Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 7/2018

16.01.2018

Endoscopic perforations: what are the indications for surgery?

verfasst von: Diane Mege, Laura Beyer-Berjot, Walid Ezzedine, Anderson Loundou, Jean-Charles Grimaud, Marc Barthet, Stéphane Berdah

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 7/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Despite their low occurrence, endoscopic perforations (EPs) are concerning. Some predictive factors have been identified, and EP management is debated, whether non-surgical (medical and/or endoscopic) or surgical. The objective was to elaborate a predictive score for surgical management of EP.

Methods

All the patients addressed for upper and lower EP, except oesophageal EP, were retrospectively included (2004–2015). Demographic data, endoscopic features (indication, location, type), clinical, biological and radiological presentations of EP were reviewed. Management of EP and outcomes were recorded. A predictive score was constructed by multiple linear regression and a cut-off value for surgical management was identified. Additional subgroup analysis was performed according to the location of EP (upper and lower).

Results

Among 41150 endoscopic procedures, 44 patients (22 males, median age = 65 years [22–87]) presenting with EP were included (0.09%). Lower gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy was mostly performed (66%). EP diagnosis was immediate in 73% of the cases (n = 32). Non-surgical management was efficient in 2/3 cases treated medically alone, and 18/20 cases treated by endoscopy. Surgical management was always successful (n = 24/24). In case of peritonitis, surgery was systematically required, whereas easily required in case of delayed diagnostic of EP. The EP score was based on the presence of previous abdominal surgery, lower GI endoscopy and diagnostic endoscopy. A cut-off EP score of 22.8% for surgery was chosen; it was associated with a specificity and sensitivity of 40 and 100%, respectively. When subgroups were analysed according to EP location, the EP score was still based on the presence of previous abdominal surgery and diagnostic endoscopy. The cut-off was 6.3 and 73.3% for upper (specificity: 73%, sensitivity: 100%) and lower (89 and 45%) locations, respectively.

