Skip to main content
Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery 7/2013

01.07.2013

Enhanced Significance of Donor–Recipient Age Gradient as a Prognostic Factor of Graft Outcome in Living Donor Kidney Transplantation

verfasst von: Milljae Shin, Jae Berm Park, Choon Hyuck David Kwon, Jae-Won Joh, Suk-Koo Lee, Sung-Joo Kim

Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery | Ausgabe 7/2013

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Successful kidney transplantation (KT) increases survival and improves quality of life for patients with end-stage renal disease. Donor age is an important factor influencing graft outcomes. We evaluated the relationship between the donor–recipient age gradient (DRAG) and graft outcomes after living-donor kidney transplantation (LDKT). Additionally, we analyzed graft survival in patients receiving kidneys from age-mismatched donors.

Methods

From February 1995 to March 2011, a series of 968 consecutive adult LDKT recipients were enrolled in our study. Graft survival and laboratory data for each patient were retrospectively collected. DRAG values were divided into four groups: ≤−21, −20 to −1, 0−20, and ≥21 years.

Results

Higher DRAG had negative effects on graft rejection episodes and serum creatinine levels beyond the first month post-transplantation. A DRAG of more than 20 years was significantly correlated with worse 10-year graft survival. Kidneys from donors older than 55 years of age showed significantly compromised graft outcomes when transplanted into recipients younger than 30 years of age, but not in older recipients. Graft survival in transplants using old-to-old allocation was not different from that of young-to-young allocation. In cases of older donors, a lower DRAG between older donors and older recipients showed more favorable graft outcomes than a higher DRAG between older donors and younger recipients.

