Distal triceps tendinopathies

The triceps tendon attaches approximately 12–14 mm distal to the olecranon tip, where it has a width of approx. 40 mm [29]. The bony footprint is approx. 460 mm² with an average length of approx. 21 mm and a width of 23 mm. The caput longum and mediale converge distally and form the superficial part of the triceps tendon, which attaches directly to the medial aspect of the olecranon and laterally partially converges with the superficial fascia of the anconeus muscle [9]. The exact anatomy of the deep portion of the triceps tendon remains disputed. Masen et al. describe a separate lower insertion tendon of the caput mediale [16], while Keener et al. depict histologically a confluence of the medial tendon parts with the central tendon [12]. Ruptures can start both from the medial or the lateral part of the tendon [9]. The typical injury mechanism is described as an eccentric force on the contracting muscle, for example, due to a fall on the outstretched arm, during weight-lifting, or due to a direct trauma to the elbow [9, 12, 16, 27]. Ruptures occur in particular near the insertion of the tendon onto the olecranon, less often at the myotendinous junction.

Histologically, tendinopathy show cell activation and proliferation, matrix changes including disorganization of collagen and neovascularization [20]. Since this remodeling process is often not painful, tendinopathies mostly become noticeable or symptomatic only when the tendon is ruptured. There are also differences in gene expression and histological parameters in different tendon regions and at different times during the healing process [6].

Diagnosis is often delayed due to misdiagnosis [26]. If tendinopathy of the triceps tendon is suspected, risk factors and traumatic events including the accident circumstances should be inquired at first. Clinically, tendinopathy of the triceps tendon manifests in stress-related posterior pain, which increases with forced extension against resistance [9, 15]. If the triceps tendon is ruptured, swelling, ecchymosis, loss of strength in extension, and a palpable gap along the course of the tendon can also occur [15, 19]. However, the latter can be difficult to see due to swelling of the soft tissue. The inability of full extension can be considered as a sign of complete rupture. A weaker extension in comparison between the healthy and the affected side can still be possible by compensation from the anconeus muscle or remaining parts of the triceps muscle. [15]. Tendinopathies often occur bilaterally. For example, rupture of the opposite extremity is almost 200 times more common in patients with Achilles tendon rupture [3]. Bilateral clinical improvement can often be observed after unilateral surgical treatment, although the exact mechanisms have not yet been fully elucidated [2]. Bilateral ruptures have also been described regarding the triceps tendon [11].

Viegas proposed the modified Thompson test as a clinical examination sign for ruptures of the triceps tendon [27]. For this test, the patient’s elbow is placed on the edge of the examination table. The muscle is compressed manually, which leads to a passive extension against gravity with tendon integrity or partial rupture, with no extension in complete ruptures (Fig. 1). However, the test is difficult to perform due to the large lever arm of the forearm and the relatively small muscle of the triceps muscle, and it is often difficult to interpret because of pain and swelling [19]. In everyday clinical practice, the extension test against resistance in the overhead position has prevailed (Fig. 2; [14, 15]). With the shoulder elevated at 180 ° and the elbow flexed, the patient is asked to extend the arm against gravity or against resistance. If elbow extension is not feasible, this suggests a complete rupture of the triceps tendon. In partial ruptures, it is often still possible to extend against gravity, but only with significantly reduced extension force against resistance in comparison with the unaffected side. However, information on sensitivity and specificity of this test is still unavailable.

X‑rays should always be acquired to detect bony avulsion injuries at the insertion area of the triceps tendon [10]. This so-called flake of bone sign (proximalization of the torn-out fragment) can be seen in 61–88% of triceps tendon ruptures (Fig. 3).

In the sonographic examination, the superficial parts of the triceps tendon can be seen better compared with its deep parts (Fig. 4; [25]). The dynamic examination of the tendon is advantageous; the tension of tendon parts can be examined with extension against resistance and, in the case of a bony rupture, the proximalizing of the fragment can be visualized during muscle contraction.

