Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 9/2016

22.12.2015

Do alterations in plasma albumin and prealbumin after minimally invasive esophagectomy for squamous cell carcinoma influence the incidence of cervical anastomotic leak?

verfasst von: Ying-Jian Wang, Xue-Hai Liu, Long-Yong Mei, Kun-Kun Li, Yao-Guang Jiang, Wei Guo

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 9/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Anastomotic leak (AL) remains a challenging and bothersome complication of minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE). In this retrospective study, we measured the perioperative albumin (ALB) and prealbumin (PA) of patients who underwent MIE, and investigated the relationship between the occurrence of AL and the altering levels of ALB/PA.

Patients and methods

Sixty patients underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic–laparoscopic esophagectomy between September 2013 and August 2014. The preoperative and postoperative levels of ALB and PA were detected, and the baseline of altering levels for ALB and PA were established. According to the decreasing values of postoperative ALB, patients were divided into Group A1 (decreased value of ALB over the average level) and Group A2 (decreased value of ALB not reach the average level). Similarly, patients were also divided into Group P1 and Group P2 according to the average decreasing values of postoperative PA. The incidence of AL and non-anastomotic-relative complications between different groups were calculated and analyzed.

Results

One postoperative death occurred (1/60, 1.7 %). Eighteen complications were observed (18/60, 30 %), including seven cases of cervical AL (7/60, 11.7 %). There was no significant difference in background or clinicopathologic factors between different groups. The levels of ALB and PA descended significantly after MIE (p = 0.0000, p = 0.0000, respectively). No correlation between deficient levels of ALB and PA was observed (p = 0.1874, r = 0.0298). There was a significant higher AL incidence in Group P1 than in Group P2 (p = 0.0322). However, the incidence of AL did not exhibit significant difference between Group A1 and Group A2 (p = 0.9252).