Conclusions

This study demonstrated that DRAG may serve as a prognostic factor for predicting graft outcomes after LDKT. Additionally, we showed that transplantation of older donor kidneys via living donation is justified in appropriately chosen age-matched recipients.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Johnson DW, Herzig K, Purdie D et al (2000) A comparison of the effects of dialysis and renal transplantation on the survival of older uremic patients. Transplantation 69:794–799PubMedCrossRef Johnson DW, Herzig K, Purdie D et al (2000) A comparison of the effects of dialysis and renal transplantation on the survival of older uremic patients. Transplantation 69:794–799PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Liem YS, Bosch JL, Arends LR et al (2007) Quality of life assessed with the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36-Item Health Survey of patients on renal replacement therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Value Health 10:390–397PubMedCrossRef Liem YS, Bosch JL, Arends LR et al (2007) Quality of life assessed with the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36-Item Health Survey of patients on renal replacement therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Value Health 10:390–397PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Wolfe RA, Ashby VB, Milford EL et al (1999) Comparison of mortality in all patients on dialysis, patients on dialysis awaiting transplantation, and recipients of a first cadaveric transplant. N Engl J Med 341:1725–1730PubMedCrossRef Wolfe RA, Ashby VB, Milford EL et al (1999) Comparison of mortality in all patients on dialysis, patients on dialysis awaiting transplantation, and recipients of a first cadaveric transplant. N Engl J Med 341:1725–1730PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Oppenheimer F, Aljama P, Asensio Peinado C et al (2004) The impact of donor age on the results of renal transplantation. Nephrol Dial Transplant 19(3):11–15 Oppenheimer F, Aljama P, Asensio Peinado C et al (2004) The impact of donor age on the results of renal transplantation. Nephrol Dial Transplant 19(3):11–15
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Fuggle SV, Allen JE, Johnson RJ et al (2010) Factors affecting graft and patient survival after live donor kidney transplantation in the UK. Transplantation 89:694–701PubMedCrossRef Fuggle SV, Allen JE, Johnson RJ et al (2010) Factors affecting graft and patient survival after live donor kidney transplantation in the UK. Transplantation 89:694–701PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Iordanous Y, Seymour N, Young A et al (2009) Recipient outcomes for expanded criteria living kidney donors: the disconnect between current evidence and practice. Am J Transplant 9:1558–1573PubMedCrossRef Iordanous Y, Seymour N, Young A et al (2009) Recipient outcomes for expanded criteria living kidney donors: the disconnect between current evidence and practice. Am J Transplant 9:1558–1573PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Noppakun K, Cosio FG, Dean PG et al (2011) Living donor age and kidney transplant outcomes. Am J Transplant 11:1279–1286PubMedCrossRef Noppakun K, Cosio FG, Dean PG et al (2011) Living donor age and kidney transplant outcomes. Am J Transplant 11:1279–1286PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Oien CM, Reisaeter AV, Leivestad T et al (2007) Living donor kidney transplantation: the effects of donor age and gender on short- and long-term outcomes. Transplantation 83:600–606PubMedCrossRef Oien CM, Reisaeter AV, Leivestad T et al (2007) Living donor kidney transplantation: the effects of donor age and gender on short- and long-term outcomes. Transplantation 83:600–606PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Rizzari MD, Suszynski TM, Gillingham KJ et al (2011) Consideration of donor age and human leukocyte antigen matching in the setting of multiple potential living kidney donors. Transplantation 92:70–75PubMedCrossRef Rizzari MD, Suszynski TM, Gillingham KJ et al (2011) Consideration of donor age and human leukocyte antigen matching in the setting of multiple potential living kidney donors. Transplantation 92:70–75PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Oniscu GC, Brown H, Forsythe JL (2004) How old is old for transplantation? Am J Transplant 4:2067–2074PubMedCrossRef Oniscu GC, Brown H, Forsythe JL (2004) How old is old for transplantation? Am J Transplant 4:2067–2074PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Veroux M, Grosso G, Corona D et al (2012) Age is an important predictor of kidney transplantation outcome. Nephrol Dial Transplant 27:1663–1671PubMedCrossRef Veroux M, Grosso G, Corona D et al (2012) Age is an important predictor of kidney transplantation outcome. Nephrol Dial Transplant 27:1663–1671PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Meier-Kriesche HU, Ojo AO, Cibrik DM et al (2000) Relationship of recipient age and development of chronic allograft failure. Transplantation 70:306–310PubMedCrossRef Meier-Kriesche HU, Ojo AO, Cibrik DM et al (2000) Relationship of recipient age and development of chronic allograft failure. Transplantation 70:306–310PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Carta P, Di Maria L, Zanazzi M et al (2010) Kidney graft survival rates do not improve by era: the impact of the age factor. Transplant Proc 42:2218–2219PubMedCrossRef Carta P, Di Maria L, Zanazzi M et al (2010) Kidney graft survival rates do not improve by era: the impact of the age factor. Transplant Proc 42:2218–2219PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Tullius SG, Tran H, Guleria I et al (2010) The combination of donor and recipient age is critical in determining host immunoresponsiveness and renal transplant outcome. Ann Surg 252:662–674PubMed Tullius SG, Tran H, Guleria I et al (2010) The combination of donor and recipient age is critical in determining host immunoresponsiveness and renal transplant outcome. Ann Surg 252:662–674PubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Gill J, Bunnapradist S, Danovitch GM et al (2008) Outcomes of kidney transplantation from older living donors to older recipients. Am J Kidney Dis 52:541–552PubMedCrossRef Gill J, Bunnapradist S, Danovitch GM et al (2008) Outcomes of kidney transplantation from older living donors to older recipients. Am J Kidney Dis 