Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 1/2010

01.01.2010 | Knee

Double-bundle PCL reconstruction using tibial double cross-pin fixation

verfasst von: Hong Chul Lim, Ji Hoon Bae, Joon Ho Wang, Jae Hyuk Yang, Chang Woo Seok, Hak Jun Kim, Seung Joo Kim

Erschienen in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy | Ausgabe 1/2010

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess the clinical results of arthroscopic double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction using double cross-pin fixation on the tibial side. Twenty-two patients who underwent PCL reconstruction using an Achilles tendon allograft with double cross-pins for tibial fixation were evaluated. There were 19 men and 3 women with mean age 36 years (range 18–59), and the average follow-up period was 33 months (range 24–60). Preoperative and postoperative knee functions were evaluated in all patients using Lysholm knee scores, the 2000 International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) grades, and Tegner activity scores. Median Lysholm knee scores were 64 (50–75) preoperatively and 88 (82–96), 89.9 ± 6.5 postoperatively (P < 0.001). Median side-to-side differences, determined using Telos stress radiographs, were 11 mm (8–14) preoperatively, and 3 mm (1–7) at final follow-up visits (P < 0.01). According to KT-2000 arthrometer measurements, mean side-to-side differences were 11 mm (8–13) preoperatively and 3 mm (1–6, P < 0.01) at final follow-up visits (P < 0.01). Preoperatively the 2000 IKDC evaluation system rated all patients as abnormal or severely abnormal (C or D), and at final follow-up visits, 20 patients (88%) were rated as normal or nearly normal (A or B) and 2 patients (12%) were rated as abnormal (C). Median preinjury and preoperative Tegner scores were 7 (range 5–9) and 3 (range 2–5), respectively, and the mean postoperative Tegner score was 6 (range 3–9). There were no intraoperative or postoperative complications. Our study shows that arthroscopic double-bundle PCL reconstruction using an Achilles allograft with double cross-pins for tibial fixation provides satisfactory clinical results given a mean follow-up of 33 months. We believe that this method provides a reliable alternative technique of PCL reconstruction.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Ahn JH, Yang HS, Jeong WK, Koh KH (2006) Arthroscopic transtibial posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with preservation of posterior cruciate ligament fibers: clinical results of minimum 2-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 34:194–204. doi:10.1177/0363546505279915 CrossRefPubMed Ahn JH, Yang HS, Jeong WK, Koh KH (2006) Arthroscopic transtibial posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with preservation of posterior cruciate ligament fibers: clinical results of minimum 2-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 34:194–204. doi:10.​1177/​0363546505279915​ CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Ahn JH, Yoo JC, Wang JH (2005) Posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: double-loop hamstring tendon autograft versus Achilles tendon allograft—clinical results of a minimum 2-year follow-up. Arthroscopy 21:965–969. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2005.05.004 PubMed Ahn JH, Yoo JC, Wang JH (2005) Posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: double-loop hamstring tendon autograft versus Achilles tendon allograft—clinical results of a minimum 2-year follow-up. Arthroscopy 21:965–969. doi:10.​1016/​j.​arthro.​2005.​05.​004 PubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Campbell RB, Jordan SS, Sekiya JK (2007) Arthroscopic tibial inlay for posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 23(1356):e1351–1354 Campbell RB, Jordan SS, Sekiya JK (2007) Arthroscopic tibial inlay for posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 23(1356):e1351–1354
5.