Conclusions

MIE appears to be a procedure of obvious influence on the nutrient metabolism of patients. The results demonstrated that patients with severely deficient level of PA had higher risk of AL after MIE.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Aminian A, Panahi N, Mirsharifi R, Karimian F, Meysamie A, Khorgami Z, Alibakhshi A (2011) Predictors and outcome of cervical anastomotic leakage after esophageal cancer surgery. J Cancer Res Ther 7:448–453CrossRefPubMed Aminian A, Panahi N, Mirsharifi R, Karimian F, Meysamie A, Khorgami Z, Alibakhshi A (2011) Predictors and outcome of cervical anastomotic leakage after esophageal cancer surgery. J Cancer Res Ther 7:448–453CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D (2011) Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 61:69–90CrossRefPubMed Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D (2011) Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 61:69–90CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Zeng H, Zheng R, Guo Y, Zhang S, Zou X, Wang N, Zhang L, Tang J, Chen J, Wei K, Huang S, Wang J, Yu L, Zhao D, Song G, Chen J, Shen Y, Yang X, Gu X, Jin F, Li Q, Li Y, Ge H, Zhu F, Dong J, Guo G, Wu M, Du L, Sun X, He Y, Coleman MP, Baade P, Chen W, Yu XQ (2015) Cancer survival in China, 2003–2005: a population-based study. Int J Cancer 136:1921–1930CrossRefPubMed Zeng H, Zheng R, Guo Y, Zhang S, Zou X, Wang N, Zhang L, Tang J, Chen J, Wei K, Huang S, Wang J, Yu L, Zhao D, Song G, Chen J, Shen Y, Yang X, Gu X, Jin F, Li Q, Li Y, Ge H, Zhu F, Dong J, Guo G, Wu M, Du L, Sun X, He Y, Coleman MP, Baade P, Chen W, Yu XQ (2015) Cancer survival in China, 2003–2005: a population-based study. Int J Cancer 136:1921–1930CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Urschel JD (1995) Esophagogastrostomy anastomotic leaks complicating esophagectomy: a review. Am J Surg 169:634–640CrossRefPubMed Urschel JD (1995) Esophagogastrostomy anastomotic leaks complicating esophagectomy: a review. Am J Surg 169:634–640CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Taguchi S, Osugi H, Higashino M, Tokuhara T, Takada N, Takemura M, Lee S, Kinoshita H (2003) Comparison of threefield esophagectomy for esophageal cancer incorporating open or thoracoscopic thoracotomy. Surg Endosc 17:1445–1450CrossRefPubMed Taguchi S, Osugi H, Higashino M, Tokuhara T, Takada N, Takemura M, Lee S, Kinoshita H (2003) Comparison of threefield esophagectomy for esophageal cancer incorporating open or thoracoscopic thoracotomy. Surg Endosc 17:1445–1450CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Luketich JD, Pennathur A, Awais O, Levy RM, Keeley S, Shende M, Christie NA, Weksler B, Landreneau RJ, Abbas G, Schuchert MJ, Nason KS (2012) Outcomes after minimally invasive esophagectomy: review of over 1000 patients. Ann Surg 256:95–103CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Luketich JD, Pennathur A, Awais O, Levy RM, Keeley S, Shende M, Christie NA, Weksler B, Landreneau RJ, Abbas G, Schuchert MJ, Nason KS (2012) Outcomes after minimally invasive esophagectomy: review of over 1000 patients. Ann Surg 256:95–103CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Rutegard M, Lagergren P, Rouvelas I, Lagergren J (2012) Intrathoracic anastomotic leakage and mortality after esophageal cancer resection: a population-based study. Ann Surg Oncol 19:99–103CrossRefPubMed Rutegard M, Lagergren P, Rouvelas I, Lagergren J (2012) Intrathoracic anastomotic leakage and mortality after esophageal cancer resection: a population-based study. Ann Surg Oncol 19:99–103CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Walther B, Johasson J, Johnsson F, Von Holstein CS, Zilling T (2003) Cervical or thoracic anastomosis after esophageal randomized trial comparing sutured neck anastomosis with stapled intrathoracic anastomosis. Ann Surg 238:803–812CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Walther B, Johasson J, Johnsson F, Von Holstein CS, Zilling T (2003) Cervical or thoracic anastomosis after esophageal randomized trial comparing sutured neck anastomosis with stapled intrathoracic anastomosis. Ann Surg 238:803–812CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Griffin SM, Lamb PJ, Dresner SM, Richardson DL, Hayes N (2001) Diagnosis and management of a mediastinal leak following radical oesophagectomy. Br J Surg 88:1346–1351CrossRefPubMed Griffin SM, Lamb PJ, Dresner SM, Richardson DL, Hayes N (2001) Diagnosis and management of a mediastinal leak following radical oesophagectomy. Br J Surg 88:1346–1351CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Patil PK, Patel SG, Mistry RC, Deshpande RK, Desai PB (1992) Cancer of the esophagus: esophagogastric anastomotic leak: a retrospective study of predisposing factors. J Surg Oncol 49:163–167CrossRefPubMed Patil PK, Patel SG, Mistry RC, Deshpande RK, Desai PB (1992) Cancer of the esophagus: esophagogastric anastomotic leak: a retrospective study of