nach oben

Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology

Erschienen in:

25.01.2021 | Retinal Disorders

Epiretinal membrane vitrectomy: outcomes with or without cataract surgery and a novel prognostic factor for cystoid macular edema

verfasst von: Nisa Silva, André Ferreira, João Heitor Marques, Natália Ferreira, Nuno Correia, Bernardete Pessoa, João Melo Beirão, Ferenc Kuhn, Angelina Meireles

Erschienen in: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology | Ausgabe 7/2021

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To assess the outcomes of vitrectomy with or without cataract surgery for the treatment of idiopathic ERM in phakic eyes and evaluate predictors of functional and anatomical outcomes.

Methods

Retrospective cohort of consecutive phakic ERM eyes distributed in three groups: a) combined (phacovitrectomy) group, b) PPV-only group, and c) consecutive group (PPV followed by cataract surgery). Main outcomes were final visual acuity (VA) and cystoid macular edema (CME) occurrence. Potential predictors of VA or CME included clinical variables and SD-OCT parameters.

Results

A total of 108 eyes were included in this study. There were no differences in the final VA between consecutive and combined groups (0.22 vs 0.10 logMAR, p = 0.851). Twelve eyes from the combined group (23%) and one eye from the PPV-only group presented CME (p = 0.001). There were no differences between postoperative CME occurrence in combined versus consecutive group (12 vs 7, p = 0.38). The presence of cotton-ball sign predicted the development of CME [OR 2.86 (95%CI 1.01–8.18), p = 0.049] while separated ERM–ILM complex was found to be protective [OR 0.25 (95%CI 0.08-0.77), p = 0.015].

Conclusions

Functional and anatomical results of PPV with ERM and ILM peeling combined with cataract surgery was equivalent to the consecutive procedure, with both strategies being effective. Separated ERM–ILM complex has prognostic value in these patients, as its presence at baseline was found to be protective for postoperative CME.

Machemer R (1978) The surgical removal of epiretinal macular membranes (macular puckers) (author’s transl). Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 173(1):36–42PubMed

Cherfan GM, Michels RG, de Bustros S, Enger C, Glaser BM (1991) Nuclear sclerotic cataract after vitrectomy for idiopathic epiretinal membranes causing macular pucker. Am J Ophthalmol 111(4):434–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9394(14)72377-3CrossRefPubMed

Dermer H, Hussain RM, Lin J, Vanner EA, Haddock LJ, Gregori NZ (2019) Combined phacovitrectomy versus sequential approach in eyes with epiretinal membrane and cataract. OSP J Ophthal 1(1):1–9

Hamoudi H, Correll Christensen U, La Cour M (2018) Epiretinal membrane surgery: an analysis of 2-step sequential- or combined phacovitrectomy surgery on refraction and macular anatomy in a prospective trial. Acta Ophthalmol 96(3):243–250. https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.13572CrossRefPubMed

Szijarto Z, Haszonits B, Biro Z, Kovacs B (2007) Phacoemulsification on previously vitrectomized eyes: results of a 10-year period. Eur J Ophthalmol 17(4):601–604. https://doi.org/10.1177/112067210701700419CrossRefPubMed

Seider MI, Michael Lahey J, Fellenbaum PS (2014) Cost of phacovitrectomy versus vitrectomy and sequential phacoemulsification. Retina 34(6):1112–1115. https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000000061CrossRefPubMed

Steel DH (2007) Phacovitrectomy: expanding indications. J Cataract Refract Surg 33(6):933–936CrossRef

Fajgenbaum MAP, Neffendorf JE, Wong RS, Laidlaw DAH, Williamson TH (2018) Intraoperative and postoperative complications in phacovitrectomy for epiretinal membrane and macular hole: a clinical audit of 1,000 consecutive eyes. Retina 38(9):1865–1872. https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000002034CrossRefPubMed

Park SP, Ahn JK, Lee GH (2009) Morphologic changes in the anterior segment after phacovitrectomy for proliferative diabetic retinopathy. J Cataract Refract Surg 35(5):868–873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.12.032CrossRefPubMed

10.

Lange C, Feltgen N, Junker B, Schulze-Bonsel K, Bach M (2009) Resolving the clinical acuity categories “hand motion” and “counting fingers” using the Freiburg Visual Acuity Test (FrACT). Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 247(1):137–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-008-0926-0CrossRefPubMed

11.

Holladay JT (1997) Proper method for calculating average visual acuity. J Refract Surg 13(4):388–391CrossRef

12.