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen CH, Chen WJ, Shih CH (2001) One-incision endoscopic technique for posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with quadriceps tendon-patellar bone autograft. Arthroscopy 17:329–332. doi:10.1053/jars.2001.21803 PubMed Chen CH, Chen WJ, Shih CH (2001) One-incision endoscopic technique for posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with quadriceps tendon-patellar bone autograft. Arthroscopy 17:329–332. doi:10.​1053/​jars.​2001.​21803 PubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen CH, Chuang TY, Wang KC, Chen WJ, Shih CH (2006) Arthroscopic posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring tendon autograft: results with a minimum 4-year follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 14:1045–1054. doi:10.1007/s00167-006-0113-y CrossRefPubMed Chen CH, Chuang TY, Wang KC, Chen WJ, Shih CH (2006) Arthroscopic posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring tendon autograft: results with a minimum 4-year follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 14:1045–1054. doi:10.​1007/​s00167-006-0113-y CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Chhabra A, Kline AJ, Harner CD (2006) Single-bundle versus double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: scientific rationale and surgical technique. Instr Course Lect 55:497–507PubMed Chhabra A, Kline AJ, Harner CD (2006) Single-bundle versus double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: scientific rationale and surgical technique. Instr Course Lect 55:497–507PubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat DeFrate LE, van der Ven A, Gill TJ, Li G (2004) The effect of length on the structural properties of an Achilles tendon graft as used in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 32:993–997. doi:10.1177/0363546503261739 CrossRefPubMed DeFrate LE, van der Ven A, Gill TJ, Li G (2004) The effect of length on the structural properties of an Achilles tendon graft as used in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 32:993–997. doi:10.​1177/​0363546503261739​ CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Garofalo R, Jolles BM, Moretti B, Siegrist O (2006) Double-bundle transtibial posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with a tendon-patellar bone-semitendinosus tendon autograft: clinical results with a minimum of 2 years’ follow-up. Arthroscopy 22:1331–1338 e1331PubMed Garofalo R, Jolles BM, Moretti B, Siegrist O (2006) Double-bundle transtibial posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with a tendon-patellar bone-semitendinosus tendon autograft: clinical results with a minimum of 2 years’ follow-up. Arthroscopy 22:1331–1338 e1331PubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Harner CD, Janaushek MA, Kanamori A, Yagi M, Vogrin TM, Woo SL (2000) Biomechanical analysis of a double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 28:144–151PubMed Harner CD, Janaushek MA, Kanamori A, Yagi M, Vogrin TM, Woo SL (2000) Biomechanical analysis of a double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 28:144–151PubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Hatayama K, Higuchi H, Kimura M, Kobayashi Y, Asagumo H, Takagishi K (2006) A comparison of arthroscopic single- and double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: review of 20 cases. Am J Orthop 35:568–571PubMed Hatayama K, Higuchi H, Kimura M, Kobayashi Y, Asagumo H, Takagishi K (2006) A comparison of arthroscopic single- and double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: review of 20 cases. Am J Orthop 35:568–571PubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Irrgang JJ, Anderson AF, Boland AL, Harner CD, Kurosaka M, Neyret P, Richmond JC, Shelborne KD (2001) Development and validation of the international knee documentation committee subjective knee form. Am J Sports Med 29:600–613PubMed Irrgang JJ, Anderson AF, Boland AL, Harner CD, Kurosaka M, Neyret P, Richmond JC, Shelborne KD (2001) Development and validation of the international knee documentation committee subjective knee form. Am J Sports Med 29:600–613PubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Irrgang JJ, Ho H, Harner CD, Fu FH (1998) Use of the International Knee Documentation Committee guidelines to assess outcome following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 6:107–114. doi:10.1007/s001670050082 CrossRefPubMed Irrgang JJ, Ho H, Harner CD, Fu FH (1998) Use of the International Knee Documentation Committee guidelines to assess outcome following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 6:107–114. doi:10.​1007/​s001670050082 CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Ishibashi Y, Rudy TW, Livesay GA, Stone JD, Fu FH, Woo SL (1997) The effect of anterior cruciate ligament graft fixation site at the tibia on knee stability: evaluation using a robotic testing system. Arthroscopy 13:177–182. doi:10.1016/S0749-8063(97)90152-3 PubMedCrossRef Ishibashi Y, Rudy TW, Livesay GA, Stone JD, Fu FH, Woo SL (1997) The effect of anterior cruciate ligament graft fixation site at the tibia on knee stability: evaluation using a robotic testing system. Arthroscopy 13:177–182. doi:10.