Anzeige
Erschienen in:
01.12.2016 | Original Article
Early Maternal Feeding Versus Traditional Delayed Feeding After Cesarean Section: A Pilot Study
Erschienen in: The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India | Ausgabe 3/2017
Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhaltenAbstract
Background
Cesarean section is on the rise all over the world; it has become a safe surgery due to better anesthesia, asepsis, blood transfusion and antibiotics. Traditionally, the patients are kept nil orally till they pass flatus. This study was performed to find out acceptance and tolerability of early feeding, its side effects and complications if any.
Methods
This comparative study was conducted in a service hospital. There were two groups of 70 cases each where one was administered early feeding and the second group was put on standard delayed feeding as is traditionally done in most of the hospitals. Gastrointestinal outcomes and other parameters were noted in both the groups and analyzed.
Results
During the study period, every alternate willing case without any exclusion criteria was allotted to each group. Early feeding was started 6 h after surgery in the study group, whereas it was withheld till passage of flatus in the control group. Appearance of bowel sounds and passage of flatus were earlier in study group (21.6 and 34.5 h, respectively) as compared with control group (31.7 and 49.2 h, respectively). There were no complications or side effects of early feeding.
Conclusion
There is no justification to withholding oral feeds as is traditionally done. Early feeding should be initiated without fear of any side effects. Patients have an early postoperative recovery; it is cost-effective and results in higher patient satisfaction.