Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 1/2008

01.01.2008 | SSAT plenery

Endoscopic Ultrasound and Computed Tomography Predictors of Pancreatic Cancer Resectability

verfasst von: Philip Q. Bao, J. Chad Johnson, Elizabeth H. Lindsey, David A. Schwartz, Ron C. Arildsen, Ewa Grzeszczak, Alexander A. Parikh, Nipun B. Merchant

Erschienen in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery | Ausgabe 1/2008

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction

This study investigates the ability of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and computed tomography (CT) to predict a margin negative (R0) resection and the need for venous resection in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD).

Methods

Patients with pancreatic head adenocarcinoma undergoing surgery with intent to resect during the last 5 years were identified. EUS and CT data on vascular involvement were collected. Preoperative imaging was compared to intraoperative findings and final pathology. Contingency table analysis using Fisher’s exact test identified imaging features of EUS and CT associated with unresectability and positive margins.

Results

Seventy-six patients met study criteria. Forty-seven (62%) underwent potentially curative PD. The R0 resection rate was 70%. There were 16 unresectable patients because of locally advanced disease. Venous involvement >180° and arterial involvement >90° by CT had 100% positive predictive value for failure to achieve R0 resection (p < .01). If patients with prestudy biliary stents were excluded, EUS venous abutment or invasion also predicted R0 failure (p = .02). Combined but not individual EUS and CT findings were predictive of need for vein resection.