Conclusion

The predictive EP score may avoid inappropriate surgical management, as well as delayed surgery after non-surgical management failure. Forthcoming study should prospectively validate this score.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Lohsiriwat V (2010) Colonoscopic perforation: incidence, risk factors, management and outcome. World J Gastroenterol 16:425–430CrossRef Lohsiriwat V (2010) Colonoscopic perforation: incidence, risk factors, management and outcome. World J Gastroenterol 16:425–430CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Rolanda C, Caetano AC, Dinis-Ribeiro M (2013) Emergencies after endoscopic procedures. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 27:783–798CrossRef Rolanda C, Caetano AC, Dinis-Ribeiro M (2013) Emergencies after endoscopic procedures. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 27:783–798CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Sagawa T, Kakizaki S, Iizuka H, Onozato Y, Sohara N, Okamura S, Mori M (2012) Analysis of colonoscopic perforations at a local clinic and a tertiary hospital. World J Gastroenterol 18:4898–4904CrossRef Sagawa T, Kakizaki S, Iizuka H, Onozato Y, Sohara N, Okamura S, Mori M (2012) Analysis of colonoscopic perforations at a local clinic and a tertiary hospital. World J Gastroenterol 18:4898–4904CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Byeon J-S (2013) Colonic perforation: can we manage it endoscopically? Clin Endosc 46:495–499CrossRef Byeon J-S (2013) Colonic perforation: can we manage it endoscopically? Clin Endosc 46:495–499CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Abbas G, Schuchert MJ, Pettiford BL, Pennathur A, Landreneau J, Landreneau J, Luketich JD, Landreneau RJ (2009) Contemporaneous management of esophageal perforation. Surgery 146:749–756CrossRef Abbas G, Schuchert MJ, Pettiford BL, Pennathur A, Landreneau J, Landreneau J, Luketich JD, Landreneau RJ (2009) Contemporaneous management of esophageal perforation. Surgery 146:749–756CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Vogel SB, Rout WR, Martin TD, Abbitt P (2005) Esophageal perforation in adults: aggressive, conservative treatment lowers morbidity and mortality. Ann Surg 241:1016–1023CrossRef Vogel SB, Rout WR, Martin TD, Abbitt P (2005) Esophageal perforation in adults: aggressive, conservative treatment lowers morbidity and mortality. Ann Surg 241:1016–1023CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Iqbal CW, Cullinane DC, Schiller HJ, Sawyer MD, Zietlow SP, Farley D (2008) Surgical management and outcomes of 165 colonoscopic perforations from a single institution. Arch Surg 143:701–707CrossRef Iqbal CW, Cullinane DC, Schiller HJ, Sawyer MD, Zietlow SP, Farley D (2008) Surgical management and outcomes of 165 colonoscopic perforations from a single institution. Arch Surg 143:701–707CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Teoh AYB, Poon CM, Lee JFY, Leong HT, Ng SSM, Sung JJY, Lau JYW (2009) Outcomes and predictors of mortality and stoma formation in surgical management of colonoscopic perforations: a multicentre review. Arch Surg 144:9–13CrossRef Teoh AYB, Poon CM, Lee JFY, Leong HT, Ng SSM, Sung JJY, Lau JYW (2009) Outcomes and predictors of mortality and stoma formation in surgical management of colonoscopic perforations: a multicentre review. Arch Surg 144:9–13CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Søreide JA, Viste A (2011) Esophageal perforation: diagnostic work-up and clinical decision-making in the first 24 hours. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 19:66CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Søreide JA, Viste A (2011) Esophageal perforation: diagnostic work-up and clinical decision-making in the first 24 hours. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 19:66CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Paspatis GA, Dumonceau JM, Barthet M, Meisner S, Repici A, Saunders BP, Vezakis A, Gonzalez JM, Turino SY, Tsiamoulos ZP, Fockens P, Hassan C (2014) Diagnosis and management of iatrogenic endoscopic perforations: position statement from the European Society of Gastrointestinal ENdoscopy (ESGE). Endoscopy 46:1–19 Paspatis GA, Dumonceau JM, Barthet M, Meisner S, Repici A, Saunders BP, Vezakis A, Gonzalez JM, Turino SY, Tsiamoulos ZP, Fockens P, Hassan C (2014) Diagnosis and management of iatrogenic endoscopic perforations: position statement from the European Society of Gastrointestinal ENdoscopy (ESGE). Endoscopy 46:1–19
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Lüning TH, Keemers-Gels ME, Barendregt WB, Tan A, Rosman C (2007) Colonoscopic perforations: a review of 30,366 patients. Surg Endosc 21:994–997CrossRef Lüning TH, Keemers-Gels ME, Barendregt WB, Tan A, Rosman C (2007) Colonoscopic perforations: a review of 30,366 patients. Surg Endosc 21:994–997CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P-A (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRef Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P-A (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Kobayashi N, Yoshitake N, Hirahara Y, Konishi J, Saito Y, Matsuda T, Ishikawa T, Sekiguchi R, Fujimori T (2012) Matched case-control study comparing endoscopic submucosal dissection and endoscopic mucosal resection for colorectal tumors. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 27:728–733 Kobayashi N, Yoshitake N, Hirahara Y, Konishi J, Saito Y, Matsuda T, Ishikawa T, Sekiguchi R, Fujimori T (2012) Matched case-control study comparing endoscopic submucosal dissection and endoscopic mucosal resection for colorectal tumors. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 27:728–733
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Orsoni P, Berdah S, Verrier C, Caamano A, Sastre B, Boutboul R, Grimaud JC, Picaud R (1997) Colonic perforation due to colonoscopy: a retrospective study of 48 cases. Endoscopy 29:160–164CrossRef Orsoni P, Berdah S, Verrier C, Caamano A, Sastre B, Boutboul R, Grimaud JC, Picaud R (1997) Colonic perforation due to colonoscopy: a retrospective study of 48 cases. Endoscopy 29:160–164CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Kowalczyk L, Forsmark CE, Ben-David K, Wagh MS, Chauhan S, Collins D, Draganov PV (2011) Algorithm for the management of endoscopic perforations: a quality improvement project. Am J Gastroenterol 106:1022–1027CrossRef Kowalczyk L, Forsmark CE, Ben-David K, Wagh MS, Chauhan S, Collins D, Draganov PV (2011) Algorithm for the management of endoscopic perforations: a quality improvement project. Am J Gastroenterol 106:1022–1027CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Farley DR, Bannon MP, Zietlow SP, Pemberton JH, Ilstrup DM, Larson DR (1997) Management of colonoscopic perforations. Mayo Clin Proc 72:729–733CrossRef Farley DR, Bannon MP, Zietlow SP, Pemberton JH, Ilstrup DM, Larson DR (1997) Management of colonoscopic perforations. Mayo Clin Proc 72:729–733CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Cho SB, Lee WS, Joo YE, Kim HR, Park SW, Park CH, Kim HS, Choi SK, Rew JS (2012) Therapeutic options for iatrogenic colon perforation: feasibility of endoscopic clip closure and predictors of the need for early surgery. Surg Endosc 26:473–479CrossRef Cho SB, Lee WS, Joo YE, Kim HR, Park SW, Park CH, Kim HS, Choi SK, Rew JS (2012) Therapeutic options for iatrogenic colon perforation: feasibility of endoscopic clip closure and predictors of the need for early surgery. Surg Endosc 26:473–479CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Sepesi B, Raymond DP, Peters JH (2010) Esophageal perforation: surgical, endoscopic and medical management strategies. Curr Opin Gastroenterol 26:379–383CrossRef Sepesi B, Raymond DP, Peters JH (2010) Esophageal perforation: surgical, endoscopic and medical management strategies. Curr Opin Gastroenterol 26:379–383CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Magdeburg R, Sold M, Post S, Kaehler G (2013) Differences in the endoscopic closure of colonic perforation due to diagnostic or therapeutic colonoscopy. Scand J Gastroenterol 48:862–867CrossRef Magdeburg R, Sold M, Post S, Kaehler G (2013) Differences in the endoscopic closure of colonic perforation due to diagnostic or therapeutic colonoscopy. Scand J Gastroenterol 48:862–867CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Chan W-K, Roslani AC, Law C-W, Goh K-L, Mahadeva S (2013) Clinical outcomes and direct costings of endoluminal clipping compared to surgery in the management of iatrogenic colonic perforation. J Dig Dis 14:670–675CrossRef Chan W-K, Roslani AC, Law C-W, Goh K-L, Mahadeva S (2013) Clinical outcomes and direct costings of endoluminal clipping compared to surgery in the management of iatrogenic colonic perforation. J Dig Dis 14:670–675CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Mangiavillano B, Viaggi P, Masci E (2010) Endoscopic closure of acute iatrogenic perforations during diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopy in the gastrointestinal tract using metallic clips: a literature review. J Dig Dis 11:12–18CrossRef Mangiavillano B, Viaggi P, Masci E (2010) Endoscopic closure of acute iatrogenic perforations during diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopy in the gastrointestinal tract using metallic clips: a literature review. J Dig Dis 11:12–18CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Tan CJ, Dasari BVM, Gardiner K (2012) Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials of self-expanding metallic stents as a bridge to surgery versus emergency surgery for malignant left-sided large bowel obstruction. Br J Surg 99:469–476CrossRef Tan CJ, Dasari BVM, Gardiner K (2012) Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials of self-expanding metallic stents as a bridge to surgery versus emergency surgery for malignant left-sided large bowel obstruction. Br J Surg 99:469–476CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Wullstein C, Köppen M, Gross E (1999) Laparoscopic treatment of colonic perforations related to colonoscopy. Surg Endosc 13:484–487CrossRef Wullstein C, Köppen M, Gross E (1999) Laparoscopic treatment of colonic perforations related to colonoscopy. Surg Endosc 13:484–487CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Hansen AJ, Tessier DJ, Anderson ML, Schlinkert RT (2007) Laparoscopic repair of colonoscopic perforations: indications and guidelines. J Gastrointest Surg 11:655–659CrossRef Hansen AJ, Tessier DJ, Anderson ML, Schlinkert RT (2007) Laparoscopic repair of colonoscopic perforations: indications and guidelines. J Gastrointest Surg 11:655–659CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Endoscopic perforations: what are the indications for surgery?
verfasst von
Diane Mege
Laura Beyer-Berjot
Walid Ezzedine
Anderson Loundou
Jean-Charles Grimaud
Marc Barthet
Stéphane Berdah
Publikationsdatum
16.01.2018
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 7/2018
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6043-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 7/2018