52:541–552PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Matas AJ, Payne WD, Sutherland DE et al (2001) 2,500 living donor kidney transplants: a single-center experience. Ann Surg 234:149–164PubMedCrossRef Matas AJ, Payne WD, Sutherland DE et al (2001) 2,500 living donor kidney transplants: a single-center experience. Ann Surg 234:149–164PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Curschellas E, Landmann J, Durig M et al (1991) Morphologic findings in “zero-hour” biopsies of renal transplants. Clin Nephrol 36:215–222PubMed Curschellas E, Landmann J, Durig M et al (1991) Morphologic findings in “zero-hour” biopsies of renal transplants. Clin Nephrol 36:215–222PubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Remuzzi G, Cravedi P, Perna A et al (2006) Long-term outcome of renal transplantation from older donors. N Engl J Med 354:343–352PubMedCrossRef Remuzzi G, Cravedi P, Perna A et al (2006) Long-term outcome of renal transplantation from older donors. N Engl J Med 354:343–352PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Asderakis A, Dyer P, Augustine T et al (2001) Effect of cold ischemic time and HLA matching in kidneys coming from “young” and “old” donors: do not leave for tomorrow what you can do tonight. Transplantation 72:674–678PubMedCrossRef Asderakis A, Dyer P, Augustine T et al (2001) Effect of cold ischemic time and HLA matching in kidneys coming from “young” and “old” donors: do not leave for tomorrow what you can do tonight. Transplantation 72:674–678PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat de Fijter JW (2005) The impact of age on rejection in kidney transplantation. Drugs Aging 22:433–449PubMedCrossRef de Fijter JW (2005) The impact of age on rejection in kidney transplantation. Drugs Aging 22:433–449PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Matas AJ, Gillingham KJ, Humar A et al (2000) Immunologic and nonimmunologic factors: different risks for cadaver and living donor transplantation. Transplantation 69:54–58PubMedCrossRef Matas AJ, Gillingham KJ, Humar A et al (2000) Immunologic and nonimmunologic factors: different risks for cadaver and living donor transplantation. Transplantation 69:54–58PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat de Fijter JW, Mallat MJ, Doxiadis II et al (2001) Increased immunogenicity and cause of graft loss of old donor kidneys. J Am Soc Nephrol 12:1538–1546PubMed de Fijter JW, Mallat MJ, Doxiadis II et al (2001) Increased immunogenicity and cause of graft loss of old donor kidneys. J Am Soc Nephrol 12:1538–1546PubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Melk A, Schmidt BM, Braun H et al (2009) Effects of donor age and cell senescence on kidney allograft survival. Am J Transplant 9:114–123PubMedCrossRef Melk A, Schmidt BM, Braun H et al (2009) Effects of donor age and cell senescence on kidney allograft survival. Am J Transplant 9:114–123PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Gjertson DW (2001) Center and other factor effects in recipients of living-donor kidney transplants. Clin Transpl 2001:209–221 Gjertson DW (2001) Center and other factor effects in recipients of living-donor kidney transplants. Clin Transpl 2001:209–221
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Morrissey PE, Gohh R, Yango A et al (2004) Renal transplant survival from older donors: a single center experience. Arch Surg 139:384–389, discussion 389 Morrissey PE, Gohh R, Yango A et al (2004) Renal transplant survival from older donors: a single center experience. Arch Surg 139:384–389, discussion 389
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Schold JD, Srinivas TR, Braun WE et al (2011) The relative risk of overall graft loss and acute rejection among African American renal transplant recipients is attenuated with advancing age. Clin Transplant 25:721–730PubMedCrossRef Schold JD, Srinivas TR, Braun WE et al (2011) The relative risk of overall graft loss and acute rejection among African American renal transplant recipients is attenuated with advancing age. Clin Transplant 25:721–730PubMedCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhao J, Song WL, Mo CB et al (2011) Factors of impact on graft function at 2 years after transplantation in living-donor kidney transplantation: a single-center study in China. Transplant Proc 43:3690–3693PubMedCrossRef Zhao J, Song WL, Mo CB et al (2011) Factors of impact on graft function at 2 years after transplantation in living-donor kidney transplantation: a single-center study in China. Transplant Proc 43:3690–3693PubMedCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Huang E, Segev DL, Rabb H (2009) Kidney transplantation in the elderly. Semin Nephrol 29:621–635PubMedCrossRef Huang E, Segev DL, Rabb H (2009) Kidney transplantation in the elderly. Semin Nephrol 29:621–635PubMedCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Lezaic V, Naumovic R, Stanic M et al (2007) Factors affecting graft function in pediatric and adult recipients of adult live donor kidney transplants. Pediatr Transplant 11:906–913PubMedCrossRef Lezaic V, Naumovic R, Stanic M et al (2007) Factors affecting graft function in pediatric and adult recipients of adult live donor kidney transplants. Pediatr Transplant 11:906–913PubMedCrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Moore PS, Farney AC, Hartmann EL et al (2007) Experience with deceased donor kidney transplantation in 114 patients over age 60. Surgery 142:514–523, discussion 523 e511–e512 Moore PS, Farney AC, Hartmann EL et al (2007) Experience with deceased donor kidney transplantation in 114 patients over age 60. Surgery 142:514–523, discussion 523 e511–e512
