Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Genetic Counseling 2/2018

03.12.2017 | Original Research

Development and Evaluation of a Telephone Communication Protocol for the Delivery of Personalized Melanoma Genomic Risk to the General Population

verfasst von: Georgina L. Fenton, Amelia K. Smit, Lucinda Freeman, Caro Badcock, Kate Dunlop, Phyllis N. Butow, Judy Kirk, Anne E. Cust

Erschienen in: Journal of Genetic Counseling | Ausgabe 2/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Communicating personalized genomic risk results for common diseases to the general population as a form of tailored prevention is novel and may require alternative genetic counseling service delivery models. We describe the development and evaluation of a communication protocol for disclosing melanoma genomic risk information to the asymptomatic general population and assess participants’ satisfaction and acceptability. Participants (n = 117) were aged 22–69 years, living in New South Wales, Australia and unselected for family history. They provided a saliva sample and had genomic testing for melanoma for low to moderate penetrant melanoma susceptibility variants in 21 genes. Participants could choose to receive their results from a genetic counselor via telephone, followed by a mailed booklet or to receive their risk result via mailed booklet only with a follow-up call for those at high risk. A follow-up questionnaire was completed by 85% of participants 3-months later. Most participants (80%) elected to receive their result via telephone. Participants were highly satisfied with the delivery of results (mean 3.4 out of 4, standard deviation 0.5), and this did not differ by delivery mode, risk category, age or sex. On follow-up, 75% accurately recalled their risk category, 6% indicated a preference for a different delivery mode, either electronic or face-to-face. The process of disclosing genomic risk results to the general population over the telephone with accompanying written material was feasible and acceptable, and may be useful for communicating polygenic risk for common diseases in the context of increasing demands for genomic testing.
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Armstrong, B. K., & Kricker, A. (1993). How much melanoma is caused by sun exposure? Melanoma Research, 3(6), 395–401.CrossRefPubMed Armstrong, B. K., & Kricker, A. (1993). How much melanoma is caused by sun exposure? Melanoma Research, 3(6), 395–401.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Baumanis, L., Evans, J., Callanan, N., & Susswein, L. (2009). Telephoned BRCA1/2 genetic test results: Prevalence, practice and patient satisfaction. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 18, 447–463.CrossRefPubMed Baumanis, L., Evans, J., Callanan, N., & Susswein, L. (2009). Telephoned BRCA1/2 genetic test results: Prevalence, practice and patient satisfaction. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 18, 447–463.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Buchanan, A. H., Rahm, A. K., & Williams, J. L. (2016). Alternate service delivery models in cancer genetic counseling: A mini-review. Frontiers in Oncology, 6, 120.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Buchanan, A. H., Rahm, A. K., & Williams, J. L. (2016). Alternate service delivery models in cancer genetic counseling: A mini-review. Frontiers in Oncology, 6, 120.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Zurück zum Zitat Burton, H., Chowdhury, S., Dent, T., Hall, A., Pashayan, N., & Pharoah, P. (2013). Public health implications from COGS and potential for risk stratification and screening. Nature Genetics, 45(4), 349–351.CrossRefPubMed Burton, H., Chowdhury, S., Dent, T., Hall, A., Pashayan, N., & Pharoah, P. (2013). Public health implications from COGS and potential for risk stratification and screening. Nature Genetics, 45(4), 349–351.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Butterfield, L. D., Borgen, W. A., Amundson, N. E., & Maglio, A. T. (2005). Fifty years of the critical incident technique: 1954-2004 and beyond. Qualitative Research, 5(4), 475–497. Butterfield, L. D., Borgen, W. A., Amundson, N. E., & Maglio, A. T. (2005). Fifty years of the critical incident technique: 1954-2004 and beyond. Qualitative Research, 5(4), 475–497.
