Introduction
Although the emergence of biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) has markedly changed the course of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and outcomes for patients, concerns have been raised regarding the higher risk of infection. Researchers in recent studies have reported an increase in the prevalence of diseases caused by nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) [
1‐
4]. Eighty percent of patients with NTM diseases in Japan have been infected with
Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) [
5]. MAC is now widely recognized as an important pathogen that causes chronic and progressive pulmonary diseases in both immunocompetent and immunosuppressed patients.
The diagnosis of MAC-PD is complicated because, in contrast to
Mycobacterium tuberculosis, the contamination of clinical specimens by MAC can come from environmental sources such as water, dust, and soil, and this organism may colonize the respiratory tract without any accompanying invasive disease [
6]. A diagnosis of MAC-PD requires clinical findings and its repeated isolation from sputum. Difficulties have also been associated with discriminating MAC-PD from rheumatoid lung disease in a clinical setting, because RA could develop pulmonary manifestations, including rheumatoid nodules, cryptogenic organizing pneumonia, bronchiolitis obliterans, and bronchiectasis [
7,
8]. The most frequent finding by computed tomography (CT) in patients with RA in one study was bronchiectasis [
8]. Although only 1–3 % of patients with RA clinically exhibit bronchiectasis, as many as 30 % of patients with RA manifest bronchiectasis on high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) [
9]. Bronchiectasis is considered to be both a risk factor for and a consequence of NTM infections [
9]. Kitada et al
. [
6,
10] recently established an enzyme immunoassay (EIA) for the serological diagnosis of MAC-PD by examining serum immunoglobulin A (IgA) antibody levels against the glycopeptidolipid (GPL) core antigen, which is a MAC-specific antigen. Unlike bronchoscopy and sputum culture examinations, this test is less invasive and provides more rapid diagnostic information on MAC-PD.
In the present study, we focused on MAC-PD in patients with RA and conducted a cross-sectional observational study to investigate the clinical usefulness of measuring anti-GPL antibodies in this patient population.
Methods
Patients
A cross-sectional observational study was conducted. The study sample consisted of 396 patients who were treated for RA between May and October 2013 at the Hirose Clinic of Rheumatology, which is an outpatient clinic located in Saitama prefecture in Japan. The inclusion criteria for patients were fulfillment of the 2010 American College of Rheumatology/European League against Rheumatism classification criteria for RA [
11]. Patients younger than 20 years of age and those who had already been enrolled in a clinical study with the intervention of a study drug were excluded. A total of 824 patients with RA visited our clinic during the study period. We randomly screened a total of 443 of 824 patients with RA, and a total of 381 patients with RA (46.2 %) were not screened.
Sera from all participants were screened for anti-GPL IgA antibodies, and all the participants underwent chest radiography. For statistical analyses, recorded data, including demographics, disease activity, comorbidities, treatments, and laboratory data, were obtained at the time of consent. All participants provided written informed consent before study enrollment according to the Declaration of Helsinki (World Medical Association General Assembly, October 2008). This study was conducted with the approval of the Hattori Clinic Institutional Review Board (Hachioji, Tokyo, Japan), which was responsible for reviewing and approving the study.
Diagnosis of MAC-PD
We defined MAC-PD according to the 2007 diagnostic criteria for NTM lung disease proposed by the American Thoracic Society and Infectious Diseases Society of America [
1]. Both of the following criteria had to be met clinically: (1) pulmonary symptoms, nodular or cavitary opacities on chest radiographs, or HRCT scans manifesting multifocal bronchiectasis with multiple small nodules; and (2) appropriate exclusion of other diagnoses. Only one of the following criteria was required microbiologically: (1) positive culture results for at least two separate expectorated sputum samples, (2) positive culture results for at least one bronchial wash or lavage, or (3) transbronchial or other lung biopsy specimens with mycobacterial histopathological features. A diagnosis of MAC-PD infection required the fulfillment of the clinical and microbiological criteria described above.
Enzyme immunoassay for anti-GPL antibodies
All serum samples were sent to the Life Science Institute, Inc. (Tokyo, Japan), where a commercially available EIA kit used to detect serum IgA antibodies specific to the MAC-GPL core antigen (Capilia MAC Antibody ELISA; TAUNS Laboratories, Shizuoka, Japan) was employed with a previously described method [
6]. The GPL core antigen is a major cell surface antigen in MAC that is absent on the cell wall of either
M. tuberculosis or
Mycobacterium kansasii [
10]. At the Life Science Institute, the cutoff value was defined as 0.7 U/ml according to previous findings [
6].