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Epstein M (1996) Aging and the kidney. J Am Soc Nephrol 7:1106–1122PubMed Epstein M (1996) Aging and the kidney. J Am Soc Nephrol 7:1106–1122PubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Lim WH, Chang S, Chadban S et al (2010) Donor–recipient age matching improves years of graft function in deceased-donor kidney transplantation. Nephrol Dial Transplant 25:3082–3089PubMedCrossRef Lim WH, Chang S, Chadban S et al (2010) Donor–recipient age matching improves years of graft function in deceased-donor kidney transplantation. Nephrol Dial Transplant 25:3082–3089PubMedCrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Lages CS, Suffia I, Velilla PA et al (2008) Functional regulatory T cells accumulate in aged hosts and promote chronic infectious disease reactivation. J Immunol 181:1835–1848PubMed Lages CS, Suffia I, Velilla PA et al (2008) Functional regulatory T cells accumulate in aged hosts and promote chronic infectious disease reactivation. J Immunol 181:1835–1848PubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Benito MJ, Lopez-Hoyos M, Fernandez-Fresnedo G et al (2008) Changes in the expression of the immunoglobulin-like transcript 3 (ILT3) and ILT4 receptors in renal allograft recipients: effect of donor and recipient aging. Transplant Proc 40:2894–2896PubMedCrossRef Benito MJ, Lopez-Hoyos M, Fernandez-Fresnedo G et al (2008) Changes in the expression of the immunoglobulin-like transcript 3 (ILT3) and ILT4 receptors in renal allograft recipients: effect of donor and recipient aging. Transplant Proc 40:2894–2896PubMedCrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Chavalitdhamrong D, Gill J, Takemoto S et al (2008) Patient and graft outcomes from deceased kidney donors age 70 years and older: an analysis of the Organ Procurement Transplant Network/United Network of Organ Sharing database. Transplantation 85:1573–1579PubMedCrossRef Chavalitdhamrong D, Gill J, Takemoto S et al (2008) Patient and graft outcomes from deceased kidney donors age 70 years and older: an analysis of the Organ Procurement Transplant Network/United Network of Organ Sharing database. Transplantation 85:1573–1579PubMedCrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Donnelly PK, Simpson AR, Milner AD et al (1990) Age-matching improves the results of renal transplantation with older donors. Nephrol Dial Transplant 5:808–811PubMedCrossRef Donnelly PK, Simpson AR, Milner AD et al (1990) Age-matching improves the results of renal transplantation with older donors. Nephrol Dial Transplant 5:808–811PubMedCrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Hariharan S, McBride MA, Bennett LE et al (1997) Risk factors for renal allograft survival from older cadaver donors. Transplantation 64:1748–1754PubMedCrossRef Hariharan S, McBride MA, Bennett LE et al (1997) Risk factors for renal allograft survival from older cadaver donors. Transplantation 64:1748–1754PubMedCrossRef
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Moers C, Kornmann NS, Leuvenink HG et al (2009) The influence of deceased donor age and old-for-old allocation on kidney transplant outcome. Transplantation 88:542–552PubMedCrossRef Moers C, Kornmann NS, Leuvenink HG et al (2009) The influence of deceased donor age and old-for-old allocation on kidney transplant outcome. Transplantation 88:542–552PubMedCrossRef
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Waiser J, Schreiber M, Budde K et al (2000) Age-matching in renal transplantation. Nephrol Dial Transplant 15:696–700PubMedCrossRef Waiser J, Schreiber M, Budde K et al (2000) Age-matching in renal transplantation. Nephrol Dial Transplant 15:696–700PubMedCrossRef
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Cohen B, Smits JM, Haase B et al (2005) Expanding the donor pool to increase renal transplantation. Nephrol Dial Transplant 20:34–41PubMedCrossRef Cohen B, Smits JM, Haase B et al (2005) Expanding the donor pool to increase renal transplantation. Nephrol Dial Transplant 20:34–41PubMedCrossRef
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Fritsche L, Horstrup J, Budde K et al (2003) Old-for-old kidney allocation allows successful expansion of the donor and recipient pool. Am J Transplant 3:1434–1439PubMedCrossRef Fritsche L, Horstrup J, Budde K et al (2003) Old-for-old kidney allocation allows successful expansion of the donor and recipient pool. Am J Transplant 3:1434–1439PubMedCrossRef
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Giessing M, Budde K, Fritsche L et al (2003) “Old-for-old” cadaveric renal transplantation: surgical findings, perioperative complications and outcome. Eur Urol 44:701–708PubMedCrossRef Giessing M, Budde K, Fritsche L et al (2003) “Old-for-old” cadaveric renal transplantation: surgical findings, perioperative complications and outcome. Eur Urol 44:701–708PubMedCrossRef
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Boesmueller C, Biebl M, Scheidl S et al (2011) Long-term outcome in kidney transplant recipients over 70 years in the Eurotransplant Senior Kidney Transplant Program: a single center experience. Transplantation 92:210–216PubMedCrossRef Boesmueller C, Biebl M, Scheidl S et al (2011) Long-term outcome in kidney transplant recipients over 70 years in the Eurotransplant Senior Kidney Transplant Program: a single center experience. Transplantation 92:210–216PubMedCrossRef
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Fabrizii V, Kovarik J, Bodingbauer M et al (2005) Long-term patient and graft survival in the Eurotransplant Senior Program: a single-center experience. Transplantation 80:582–589PubMedCrossRef Fabrizii V, Kovarik J, Bodingbauer M et al (2005) Long-term patient and graft survival in the Eurotransplant Senior Program: a single-center experience. Transplantation 80:582–589PubMedCrossRef
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Cooper M, Forland CL (2011) The elderly as recipients of living donor kidneys, how old is too old? Curr Opin Organ Transplant 16:250–255PubMedCrossRef Cooper M, Forland CL (2011) The elderly as recipients of living donor kidneys, how old is too old? Curr Opin Organ Transplant 16:250–255PubMedCrossRef
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Heldal K, Hartmann A, Leivestad T et al (2011) Risk variables associated with the outcome of kidney recipients > 70 years of age in the new millennium. Nephrol Dial Transplant 26:2706–2711PubMedCrossRef Heldal K, Hartmann A, Leivestad T et al (2011) Risk variables associated with the outcome of kidney recipients > 70 years of age in the new millennium. Nephrol Dial Transplant 26:2706–2711PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Enhanced Significance of Donor–Recipient Age Gradient as a Prognostic Factor of Graft Outcome in Living Donor Kidney Transplantation
verfasst von
Milljae Shin
Jae Berm Park
Choon Hyuck David Kwon
Jae-Won Joh
Suk-Koo Lee
Sung-Joo Kim
Publikationsdatum
01.07.2013
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
World Journal of Surgery / Ausgabe 7/2013
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-013-2038-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 7/2013

