Introduction
Gastric Cancer is a kind of common malignancy with poor prognosis worldwide [
1]. A variety of factors are reported to be associated with the development of gastric cancer, such as irregular diet, genetic and epigenetic influence [
2]. Due to the lack of typical early symptoms, gastric cancer patients are always diagnosed at advanced stages [
3]. The detailed knowledge of the molecular characteristics and the identification of new biomarkers are beneficial for the treatment of gastric cancer. Therefore, finding the biomarker for early diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of gastric cancer is of great importance.
MicroRNAs (miRNAs, 20–24 nucleotides in length) are a series of non-coding RNAs, which have vital roles in the regulation of gene expression at the post-transcriptional level via binding to the 3′-UTR of target mRNAs [
4]. Meanwhile, miRNAs participate in the regulation of a variety of human proteins, which makes it easier to affect the genetic pathways [
5]. Currently, miRNA has been reported to act as oncogenes or anti-oncogenes in the initiation and development of various cancers [
6‐
10]. For example, miR-423-3p acts as an oncogene and promotes cell proliferation, migration, and invasion of lung cancer [
11]. MiRNAs also have been demonstrated to be implicated in the development, progression, and metastasis of gastric cancer. MiR-196a could promote the invasion and metastasis of gastric cancer by targeting SFRP1; miR-383-5p was downregulated and might act as a tumor suppressor for gastric cancer, and miR-374a has been reported to act as a biomarker for the diagnosis and prognosis of gastric cancer [
12‐
14].
In the present study, miR-484 was investigated in the regulation of gastric cancer. MiR-484 was suggested to play a role in the progression of lung cancer by inhibiting the apoptosis of the cell [
15]. It is also reported that miR-484 inhibits cell proliferation of cervical cancer and breast cancer [
16,
17]. Additionally, mir-484 has been demonstrated to be down-regulated in gastric cancer [
18‐
20], however, the specific mechanism of miR-484 on the modulation of gastric cancer has not been reported. Therefore, the subject of this study is to investigate the role of miR-484 in the prognosis and progression of gastric cancer, providing considerable therapeutic strategies against gastric cancer.
Materials and methods
Patients and tissue samples collection
The paired gastric cancer tissue and matched adjacent normal tissue specimens used for the investigation were collected from 124 patients with gastric cancer admitted to Binzhou Medical University Hospital, from January 2011 to December 2013. The isolated samples were confirmed with pathology diagnosis following the International Union against Cancer. The collected tissues were snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at − 80 °C for further analysis. Additionally, all the patients had not received any anti-tumor therapies, and a 5-year follow up survey was carried to collect the survival status. Meanwhile, the clinicopathological information of the patients, including age, gender, tumor size, differentiation, lymph node metastasis, and TNM stage are listed in Tables
1 and
2. All participants signed written informed consent in this study. The research was approved by the Ethics Committee of Binzhou Medical University Hospital.