​1016/​S0749-8063(97)90152-3 PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Jung YB, Jung HJ, Tae SK, Lee YS, Lee KH (2005) Reconstruction of the posterior cruciate ligament with a mid-third patellar tendon graft with use of a modified tibial inlay method. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87(Suppl 1):247–263. doi:10.2106/JBJS.E.00203 CrossRefPubMed Jung YB, Jung HJ, Tae SK, Lee YS, Lee KH (2005) Reconstruction of the posterior cruciate ligament with a mid-third patellar tendon graft with use of a modified tibial inlay method. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87(Suppl 1):247–263. doi:10.​2106/​JBJS.​E.​00203 CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat MacGillivray JD, Stein BE, Park M, Allen AA, Wickiewicz TL, Warren RF (2006) Comparison of tibial inlay versus transtibial techniques for isolated posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: minimum 2-year follow-up. Arthroscopy 22:320–328. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2005.08.057 PubMedCrossRef MacGillivray JD, Stein BE, Park M, Allen AA, Wickiewicz TL, Warren RF (2006) Comparison of tibial inlay versus transtibial techniques for isolated posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: minimum 2-year follow-up. Arthroscopy 22:320–328. doi:10.​1016/​j.​arthro.​2005.​08.​057 PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Margheritini F, Mauro CS, Rihn JA, Stabile KJ, Woo SL, Harner CD (2004) Biomechanical comparison of tibial inlay versus transtibial techniques for posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: analysis of knee kinematics and graft in situ forces. Am J Sports Med 32:587–593. doi:10.1177/0363546503261717 CrossRefPubMed Margheritini F, Mauro CS, Rihn JA, Stabile KJ, Woo SL, Harner CD (2004) Biomechanical comparison of tibial inlay versus transtibial techniques for posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: analysis of knee kinematics and graft in situ forces. Am J Sports Med 32:587–593. doi:10.​1177/​0363546503261717​ CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Noyes FR, Barber-Westin SD (2006) Two-strand posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with a quadriceps tendon-patellar bone autograft: technical considerations and clinical results. Instr Course Lect 55:509–528PubMed Noyes FR, Barber-Westin SD (2006) Two-strand posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with a quadriceps tendon-patellar bone autograft: technical considerations and clinical results. Instr Course Lect 55:509–528PubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Nyland J, Hester P, Caborn DN (2002) Double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with allograft tissue: 2-year postoperative outcomes. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 10:274–279CrossRefPubMed Nyland J, Hester P, Caborn DN (2002) Double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with allograft tissue: 2-year postoperative outcomes. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 10:274–279CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Oakes DA, Markolf KL, McWilliams J, Young CR, McAllister DR (2002) Biomechanical comparison of tibial inlay and tibial tunnel techniques for reconstruction of the posterior cruciate ligament. Analysis of graft forces. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84-A:938–944PubMed Oakes DA, Markolf KL, McWilliams J, Young CR, McAllister DR (2002) Biomechanical comparison of tibial inlay and tibial tunnel techniques for reconstruction of the posterior cruciate ligament. Analysis of graft forces. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84-A:938–944PubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Scheffler SU, Sudkamp NP, Gockenjan A, Hoffmann RF, Weiler A (2002) Biomechanical comparison of hamstring and patellar tendon graft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques: The impact of fixation level and fixation method under cyclic loading. Arthroscopy 18:304–315. doi:10.1053/jars.2002.30609 PubMedCrossRef Scheffler SU, Sudkamp NP, Gockenjan A, Hoffmann RF, Weiler A (2002) Biomechanical comparison of hamstring and patellar tendon graft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques: The impact of fixation level and fixation method under cyclic loading. Arthroscopy 18:304–315. doi:10.