Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 1/2020

24.09.2019 | Otology

Electrophysiological detection of electrode fold-over in perimodiolar cochlear implant electrode arrays: a multi-center study case series

verfasst von: P. Mittmann, G. Lauer, A. Ernst, S. Mutze, F. Hassepass, S. Arndt, D. Arweiler-Harbeck, F. Christov

Erschienen in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology | Ausgabe 1/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

It is important for the surgeon to determine the position of the CI electrode array during and after its placement within the cochlea. Most preferably, this should be within the scala tympani to obtain the best audiological outcome. Thus, misplacement into the scala vestibuli or tip fold-over should be prevented. Since there are different ways to ensure proper positioning of the electrode array within the scala tympani (e.g., intraoperative radiography, electrophysiological recordings), our study was aimed at detecting intraoperative electrophysiologic characteristics to better understand the mechanisms of those electrode tip fold-overs.

Material and methods

In a multi-centric, retrospective case–control series, patients with a postoperatively by radiography detected tip fold-over in perimodiolar electrodes were included. The point of fold-over (i.e., the electrode position) was determined and the intraoperative Auto-NRT recordings were analysed and evaluated.

Results

Four patients were found to have an electrode tip fold-over (out of 85 implantees). Significant changes of the Auto-NRT recordings were not detected. All tip fold-overs occurred in the most apical part of the electrodes.

Discussion

Cochlear implantation for hearing impaired patients plays a decisive role in modern auditory rehabilitation. Perimodiolar electrode arrays may fold over during the insertion and, hence, could have a negative impact on audiological outcome. Characteristic electrophysiologic changes to possibly predict this were not found in our series.
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Kiefer J, Gstoettner W, Baumgartner W, Pok SM, Tillein J, Ye Q, von Ilberg C (2004) Conservation of low-frequency hearing in cochlear implantation. Acta Otolaryngol 124(3):272–280CrossRef Kiefer J, Gstoettner W, Baumgartner W, Pok SM, Tillein J, Ye Q, von Ilberg C (2004) Conservation of low-frequency hearing in cochlear implantation. Acta Otolaryngol 124(3):272–280CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Skinner MW, Holden TA, Whiting BR, Voie AH, Brunsden B, Neely JG, Saxon EA, Hullar TE, Finley CC (2007) In vivo estimates of the position of advanced bionics electrode arrays in the human cochlea. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 197:2–24CrossRef Skinner MW, Holden TA, Whiting BR, Voie AH, Brunsden B, Neely JG, Saxon EA, Hullar TE, Finley CC (2007) In vivo estimates of the position of advanced bionics electrode arrays in the human cochlea. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 197:2–24CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Grolman W, Maat A, Verdam F, Simis Y, Carelsen B, Freling N, Tange RA (2009) Spread of excitation measurements for the detection of electrode array foldovers: a prospective study comparing 3-dimensional rotational X-ray and intraoperative spread of excitation measurements. Otol Neurotol 30(1):27–33CrossRef Grolman W, Maat A, Verdam F, Simis Y, Carelsen B, Freling N, Tange RA (2009) Spread of excitation measurements for the detection of electrode array foldovers: a prospective study comparing 3-dimensional rotational X-ray and intraoperative spread of excitation measurements. Otol Neurotol 30(1):27–33CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Shepherd RK, Hatsushika S, Clark GM (1993) Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve: the effect of electrode position on neural excitation. Hear Res 66(1):108–120CrossRef Shepherd RK, Hatsushika S, Clark GM (1993) Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve: the effect of electrode position on neural excitation. Hear Res 66(1):108–120CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Cohen LT, Saunders E, Richardson LM (2004) Spatial spread of neural excitation: comparison of compound action potential and forward-masking data in cochlear implant recipients. Int J Audiol 43(6):346–355CrossRef Cohen LT, Saunders E, Richardson LM (2004) Spatial spread of neural excitation: comparison of compound action potential and forward-masking data in cochlear implant recipients. Int J Audiol 43(6):346–355CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Mittmann P, Todt I, Ernst A, Rademacher G, Mutze S, Goricke S, Schlamann M, Ramalingam R, Lang S, Christov F, Arweiler-Harbeck D (2016) Electrophysiological detection of scalar changing perimodiolar cochlear electrode arrays: a long term follow-up study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 273(12):4251–4256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-016-4175-2 CrossRefPubMed Mittmann P, Todt I, Ernst A, Rademacher G, Mutze S, Goricke S, Schlamann M, Ramalingam R, Lang S, Christov F, Arweiler-Harbeck D (2016) Electrophysiological detection of scalar changing perimodiolar cochlear electrode arrays: a long term follow-up study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 273(12):4251–4256. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00405-016-4175-2 CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Cohen NL, Hoffman RA (1991) Complications of cochlear implant surgery in adults and children. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 100(9 Pt 1):708–711CrossRef Cohen NL, Hoffman RA (1991) Complications of cochlear implant surgery in adults and children. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 100(9 Pt 1):708–711CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Lassig AA, Zwolan TA, Telian SA (2005) Cochlear implant failures and revision. Otol Neurotol 26(4):624–634CrossRef Lassig AA, Zwolan TA, Telian SA (2005) Cochlear implant failures and revision. Otol Neurotol 26(4):624–634CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Rotteveel LJ, Proops DW, Ramsden RT, Saeed SR, van Olphen AF, Mylanus EA (2004) Cochlear implantation in 53 patients with otosclerosis: demographics, computed tomographic scanning, surgery, and complications. Otol Neurotol 25(6):943–952CrossRef Rotteveel LJ, Proops DW, Ramsden RT, Saeed SR, van Olphen AF, Mylanus EA (2004) Cochlear implantation in 53 patients with otosclerosis: demographics, computed tomographic scanning, surgery, and complications. Otol Neurotol 25(6):943–952CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Saunders E, Cohen L, Aschendorff A, Shapiro W, Knight M, Stecker M, Richter B, Waltzman S, Tykocinski M, Roland T, Laszig R, Cowan R (2002) Threshold, comfortable level and impedance changes as a function of electrode-modiolar distance. Ear Hear 23(1 Suppl):28S–40SCrossRef Saunders E, Cohen L, Aschendorff A, Shapiro W, Knight M, Stecker M, Richter B, Waltzman S, Tykocinski M, Roland T, Laszig R, Cowan R (2002) Threshold, comfortable level and impedance changes as a function of electrode-modiolar distance. Ear Hear 23(1 Suppl):28S–40SCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Electrophysiological detection of electrode fold-over in perimodiolar cochlear implant electrode arrays: a multi-center study case series
verfasst von
P. Mittmann
G. Lauer
A. Ernst
S. Mutze
F. Hassepass
S. Arndt
D. Arweiler-Harbeck
F. Christov
Publikationsdatum
24.09.2019
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology / Ausgabe 1/2020
Print ISSN: 0937-4477
Elektronische ISSN: 1434-4726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-019-05653-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2020

European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 1/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Update HNO

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.