vaginal delivery. This may be explained by the fact that the American studies were done in a developed setting, where infectious diseases are less prevalent due to high standards of infection control. A majority of those with postpartum pyrexia were observed in the 20–34 year age group. However, with the exception of grand multiparity, no socio-demographic factor was found to be significantly associated with postpartum pyrexia. Risk factors identified included: five or more vaginal examinations prior to delivery, perineal tears, prolonged active phase of labour greater than 18 h, anemia prior to delivery, pre-eclampsia, grand multiparty, less than 4 antenatal visits and caesarean delivery (in order of decreasing significance). Most of these factors are in keeping with a review for low and middle income countries in 2012 [
16]. Our findings also corroborate with those of a study carried out in Ethiopia [
14] which reported caesarean delivery and anemia as significant risk factors of postpartum pyrexia. Also, studies in Nigeria [
5,
9], revealed that frequent vaginal examinations was associated with significant risk of puerperal sepsis, and subsequent pyrexia. However, our findings contrary to other studies [
3,
12], found no association between PP and prolonged rupture of membranes (PROM). This is probably due to routine use of broad spectrum antibiotics in patients with PROM at the DGH, as prophylaxis for chorioamnionitis and subsequent neonatal sepsis. In contrast to previous studies [
17‐
19], there was no significant association between postpartum pyrexia and comorbidities like HIV infection, diabetes and obesity. These were large sample sized prospective cohort studies involving postpartum women, who were followed over long periods. Our study may have been limited because of the retrospective design and a short duration of study. Contrary to previous reviews [
3,
10] which reported puerperal sepsis as the leading cause of postpartum pyrexia, malaria was the single most frequent cause of postpartum pyrexia observed in this study. The high incidence of postpartum malaria observed is typical to that described in a Gabonese study [
20], which revealed that puerperal women were susceptible to a considerable risk of developing malaria. This finding is also in keeping with a similarly higher incidence of postpartum malaria reported in Nigeria [
5]. This high incidence is probably due to the similarities in demographics between Cameroon, Nigeria and Gabon, were malaria is highly endemic, coupled with inconsistent or poor adherence to the intermittent preventive measures against malaria among pregnant women in these countries. Bacterial infection was the most prevalent etiology associated with postpartum pyrexia cumulatively. UTI (18.7%) and puerperal sepsis (17.9%) mostly in the form of endometritis, were the two most commonly identified infections in our study. This finding differs from that of an Ethiopian study, which noted a lower rate of UTI (14%) and very high rate of puerperal sepsis (39%). Given that onset of postpartum pyrexia due to puerperal sepsis is more common after the first week postpartum, which is usually post-discharge, most cases usually go undiagnosed. The retrospective design of our study hindered follow up of patients post discharge, so most of the late cases of postpartum pyrexia may have been missed, which was not the case with the above study which had a prospective design. This could explain their higher prevalence of puerperal sepsis. Approximately 77.5% of culture results reviewed in this study were positive, with the most isolated germ being
E. coli. This finding is similar to those revealed in other studies [
21,
22] which identified
E. coli as the most commonly isolated organism from high vaginal swabs obtained from women with puerperal sepsis. However, these studies were limited to high vaginal swab cultures among women with puerperal sepsis and so may not reflect the true microbiological spectrum of postpartum pyrexia, compared to our study which reviewed culture results from different specimen. Six different species of bacteria were observed from high vaginal swabs cultures reviewed, with
E. coli and group-A beta hemolytic streptococci being the most frequent. This result is highly reflective of the polymicrobial nature of puerperal sepsis, as reported in literature [
3,
10,
21,
23]. The importance of timing the onset of pyrexia postpartum, cannot be over emphasized. It is an important indicator of the possible aetiology and management strategy to be implored by the care giver. We observed in our study that pyrexia was more common within first 3 days postpartum. This finding is contradictory to a previous review [
13] in which 94% of cases of postpartum pyrexia, mostly secondary to postpartum infections occurred several days post discharge. This discrepancy can be explained by that fact that malaria was the single most common cause of postpartum pyrexia in our study, as opposed to bacterial infections which often present late, and are often diagnosed on readmission several days postpartum.