Effective treatment of squamous cell carcinomas with ingenol mebutate gel in immunologically intact SKH1 mice

Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is the second most common human cancer after basal cell carcinoma, with >250,000 cases diagnosed in the USA each year. The usual treatment options include surgery, curettage and electrodesiccation, and radiation [2]. Topical imiquimod or fluorouracil may also be suitable for patients with small tumours in low-risk locations, who are unwilling or unsuitable to receive conventional treatments [10].

Following phase III studies [8], topical ingenol mebutate (ingenol-3-angelate, PEP005) was recently approved by the Federal Drug Administration (USA) for the treatment of actinic keratosis, a precursor of SCC. Ingenol mebutate was derived from the sap of Euphorbia peplus, and in a phase I/II clinical study, a complete clinical response was achieved in 2/4 SCCs treated topically with the sap from this plant [14]. Ingenol mebutate was also effective against inoculated murine SCC tumours (LK2 and PAM212) grown in nude mice (Foxn1 ^nu or BALB/c^nu/nu) [9, 12], with haemorrhage [9], neutrophils and antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity appearing to be important for relapse-free cure in these models [4]. In general, mouse studies have suggested that ingenol mebutate has a dual mechanism of action against tumours involving initial induction of primary necrosis [12] followed by immune-mediated clearance of residual tumour cells [17].

T cell deficient nude mice may not be ideal for testing treatments for SCCs, as SCCs are believed to be subject to immune control [20]. This contention may extend to the testing of ingenol mebutate treatment in nude mice [9, 12], as there is emerging evidence suggesting cross talk between neutrophils and T cells [13, 18], with ingenol mebutate treatment also shown to induce anti-cancer T cells and antibodies [4, 7]. Here we test ingenol mebutate in an immunologically intact mouse model, inbred SKH1 mice [5] inoculated with the T7 SCC line, derived from an SCC induced in these mice by chronic minimally erythemal ultraviolet irradiation [11].

Treatment of T7 SCC tumours growing in female mice with 0.25 % ingenol mebutate (once daily for two days) resulted in a 70 % cure rate, defined as no visible tumour after 150 days post treatment initiation (Fig. 1, logrank test, placebo vs ingenol mebutate, p = 0.0002). When the ingenol mebutate dose was reduced to 0.1 % in female mice, tumour growth was delayed significantly by ≈10 days (placebo vs ingenol mebutate, p = 0.0006), but the treatment failed to cure any of the tumours (data not shown).

Treatment of T7 tumours in male mice with 0.25 % ingenol mebutate resulted in a cure rate of 30 % (placebo vs ingenol mebutate p = 0.008, n = 10 per group) (data not shown). The difference between male and female mice treated with 0.25 % ingenol mebutate approached significance (p = 0.108).

Within hours of ingenol mebutate treatment, clear signs of haemorrhage in and around the tumour site were evident. After 48 h an eschar formed over the tumour site, which resolved after 3–4 weeks, with a favourable cosmetic outcome evident after 2–3 months (Fig. 2a). Electron microscopy showed disruption of the inner membrane and cristae of the tumour mitochondria within hours of treatment, with complete loss of inner membrane structures evident at 16–24 h (Fig. 2b). At 24 h post treatment, primary necrosis of tumour cells was clearly seen (Fig. 2b).

Histology of placebo-treated tumours (which were indistinguishable from untreated tumours) illustrated their subcutaneous location ≈200–300 μm below the epidermis (Fig. 2c, left panel). Six hours after ingenol mebutate treatment, widespread haemorrhage was evident throughout the tumour (Fig. 2c, upper right panel) and the surrounding tissue (not shown). A neutrophil infiltrate was evident as early as 6 h post treatment (not shown), and by 24 h prodigious neutrophil infiltrates were seen in and around the tumour site (Fig. 2c, lower right panel).

Herein, we show that ingenol mebutate gel treatment (0.25 %) was effective at regressing subcutaneous SCCs using the T7/SKH1 mouse model. This study, together with previous clinical studies using E. peplus sap [14], supports further clinical development of ingenol mebutate for the treatment of SCCs in humans.

Ingenol mebutate gel treatment of SCCs in this model resulted in a rapid onset of haemorrhage in and around the tumour, disruption of tumour cell mitochondria and death of the tumour cells by primary necrosis. A prodigious infiltrate of neutrophils was observed, with post treatment SCC-specific IgG responses also apparent (see Online Resource 2), suggesting the activation of SCC-specific CD4 T cells. These observations are consistent with previous studies using murine SCC lines grown in nude mice and mouse B16 melanomas grown in C57/BL6 mice [4, 7, 9, 12], and support the view that ingenol mebutate gel treatment kills tumour cells by inducing primary necrosis with both the innate and adaptive immune systems being activated.

The ingenol mebutate concentration in the gel (0.25 %) required to cure T7 tumours was higher than the 0.05 % being used to treat actinic keratoses in humans [8]; however, 0.25 % ingenol mebutate gel has been tested for the treatment of superficial basal cell carcinomas in a small number of patients [6]. LK2 tumours in nude mice were effectively treated with 0.1 % ingenol mebutate given daily for 3 days [4]. The reason for the lower dose requirement in the LK2/nude model is unclear, with no overt differences in neutrophil infiltration apparent in the LK2/nude and SKH1/T7 models. The LD₉₀ values for in vitro treatment of LK2 and T7 cells with ingenol mebutate were also both ≈100 μg/ml (data not shown). The differences may reflect increased drug penetration through nude mouse skin [16] or other differences in skin biology, rather than be related to immunological differences between the mouse strains. The possible difference (p = 0.108) in cure rates for male and female SKH1 mice may similarly reflect increased drug penetration through female mouse skin [3]. Gender differences in the thickness of different skin layers have been reported for SKH1 and other mice [1, 15], and in our experience SKH1 male skin is tougher and harder to inject than female skin. Such skin differences in mice may influence drug penetration, but may also affect other factors such as the consistency of shallow s.c. injections of tumour cells and/or local dissemination of the tumours. It should also be noted that there were no gender differences in the efficacy of ingenol mebutate in the treatment of actinic keratoses in humans [8].

Although SCCs are believed to be subject to immune control [20], there is a paucity of SCC models in immunologically intact mice [19]. We also investigated the 13.1 SCC line derived from C3H/HeN mice [11] and confirmed its epithelial origin using electron microscopy (data not shown). However, variable spontaneous regression rates (0–60 %) and variable growth rates (10–60 days to reach 100 mm²) made this model difficult to use. In contrast, the T7 SCC model provides a convenient and a reliable model for testing interventions in immunologically intact mice; however, the model does require an inbred SKH1 colony, as these mice are no longer commercially available.