Table 1Correlation between miR-484 expression levels and clinical features in gastric cancer patients
Age |
< 60 | 63 | 33 | 30 | 0.269 |
≥ 60 | 61 | 36 | 25 |
Gender |
Male | 76 | 37 | 39 | 0.632 |
Female | 48 | 32 | 16 |
Differentiation |
Well + Moderate | 71 | 29 | 42 | 0.006 |
Poor | 53 | 40 | 13 |
T Stage |
T1-T2 | 64 | 34 | 30 | 0.388 |
T3-T4 | 60 | 35 | 25 |
Lauren classification |
Intestinal | 68 | 33 | 25 | 0.504 |
Diffused | 56 | 26 | 30 |
Lymph node metastasis |
Negative | 57 | 24 | 33 | 0.015 |
Positive | 67 | 45 | 22 |
Distant metastasis |
Negative | 93 | 47 | 46 | 0.005 |
Positive | 31 | 22 | 9 |
TNM stage |
I - II | 55 | 26 | 29 | 0.002 |
III - IV | 69 | 43 | 26 |
Table 2Multivariate Cox analysis of clinical parameters in relation to overall survival
miR-484 | 2.868 | 1.148–7.167 | 0.024 |
Age | 1.176 | 0.589–2.350 | 0.645 |
Gender | 1.276 | 0.611–2.664 | 0.517 |
Differentiation | 1.563 | 0.715–3.413 | 0.263 |
T stage | 1.529 | 0.760–3.076 | 0.234 |
Lauren classification | 1.426 | 0.707–2.879 | 0.322 |
Lymph node metastasis | 1.844 | 0.861–3.953 | 0.116 |
Distant metastasis | 2.172 | 1.032–4.570 | 0.041 |
TNM stage | 2.061 | 1.029–4.126 | 0.041 |
Cell lines and transfection
Gastric cancer cell lines (HGC-27, SNU-1, AGS, NCI-N87) and a normal gastric mucous membrane cell line (GES-1) were purchased from Shanghai Cell Bank of the Chinese Academy of Sciences. All the cells were incubated in the RPMI1640 medium with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), in a humidified incubator at 37 °C with 5% CO2. For the cell transfection, miR-484 mimic, mimic negative control (NC), miR-484 inhibitor, inhibitor NC (RiboBio, Guangzhou, China) were used for the overexpression and knockdown of miR-484, and the Lipofectamine 2000 Reagent (Invitrogen, USA) was employed according to the instructions of the manufacturer. The sequence of miR-484 mimic is: 5′-UCAGGCUCAGUCCCCUCCCGAU-3′, and the sequence of miR-484 inhibitor is: 5′- AUCGGGAGGGGACUGAGCCUGA-3′.
RNA extraction and quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR)
The TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) was used to extract total RNA of tissues and cells. The extracted RNA reverse transcript to cDNA by a High Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA), and stored at − 20 °C. Next, qRT-PCR was utilized to investigate the expression of miR-484 in tissues and cells, which was carried out with the SYBR Green I Master Mix kit (Invitrogen) and ran on the 7300 Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, USA). The expression level was determined using the 2-ΔΔCt method and normalized to U6.
Cell proliferation assay
The transfection cells were seeded into a 96-well plate with a cell concentration of 5 × 103/ mL per well. At 0, 24, 48, 72 h, 10 μL cell counting kit-8 (CCK-8) reagent (Dojindo, Kumamoto, Japan) was added to each well, and then incubated in a humidified incubator for 4 h at 37 °C with 5% CO2. The absorbance at 450 nm was measured by a microplate reader (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Experiments were repeated in triplicate.
Transwell migration and invasion assay
The 24-well transwell chambers (Multiskan MK3, Thermo, Waltham, MA, USA) with a pore size of 8 μm polycarbonate membrane was employed to analyze the migration and invasion. For the migration assay, the transfected cells with the concentration of 2 × 105/ml were seeded into the upper compartment and then incubated in the culture medium without FBS at 37 °C for 24 h. While for the invasion assay, the upper chamber was coated with Matrigel (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). The lower chamber was filled the culture medium with 10% FBS as a chemoattractant. After incubating for 48 h, the migrated cells were stained with 0.1% crystal violet and counted by a microscope.
Statistical analysis
All results are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Statistical analysis of the data was conducted with SPSS 20.0 software (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) and GraphPad Prism 5.0 software (GraphPad Software, Inc., Chicago, USA). The differences between the two groups are analyzed through Student’s t-test. The correlation of miR-484 with clinicopathological features was evaluated by χ2 test. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression analysis were used to determine the prognostic significance of miR-484. The differences were considered to be significant when P < 0.05.