Wielders LHP, Schouten J, Winkens B, van den Biggelaar F, Veldhuizen CA, Findl O, Murta JCN, Goslings WRO, Tassignon MJ, Joosse MV, Henry YP, Rulo AHF, Guell JL, Amon M, Kohnen T, Nuijts R, Group EPS (2018) European multicenter trial of the prevention of cystoid macular edema after cataract surgery in nondiabetics: ESCRS PREMED study report 1. J Cataract Refract Surg 44(4):429–439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.01.029CrossRefPubMed

13.

Govetto A, Lalane RA 3rd, Sarraf D, Figueroa MS, Hubschman JP (2017) Insights into epiretinal membranes: presence of ectopic inner foveal layers and a new optical coherence tomography staging scheme. Am J Ophthalmol 175:99–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2016.12.006CrossRefPubMed

14.

Tsunoda K, Watanabe K, Akiyama K, Usui T, Noda T (2012) Highly reflective foveal region in optical coherence tomography in eyes with vitreomacular traction or epiretinal membrane. Ophthalmology 119(3):581–587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.08.026CrossRefPubMed

15.

Warren KA, Bahrani H, Fox JE (2010) NSAIDs in combination therapy for the treatment of chronic pseudophakic cystoid macular edema. Retina 30(2):260–266. https://doi.org/10.1097/iae.0b013e3181b8628eCrossRefPubMed

16.

Wittpenn JR, Silverstein S, Heier J, Kenyon KR, Hunkeler JD, Earl M, Acular LSCMESG (2008) A randomized, masked comparison of topical ketorolac 0.4% plus steroid vs steroid alone in low-risk cataract surgery patients. Am J Ophthalmol 146(4):554–560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2008.04.036CrossRefPubMed

17.

Singh R, Alpern L, Jaffe GJ, Lehmann RP, Lim J, Reiser HJ, Sall K, Walters T, Sager D (2012) Evaluation of nepafenac in prevention of macular edema following cataract surgery in patients with diabetic retinopathy. Clin Ophthalmol 6:1259–1269. https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S31902CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

18.

Kim SJ, Bressler NM (2009) Optical coherence tomography and cataract surgery. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 20(1):46–51. https://doi.org/10.1097/icu.0b013e3283199162CrossRefPubMed

19.

Giani A, Cigada M, Choudhry N, Deiro AP, Oldani M, Pellegrini M, Invernizzi A, Duca P, Miller JW, Staurenghi G (2010) Reproducibility of retinal thickness measurements on normal and pathologic eyes by different optical coherence tomography instruments. Am J Ophthalmol 150(6):815–824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2010.06.025CrossRefPubMed

20.

Grzybowski A, Sikorski BL, Ascaso FJ, Huerva V (2016) Pseudophakic cystoid macular edema: update 2016. Clin Interv Aging 11:1221–1229. https://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S111761CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

21.

Dugas B, Ouled-Moussa R, Lafontaine PO, Guillaubey A, Berrod JP, Hubert I, Bron AM, Creuzot-Garcher CP (2010) Idiopathic epiretinal macular membrane and cataract extraction: combined versus consecutive surgery. Am J Ophthalmol 149(2):302–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2009.09.011CrossRefPubMed

22.

Frisina R, Pinackatt SJ, Sartore M, Monfardini A, Baldi A, Cesana BM, Semeraro F, Bratu A, Parolini B (2015) Cystoid macular edema after pars plana vitrectomy for idiopathic epiretinal membrane. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 253(1):47–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-014-2655-xCrossRefPubMed

23.

Hardin JS, Gauldin DW, Soliman MK, Chu CJ, Yang YC, Sallam AB (2018) Cataract surgery outcomes in eyes with primary epiretinal membrane. JAMA Ophthalmol 136(2):148–154. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2017.5849CrossRefPubMed

24.

Feng H, Adelman RA (2014) Cataract formation following vitreoretinal procedures. Clin Ophthalmol 8:1957–1965. https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S68661CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

25.

Reilly G, Melamud A, Lipscomb P, Toussaint B (2015) Surgical outcomes in patients with macular pucker and good preoperative visual acuity after vitrectomy with membrane peeling. Retina 35(9):1817–1821. https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000000558CrossRefPubMed

26.

Doguizi S, Sekeroglu MA, Ozkoyuncu D, Omay AE, Yilmazbas P (2018) Clinical significance of ectopic inner foveal layers in patients with idiopathic epiretinal membranes. Eye (Lond) 32:1652–1660. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-018-0153-9CrossRef

27.

Kim JY, Kim DY, Kim KT, Song J, Chae JB, Kim JG (2020) Visual prognostic factors of epiretinal membrane surgery in patients with pseudophakia. Ophthalmologica 243(1):43–50. https://doi.org/10.1159/000502748CrossRefPubMed

28.

