Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 4/2019

05.03.2019 | Assisted Reproduction Technologies

Early detection of cryostorage tank failure using a weight-based monitoring system

verfasst von: Zahava P. Michaelson, Sai T. Bondalapati, Selma Amrane, Robert W. Prosser, Daniel M. Hill, Pallavi Gaur, Matt Recio, David E. Travassos, Mikaela D. Wolfkamp, Sasha Sadowy, Colin Thomas, Eric J. Forman, Zev Williams

Erschienen in: Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics | Ausgabe 4/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To study the relationship between liquid nitrogen loss and temperature in cryostorage dewars and develop an early-warning alarm for impending tank failure.

Methods

Cryostorage dewars were placed on custom-engineered scales, and weight and temperature data were continuously monitored in the setting of slow, medium, and fast rate-loss of LN2 to simulate three scenarios of tank failure.

Results

LN2 Tank weights and temperatures were continuously monitored and recorded, with a calculated alarm trigger set at 10% weight loss and temperature of − 185 °C. With an intact tank, a 10% loss in LN2 occurred in 4.2–4.9 days. Warming to − 185 °C occurred in 37.8–43.7 days, over 30 days after the weight-based alarm was triggered. Full evaporation of LN2 required ~ 36.8 days. For the medium rate-loss simulation, a 10% loss in LN2 occurred in 0.8 h. Warming to − 185 °C occurred in 3.7–4.8 h, approximately 3 h after the weight-based alarm was triggered. For the fast rate-loss simulation, a 10% weight loss occurred within 15 s, and tanks were depleted in under 3 min. Tank temperatures began to rise immediately and at a relatively constant rate of 43.9 °C/h and 51.6 °C/h. Temperature alarms would have sounded within 0.37 and 0.06 h after the breech.

Conclusions

This study demonstrates that a weight-based alarm system can detect tank failures prior to a temperature-based system. Weight-based monitoring could serve as a redundant safety mechanism for added protection of cryopreserved reproductive tissues.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Cohen J, Inge KL, Wiker SR, Wright G, Fehilly CB, Turner TGJ. Duration of storage of cryopreserved human embryos. J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transf. 1988;5:301–3.CrossRefPubMed Cohen J, Inge KL, Wiker SR, Wright G, Fehilly CB, Turner TGJ. Duration of storage of cryopreserved human embryos. J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transf. 1988;5:301–3.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Glenister PH, Whittingham DG, Lyon MF. Further studies on the effect of radiation during the storage of frozen 8-cell mouse embryos at -196 degrees C. J Reprod Fertil. 1984;70:229–34.CrossRefPubMed Glenister PH, Whittingham DG, Lyon MF. Further studies on the effect of radiation during the storage of frozen 8-cell mouse embryos at -196 degrees C. J Reprod Fertil. 1984;70:229–34.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Goldman KN, Kramer Y, Hodes-Wertz B, Noyes N, McCaffrey C, Grifo JA. Long-term cryopreservation of human oocytes does not increase embryonic aneuploidy. Fertil Steril. 2015;103:662–8.CrossRefPubMed Goldman KN, Kramer Y, Hodes-Wertz B, Noyes N, McCaffrey C, Grifo JA. Long-term cryopreservation of human oocytes does not increase embryonic aneuploidy. Fertil Steril. 2015;103:662–8.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Ueno S, Uchiyama K, Kuroda T, Yabuuchi A, Ezoe K, Okimura T, et al. Cryostorage duration does not affect pregnancy and neonatal outcomes: a retrospective single-centre cohort study of vitrified-warmed blastocysts. Reprod BioMed Online. 2018;36:614–9.CrossRefPubMed Ueno S, Uchiyama K, Kuroda T, Yabuuchi A, Ezoe K, Okimura T, et al. Cryostorage duration does not affect pregnancy and neonatal outcomes: a retrospective single-centre cohort study of vitrified-warmed blastocysts. Reprod BioMed Online. 2018;36:614–9.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Bulletin A. ASRM statement on second report of storage tank failure. In: ASRM Office of Public Affairs Vol 20, 2018. Bulletin A. ASRM statement on second report of storage tank failure. In: ASRM Office of Public Affairs Vol 20, 2018.
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Tomlinson M, Morroll D. Risks associated with cryopreservation: a survey of assisted conception units in the UK and Ireland. Hum Fertil (Camb). 2008;11:33–42.CrossRef Tomlinson M, Morroll D. Risks associated with cryopreservation: a survey of assisted conception units in the UK and Ireland. Hum Fertil (Camb). 2008;11:33–42.CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Schiewe MC, Freeman M, Whitney JB, VerMilyea MD, Jones A, Aguirre M et al. Comprehensive assessment of cryogenic storage risk and quality management concerns: best practice guidelines for ART labs. J Assist Reprod Genet 2018; 35(12):in press. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-018-1310-6. Schiewe MC, Freeman M, Whitney JB, VerMilyea MD, Jones A, Aguirre M et al. Comprehensive assessment of cryogenic storage risk and quality management concerns: best practice guidelines for ART labs. J Assist Reprod Genet 2018; 35(12):in press. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s10815-018-1310-6.
Metadaten
Titel
Early detection of cryostorage tank failure using a weight-based monitoring system
verfasst von
Zahava P. Michaelson
Sai T. Bondalapati
Selma Amrane
Robert W. Prosser
Daniel M. Hill
Pallavi Gaur
Matt Recio
David E. Travassos
Mikaela D. Wolfkamp
Sasha Sadowy
Colin Thomas
Eric J. Forman
Zev Williams
Publikationsdatum
05.03.2019
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics / Ausgabe 4/2019
Print ISSN: 1058-0468
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7330
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-019-01402-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2019

Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 4/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.