Surgical Endoscopy 7/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Wie erfolgreich ist eine Re-Ablation nach Rezidiv?

23.04.2024 Ablationstherapie Nachrichten

Nach der Katheterablation von Vorhofflimmern kommt es bei etwa einem Drittel der Patienten zu Rezidiven, meist binnen eines Jahres. Wie sich spätere Rückfälle auf die Erfolgschancen einer erneuten Ablation auswirken, haben Schweizer Kardiologen erforscht.

Hinter dieser Appendizitis steckte ein Erreger

23.04.2024 Appendizitis Nachrichten

Schmerzen im Unterbauch, aber sonst nicht viel, was auf eine Appendizitis hindeutete: Ein junger Mann hatte Glück, dass trotzdem eine Laparoskopie mit Appendektomie durchgeführt und der Wurmfortsatz histologisch untersucht wurde.

Mehr Schaden als Nutzen durch präoperatives Aussetzen von GLP-1-Agonisten?

23.04.2024 Operationsvorbereitung Nachrichten

Derzeit wird empfohlen, eine Therapie mit GLP-1-Rezeptoragonisten präoperativ zu unterbrechen. Eine neue Studie nährt jedoch Zweifel an der Notwendigkeit der Maßnahme.

Ureterstriktur: Innovative OP-Technik bewährt sich

19.04.2024 EAU 2024 Kongressbericht

Die Ureterstriktur ist eine relativ seltene Komplikation, trotzdem bedarf sie einer differenzierten Versorgung. In komplexen Fällen wird dies durch die roboterassistierte OP-Technik gewährleistet. Erste Resultate ermutigen.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.