Watanabe K, Tsunoda K, Mizuno Y, Akiyama K, Noda T (2013) Outer retinal morphology and visual function in patients with idiopathic epiretinal membrane. JAMA Ophthalmol 131(2):172–177. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2013.686CrossRefPubMed

29.

Kim JH, Kim YM, Chung EJ, Lee SY, Koh HJ (2012) Structural and functional predictors of visual outcome of epiretinal membrane surgery. Am J Ophthalmol 153(1):103–110 e101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2011.06.021CrossRefPubMed

30.

Shimozono M, Oishi A, Hata M, Matsuki T, Ito S, Ishida K, Kurimoto Y (2012) The significance of cone outer segment tips as a prognostic factor in epiretinal membrane surgery. Am J Ophthalmol 153(4):698.e1–704.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2011.09.011CrossRef

31.

Inoue M, Morita S, Watanabe Y, Kaneko T, Yamane S, Kobayashi S, Arakawa A, Kadonosono K (2010) Inner segment/outer segment junction assessed by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography in patients with idiopathic epiretinal membrane. Am J Ophthalmol 150(6):834–839. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2010.06.006CrossRefPubMed

32.

Stevenson W, Prospero Ponce CM, Agarwal DR, Gelman R, Christoforidis JB (2016) Epiretinal membrane: optical coherence tomography-based diagnosis and classification. Clin Ophthalmol 10:527–534. https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S97722

33.

Pardo-Munoz A, Muriel-Herrero A, Abraira V, Muriel A, Munoz-Negrete FJ, Murube J (2006) Phacoemulsification in previously vitrectomized patients: an analysis of the surgical results in 100 eyes as well as the factors contributing to the cataract formation. Eur J Ophthalmol 16(1):52–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/112067210601600110CrossRefPubMed

34.

Lee JY, Kim KH, Shin KH, Han DH, Lee DY, Nam DH (2012) Comparison of intraoperative complications of phacoemulsification between sequential and combined procedures of pars plana vitrectomy and cataract surgery. Retina 32(10):2026–2033. https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0b013e3182561fabCrossRefPubMed

35.

Kim M, Kim HE, Lee DH, Koh HJ, Lee SC, Kim SS (2015) Intraocular lens power estimation in combined phacoemulsification and pars plana vitrectomy in eyes with epiretinal membranes: a case–control study. Yonsei Med J 56(3):805–811. https://doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2015.56.3.805CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

36.

Shi L, Chang JS, Suh LH, Chang S (2019) Differences in refractive outcomes between phacoemulsification for cataract alone and combined phacoemulsification and vitrectomy for epiretinal membrane. Retina 39(7):1410–1415. https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000002153CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Epiretinal membrane vitrectomy: outcomes with or without cataract surgery and a novel prognostic factor for cystoid macular edema
verfasst von: Nisa Silva
André Ferreira
João Heitor Marques
Natália Ferreira
Nuno Correia
Bernardete Pessoa
João Melo Beirão
Ferenc Kuhn
Angelina Meireles
Publikationsdatum: 25.01.2021
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology / Ausgabe 7/2021
Print ISSN: 0721-832X
Elektronische ISSN: 1435-702X
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-021-05076-5

Update Augenheilkunde

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Epiretinal membrane vitrectomy: outcomes with or without cataract surgery and a novel prognostic factor for cystoid macular edema

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Neu im Fachgebiet Augenheilkunde

Ophthalmika in der Schwangerschaft

Operative Therapie und Keimnachweis bei endogener Endophthalmitis

Bakterielle endogene Endophthalmitis

So erreichen Sie eine bestmögliche Wundheilung der Kornea

Update Augenheilkunde

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 7/2021

Correlation between tangential distortion of the outer retinal layer and metamorphopsia in patients with epiretinal membrane

Comparability of corneal thickness and opacity depth assessed by OCT and UBM

Comparative analysis of polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy with and without hemorrhage treated by anti-VEGF monotherapy

Outcomes after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty over a period of 7 years at a tertiary referral center: endothelial cell density, central corneal thickness, and visual acuity

Deep sclerectomy and trabeculectomy augmented with Mitomycin C: 2-year post-operative outcomes

Clinico-demographic profile and outcomes of 25-gauge vitrectomy in advanced stage 5 retinopathy of prematurity

Neu im Fachgebiet Augenheilkunde

Ophthalmika in der Schwangerschaft

Operative Therapie und Keimnachweis bei endogener Endophthalmitis

Bakterielle endogene Endophthalmitis

So erreichen Sie eine bestmögliche Wundheilung der Kornea

Update Augenheilkunde