Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Supportive Care in Cancer 12/2023

01.12.2023 | Research

Development and refinement of a novel end-of-life planning website for patients with advanced cancer: a mixed methods approach

verfasst von: Casey A. Walsh, Jennifer Good, Anas Ismaiel, Sarah Yarborough, Megan J. Shen

Erschienen in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Ausgabe 12/2023

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Despite known benefits of planning for end-of-life, no digital tool exists to help patients with advanced cancer and their loved ones plan for death comprehensively. To address this unmet need, we developed a preliminary version of an innovative website to help patients with advanced cancer prepare for end-of-life tasks.

Methods

Guided by the Obesity-Related Behavioral Intervention Trials (ORBIT) model for behavioral intervention development, patients with advanced cancer (n = 10) and their caregivers (n = 10) participated in a “Think Aloud” exercise and usability protocols to optimize the end-of-life planning website. The website was iteratively refined throughout the study in collaboration with the partnering company, Peacefully, Inc. Participants also completed the Acceptability E-Scale and System Usability Scale, with a priori benchmarks established for acceptability (scores of ≥ 24 on the Acceptability E-Scale) and usability (scores of ≥ 68 on the System Usability Scale).

Results

Patients (N = 10) and caregivers (N = 10) completed usability testing. Patients were majority female (80%), White (100%), and had a mean age of 58 years. Caregivers (N = 10) were majority male (60%), spouse/partner (90%), White (90%), and had a mean age of 59 years. For patients, a priori hypotheses were met for both acceptability (mean score of 24.7, SD = 4.35) and usability (mean score of 73.8, SD = 6.15). For caregivers, acceptability was just below the cutoff (mean score of 22.9, SD = 4.07) and usability exceeded the cutoff (mean score of 70.0, SD = 8.42). Overall, patients and caregivers reported high levels of satisfaction and found the website helpful, with specific suggestions for changes (e.g., add more information about information security, improve text legibility).