World Journal of Surgery 7/2013 Zur Ausgabe

Echinokokkose medikamentös behandeln oder operieren?

06.05.2024 DCK 2024 Kongressbericht

Die Therapie von Echinokokkosen sollte immer in spezialisierten Zentren erfolgen. Eine symptomlose Echinokokkose kann – egal ob von Hunde- oder Fuchsbandwurm ausgelöst – konservativ erfolgen. Wenn eine Op. nötig ist, kann es sinnvoll sein, vorher Zysten zu leeren und zu desinfizieren. 

Recycling im OP – möglich, aber teuer

05.05.2024 DCK 2024 Kongressbericht

Auch wenn sich Krankenhäuser nachhaltig und grün geben – sie tragen aktuell erheblich zu den CO2-Emissionen bei und produzieren jede Menge Müll. Ein Pilotprojekt aus Bonn zeigt, dass viele Op.-Abfälle wiederverwertet werden können.

Im OP der Zukunft läuft nichts mehr ohne Kollege Roboter

04.05.2024 DCK 2024 Kongressbericht

Der OP in der Zukunft wird mit weniger Personal auskommen – nicht, weil die Technik das medizinische Fachpersonal verdrängt, sondern weil der Personalmangel es nötig macht.

Nur selten Nachblutungen nach Abszesstonsillektomie

03.05.2024 Tonsillektomie Nachrichten

In einer Metaanalyse von 18 Studien war die Rate von Nachblutungen nach einer Abszesstonsillektomie mit weniger als 7% recht niedrig. Nur rund 2% der Behandelten mussten nachoperiert werden. Die Therapie scheint damit recht sicher zu sein.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.