Magneti resonance imaging (MRI) diagnostics are suitable for assessing the extent of injury, possible tendon retraction, changes in muscle quality, and accompanying injuries, since both the superficial and deep areas of the tendon and its surrounding structures can be assessed well (Fig. 5; [9, 14]). Tendinopathies show abnormal signal intensities in liquid-sensitive sequences, while with ruptures a waved triceps tendon is seen as an indication of a lack of tension [9].

Surgical treatment consists of debridement of the insertion region with subsequent anatomical refixation. Surgical reconstruction is indicated for complete ruptures. There is no uniform recommendation for the operative treatment of partial ruptures. Depending on the source, surgical refixation is recommended for partial tendon ruptures of 50–75%, with a relevant strength deficit compared with the healthy opposite side [9, 21].

The most widespread refixation technique is transosseous triceps tendon fixation, which, however, has disadvantages regarding primary stability and footprint coverage due to the inexact anatomical reinsertion [14]. The “knotless suture-bridge repair” technique—adopted from shoulder surgery—includes a double-row, crossing anchor fixation of the triceps tendon [8]. Thanks to an almost anatomical reconstruction, high biomechanical primary stability can be achieved. On this basis, the modified V‑shaped double-row triceps tendon reconstruction was developed in our group, which has improved biomechanical primary stability compared with the suture-bridge technique and is associated with less tendon dislocation [23]. An example of a surgically treated rupture of the distal triceps tendon using the V‑shaped double row reconstruction [22] is shown in Fig. 6. With this technique, two double-hinged anchors are placed medially and laterally at the proximal insertion area of the triceps tendon. The distal triceps tendon is then secured medially, laterally, and centrally with four sutures over a length of at least 3 cm. Approximately 4 cm distal to the olecranon tip, a monocortical borehole is made at a 45 ° angle in a proximal direction to the ulna shaft. The free thread ends are threaded into a button and this is inserted transcortically. The button is then flipped in an intramedullary fashion by pulling on the ends of the threads and the tendon pressure is adjusted by tensioning the threads (Fig. 6).

Postoperatively, the elbow is immobilized in 90° flexion in a posterior cast for 3–4 days [14]. The patient is then switched to a movable brace with flexion being limited to 90° for 6 weeks. The passive and active-assisted exercise begins on the first postoperative day with a restriction of active extension for 6 weeks postoperatively. Sporting activities are prohibited for at least 12 weeks.

Athwal et al. [4] also describe the possibility of arthroscopic refixation of the triceps tendon and were able to report good clinical results in two cases.

Overall, few case series and case reports describe good postoperative results, with 89% of the operated patients being able to return to the pre-traumatic activity level [10]. In the described cases, however, traumatic events are usually described as the cause of the rupture without predisposing tendinopathy. Bava et al. [5] reported good results from five surgically treated patients 32 months postoperatively, with the vast majority of the patients regaining full strength and a full range of motion. Other cases are described in which operated patients could bench press weights of more than 200 kg [18] or return to competitive motorcycle races, professional football, or professional hockey [10]. Van Riet et al. [26] report 23 interventions on 22 patients with eight complete and 15 partial ruptures. Good clinical results were shown with an average extension loss of 10° and an average flexion of 136 °. Manual strength tests showed a strength level of at least 4/5 and the isokinetic peak strength averaged 82% of the unaffected arm. In ten patients the ruptures were initially not recognized, and thus there was a delay between injury and diagnosis. Although the results were comparable to those receiving early care, the recovery process of patients with delayed diagnosis was overall slower; therefore, early surgical treatment within 3 weeks is recommended as the treatment of choice after post-traumatic treatment.

Postoperative complications include secondary olecranon bursitis and a persistent flexion deficit of up to 20°. The re-rupture rate is low at 6% and mostly associated with renewed trauma [9]. Van Riet describes results that are as good for surgically treated ruptures as for primary interventions [26].