Radiological evaluation
Chest x-rays were assessed by consensus reading by four rheumatologists and one respiratory physician (WH, KI, MM, TN, TU). All patients with RA who had abnormal shadows on their chest x-rays underwent chest CT. Chest CT images from patients with RA were reviewed with consensus reading by one rheumatologist and one respiratory physician experienced in CT (WH, TU). To localize the infection by MAC, the lungs of each patient were divided into 10 fields (right lung: S1 + S2, S3, S4 + S5, S6, and S7 + S8 + S9 + S10; left lung: S1 + S2, S3, S4 + S5, S6, and S8 + S9 + S10) according to Moore’s definition [
12]. Each field was scored with reference to the presence of bronchiectasis, centrilobular nodules, air space disease, a cavity, and nodules larger than 5 mm as described in a previous study [
13]. The severity of bronchiectasis was categorized as grade 1 (diameter of the bronchus less than twice as large as the accompanying vessel), grade 2 (diameter of the bronchus at least twice as large as the accompanying vessel), or grade 3 (cystic bronchiectasis). The distribution of centrilobular nodules (size less than 5 mm) was categorized as grade 1 (0–50 % of the segment), grade 2 (50–100 % of the segment), or grade 3 (100 % of the segment). Air space disease was defined as an area of patchy or dense consolidation. Air space disease and cavity formation were categorized as grade 3 on the basis of a previous study in which these two findings were closely related to clinical features [
14]. Nodular sizes larger than 5 mm were also scored as grade 1. Grades of the 10 fields were summed to calculate scores for these radiological findings. Thus, the maximum scores of bronchiectasis, centrilobular nodules, air space disease, cavities, and nodules larger than 5 mm in both lungs were 30, 30, 30, 30, and 10, respectively. Scores for the extent of MAC-PD were added to give total CT scores [
13]. Thus, the maximum possible total CT score in both lungs was 130.
Sputum
All patients with RA with abnormal findings on chest CT compatible with MAC-PD submitted expectorated sputum for examination on three consecutive days. An early-morning specimen was collected in a sterile cup, and it was immediately transported to the microbiology laboratory at the Life Science Institute. The sputum was examined and cultured for mycobacteria. Identification of MAC was confirmed by TaqMan polymerase chain reaction (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) at the same laboratory. The patients whose expectorated sputum was negative for MAC were recommended to undergo bronchoscopy at the Fukujuji Hospital, which was performed once the patient’s consent was obtained.
Statistical analysis
All data were analyzed using SAS software version 9.3 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). Demographics and clinical characteristics were expressed as means and standard deviations for continuous variables or as frequencies and percentages for categorical variables. Comparisons between patients with RA with and without MAC-PD were made using Student’s t test for continuous variables. Pearson’s χ2 test was used for categorized variables. All P values were two-tailed, and P values less than 0.05 were considered significant. The Mann–Whitney U test was used to compare the differences in titers of anti-GPL antibodies between patients with and those without MAC organisms in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) samples. Correlation coefficients between the extent of MAC-PD on chest CT images and titers of anti-GPL IgA antibodies were analyzed using a simple regression analysis.
Discussion
In the present study, we assessed, for the first time to our knowledge, the clinical usefulness of an EIA kit as a supplementary diagnostic aid for MAC-PD in a large series of patients with RA. Our results revealed that a positive likelihood ratio, pretest probability, and positive and negative posttest probabilities were 80.0, 2.7 %, 69 %, and 0.54 %, respectively. The positive likelihood ratio of 80.0 indicated that detection of serum anti-GPL antibodies has a large effect on increasing the probability of MAC-PD presence. Pre- and posttest probability values showed that the probability of MAC-PD presence increases from 2.7 % to 69 % after obtaining a positive test of serum anti-GPL antibodies. In addition, measuring anti-GPL antibodies showed excellent positive and negative predictive values and AUC for MAC-PD in patients with RA.
Although the specificity of the EIA kit was high, false-positive EIA determinations were obtained in four patients. In these four patients, titers of anti-GPL antibodies were positive at low values (0.7, 0.9, 1.8, and 2.0 U/ml). Several explanations have been proposed for these false-positive results. First, they could have been due to extrapulmonary infections by MAC [
15]; however, this was unlikely in our patients because of the lack of clinical symptoms, negative culture results, and negative positron emission tomography findings. Second, they could have been due to asymptomatic colonization with MAC organisms from the environment [
8]. Third, they could have been due to non-specific binding of IgA in serum to the GPL core antigen.
