nach oben

Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

Erschienen in:

01.01.2011 | Original Article

Early Detection of Anastomotic Leakage After Elective Low Anterior Resection

verfasst von: Elyamani Fouda, Ayman El Nakeeb, Alaa Magdy, Enas A. Hammad, Gamal Othman, Mohamed Farid

Erschienen in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery | Ausgabe 1/2011

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Colorectal anastomotic leakage is a serious complication leading to major postoperative morbidity and mortality. In the present study, we investigated the early detection of anastomotic leakage before its clinical presentation.

Method

Fifty-six patients with rectal cancer were included prospectively in this study. All patients underwent elective low anterior resection. Peritoneal samples were collected from the abdominal drains at the first, third, and fifth days postoperatively for bacteriological study (quantitative cultures for both aerobes and anaerobes) and cytokines (IL-6, IL-10, TNF) measurement. Patients were divided into two groups: those without symptomatic or clinical evidence of anastomotic leakage (AL; group 1) and those with clinical evidence of AL (group 2). Study variables included hospital stay, wound infection, operative time, blood loss, height of anastomosis, intraperitoneal cytokines, and microbiological study of peritoneal fluid.

Result

Clinically evident AL occurred in eight patients (14.3%) and diagnosed postoperatively on median day 6. Intraperitoneal bacterial colonization and cytokine levels were significantly higher in patients with clinical evidence of AL. Wound infection was significantly higher in anastomotic leakage group. The hospital stay for the patients with anastomotic leakage was significantly longer than those without AL (14 ± 1.41 vs. 5.43 ± 0.89 days). A significant difference among two groups was observed regarding operative time, blood loss, blood transfusion, and height of the anastomosis.

Conclusion

The peritoneal cytokines levels and intraperitoneal bacterial colonization might be an additional diagnostic tool that can support the decision making of surgeons for early detection of anastomotic leak in colorectal surgery.

Alves A, Panis Y, Trancart D, et al. Factors associated with clinically significant anastomotic leakage after large bowel resection: multivariate analysis of 707 patients. World J Surg 2002;26: 499–502.PubMedCrossRef

Fielding LP, Stewart-Brown S, Blesovsky L, Kearney G. Anastomotic integrity after operations for large-bowel cancer: a multicentre study. Br Med J 1980;281:411–414.PubMedCrossRef

Golub R, Golub RW, Cantu R Jr, Stein HD. A multivariate analysis of factors contributing to leakage of intestinal anastomoses. J Am Coll Surg 1997;184:364–372.PubMed

Isbister WH. Anastomotic leak in colorectal surgery: a single surgeon's experience. ANZ J Surg 2001;71:516–520.PubMedCrossRef

Tsuyoshi Konishi, Toshiaki Watanabe, Junji Kishimoto, Hirokazu Nagawa. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after surgery for colorectal cancer: results of prospective surveillance. J Am Coll Surg 2006, Vol. 202, No. 3,439–444CrossRef

Hallbook O, Sjodahl R. Anastomotic leakage and functional outcome after anterior resection of the rectum. Br J Surg 1996;83:60PubMedCrossRef

Zaheer S, Pemberton JH, Farouk R, Dozois RR, Wolff BG, Ilstrup D. Surgical treatment of adenocarcinoma of the rectum. Ann Surg 1998; 227: 800–811.PubMedCrossRef

Arenal JJ, Benito C, Concejo MP, Ortega E. Colorectal resection and primary anastomosis in patients aged 70 and older: a prospective study. Eur J Surg 1999; 165: 593–597.PubMedCrossRef

Peter Matthiessen, Ida Strand, Kjell Jansson, Cathrine To¨rnquist, R.N., Magnus Andersson, Jorgen Rutegard, Lars Norgren. Is early detection of anastomotic leakage possible by intraperitoneal microdialysis and intraperitoneal cytokines after anterior resection of the rectum for cancer? Dis Colon Rectum, 2007, vol 50, No. 11,1918–27CrossRef

10.

Karanjia ND, Heald RJ. Anterior resection without a defunctioning colostomy: questions of safety. Br J Surg 1992;79:1109–10.PubMedCrossRef

11.

Karanjia ND, Corder AP, Bearn P, Heald RJ. Leakage from stapled low anastomosis after total mesorectal excision for carcinoma of the rectum. Br J Surg 1994;81:1224–1226.PubMedCrossRef

12.

