Inclusion/exclusion criteria
Patients are eligible for the DIPA trial (Table
1) if they meet all four inclusion criteria: 1) consulting their GP for a new episode of non-traumatic knee pain. A new episode of knee pain is defined as pain presented to the GP for the first time, or if a patient did not consult the GP with these symptoms in the previous 3 months [
12], 2) aged 45 years or older, 3) meeting the clinical American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria for OA of the knee [
13], and 4) having a pain severity of 2 or more (on a 0-10 scale).
Table 1
Inclusion and exclusion criteria of the DIPA trial.
People with a new episode of non-traumatic knee pain | Contra-indication for NSAID or acetaminophen |
Age ≥ 45 years | Arthroplasty/osteotomy |
Comply with the clinical ACR criteria* | Already on NSAID or acetaminophen use^ |
Pain severity scale ≥ 2 on a 11-point numeric rating scale | Surgery or major trauma of affected knee in previous 6 months |
| Oral corticosteroid use |
| Myocardial infarction or stroke in previous 6 months |
Patients are excluded if they are: 1) contra-indicated for NSAID or acetaminophen use, i.e. gastrointestinal bleedings in history or active, blood dyscrasia, bone marrow depression (myelosuppression), serious heart failure, serious liver or kidney disease (glomerular filtration < 30 ml/min), alcoholism, colitis ulcerosa, Crohn's disease, sulphite hypersensitivity, asthma, urticaria, angioedema, nasal polyps or rhinitis after use of acetylsalicylic acid or other prostaglandin synthetase inhibitors, or use of anti-depressive medication (SSRIs), 2) having an arthroplasty or osteotomy of the knee on the contralateral or unilateral side, 3) already taking NSAIDs or acetaminophen at doses similar to or higher than the study dose, 4) surgery or major trauma of the affected joint within the previous 6 months, 5) myocardial infarction or stroke in the last 6 months, and 6) oral use of a corticosteroid.
Patient selection
An academic research network of GPs in the south-west of the Netherlands agreed to participate and to refer patients who consult for a new episode of non-traumatic knee pain to the DIPA trial. The GP takes the patient's history and performs the physical examination as part of the usual daily care. The GP gives study information to the patient, and sends the patient's name and information regarding history taking/physical examination by fax to the research department at Erasmus MC. Within two days after the GP visit, patients are contacted (by the researcher), checked for eligibility (in- and exclusion criteria), and asked for written informed consent. Baseline measurements and randomization then take place.
Interventions
Patients are randomly allocated to either diclofenac (maximum daily intake of 3 × 50 mg) or acetaminophen (maximum daily intake of 3 × 1000 mg). Both medications are prescribed in accordance with the Dutch clinical guidelines for GPs for non-traumatic knee symptoms [
2]. The guideline recommends analgesics for 2 weeks and, if required, for an additional 1-2 weeks [
2]. This is in accordance with the EULAR and OARSI recommendations [
3,
4]. Patients in the diclofenac group with an increased risk of gastro-intestinal problems will also receive a mucosal protector (e.g. omeprazol once daily, 20 mg). Patients at increased risk of gastro-intestinal problems are 60 years or older and/or have a serious co-morbidity (e.g. rheumatic disease and diabetes mellitus). Patients take their allocated medication on demand, and can change their medication intake when their pain level alters. This leads to an approach that is close to usual daily care.
Outcome measures
The primary outcomes of this study are: 1) pain and function measured with the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) [
14] and 2) pain assessed with an 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS) in a diary [
15]. Secondary outcomes are: 1) patients' perceived pain measured every 3 weeks on the 11-point NRS [
15], 2) patients' perceived recovery measured on a 7-point Likert scale (1 = completely recovered; 7 = worse than ever), 3) constant and intermittent pain measured with the Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain (ICOAP) questionnaire [
16], 4) patients' quality of life assessed with the EuroQol instrument EQ-5D [
17], 5) all direct medical, patient and productivity costs measured with the PROductivity and DISease Questionnaire (PRODISQ) [
18], 6) compliance to therapy assessed in the diary, 7) co-interventions (e.g. changes in doses of co-medication), and 8) adverse reactions.
Questionnaires
The primary and secondary outcome measurements are assessed with questionnaires and diaries. During the study, patients fill out a total of 5 questionnaires (at baseline and at 3, 6, 9, and 12-weeks follow-up). After the informed consent and before randomization, the patient fills out the baseline questionnaire. After the baseline questionnaire, patients receive a follow-up questionnaire every 3 weeks.
Five validated instruments are used in all 5 questionnaires.
1) The KOOS measures the functional status of patients with knee OA [
14]. The KOOS consists of 5 subscales: pain, symptoms, activities of daily living, sport and function, and knee-related quality of life. The Dutch version of the KOOS is validated and suitable for use in patients with mild and moderate OA [
14]. The KOOS questionnaire is an extension of the Western Ontario and McMaster osteoarthritis index (WOMAC), and WOMAC scores of pain and function can be calculated from the KOOS [
19‐
21]. The WOMAC is recommended for use in elderly subjects with knee OA [
19].