Discussion
Gastric cancer is considered to be a highly lethal malignancy, due to its terrible proliferation, migration, and invasion, which can lead to high mortality and poor prognosis. The modular and cellular factors that governing these processes remain unclear [
21]. Multiple studies have reported that microRNAs could regulate target mRNAs and its abnormal expression was closely related to the migration, invasion, and proliferation of various cancers [
10,
22‐
24]. For instance, miR-593 can inhibit the migration and invasion of non-small cell lung cancer cells by targeting SLUG-associated signaling pathways [
25]. MiRNAs have different behaviors in various cancers. MiR-601 acts as an oncogene in gastric cancer, which was upregulated and related with the poor prognosis of gastric cancer [
26]. On the other hand, miR-601 was also a prognosis marker of breast cancer, because its downregulation could promote the proliferation, migration, and invasion of breast cancer cells [
27]. For gastric cancer, a variety of miRNAs have been reported to play a role in its proliferation, migration, and invasion, such as miR-4317, miR-501-5p, miR-214 and so on [
28‐
30]. Moreover, miR-214 was also demonstrated to enhance the invasion of breast cancer cells, and it was upregulated in breast cancer, which is opposite to the expression in gastric cancer [
31].
In the present study, the role of miR-484 in the proliferation, migration, and invasion of gastric cancer was studied, and we found the expression of miR-484 was downregulated in gastric cancer tissues compared with paired adjacent normal tissues. Moreover, the expression of miR-484 was associated with differentiation, lymph node metastasis, and TNM stage. From these results, it can be inferred that miR-484 may be a tumor suppressor, which is consistent with previous studies [
18‐
20]. Furthermore, the association of miR-484 with tumor differentiation, lymph node metastasis and TNM stage of the patients was found, indicating the potential role of miR-484 in the development of gastric cancer. Additionally, based on the survival information and the clinical features of patients, the Kaplan-Meier curve and Cox regression analyses were employed to explore the clinical significance of miR-484. From the results, we found that the patients with low expression of miR-484 had shorter survival time, which indicated that the downregulation of miR-484 was associated with poor overall survival.
Previous studies have demonstrated the dysregulation of miRNAs that play roles in cell proliferation, migration, and invasion of various cancers. For example, the downregulation of miR-449a exerted inhibitory effect on the proliferation, migration, and invasion of cervical cancer [
8]. The overexpression of miR-200 could suppress tumor proliferation in colorectal cancer [
32]. Actually, the role of miR-484 in a certain type of cancer is still a controversial issue. Recent research has found the dysregulation of miR-484 in various cancers, and its expression was different. The expression of miR-484 in lung cancer was increased, but it was downregulated in cervical cancer and metastatic renal cell carcinoma [
16,
33,
34]. It also has been reported that miR-484 was highly specific for prostate cancer, which could make it act as a prostate cancer screening biomarker [
35]. In hepatocellular carcinoma, miR-484 has an oncogenic role by targeting TUSC5 [
36]. Moreover, miR-484 could act as the biomarker for many other cancers, including lung cancer, breast cancer, cervical cancer and colorectal cancer [
15,
16,
37]. In the present study, the upregulation of miR-484 inhibited the proliferation, migration, and invasion of gastric cancer cells, which suggested that miR-484 might be involved in the progression of gastric cancer.
However, there are also some limitations in our study. Previous studies have demonstrated that miR-484 can reduce the expression of a series of oncogenes, such as ZEB1, SMAD2, etc., inhibit the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) of tumor cells, or regulate the extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 signaling [
16,
34,
38]. The precise molecular mechanisms underlying the role of miR-484 should be investigated in further studies. On the other hand, only a limited number of samples were included in the current study and increased sample size should be used in the future to validate the accuracy of miR-484 as a biomarker.
To summarize, the present study indicated the downregulation of miR-484 was associated with the poor overall survival of gastric cancer patients, which makes it possible to act as a candidate prognostic biomarker. The overexpression of miR-484 in gastric cancer leads to inhibited cell proliferation, migration, and invasion, indicating that miR-484 may be a therapeutic target for the treatment of gastric cancer.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.