​1053/​jars.​2002.​30609 PubMedCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Shino K, Nakagawa S, Nakamura N, Matsumoto N, Toritsuka Y, Natsu-ume T (1996) Arthroscopic posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring tendons: one-incision technique with Endobutton. Arthroscopy 12:638–642. doi:10.1016/S0749-8063(96)90207-8 PubMedCrossRef Shino K, Nakagawa S, Nakamura N, Matsumoto N, Toritsuka Y, Natsu-ume T (1996) Arthroscopic posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring tendons: one-incision technique with Endobutton. Arthroscopy 12:638–642. doi:10.​1016/​S0749-8063(96)90207-8 PubMedCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Tegner Y, Lysholm J (1985) Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries. Clin Orthop Relat Res 198(9):43–49PubMed Tegner Y, Lysholm J (1985) Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries. Clin Orthop Relat Res 198(9):43–49PubMed
29.
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Wiley WB, Askew MJ, Melby A III, Noe DA (2006) Kinematics of the posterior cruciate ligament/posterolateral corner-injured knee after reconstruction by single- and double-bundle intra-articular grafts. Am J Sports Med 34:741–748. doi:10.1177/0363546505282615 CrossRefPubMed Wiley WB, Askew MJ, Melby A III, Noe DA (2006) Kinematics of the posterior cruciate ligament/posterolateral corner-injured knee after reconstruction by single- and double-bundle intra-articular grafts. Am J Sports Med 34:741–748. doi:10.​1177/​0363546505282615​ CrossRefPubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Zantop T, Lenschow S, Lemburg T, Weimann A, Petersen W (2004) Soft-tissue graft fixation in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: evaluation of the effect of tibial insertion site on joint kinematics and in situ forces using a robotic/UFS testing system. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 124:614–620. doi:10.1007/s00402-004-0741-y CrossRefPubMed Zantop T, Lenschow S, Lemburg T, Weimann A, Petersen W (2004) Soft-tissue graft fixation in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: evaluation of the effect of tibial insertion site on joint kinematics and in situ forces using a robotic/UFS testing system. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 124:614–620. doi:10.​1007/​s00402-004-0741-y CrossRefPubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Zantop T, Ruemmler M, Welbers B, Langer M, Weimann A, Petersen W (2005) Cyclic loading comparison between biodegradable interference screw fixation and biodegradable double cross-pin fixation of human bone-patellar tendon-bone grafts. Arthroscopy 21:934–941. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2005.05.022 PubMedCrossRef Zantop T, Ruemmler M, Welbers B, Langer M, Weimann A, Petersen W (2005) Cyclic loading comparison between biodegradable interference screw fixation and biodegradable double cross-pin fixation of human bone-patellar tendon-bone grafts. Arthroscopy 21:934–941. doi:10.​1016/​j.​arthro.​2005.​05.​022 PubMedCrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Zantop T, Weimann A, Rummler M, Hassenpflug J, Petersen W (2004) Initial fixation strength of two bioabsorbable pins for the fixation of hamstring grafts compared to interference screw fixation: single cycle and cyclic loading. Am J Sports Med 32:641–649. doi:10.1177/0095399703258616 CrossRefPubMed Zantop T, Weimann A, Rummler M, Hassenpflug J, Petersen W (2004) Initial fixation strength of two bioabsorbable pins for the fixation of hamstring grafts compared to interference screw fixation: single cycle and cyclic loading. Am J Sports Med 32:641–649. doi:10.​1177/​0095399703258616​ CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Double-bundle PCL reconstruction using tibial double cross-pin fixation
verfasst von
Hong Chul Lim
Ji Hoon Bae
Joon Ho Wang
Jae Hyuk Yang
Chang Woo Seok
Hak Jun Kim
Seung Joo Kim
Publikationsdatum
01.01.2010
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy / Ausgabe 1/2010
Print ISSN: 0942-2056
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-7347
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-009-0812-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2010

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 1/2010 Zur Ausgabe

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen. 
» Jetzt entdecken

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.