predisposing factors. J Surg Oncol 49:163–167CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Pross M, Manger T, Reinheckel T, Mirow L, Kunz D, Lippert H (2000) Endoscopic treatment of clinically symptomatic leaks of thoracic esophageal anastomoses. Gastrointest Endosc 51:73–76CrossRefPubMed Pross M, Manger T, Reinheckel T, Mirow L, Kunz D, Lippert H (2000) Endoscopic treatment of clinically symptomatic leaks of thoracic esophageal anastomoses. Gastrointest Endosc 51:73–76CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Junemann-Ramirez M, Awan MY, Khan ZM, Rahamim JS (2005) Anastomotic leakage post-esophagogastrectomy for esophageal carcinoma: retrospective analysis of predictive factors, management and influence on long term survival in a high volume centre. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 27:3–7CrossRefPubMed Junemann-Ramirez M, Awan MY, Khan ZM, Rahamim JS (2005) Anastomotic leakage post-esophagogastrectomy for esophageal carcinoma: retrospective analysis of predictive factors, management and influence on long term survival in a high volume centre. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 27:3–7CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Tabatabai A, Hashemi M, Mohajeri G, Ahmadinejad M, Khan IA, Haghdani S (2009) Incidence and risk factors predisposing anastomotic leak after transhiatal esophagectomy. Ann Thorac Med 4:197–200CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tabatabai A, Hashemi M, Mohajeri G, Ahmadinejad M, Khan IA, Haghdani S (2009) Incidence and risk factors predisposing anastomotic leak after transhiatal esophagectomy. Ann Thorac Med 4:197–200CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Guo W, Zhao YP, Jiang YG, Niu HJ, Liu XH, Ma Z, Wang RW (2012) Prevention of postoperative chylothorax with thoracic duct ligation during video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy for cancer. Surg Endosc 26:1332–1336CrossRefPubMed Guo W, Zhao YP, Jiang YG, Niu HJ, Liu XH, Ma Z, Wang RW (2012) Prevention of postoperative chylothorax with thoracic duct ligation during video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy for cancer. Surg Endosc 26:1332–1336CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Zou YB, Yan H, Liu XH, Zhao YJ, Jiang YG, Wang RW, Guo W (2013) Lateral position could provide more excellent hemodynamic parameters during video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy for cancer. Surg Endosc 27:3720–3725CrossRefPubMed Zou YB, Yan H, Liu XH, Zhao YJ, Jiang YG, Wang RW, Guo W (2013) Lateral position could provide more excellent hemodynamic parameters during video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy for cancer. Surg Endosc 27:3720–3725CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Kauppi J, Räsänen J, Sihvo E, Huuhtanen R, Nelskylä K, Salo J (2015) Open versus minimally invasive esophagectomy: clinical outcomes for locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma. Surg Endosc 29:2614–2619CrossRefPubMed Kauppi J, Räsänen J, Sihvo E, Huuhtanen R, Nelskylä K, Salo J (2015) Open versus minimally invasive esophagectomy: clinical outcomes for locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma. Surg Endosc 29:2614–2619CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Luketich JD, Alvelo-Rivera M, Buenaventura PO, Christie NA, McCaughan JS, Litle VR, Schauer PR, Close JM, Fernando HC (2003) Minimally invasive esophagectomy: outcomes in 222 patients. Ann Surg 238:486–494PubMedPubMedCentral Luketich JD, Alvelo-Rivera M, Buenaventura PO, Christie NA, McCaughan JS, Litle VR, Schauer PR, Close JM, Fernando HC (2003) Minimally invasive esophagectomy: outcomes in 222 patients. Ann Surg 238:486–494PubMedPubMedCentral
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Anderegg MC, Gisbertz SS, van Berge Henegouwen MI (2014) Minimally invasive surgery for oesophageal cancer. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 28:41–52CrossRefPubMed Anderegg MC, Gisbertz SS, van Berge Henegouwen MI (2014) Minimally invasive surgery for oesophageal cancer. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 28:41–52CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Herrmann FR, Safran C, Levkoff SE, Minaker KL (1992) Serum albumin level on admission as a predictor of death, length of stay and readmission. Arch Intern Med 152:125–130CrossRefPubMed Herrmann FR, Safran C, Levkoff SE, Minaker KL (1992) Serum albumin level on admission as a predictor of death, length of stay and readmission. Arch Intern Med 152:125–130CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Ellebæk M, Qvist N, Fristrup C, Mortensen MB (2014) Mediastinal microdialysis in the diagnosis of early anastomotic leakage after resection for cancer of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction. Am J Surg 208:397–405CrossRefPubMed Ellebæk M, Qvist N, Fristrup C, Mortensen MB (2014) Mediastinal microdialysis in the diagnosis