Conclusions

The findings from this study will inform modifications to optimize an innovative website to support patients with advanced cancer to prepare holistically for end-of-life tasks.
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Smith TJ et al (2012) American Society of Clinical Oncology provisional clinical opinion: the integration of palliative care into standard oncology care. J Clin Oncol 30(8):880–887CrossRefPubMed Smith TJ et al (2012) American Society of Clinical Oncology provisional clinical opinion: the integration of palliative care into standard oncology care. J Clin Oncol 30(8):880–887CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Schubart JR et al (2019) Advance care planning among patients with advanced cancer. J Oncol Pract 15(1):e65–e73CrossRefPubMed Schubart JR et al (2019) Advance care planning among patients with advanced cancer. J Oncol Pract 15(1):e65–e73CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Sudore RL et al (2018) Engaging diverse English- and Spanish-speaking older adults in advance care planning: the PREPARE randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med 178(12):1616–1625CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sudore RL et al (2018) Engaging diverse English- and Spanish-speaking older adults in advance care planning: the PREPARE randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med 178(12):1616–1625CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Heyland DK et al (2006) What matters most in end-of-life care: perceptions of seriously ill patients and their family members. CMAJ 174(5):627–633CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Heyland DK et al (2006) What matters most in end-of-life care: perceptions of seriously ill patients and their family members. CMAJ 174(5):627–633CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Steinhauser KE et al (2001) Preparing for the end of life: preferences of patients, families, physicians, and other care providers. J Pain Symptom Manage 22(3):727–737CrossRefPubMed Steinhauser KE et al (2001) Preparing for the end of life: preferences of patients, families, physicians, and other care providers. J Pain Symptom Manage 22(3):727–737CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Auriemma CL et al (2020) Completion of advance directives and documented care preferences during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. JAMA Netw Open 3(7):e2015762–e2015762CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Auriemma CL et al (2020) Completion of advance directives and documented care preferences during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. JAMA Netw Open 3(7):e2015762–e2015762CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Payne HE et al (2015) Behavioral functionality of mobile apps in health interventions: a systematic review of the literature. JMIR mHealth uHealth 3(1):e20CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Payne HE et al (2015) Behavioral functionality of mobile apps in health interventions: a systematic review of the literature. JMIR mHealth uHealth 3(1):e20CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Czajkowski SM et al (2015) From ideas to efficacy: the ORBIT model for developing behavioral treatments for chronic diseases. Health Psychol 34(10):971–982CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Czajkowski SM et al (2015) From ideas to efficacy: the ORBIT model for developing behavioral treatments for chronic diseases. Health Psychol 34(10):971–982CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Tariman JD et al (2011) Validation and testing of the Acceptability E-scale for web-based patient-reported outcomes in cancer care. Appl Nurs Res 24(1):53–58CrossRefPubMed Tariman JD et al (2011) Validation and testing of the Acceptability E-scale for web-based patient-reported outcomes in cancer care. Appl Nurs Res 24(1):53–58CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Lunenburg F (2011) Goal-setting theory of motivation. Int J Manag Bus Adm 15(1):1–6 Lunenburg F (2011) Goal-setting theory of motivation. Int J Manag Bus Adm 15(1):1–6
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Pfeiffer E (1975) A short portable mental status questionnaire for the assessment of organic brain deficit in elderly patients. J Am Geriatr Soc 23(10):433–441CrossRefPubMed Pfeiffer E (1975) A short portable mental status questionnaire for the assessment of organic brain deficit in elderly patients. J Am Geriatr Soc 23(10):433–441CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Charlson ME et al (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40(5):373–383CrossRefPubMed Charlson ME et al (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40(5):373–383CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Sandelowski M (2010) What’s in a name? Qualitative description revisited. Research in Nursing & Health, 33(1):77–84 Sandelowski M (2010) What’s in a name? Qualitative description revisited. Research in Nursing & Health, 33(1):77–84
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Sandelowski M (2000) Whatever happened to qualitative description? Res Nurs Health 23(4):334–340CrossRefPubMed Sandelowski M (2000) Whatever happened to qualitative description? Res Nurs Health 23(4):334–340CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Sullivan-Bolyai S, Bova C, Harper D (2005) Developing and refining interventions in persons with health disparities: the use of qualitative description. Nurs Outlook 53(3):127–133CrossRefPubMed Sullivan-Bolyai S, Bova C, Harper D (2005) Developing and refining interventions in persons with health disparities: the use of qualitative description. Nurs Outlook 53(3):127–133CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J (2007) Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care 19(6):349–357CrossRefPubMed Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J (2007) Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care 19(6):349–357CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Bangor A, Kortum P, Miller J (2009) Determining what individual SUS scores mean: adding an adjective rating scale. J Usability Stud 4(3):114–123 Bangor A, Kortum P, Miller J (2009) Determining what individual SUS scores mean: adding an adjective rating scale. J Usability Stud 4(3):114–123
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Brooke J (2013) SUS: a retrospective. J Usability Stud 8(2):29–40 Brooke J (2013) SUS: a retrospective. J Usability Stud 8(2):29–40
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee K et al (2023) Digital health interventions for adult patients with cancer evaluated in randomized controlled trials: scoping review. J Med Internet Res 25:e38333CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lee K et al (2023) Digital health interventions for adult patients with cancer evaluated in randomized controlled trials: scoping review. J Med Internet Res 25:e38333CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Resick JM et al (2020) Patient-centered and efficacious advance care planning in cancer: protocol and key design considerations for the PEACe-compare trial. Contemp Clin Trials 96:106071CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Resick JM et al (2020) Patient-centered and efficacious advance care planning in cancer: protocol and key design considerations for the PEACe-compare trial. Contemp Clin Trials 96:106071CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Sucala M et al (2021) Behavior science in the evolving world of digital health: considerations on anticipated opportunities and challenges. Transl Behav Med 11(2):495–503CrossRefPubMed Sucala M et al (2021) Behavior science in the evolving world of digital health: considerations on anticipated opportunities and challenges. Transl Behav Med 11(2):495–503CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Falzarano F, Prigerson HG, Maciejewski PK (2021) The role of advance care planning in cancer patient and caregiver grief resolution: helpful or harmful? Cancers 13(8):1977. (Basel) Falzarano F, Prigerson HG, Maciejewski PK (2021) The role of advance care planning in cancer patient and caregiver grief resolution: helpful or harmful? Cancers 13(8):1977. (Basel)
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Allsop MJ et al (2022) Building on sand: digital technologies for care coordination and advance care planning. BMJ Support Palliat Care 12(2):194–197CrossRefPubMed Allsop MJ et al (2022) Building on sand: digital technologies for care coordination and advance care planning. BMJ Support Palliat Care 12(2):194–197CrossRefPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Birtwistle J et al (2022) Mapping and characterising electronic palliative care coordination systems and their intended impact: a national survey of end-of-life care commissioners. PLoS ONE 17(10):e0275991CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Birtwistle J et al (2022) Mapping and characterising electronic palliative care coordination systems and their intended impact: a national survey of end-of-life care commissioners. PLoS ONE 17(10):e0275991CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Temel JS, Petrillo LA, Greer JA (2022) Patient-centered palliative care for patients with advanced lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 40(6):626–634CrossRefPubMed Temel JS, Petrillo LA, Greer JA (2022) Patient-centered palliative care for patients with advanced lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 40(6):626–634CrossRefPubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Chaiviboontham S (2011) Recruitment and retention challenges in research of palliative care in patients with advanced cancer. Progress Palliat Care 19(4):185–188CrossRef Chaiviboontham S (2011) Recruitment and retention challenges in research of palliative care in patients with advanced cancer. Progress Palliat Care 19(4):185–188CrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat McDermott E, Selman LE (2018) Cultural factors influencing advance care planning in progressive, incurable disease: a systematic review with narrative synthesis. J Pain Symptom Manage 56(4):613–636CrossRefPubMed McDermott E, Selman LE (2018) Cultural factors influencing advance care planning in progressive, incurable disease: a systematic review with narrative synthesis. J Pain Symptom Manage 56(4):613–636CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Development and refinement of a novel end-of-life planning website for patients with advanced cancer: a mixed methods approach
verfasst von
Casey A. Walsh
Jennifer Good
Anas Ismaiel
Sarah Yarborough
Megan J. Shen
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2023
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Supportive Care in Cancer / Ausgabe 12/2023
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-023-08153-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 12/2023