Hyman N, Manchester TL, Osler T. Anastomotic leaks after intestinal anastomosis: it’s later than you think. Ann Surg 2007;245:254–258.PubMedCrossRef

13.

M den Dulk, S.L. Noter, E.R. Hendriks, M.A.M. Brouwers, C.H. van der Vlies, R.J. Oostenbroek, A.G. Menon, W.H. Steup, C.J.H. van de Velde. Improved diagnosis and treatment of anastomotic leakage after colorectal surgery EJSO 35 (2009) 420–426

14.

Burak Ugrasx, Murat Girisx, Yesxim Erbil, Murat Gokpınar, Gamze C¸ ıtlak, Halim _Isxsever, Alp Bozbora, Serdar Oztezcan. Early prediction of anastomotic leakage after colorectal surgery by measuring peritoneal cytokines: Prospective study. Int J Surg 6 (2008) 28–35

15.

Mark I. van Berge Henegouwen, Tom van der Poll, MD, Sander J. H. van Deventer, Dirk J. Gouma. Peritoneal Cytokine Release after Elective Gastrointestinal Surgery and Postoperative Complications. THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY 1998, VOL 175,311–16CrossRef

16.

Badia JM, Whawell SA, Scott-Coombes DM, et al. Peritoneal and systemic cytokine response to laparotomy. Br J Surg. 1996;83: 347–348.PubMedCrossRef

17.

Herwig R, Glodny B, Kuhle C, Schluter B, Brinkmann OA, Strasser H.Early identification of peritonitis by peritoneal cytokine measurement. Dis Colon Rectum 2002;45: 514–21.PubMedCrossRef

18.

Raahave d. New technique for quantitative bacteriological sampling of wounds by velvet pads: clinical sampling trial. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, Oct. 1975, P. 277–280 Vol. 2, No. 4PubMed

19.

Robson MC, Heggers JP. Bacterial quantification of open wounds. Mil Med. 1969;134:19–24.PubMed

20.

Robson MC. Wound infection: a failure of wound healing caused by an imbalance of bacteria. Surg Clin North Am. 1997;77:637–650.PubMedCrossRef

21.

Bowler PG, Duerden BI, Armstrong DG. Wound microbiology and associated approaches to wound management. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2001;14:244–269.PubMedCrossRef

22.

Brook I, Edith HF. Aerobic and anerobic microbiology in intraabdominal infections associated with diverticulitis. J Med Microbiol. 2000,vol 49,827–830PubMed

23.

Collee JG and Marr W: Specimen collection, culture containers and media. In: Collee J.G, Fraser A.G, Marmion B.P, Simmons A (eds.): Mackie and MacCartney Practical Medical Microbiology. New York: Churchill Livingstone, 1996 PP: 95–111.

24.

Alves A, Panis Y, Pocard M, Regimbeau JM, Valleur P. Management of anastomotic leakage after nondiverted large bowel resection. J Am Coll Surg 1999; 189: 554–9.PubMedCrossRef

25.

Soeters PB, de Zoete JP, Dejong CHC, Williams NS, Baeten CG. Colorectal surgery and anastomotic leakage. Dig Surg 2002; 19: 150–5.PubMedCrossRef

26.

Wong NY, EuKW. A defunctioning ileostomy does not prevent clinical anastomotic leak after a low anterior resection: a prospective comparative study. Dis Colon Rectum 2005;48:2076–2079.PubMedCrossRef

27.

Rullier E, Laurent C, Garrelon JL, Michel P, Saric J, Parneix M. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after resection of rectal cancer. Br J Surg 1998;85:355–8.PubMedCrossRef

28.

Bell SW, Walker KG, Rickard MJ. Anastomotic leakage after curative anterior resection results in a higher prevalence of local recurrence. Br J Surg 2003;90:1261–6.PubMedCrossRef

29.

Petersen S, Freitag M, Hellmich G, Ludwig K. Anastomotic leakage: impact on local recurrence and survival in surgery of colorectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 1998;13:160–3.PubMedCrossRef

30.

Monica Millan, Eduardo Garcı´a-Granero, Blas Flor, Stephanie Garcı´a-Botello, Salvador Lledo. Early Prediction of Anastomotic Leak in Colorectal Cancer Surgery by Intramucosal pH. Dis Colon Rectum, May 2006, Vol. 49, No. 5 595–601CrossRef

31.