Zurück zum Zitat Cherkas, L. F., Harris, J. M., Levinson, E., Spector, T. D., & Prainsack, B. (2010). A survey of UK public interest in internet-based personal genome testing. PLoS One, 5(10), e13473.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Cherkas, L. F., Harris, J. M., Levinson, E., Spector, T. D., & Prainsack, B. (2010). A survey of UK public interest in internet-based personal genome testing. PLoS One, 5(10), e13473.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Zurück zum Zitat Christensen, K. D., Roberts, J. S., Shalowitz, D. I., Everett, J. N., Kim, S. Y., Raskin, L., et al. (2011). Disclosing individual CDKN2A research results to melanoma survivors: Interest, impact, and demands on researchers. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 20(3), 522–529.CrossRef Christensen, K. D., Roberts, J. S., Shalowitz, D. I., Everett, J. N., Kim, S. Y., Raskin, L., et al. (2011). Disclosing individual CDKN2A research results to melanoma survivors: Interest, impact, and demands on researchers. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 20(3), 522–529.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cohen, S. A., Marvin, M. L., Riley, B. D., Vig, H. S., Rousseau, J. A., & Gustafson, S. L. (2013). Identification of genetic counseling service delivery models in practice: A report from the NSGC Service delivery model task force. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 22(4), 411–421.CrossRefPubMed Cohen, S. A., Marvin, M. L., Riley, B. D., Vig, H. S., Rousseau, J. A., & Gustafson, S. L. (2013). Identification of genetic counseling service delivery models in practice: A report from the NSGC Service delivery model task force. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 22(4), 411–421.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Edwards, A., Gray, J., Clarke, A., Dundon, J., Elwyn, G., Gaff, C., et al. (2008). Interventions to improve risk communication in clinical genetics: Systematic review. Patient Education and Counseling, 71(1), 4–25.CrossRefPubMed Edwards, A., Gray, J., Clarke, A., Dundon, J., Elwyn, G., Gaff, C., et al. (2008). Interventions to improve risk communication in clinical genetics: Systematic review. Patient Education and Counseling, 71(1), 4–25.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Fagerlin, A., Ubel, P. A., Smith, D. M., & Zikmund-Fisher, B. J. (2007). Making numbers matter: Present and future research in risk communication. American Journal of Health Behavior, 31(Suppl 1), S47–S56.CrossRefPubMed Fagerlin, A., Ubel, P. A., Smith, D. M., & Zikmund-Fisher, B. J. (2007). Making numbers matter: Present and future research in risk communication. American Journal of Health Behavior, 31(Suppl 1), S47–S56.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Foulkes, W. D., Knoppers, B. M., & Turnbull, C. (2016). Population genetic testing for cancer susceptibility: Founder mutations to genomes. Nature Reviews. Clinical Oncology, 13(1), 41–54.CrossRefPubMed Foulkes, W. D., Knoppers, B. M., & Turnbull, C. (2016). Population genetic testing for cancer susceptibility: Founder mutations to genomes. Nature Reviews. Clinical Oncology, 13(1), 41–54.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Godard, B., Kaariainen, H., Kristoffersson, U., Tranebjaerg, L., Coviello, D., & Ayme, S. (2003). Provision of genetic services in Europe: Current practices and issues. European Journal of Human Genetics, 11(Suppl 2), S13–S48.CrossRefPubMed Godard, B., Kaariainen, H., Kristoffersson, U., Tranebjaerg, L., Coviello, D., & Ayme, S. (2003). Provision of genetic services in Europe: Current practices and issues. European Journal of Human Genetics, 11(Suppl 2), S13–S48.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Graves, K. D., Leventhal, K. G., Nusbaum, R., Salehizadeh, Y., Hooker, G. W., Peshkin, B. N., et al. (2013). Behavioral and psychosocial responses to genomic testing for colorectal cancer risk. Genomics, 102(2), 123–130.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Graves, K. D., Leventhal, K. G., Nusbaum, R., Salehizadeh, Y., Hooker, G. W., Peshkin, B. N., et al. (2013). Behavioral and psychosocial responses to genomic testing for colorectal cancer risk. Genomics, 102(2), 123–130.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Zurück zum Zitat Green, A. C., Williams, G. M., Logan, V., & Strutton, G. M. (2011). Reduced melanoma after regular sunscreen use: Randomized trial follow-up. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 29(3), 257–263.CrossRefPubMed Green, A. C., Williams, G. M., Logan, V., & Strutton, G. M. (2011). Reduced melanoma after regular sunscreen use: Randomized trial follow-up. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 29(3), 257–263.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Gurmankin, A. D., Domchek, S., Stopfer, J., Fels, C., & Armstrong, K. (2005). Patients’ resistance to risk information in genetic counseling for brca1/2. Archives of Internal Medicine, 165(5), 523–529.CrossRefPubMed Gurmankin, A. D., Domchek, S., Stopfer, J., Fels, C., & Armstrong, K. (2005). Patients’ resistance to risk information in genetic counseling for brca1/2. Archives of Internal Medicine, 165(5), 523–529.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Hallowell, N., Green, J. M., Statham, H., Murton, F., & Richards, M. P. M. (1997). Recall of numerical risk estimates and counsellees' perceptions of the importance of risk information following genetic counselling for breast and ovarian cancer. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 2(2), 149–159.CrossRef Hallowell, N., Green, J. M., Statham, H., Murton, F., & Richards, M. P. M. (1997). Recall of numerical risk estimates and counsellees' perceptions of the importance of risk information following genetic counselling for breast and ovarian cancer. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 2(2), 149–159.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hawley, S. T., Zikmund-Fisher, B., Ubel, P., Jancovic, A., Lucas, T., & Fagerlin, A. (2008). The impact of the format of graphical presentation on health-related knowledge and treatment choices. Patient Education and Counseling, 73(3), 448–455.CrossRefPubMed Hawley, S. T., Zikmund-Fisher, B., Ubel, P., Jancovic, A., Lucas, T., & Fagerlin, A. (2008). The impact of the format of graphical presentation on health-related knowledge and treatment choices. Patient Education and Counseling, 73(3), 448–455.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Hooker, G. W., Babu, D., Myers, M., Zierhut, H., & McAllister, M. (2017). Standards for the reporting of genetic counseling interventions in research and other studies (GCIRS): An NSGC task force report. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 26(3), 355–360.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hooker, G. W., Babu, D., Myers, M., Zierhut, H., & McAllister, M. (2017). Standards for the reporting of genetic counseling interventions in research and other studies (GCIRS): An NSGC task force report. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 26(3), 355–360.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Zurück zum Zitat Jenkins, J., Calzone, K. A., Dimond, E., Liewehr, D. J., Steinberg, S. M., Jourkiv, O., et al. (2007). Randomized comparison of phone versus in-person BRCA1/2 predisposition genetic test result disclosure counseling. Genetics in Medicine, 9(8), 487–495.CrossRefPubMed Jenkins, J., Calzone, K. A., Dimond, E., Liewehr, D. J., Steinberg, S. M., Jourkiv, O., et al. (2007). Randomized comparison of phone versus in-person BRCA1/2 predisposition genetic test result disclosure counseling. Genetics in Medicine, 9(8), 487–495.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Kasparian, N., Wakefield, C., & Meiser, B. (2007). Assessment of psychosocial outcomes in genetic counseling research: An overview of available measurement scales. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 16(6), 693–712.CrossRefPubMed Kasparian, N., Wakefield, C., & Meiser, B. (2007). Assessment of psychosocial outcomes in genetic counseling research: An overview of available measurement scales. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 16(6), 693–712.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Lautenbach, D. M., Christensen, K. D., Sparks, J. A., & Green, R. C. (2013). Communicating genetic risk information for common disorders in the era of genomic medicine. Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics, 14, 491–513.CrossRefPubMed Lautenbach, D. M., Christensen, K. D., Sparks, J. A., & Green, R. C. (2013). Communicating genetic risk information for common disorders in the era of genomic medicine. Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics, 14, 491–513.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Leachman, S. A., Lucero, O. M., Sampson, J. E., Cassidy, P., Bruno, W., Queirolo, P., et al. (2017). Identification, genetic testing, and management of hereditary melanoma. Cancer and Metastasis Reviews, 36(1), 77–90.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Leachman, S. A., Lucero, O. M., Sampson, J. E., Cassidy, P., Bruno, W., Queirolo, P., et al. (2017). Identification, genetic testing, and management of hereditary melanoma. Cancer and Metastasis Reviews, 36(1), 77–90.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Zurück zum Zitat Lloyd, S., Watson, M., Waites, B., Meyer, L., Eeles, R., Ebbs, S., et al. (1996). Familial breast cancer: A controlled study of risk perception, psychological morbidity and health beliefs in women attending for genetic counselling. British Journal of Cancer, 74(3), 482–487.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lloyd, S., Watson, M., Waites, B., Meyer, L., Eeles, R., Ebbs, S., et al. (1996). Familial breast cancer: A controlled study of risk perception, psychological morbidity and health beliefs in women attending for genetic counselling. British Journal of Cancer, 74(3), 482–487.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Zurück zum Zitat McBride, C. M., Bryan, A. D., Bray, M. S., Swan, G. E., & Green, E. D. (2012). Health behavior change: Can genomics improve behavioral adherence? American Journal of Public Health, 102(3), 401–405.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral McBride, C. M., Bryan, A. D., Bray, M. S., Swan, G. E., & Green, E. D. (2012). Health behavior change: Can genomics improve behavioral adherence? American Journal of Public Health, 102(3), 401–405.