Supportive Care in Cancer 12/2023 Zur Ausgabe

Labor, CT-Anthropometrie zeigen Risiko für Pankreaskrebs

13.05.2024 Pankreaskarzinom Nachrichten

Gerade bei aggressiven Malignomen wie dem duktalen Adenokarzinom des Pankreas könnte Früherkennung die Therapiechancen verbessern. Noch jedoch klafft hier eine Lücke. Ein Studienteam hat einen Weg gesucht, sie zu schließen.

Viel pflanzliche Nahrung, seltener Prostata-Ca.-Progression

12.05.2024 Prostatakarzinom Nachrichten

Ein hoher Anteil pflanzlicher Nahrung trägt möglicherweise dazu bei, das Progressionsrisiko von Männern mit Prostatakarzinomen zu senken. In einer US-Studie war das Risiko bei ausgeprägter pflanzlicher Ernährung in etwa halbiert.

Alter verschlechtert Prognose bei Endometriumkarzinom

11.05.2024 Endometriumkarzinom Nachrichten

Ein höheres Alter bei der Diagnose eines Endometriumkarzinoms ist mit aggressiveren Tumorcharakteristika assoziiert, scheint aber auch unabhängig von bekannten Risikofaktoren die Prognose der Erkrankung zu verschlimmern.

Darf man die Behandlung eines Neonazis ablehnen?

08.05.2024 Gesellschaft Nachrichten

In einer Leseranfrage in der Zeitschrift Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology möchte ein anonymer Dermatologe bzw. eine anonyme Dermatologin wissen, ob er oder sie einen Patienten behandeln muss, der eine rassistische Tätowierung trägt.

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.