Platell C., N. Barwood, G. Dorfmann, G. Makin. The incidence of anastomotic leaks in patients undergoing colorectal surgery Colorectal Disease 2006, 9, 71–79CrossRef

32.

Yeh CY, Changchien CR, Wang JY, Chen JS, Chen HH, Chiang JM, Tang R. Pelvic drainage and other risk factors for leakage after elective anterior resection in rectal cancer patients. Ann Surg 2005; 241: 9–13.PubMed

33.

Sagar PM, Hartley MN, Macfie J, Mancey-Jones B, Sedman P, May J. Randomized trial of pelvic drainage after rectal resection. Dis Colon Rectum 1995; 38: 254–8.PubMedCrossRef

34.

Poon RT, Chu KW, Ho JW, Chan CW, Law WL, Wong J. Prospective evaluation of selective defunctioning stoma for low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision. World J Surg 1999;23:463–8.PubMedCrossRef

35.

Peter Matthiessen, Olof Hallbo¨o¨k, Jo¨rgen Rutegهrd, Go¨ran Simert, Rune Sjo¨dahl, Defunctioning stoma reduces symptomatic anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection of the rectum for cancer a randomized multicenter trial. Annals of Surgery 2007 vol 246, number 2, 207–214CrossRef

36.

Peel AL, Taylor EW. Proposed definitions for the audit of postoperative infection: a discussion paper. Surgical Infection Study Group. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1991;73:385–8.PubMed

37.

Eckmann C, Kujath P, Schiedeck TH, Shekarriz H, Bruch HP. Anastomotic leakage following low anterior resection: results of a standardized diagnostic and therapeutic approach. Int J Colorectal Dis 2004; 19: 128–33.PubMedCrossRef

38.

Komen N, R. W. F. de Bruin, G. J. Kleinrensink, J. Jeekel J. F. Lange. Anastomotic leakage, the search for a reliable biomarker. A review of the literature. Colorectal Disease 2008, 10, 109–117PubMedCrossRef

39.

Heel KA, Hall JC. Peritoneal defences and peritoneum associated lymphoid tissue. Br J Surg. 1996;83:1031–1036.PubMedCrossRef

40.

Kinnaert P, De Wilde JP, Bournonville B, et al. Direct activation of human peritoneal mesothelial cells by heat-killed microorganisms. Ann Surg. 1997;224:749–755.CrossRef

41.

Sherwood ER, Toliver-Kinsky T. Mechanisms of the inflammatory response. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 2004; 18:385–405.PubMedCrossRef

42.

Scheingraber S, Bauerfeind F, Bohme J, Dralle H. Limits of peritoneal cytokine measurements during abdominal lavage treatment for intraabdominal sepsis. Am J Surg 2001;181: 301–8.PubMedCrossRef

43.

Jansson K, Redler B, Truedsson L, Magnuson A, Matthiessen P, Andersson M, et al. Intraperitoneal cytokine response after major surgery: higher postoperative intraperitoneal versus systemic cytokine levels suggest the gastrointestinal tract as the major source of the postoperative inflammatory reaction. Am J Surg 2004;187:372–7.PubMedCrossRef

44.

Ruiter J. De, Weel J.,Manusama E, Kingma WP, Van der Voort (2009) The epidemiology of intra-abdominal flora in critically ill patients with secondary and tertiary abdominal sepsis. Infection 37(6):522–527CrossRef

45.

Prescott, L.M; Klein, D.A. and Harley J.P. Normal Microbiota and non specific host resistance. In: Prescott, L.M; Klein, D.A. and Harley J.P. (eds.): Microbiology.2005, PP; 673–704. McGraw Hill.

46.

Sarginson RE, Taylor N, van Saene HKF (2001) Glossary of terms and definitions. Curr Anaesth Crit Care 12:2–5CrossRef

47.

van Uffelen R, van Saene HKF, Fidler V. Oropharyngeal flora as a source of colonizing the lower airways in patients on artificial ventilation. Intensive Care Med 1984,10:233–237PubMedCrossRef

48.

Estes RJ, Meduri GU. The pathogenesis of ventilator associated pneumonia. I. Mechanisms of bacterial transcolonization and airway inoculation. Intensive Care Med 1995, 21:365–383PubMedCrossRef

49.

van der Spoel JI, Oudemans-van Straaten HM, Stoutenbeek CP et al. Neostigmine resolves critical illness-related colonic ileus in intensive care patients with multiple organ failure–a prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Intensive Care Med 2001, 27:822–827.PubMedCrossRef

50.