The average titer of anti-GPL antibodies in the antibody-positive individuals in a previous study conducted with patients with non-rheumatic disease [
6] was 10.7 ± 7.9 U/ml, whereas it was 2.53 ± 1.94 U/ml in our study. The lower titer of anti-GPL antibodies and two false-negative cases observed in patients with RA could be explained by the following reasons: (1) impaired antibody responses against the MAC GPL antigen by immunosuppressive therapy, (2) altered immune responses to GPL core potentially governed by human leukocyte antigen genes [
16], and/or (3) less severe MAC-PD in the two false-negative cases. Concomitant use of methotrexate (MTX) may affect the positivity and titers of anti-GPL antibodies. In the present study, the average dosage of MTX used for the enrolled patients was lower than that commonly used in Western countries. Further studies are needed to investigate anti-GPL antibody generation in patients with RA receiving higher dosages of MTX.
The incidence of NTM in the Japanese general population is estimated at 5.7/100,000/yr [
17], but no data are available for age-matched prevalence of MAC-PD. Considering the incidence of MAC-PD in Japanese general population, the prevalence of MAC-PD in our study appears to be very high. We speculated that both intensive examinations for MAC-PD among the enrolled patients, comprising CT, sputum culture, and bronchoscopy, and the older age of the patients in the present study might be responsible for this high prevalence.
Differentiating MAC-PD from other pulmonary comorbidities, including RA-associated interstitial lung disease, is challenging in clinical practice. The initial imaging study obtained for diagnosis of pulmonary comorbidity in patients with RA is almost always a chest x-ray. When we analyzed the diagnostic performance of anti-GPL antibodies in 57 patients with RA who had abnormal shadows on their chest x-rays, the positive and negative predictive values and accuracy of the assay were estimated as 100 %, 96 %, and 97 %, respectively. Although the number of the patients was small, these data indicated promising diagnostic performance of anti-GPL antibodies in this patient population. Furthermore, our study demonstrates the usefulness of testing for this antibody in patients with chest CT findings compatible with MAC-PD. MAC organisms were detected in the BALF of all six patients who had positive CT findings compatible with MAC-PD and anti-GPL antibodies, whereas the organisms were not detected in the BALF of the other six patients who had negative anti-GPL antibodies in spite of characteristic CT findings. These results support the possibility that combining positive anti-GPL antibodies and positive CT findings for MAC-PD could yield an alternative diagnostic procedure for MAC-PD, even in patients with negative expectorated sputum culture results for MAC. Further investigations based on a prospective cohort study recruiting patients with RA with abnormal x-ray and CT findings are required to fully establish the usefulness of this antibody detection in differentiating MAC-PD from other pulmonary comorbidities. A cost-effectiveness analysis for measuring anti-GPL antibodies in patients with RA is also needed.
Measuring anti-GPL antibodies could be a useful tool for evaluating disease severity and monitoring disease activity of MAC-PD in addition to its diagnostic ability, based on the following findings. First, the titers of the antibodies showed significant correlation with the extent of MAC-PD in patients with RA, as shown in Fig.
3. Second, we found one patient whose serum level of anti-GPL antibodies gradually declined after successful antimicrobial chemotherapy (Additional file
1), suggesting that the level of the antibodies reflected disease activity of MAC infection. Further investigation is required to establish this relationship in patients with RA.
The results of univariate analysis revealed that patients with RA with MAC-PD had a longer disease duration, a lower BMI, and a smaller number of peripheral lymphocytes (Table
3) than other subjects. However, cross-sectional studies cannot establish causality; they can only determine associations. Therefore, a longitudinal study is required to identify risk factors for development of MAC-PD in patients with RA.
Before initiating immunosuppressive treatment of RA, screening for latent or chronic infectious diseases is mandatory to ensure patient safety and continuation of treatment without infectious events. Current guidelines recommend screening tests for tuberculosis and hepatitis virus in particular [
18,
19]. Given the high diagnostic performance of anti-GPL antibodies for diagnosing MAC-PD in patients with RA and the clinical consequences of this pulmonary disease, we recommend measuring anti-GPL antibodies before starting treatment of RA, especially in patients with abnormal chest x-rays in regions or countries with moderate to high prevalence of MAC-PD. Those patients who have positive tests for anti-GPL antibodies should be examined with additional pulmonary imaging and microbiological studies to diagnose MAC-PD in consultation with a pulmonologist.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors’ contributions
WH conceived of the study; participated in study design and coordination, data acquisition, and data analysis; evaluated the results; and drafted the manuscript. TU participated in evaluating chest x-rays and CT images and scoring them for the extent of MAC-PD, evaluated the data, and helped to draft the manuscript. MH participated in the study design, evaluated the results, revised the manuscript critically for important intellectual content, and helped to draft the manuscript. AN and KY performed statistical analyses, evaluated the results, and helped to draft the manuscript. KI, TI, and MM participated in data acquisition and data analysis and helped to draft the manuscript. TN participated in the design of the study, data acquisition, and data analysis; evaluated the results; revised the manuscript critically for important intellectual content; and helped to draft the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.