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Zurück zum Zitat McBride, C. M., Birmingham, W. C., & Kinney, A. Y. (2015). Health psychology and translational genomic research: Bringing innovation to cancer-related behavioral interventions. The American Psychologist, 70(2), 91–104.CrossRefPubMed McBride, C. M., Birmingham, W. C., & Kinney, A. Y. (2015). Health psychology and translational genomic research: Bringing innovation to cancer-related behavioral interventions. The American Psychologist, 70(2), 91–104.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Modell, S. M., Kardia, S. L. R., & Citrin, T. (2014). Stakeholder consultation insights on the future of genomics at the clinical-public health interface. Translational Research, 163(5), 466–477.CrossRefPubMed Modell, S. M., Kardia, S. L. R., & Citrin, T. (2014). Stakeholder consultation insights on the future of genomics at the clinical-public health interface. Translational Research, 163(5), 466–477.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Patrick-Miller, L. J., Egleston, B. L., Fetzer, D., Forman, A., Bealin, L., Rybak, C., et al. (2014). Development of a communication protocol for telephone disclosure of genetic test results for cancer predisposition. JMIR Res Protoc, 3(4), e49.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Patrick-Miller, L. J., Egleston, B. L., Fetzer, D., Forman, A., Bealin, L., Rybak, C., et al. (2014). Development of a communication protocol for telephone disclosure of genetic test results for cancer predisposition. JMIR Res Protoc, 3(4), e49.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Zurück zum Zitat Peshkin, B. N., Kelly, S., Nusbaum, R. H., Similuk, M., DeMarco, T. A., Hooker, G. W., et al. (2016). Patient perceptions of telephone vs. in-person BRCA1/BRCA2 genetic counseling. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 25(3), 472–482.CrossRefPubMed Peshkin, B. N., Kelly, S., Nusbaum, R. H., Similuk, M., DeMarco, T. A., Hooker, G. W., et al. (2016). Patient perceptions of telephone vs. in-person BRCA1/BRCA2 genetic counseling. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 25(3), 472–482.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Salemink, S., Dekker, N., Kets, C. M., van der Looij, E., van Zelst-Stams, W. A. G., & Hoogerbrugge, N. (2013). Focusing on patient needs and preferences may improve genetic counseling for colorectal cancer. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 22(1), 118–124.CrossRefPubMed Salemink, S., Dekker, N., Kets, C. M., van der Looij, E., van Zelst-Stams, W. A. G., & Hoogerbrugge, N. (2013). Focusing on patient needs and preferences may improve genetic counseling for colorectal cancer. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 22(1), 118–124.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Schmidlen, T. J., Wawak, L., Kasper, R., García-España, J. F., Christman, M. F., & Gordon, E. S. (2014). Personalized genomic results: Analysis of informational needs. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 23(4), 578–587.CrossRefPubMed Schmidlen, T. J., Wawak, L., Kasper, R., García-España, J. F., Christman, M. F., & Gordon, E. S. (2014). Personalized genomic results: Analysis of informational needs. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 23(4), 578–587.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Shelton, C. A., & Whitcomb, D. C. (2015). Evolving roles for physicians and genetic counselors in managing complex genetic disorders. Clin Transl Gastroenterol, 6, e124.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Shelton, C. A., & Whitcomb, D. C. (2015). Evolving roles for physicians and genetic counselors in managing complex genetic disorders. Clin Transl Gastroenterol, 6, e124.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Zurück zum Zitat Sie, A. S., van Zelst-Stams, W. A., Spruijt, L., Mensenkamp, A. R., Ligtenberg, M. J., Brunner, H. G., et al. (2014). More breast cancer patients prefer BRCA-mutation testing without prior face-to-face genetic counseling. Familial Cancer, 13(2), 143–151.PubMed Sie, A. S., van Zelst-Stams, W. A., Spruijt, L., Mensenkamp, A. R., Ligtenberg, M. J., Brunner, H. G., et al. (2014). More breast cancer patients prefer BRCA-mutation testing without prior face-to-face genetic counseling. Familial Cancer, 13(2), 143–151.PubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Sie, A. S., Spruijt, L., van Zelst-Stams, W. A., Mensenkamp, A. R., Ligtenberg, M. J., Brunner, H. G., et al. (2016). High satisfaction and low distress in breast cancer patients one year after BRCA-mutation testing without prior face-to-face genetic counseling. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 25(3), 504–514.CrossRefPubMed Sie, A. S., Spruijt, L., van Zelst-Stams, W. A., Mensenkamp, A. R., Ligtenberg, M. J., Brunner, H. G., et al. (2016). High satisfaction and low distress in breast cancer patients one year after BRCA-mutation testing without prior face-to-face genetic counseling. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 25(3), 504–514.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Smerecnik, C. M., Mesters, I., Verweij, E., de Vries, N. K., & de Vries, H. (2009). A systematic review of the impact of genetic counseling on risk perception accuracy. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 18(3), 217–228.CrossRefPubMed Smerecnik, C. M., Mesters, I., Verweij, E., de Vries, N. K., & de Vries, H. (2009). A systematic review of the impact of genetic counseling on risk perception accuracy. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 18(3), 217–228.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Smit, A. K., Keogh, L. A., Newson, A. J., Hersch, J., Butow, P., & Cust, A. E. (2015). Exploring the potential emotional and Behavioural impact of providing personalised genomic risk information to the public: A focus group study. Public Health Genomics, 18(5), 309–317.CrossRefPubMed Smit, A. K., Keogh, L. A., Newson, A. J., Hersch, J., Butow, P., & Cust, A. E. (2015). Exploring the potential emotional and Behavioural impact of providing personalised genomic risk information to the public: A focus group study. Public Health Genomics, 18(5), 309–317.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Smit, A. K., Keogh, L. A., Hersch, J., Newson, A. J., Butow, P., Williams, G., et al. (2016). Public preferences for communicating personal genomic risk information: A focus group study. Health Expectations, 19(6), 1203–1214.CrossRefPubMed Smit, A. K., Keogh, L. A., Hersch, J., Newson, A. J., Butow, P., Williams, G., et al. (2016). Public preferences for communicating personal genomic risk information: A focus group study. Health Expectations, 19(6), 1203–1214.CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Smit, A. K., Espinoza, D., Newson, A. J., Morton, R. L., Fenton, G., Freeman, L., et al. (2017). A pilot randomized controlled trial of the feasibility, acceptability, and impact of giving information on personalized genomic risk of melanoma to the public. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 26(2), 212–221.CrossRef Smit, A. K., Espinoza, D., Newson, A. J., Morton, R. L., Fenton, G., Freeman, L., et al. (2017). A pilot randomized controlled trial of the feasibility, acceptability, and impact of giving information on personalized genomic risk of melanoma to the public. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 26(2), 212–221.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Vos, J., Gomez-Garcia, E., Oosterwijk, J. C., Menko, F. H., Stoel, R. D., van Asperen, C. J., et al. (2012a). Opening the psychological black box in genetic counseling. The psychological impact of DNA testing is predicted by the counselees' perception, the medical impact by the pathogenic or uninformative BRCA1/2-result. Psychooncology, 21(1), 29–42. Vos, J., Gomez-Garcia, E., Oosterwijk, J. C., Menko, F. H., Stoel, R. D., van Asperen, C. J., et al. (2012a). Opening the psychological black box in genetic counseling. The psychological impact of DNA testing is predicted by the counselees' perception, the medical impact by the pathogenic or uninformative BRCA1/2-result. Psychooncology, 21(1), 29–42.
Zurück zum Zitat Vos, J., Oosterwijk, J. C., Gomez-Garcia, E., Menko, F. H., Collee, M. J., van Asperen, C. J., et al. (2012b). Exploring the short-term impact of DNA-testing in breast cancer patients: The counselees' perception matters, but the actual BRCA1/2 result does not. Patient Education and Counseling, 86(2), 239–251. Vos, J., Oosterwijk, J. C., Gomez-Garcia, E., Menko, F. H., Collee, M. J., van Asperen, C. J., et al. (2012b). Exploring the short-term impact of DNA-testing in breast cancer patients: The counselees' perception matters, but the actual BRCA1/2 result does not. Patient Education and Counseling, 86(2), 239–251.
Zurück zum Zitat Weinstock, M. A. (2012). Reducing death from melanoma and standards of evidence. The Journal of Investigative Dermatology, 132(5), 1311–1312.CrossRefPubMed Weinstock, M. A. (2012). Reducing death from melanoma and standards of evidence. The Journal of Investigative Dermatology, 132(5), 1311–1312.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Development and Evaluation of a Telephone Communication Protocol for the Delivery of Personalized Melanoma Genomic Risk to the General Population
verfasst von
Georgina L. Fenton
Amelia K. Smit
Lucinda Freeman
Caro Badcock
Kate Dunlop
Phyllis N. Butow
Judy Kirk
Anne E. Cust
Publikationsdatum
03.12.2017
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of Genetic Counseling / Ausgabe 2/2018
Print ISSN: 1059-7700
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-3599
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-017-0183-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2018