of early anastomotic leakage after resection for cancer of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction. Am J Surg 208:397–405CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Mears E (1996) Outcomes of continuous process improvement of a nutritional care program incorporating serum prealbumin measurements. Nutrition 12:479–484CrossRefPubMed Mears E (1996) Outcomes of continuous process improvement of a nutritional care program incorporating serum prealbumin measurements. Nutrition 12:479–484CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Luechakiettisak P, Kasetsunthorn S (2008) Comparison of hand-sewn and stapled in esophagogastric anastomosis after esophageal cancer resection: a prospective randomized study. J Med Assoc Thai 91:681–685PubMed Luechakiettisak P, Kasetsunthorn S (2008) Comparison of hand-sewn and stapled in esophagogastric anastomosis after esophageal cancer resection: a prospective randomized study. J Med Assoc Thai 91:681–685PubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Worrell S, Mumtaz S, Tsuboi K, Lee TH, Mittal SK (2010) Anastomotic complications associated with stapled versus hand-sewn anastomosis. J Surg Res 161:9–12CrossRefPubMed Worrell S, Mumtaz S, Tsuboi K, Lee TH, Mittal SK (2010) Anastomotic complications associated with stapled versus hand-sewn anastomosis. J Surg Res 161:9–12CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Guo W, Zou YB, Ma Z, Niu HJ, Jiang YG, Zhao YP, Gong TQ, Wang RW (2013) One surgeon’s learning curve for video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer with the patient in lateral position: how many cases are needed to reach competence? Surg Endosc 27:1346–1352CrossRefPubMed Guo W, Zou YB, Ma Z, Niu HJ, Jiang YG, Zhao YP, Gong TQ, Wang RW (2013) One surgeon’s learning curve for video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer with the patient in lateral position: how many cases are needed to reach competence? Surg Endosc 27:1346–1352CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Scheepers JJ, van der Peet DL, Veenhof AA, Heijnen B, Cuesta MA (2010) Systematic approach of postoperative gastric conduit complications after esophageal resection. Dis Esophagus 23:117–121CrossRefPubMed Scheepers JJ, van der Peet DL, Veenhof AA, Heijnen B, Cuesta MA (2010) Systematic approach of postoperative gastric conduit complications after esophageal resection. Dis Esophagus 23:117–121CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Honda M, Kuriyama A, Noma H, Nunobe S, Furukawa TA (2013) Hand-sewn versus mechanical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 257:238–248CrossRefPubMed Honda M, Kuriyama A, Noma H, Nunobe S, Furukawa TA (2013) Hand-sewn versus mechanical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 257:238–248CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Guo W, Zou YB, Ma Z, Niu HJ, Jiang YG, Zhao YP, Gong TQ, Wang RW (2013) One surgeon’s learning curve for video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer with the patient in lateral position: how many cases are needed to reach competence? Surg Endosc 27:1346–1352CrossRefPubMed Guo W, Zou YB, Ma Z, Niu HJ, Jiang YG, Zhao YP, Gong TQ, Wang RW (2013) One surgeon’s learning curve for video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer with the patient in lateral position: how many cases are needed to reach competence? Surg Endosc 27:1346–1352CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Aminian A, Panahi N, Mirsharifi R, Karimian F, Meysamie A, Khorgami Z, Alibakhshi A (2011) Predictors and outcome of cervical anastomotic leakage esophageal cancer surgery. J Cancer Res Ther 7:448–453CrossRefPubMed Aminian A, Panahi N, Mirsharifi R, Karimian F, Meysamie A, Khorgami Z, Alibakhshi A (2011) Predictors and outcome of cervical anastomotic leakage esophageal cancer surgery. J Cancer Res Ther 7:448–453CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Kondrup J, Rasmussen HH, Hamberg O, Stanga Z, Ad Hoc ESPEN Working Group (2003) Nutritional risk screening (NRS 2002): a new method based on an analysis of controlled clinical trials. Clin Nutr 22:321–336CrossRefPubMed Kondrup J, Rasmussen HH, Hamberg O, Stanga Z, Ad Hoc ESPEN Working Group (2003) Nutritional risk screening (NRS 2002): a new method based on an analysis of controlled clinical trials. Clin Nutr 22:321–336CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Do alterations in plasma albumin and prealbumin after minimally invasive esophagectomy for squamous cell carcinoma influence the incidence of cervical anastomotic leak?
verfasst von
Ying-Jian Wang
Xue-Hai Liu
Long-Yong Mei
Kun-Kun Li
Yao-Guang Jiang
Wei Guo
Publikationsdatum
22.12.2015
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 9/2016
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4705-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2016

Surgical Endoscopy 9/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.