Erschienen in:
01.09.2011 | Original Article
Does a learning curve exist in endorectal two-dimensional ultrasound accuracy?
verfasst von:
O. J. Morris, B. Draganic, S. Smith
Erschienen in:
Techniques in Coloproctology
|
Ausgabe 3/2011
Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten
Abstract
Background
Aim of the study was to assess adequacy of Colorectal Surgical Society of Australia and New Zealand (CSSANZ) endorectal ultrasound (ERUS) training and whether a subsequent learning curve exists.
Methods
A prospective audit of ERUS for staging rectal cancer by a single surgeon from commencement of consultant practice was performed. Data were recorded in a prospectively maintained database. The audit commenced on completion of CSSANZ training. T- and N-stage were assessed clinically, then by ERUS prior to treatment and finally by histology over 8 years.
Results
The results were compared over three time periods: the first a single year, then two three-year periods. Two hundred and seventy-two patients were examined. Two hundred and thirty-three were assessable for T-stage (13 no tumour excision, 26 long course pre-operative radiotherapy) and 142 for N-stage (74 endoanal excision, 17 proximal mesorectum un-assessable). Overall accuracy was 82% for T-stage and 73% for N-stage. Accuracy for T- and N-staging did not change significantly over the three time periods (T: 82.1, 82.3, 81.6%, P = 0.14; N: 83.3, 67.9, 74.2%, P = 0.31). The utility of ERUS was demonstrated by clinical assessment not being possible in 32% of cases and where the two modalities disagreed was correct 82% of the time.
Conclusions
Endorectal ultrasound rectal cancer staging is accurate for T-stage. Competency in ERUS can be achieved in the CSSANZ fellowship and accuracy does not improve with further experience. An ERUS accreditation scheme should be established for future trainees.