Conclusions

Pancreas protocol CT imaging appears to be a better predictor of resectability compared to EUS. EUS accuracy is affected by the presence of biliary stents.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Murray T, Xu J, Thun MJ. Cancer Statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 2007;57:43–66.PubMedCrossRef Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Murray T, Xu J, Thun MJ. Cancer Statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 2007;57:43–66.PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Winter JM, Cameron JL, Campbell KA, Arnold MA, Chang DC, Coleman J, Hodgin MB, Sauter PK, Hruban RH, Riall TS, Schulick RD, Choti MA, Lillemoe KD, Yeo CJ. 1423 pancreaticoduodenectomies for pancreatic cancer: a single-institution experience. J Gastrointest Surg 2006;10:1199–1211.PubMedCrossRef Winter JM, Cameron JL, Campbell KA, Arnold MA, Chang DC, Coleman J, Hodgin MB, Sauter PK, Hruban RH, Riall TS, Schulick RD, Choti MA, Lillemoe KD, Yeo CJ. 1423 pancreaticoduodenectomies for pancreatic cancer: a single-institution experience. J Gastrointest Surg 2006;10:1199–1211.PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Schwarz RE, Smith DD. Extent of lymph node retrieval and pancreatic cancer survival: Information from a large US population database. Ann Surg Oncol 2006;13:1189–1200.PubMedCrossRef Schwarz RE, Smith DD. Extent of lymph node retrieval and pancreatic cancer survival: Information from a large US population database. Ann Surg Oncol 2006;13:1189–1200.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Michalski CW, Kleeff J, Wente MN, Diener MK, Buchler MW, Friess H. Systematic review and meta-analysis of standard and extended lymphadenectomy in pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer. Br J Surg 2007;94:265–273.PubMedCrossRef Michalski CW, Kleeff J, Wente MN, Diener MK, Buchler MW, Friess H. Systematic review and meta-analysis of standard and extended lymphadenectomy in pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer. Br J Surg 2007;94:265–273.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Peiper M, Bolke E, Orth K, Hosch SB, Rehders A, Matthaei H, Knoefel WT. Current status of radical systematic lymphadenectomy in pancreatic cancer—A review of the literature. Eur J Med Res 2007;12:47–53.PubMed Peiper M, Bolke E, Orth K, Hosch SB, Rehders A, Matthaei H, Knoefel WT. Current status of radical systematic lymphadenectomy in pancreatic cancer—A review of the literature. Eur J Med Res 2007;12:47–53.PubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Howard T, Krug JE, Yu J, Zyromski NJ, Schmidt CM, Jacobson LE, Madura J, Wiebke EA, Lillemoe KD. A margin-negative R0 resection accomplished with minimal postoperative complications is the surgeon’s contribution to long-term survival in pancreatic cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 2006;10:1338–1346.PubMedCrossRef Howard T, Krug JE, Yu J, Zyromski NJ, Schmidt CM, Jacobson LE, Madura J, Wiebke EA, Lillemoe KD. A margin-negative R0 resection accomplished with minimal postoperative complications is the surgeon’s contribution to long-term survival in pancreatic cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 2006;10:1338–1346.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Hunt GC, Faigel DO. Assessment of EUS for diagnosing, staging, and determining resectability of pancreatic cancer: A review. Gastrointest Endosc 2002;55:232–237.PubMedCrossRef Hunt GC, Faigel DO. Assessment of EUS for diagnosing, staging, and determining resectability of pancreatic cancer: A review. Gastrointest Endosc 2002;55:232–237.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Gress FG, Hawes RH, Savides TJ, Ikenberry SO, Cummings O, Kopecky K, Sherman S, Wiersema M, Lehman GA. Role of EUS in the preoperative staging of pancreatic cancer: A large single-center experience. Gastrointest Endosc 1999;50:786–791.PubMedCrossRef Gress FG, Hawes RH, Savides TJ, Ikenberry SO, Cummings O, Kopecky K, Sherman S, Wiersema M, Lehman GA. Role of EUS in the preoperative staging of pancreatic cancer: A large single-center experience. Gastrointest Endosc 1999;50:786–791.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Greene FL. Exocrine pancreas. AJCC cancer staging manual. 6th Ed. New York: Springer-Verlag, 2002: 179–187. Greene FL. Exocrine pancreas. AJCC cancer staging manual. 6th Ed. New York: Springer-Verlag, 2002: 179–187.
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Yusoff IF, Mendelson RM, Edmunds SE, Ramsay D, Cullingford GL, Fletcher DR, Zimmerman AM. Preoperative assessment of pancreatic malignancy using endoscopic ultrasound. Abdom Imaging 2003;28:556–562.PubMedCrossRef Yusoff IF, Mendelson RM, Edmunds SE, Ramsay D, Cullingford GL, Fletcher DR, Zimmerman AM. Preoperative assessment of pancreatic malignancy using endoscopic ultrasound. Abdom Imaging 2003;28:556–562.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat DeWitt J, Devereaux B, Chriswell M, McGreevy K, Howard T, Imperiale TF, Ciaccia D, Lane KA, Maglinte D, Kopecky K, LeBlanc J, McHenry L, Madura J, Aisen A, Cramer H, Cummings O, Sherman S. Comparison of endoscopic ultrasonography and multidetector computed tomography for detecting and staging pancreatic cancer. Ann Intern Med 2004;141:753–763.PubMed DeWitt J, Devereaux B, Chriswell M, McGreevy K, Howard T, Imperiale TF, Ciaccia D, Lane KA, Maglinte D, Kopecky K, LeBlanc J, McHenry L, Madura J, Aisen A, Cramer H, Cummings O, Sherman S. Comparison of endoscopic ultrasonography and multidetector computed tomography for detecting and staging pancreatic cancer. Ann Intern Med 2004;141:753–763.PubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Soriano A, Castells A, Ayuso C, Ayuso JR, de Caralt MT, Gines MA, Real MI, Gilabert R, Quinto L, Trilla A, Feu F, Montanya X, Fernandez-Cruz L, Navarro S. Preoperative staging and tumor resectability assessment of pancreatic cancer: prospective study comparing endoscopic ultrasonography, helical computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and angiography. Am J Gastroenterol 2004;99:492–501.PubMedCrossRef Soriano A, Castells A, Ayuso C, Ayuso JR, de Caralt MT, Gines MA, Real MI, Gilabert R, Quinto L, Trilla A, Feu F, Montanya X, Fernandez-Cruz L, Navarro S. Preoperative staging and tumor resectability assessment of pancreatic cancer: prospective study comparing endoscopic ultrasonography, helical computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and angiography. Am J Gastroenterol 2004;99:492–501.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Phoa SS, Reeders JW, Stoker J, Rauws EA, Gouma DJ, Lameris JS. CT criteria for venous invasion in patients with pancreatic head carcinoma. Br J Radiol 2000;73:1159–1164.PubMed Phoa SS, Reeders JW, Stoker J, Rauws EA, Gouma DJ, Lameris JS. CT criteria for venous invasion in patients with pancreatic head carcinoma. Br J Radiol 2000;73:1159–1164.PubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Li H, Zeng MS, Zhou KR, Jin DY, Lou WH. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma: Signs of vascular invasion determined by multi-detector row CT. Br J Radiol 2006;79:880–887.PubMedCrossRef Li H, Zeng MS, Zhou KR, Jin DY, Lou WH. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma: Signs of vascular invasion determined by multi-detector row CT. Br J Radiol 2006;79:880–887.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Aslanian H, Salem R, Lee J, Andersen D, Robert M, Topazian M. EUS diagnosis of vascular invasion in pancreatic cancer: Surgical and histologic correlates. Am J Gastroenterol 2005;100:1381–1385.PubMedCrossRef Aslanian H, Salem R, Lee J, Andersen D, Robert M, Topazian M. EUS diagnosis of vascular invasion in pancreatic cancer: Surgical and histologic correlates. Am J Gastroenterol 2005;100:1381–1385.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Rosch T, Dittler HJ, Strobel K, Meining A, Schusdziarra V, Lorenz R, Allescher HD, Kassem AM, Gerhardt P, Siewert JR, Hofler H, Classen M. Endoscopic ultrasound criteria for vascular invasion in the staging of cancer of the head of the pancreas: A blind reevaluation of videotapes. Gastrointest Endosc 2000;52:469–477.PubMedCrossRef Rosch T, Dittler HJ, Strobel K, Meining A, Schusdziarra V, Lorenz R, Allescher HD, Kassem AM, Gerhardt P, Siewert JR, Hofler H, Classen M. Endoscopic ultrasound criteria for vascular invasion in the staging of cancer of the head of the pancreas: A blind reevaluation of videotapes. Gastrointest Endosc 2000;52:469–477.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Yovino S, Darwin P, Daly B, Garofalo M, Moesinger R. Predicting unresectability in pancreatic cancer patients: The additive effects of CT and endoscopic ultrasound. J Gastrointest Surg 2007;11:36–42.PubMedCrossRef Yovino S, Darwin P, Daly B, Garofalo M, Moesinger R. Predicting unresectability in pancreatic cancer patients: The additive effects of CT and endoscopic ultrasound. J Gastrointest Surg 2007;11:36–42.PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Endoscopic Ultrasound and Computed Tomography Predictors of Pancreatic Cancer Resectability
verfasst von
Philip Q. Bao
J. Chad Johnson
Elizabeth H. Lindsey
David A. Schwartz
Ron C. Arildsen
Ewa Grzeszczak
Alexander A. Parikh
Nipun B. Merchant
Publikationsdatum
01.01.2008
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery / Ausgabe 1/2008
Print ISSN: 1091-255X
Elektronische ISSN: 1873-4626
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-007-0373-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2008

Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 1/2008 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.