Wakefield CH, Carey D, Foulds S, Monson JRT, Guillou PJ Polymorphonuclear leukocyte activation: an early marker of the postsurgical response. Arch Surg 1993 128: 390–395.PubMed

51.

Brook I: Microbiology and management of abdominal infections. Dig Dis Sci 2008,53:2585–2591.PubMedCrossRef

52.

Nichols RL, Condon RE. Preoperative preparation of the colon. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1971;132:323–37.

53.

Hares MM, Alexander-Williams J. The effect of bowel preparation on colonic surgery. World J Surg 1982;6:175–81.PubMedCrossRef

54.

Wolters U, Keller HW, Sorgatz S, Raab A, Pichlmaier H. Prospective randomized study of preoperative bowel cleansing for patients undergoing colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 1994;81:598–600PubMedCrossRef

55.

Schein M, Assalia A, Eldar S, Wittman DH. Is mechanical bowel preparation necessary before primary colonic anastomosis? An experimental study. Dis Colon Rectum 1995;38:749–54PubMedCrossRef

56.

Irving A, Scringemour D. Mechanical bowel preparation for colonic resection and anastomosis. Br J Surg 1987;74:580–81PubMedCrossRef

Titel: Early Detection of Anastomotic Leakage After Elective Low Anterior Resection
verfasst von: Elyamani Fouda
Ayman El Nakeeb
Alaa Magdy
Enas A. Hammad
Gamal Othman
Mohamed Farid
Publikationsdatum: 01.01.2011
Verlag: Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery / Ausgabe 1/2011
Print ISSN: 1091-255X
Elektronische ISSN: 1873-4626
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-010-1364-y

Neu im Fachgebiet Chirurgie

Wie erfolgreich ist eine Re-Ablation nach Rezidiv?

23.04.2024 Ablationstherapie Nachrichten

Nach der Katheterablation von Vorhofflimmern kommt es bei etwa einem Drittel der Patienten zu Rezidiven, meist binnen eines Jahres. Wie sich spätere Rückfälle auf die Erfolgschancen einer erneuten Ablation auswirken, haben Schweizer Kardiologen erforscht.

Hinter dieser Appendizitis steckte ein Erreger

23.04.2024 Appendizitis Nachrichten

Schmerzen im Unterbauch, aber sonst nicht viel, was auf eine Appendizitis hindeutete: Ein junger Mann hatte Glück, dass trotzdem eine Laparoskopie mit Appendektomie durchgeführt und der Wurmfortsatz histologisch untersucht wurde.

Mehr Schaden als Nutzen durch präoperatives Aussetzen von GLP-1-Agonisten?

23.04.2024 Operationsvorbereitung Nachrichten

Derzeit wird empfohlen, eine Therapie mit GLP-1-Rezeptoragonisten präoperativ zu unterbrechen. Eine neue Studie nährt jedoch Zweifel an der Notwendigkeit der Maßnahme.

Ureterstriktur: Innovative OP-Technik bewährt sich

19.04.2024 EAU 2024 Kongressbericht

Die Ureterstriktur ist eine relativ seltene Komplikation, trotzdem bedarf sie einer differenzierten Versorgung. In komplexen Fällen wird dies durch die roboterassistierte OP-Technik gewährleistet. Erste Resultate ermutigen.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Aktuelle BDC Leitlinien-Webinare

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Background

Method

Result

Conclusion

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2011

Neuroendocrine Tumors of Meckel’s Diverticulum: Lessons from a Single Institution Study of Eight Cases

Contemporary Single-Center Surgical Experiences in Redo Procedures of the Pancreas: Improved Outcome and Reduction of Operative Risk

Anastomotic Leakage Contributes to the Risk for Systemic Recurrence in Stage II Colorectal Cancer

A Case–Control Study of Laparoscopy-Assisted and Open Distal Gastrectomy for Advanced Gastric Cancer

Direct Costs of Care in a Randomized Controlled Trial of Endoscopic Sclerotherapy versus Emergency Portacaval Shunt for Bleeding Esophageal Varices in Cirrhosis—Part 4

Mechanisms of Action of the Gasotransmitter Hydrogen Sulfide in Modulating Contractile Activity of Longitudinal Muscle of Rat Ileum

Update Chirurgie