Journal of Genetic Counseling 2/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Hirsutismus bei PCOS: Laser- und Lichttherapien helfen

26.04.2024 Hirsutismus Nachrichten

Laser- und Lichtbehandlungen können bei Frauen mit polyzystischem Ovarialsyndrom (PCOS) den übermäßigen Haarwuchs verringern und das Wohlbefinden verbessern – bei alleiniger Anwendung oder in Kombination mit Medikamenten.

ICI-Therapie in der Schwangerschaft wird gut toleriert

Müssen sich Schwangere einer Krebstherapie unterziehen, rufen Immuncheckpointinhibitoren offenbar nicht mehr unerwünschte Wirkungen hervor als andere Mittel gegen Krebs.

Weniger postpartale Depressionen nach Esketamin-Einmalgabe

Bislang gibt es kein Medikament zur Prävention von Wochenbettdepressionen. Das Injektionsanästhetikum Esketamin könnte womöglich diese Lücke füllen.

Bei RSV-Impfung vor 60. Lebensjahr über Off-Label-Gebrauch aufklären!

22.04.2024 DGIM 2024 Kongressbericht

Durch die Häufung nach der COVID-19-Pandemie sind Infektionen mit dem Respiratorischen Synzytial-Virus (RSV) in den Fokus gerückt. Fachgesellschaften empfehlen eine Impfung inzwischen nicht nur für Säuglinge und Kleinkinder.

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.