2) The measure of Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain (ICOAP) identifies different types of pain due to OA. The ICOAP is a reliable and valid to measure constant and intermittent pain [
16].
3) The 11-point NRS measures the perceived level of pain intensity (0 = no pain; 10 = worst pain ever) [
22‐
25]. The NRS is a valid measurement to score pain intensity level [
22].
4) The EuroQol (EQ-5D) measures quality of life. The EuroQol is a generic questionnaire and consists of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression [
17]. The EuroQol allows to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of a healthcare intervention [
26,
27] and can be converted into utilities to calculate Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) [
28].
5) The PRODISQ measures all direct medical, patient, and productivity costs. The PRODISQ consists of 7 modules. In the present study, only modules 1-5 are used because these questions are related to the individual patient, whereas modules 6 and 7 are utilized by management. Modules 1-5 cover: 1) demography and disease, 2) profession, working situation, and income, 3) absence from work, 4) compensation mechanisms, and 5) productivity costs whilst at work (efficiency loss) [
18].
Besides these validated questionnaires, the baseline questionnaire addresses patient characteristics (age, gender, weight, height, and social status), knee-related characteristics (history and localisation of knee symptoms), problems at work due to knee problems, and co-morbidities. The four follow-up questionnaires measure medication use, adverse reactions, medical consumption, patients' perceived recovery, and knee-related characteristics.
Table
2 presents an overview of the questionnaire items.
Table 2
Overview of questionnaire items.
Demographics
| | | | | | |
Age, gender, weight, height, and social status |
X
| | | | | |
Outcome measures
| | | | | | |
Pain score (NRS) |
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
Pain score (KOOS) |
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
| |
Function score (KOOS) |
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
| |
Perceived recovery |
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
| |
Constant pain, and pain that comes and goes (ICOAP) |
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
| |
Quality of life (EuroQol) |
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
| |
Direct medical, patient, and productivity costs (PRODISQ) | | | | |
X
| |
Compliance | | | | | |
X
|
Adverse reactions | |
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
| |
Other outcomes
| | | | | | |
Knee-related characteristics (History, duration, and localisation) |
X
| | | | | |
Co-morbidities |
X
| | | | | |
Medication use | |
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
Medical consumption (Visit to GP, medical specialist, physical therapist, etc.) | |
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
| |
Pain diary
During the DIPA trial, patients fill out a diary to score daily pain (using an 11-point NRS), medication use, and compliance. Being a pragmatic trial, patients may change their medication dosage when pain alters. These alterations may be important for interpreting the results of the trial. Therefore, information on compliance to the allocated treatment is also collected.
Sample size
The sample size is calculated to detect clinically relevant differences in pain and function between the two groups (diclofenac versus acetaminophen), measured by the KOOS during the 12-week study period. To detect a clinically relevant difference of 10 points (15%) on the KOOS pain score between the two treatment groups after 12 weeks, 73 patients per group are needed (power 95%, alpha 0.05, one-sided testing). Based on an expected 5% loss to follow, 154 patients (2 × 77) should be included.
Statistical analyses
All analyses will be performed on an intention-to-treat basis, analyzing all patients in the treatment group to which they were randomly allocated. Analysis per protocol will also be conducted, analyzing only those patients that have measures on the primary outcome measurement at both baseline and 12-weeks follow-up. Descriptive data of baseline characteristics will be presented for both groups to check comparability. Generalized estimating equation (GEE) analysis will be conducted to investigate (longitudinally) the 2, 4, and 6 weeks effectiveness of diclofenac compared to acetaminophen for pain assessed with the diary. Differences between the two groups over the 12-week follow-up will also be assessed with GEE. The outcome variables are pain (measured with the NRS), and pain and function (assessed with the KOOS). Using GEE, the correlation of multiple measurements within one patient is taken into account [
29].
To detect predictive variables for treatment responders at 12-weeks follow-up multivariate regression analyses will be used. Treatment response is defined based on the OMERACT-OARSI responder criteria [
30,
31] as a high improvement in pain or function of ≥ 50%, or an improvement on pain ≥ 20%, and/or function ≥ 20%.
In addition, a cost-utility analysis will be performed that expresses health improvements in QALYs assessed with the EuroQol. If the course of OA (and its related costs) appears to fluctuate (particularly if the difference between treatment arms is not stable over time), an additional modeling study using a Markov model will be performed. Statistical methods will be used to describe uncertainty in costs and effects estimates based on patient data. A 95% confidence interval for the cost-utility ratio will be calculated and an acceptability curve presented. In case of a modeling study, a probabilistic sensitivity analysis will be performed.