nach oben

International Journal of Clinical Oncology

Erschienen in:

10.04.2022 | Original Article

Estrogen receptor-negative/progesterone receptor-positive and her-2-negative breast cancer might no longer be classified as hormone receptor-positive breast cancer

verfasst von: Hongjuan Zheng, Chenyang Ge, Haiping Lin, Lunpo Wu, Qinghua Wang, Shishi Zhou, Wanfen Tang, Xia Zhang, Xiayun Jin, Xifeng Xu, Zhongwu Hong, Jianfei Fu, Jinlin Du

Erschienen in: International Journal of Clinical Oncology | Ausgabe 7/2022

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

The single progesterone receptor (PR)-positive phenotype (estrogen receptor (ER)-/PR + , sPR positive) is an infrequent and independent biological entity. However, the prognosis of patients with sPR-positive and her-2-negative phenotype is still controversial, and it is not always easy to decide treatment strategies for them.

Methods

Patients during 2010–2014 were identified from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to evaluate cancer-specific survival (CSS). The propensity score matching (PSM) method was used to balance differences of characteristics in groups. The Life-Table method was used to calculate 5-year CSS rates and the annual hazard rate of death (HRD).

Results

A total of 97,527 patients were included, and only 745 (0.76%) patients were sPR-positive phenotype. The majority of sPR-positive breast cancer were basal-like subtype. Survival analysis showed that the sPR-positive breast cancer had similar prognosis comparing to double hormonal receptor-negative (ER-/PR-, dHoR-negative) breast cancer, and had the highest HRD during the initial 1–2 years of follow-up, then maintained the HRD of almost zero during the late years of follow-up.

Conclusions

The patients with sPR-positive and her-2-negative breast cancer, similar to dHoR-negative breast cancer, had a worse survival, and could benefit from chemotherapy significantly. However, the escalating endocrine therapy was not recommended for sPR-positive patients. The patients with sPR positive should be excluded from future clinical trials concerning endocrine therapy.

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Wl M (1973) Estrogen receptors in human breast cancer. J Clin Invest 52(1):73–77. https://doi.org/10.1172/Jci107175CrossRef

Aaltomaa S, Lipponen P, Eskelinen M et al (1991) Hormone receptors as prognostic factors in female breast cancer. Ann Med. 23(6):643–8. https://doi.org/10.3109/07853899109148097CrossRefPubMed

May E, Mouriesse H, May-Levin F et al (1990) Human breast cancer: identification of populations with a high risk of early relapse in relation to both oestrogen receptor status and C-Erbb-2 overexpression. British J Cancer. 62(3):430–5. https://doi.org/10.1038/Bjc.1990.312CrossRef

Jm R, Lv B, Aj K et al (1985) Disease-Free Interval and estrogen receptor activity in tumor tissue of patients with primary breast cancer: analysis after long-term follow-up. Breast Cancer Res Treatm 6(2):123–130. https://doi.org/10.1007/Bf02235743.PubmedPmid:4052639CrossRef

Chevallier B, Heintzmann F, Mosseri V et al (1988) Prognostic value of estrogen and progesterone receptors in operable breast-cancer - results of a univariate and multivariate-analysis. Cancer Am Cancer Soc. 62(12):2517–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142CrossRef

Alanko A, Heinonen E, Scheinin T et al (1985) Significance of estrogen and progesterone receptors, disease-free interval, and site of 1st metastasis on survival of breast-cancer patients. Cancer-Am Cancer Soc. 56(7):1696–700. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142CrossRef

Nadji M, Gomez-Fernandez C, Ganjei-Azar P et al (2005) Immunohistochemistry of estrogen and progesterone receptors reconsidered: experience with 5,993 breast cancers. Am JClin Pathol 123(1):21–7. https://doi.org/10.1309/4wv79n2ghj3x1841CrossRef

Bardou VJ, Arpino G, Elledge RM et al (2003) Progesterone receptor status significantly improves outcome prediction over estrogen receptor status alone for adjuvant endocrine therapy in two large breast cancer databases. J Clin Oncol. 21(10):1973–9. https://doi.org/10.1200/Jco.2003.09.099CrossRefPubMed

Ravdin PM, Green S, Dorr TM et al (1992) Prognostic-significance of progesterone-receptor levels in estrogen receptor-positive patients with metastatic breast-cancer treated with tamoxifen - results of a prospective southwest-oncology-group study. J Clin Oncol. 10(8):1284–91. https://doi.org/10.1200/Jco.1992.10.8.1284CrossRefPubMed

10.

Ck O, Mg Y, Wa K et al (1980) The value of estrogen and progesterone receptors in the treatment of breast-cancer. Cancer-Am Cancer Soc 46(12):2884–2888. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142CrossRef

11.

Schroth W, Winter S, Buttner F et al (2016) Clinical outcome and global gene expression data support the existence of the estrogen receptor-negative/progesterone receptor-positive invasive breast cancer phenotype. Breast Cancer Res Treatm 155(1):85–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10549-015-3651-5CrossRef

12.

Ethier JL, Ocana A, Rodriguez Lescure A et al (2018) Outcomes of single versus double hormone receptor-positive breast cancer a geicam/9906 sub-study. Eur J Cancer. 94:199–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.Ejca.2018.02.018CrossRefPubMed

13.

Kuroda H, Muroi N, Hayashi M et al (2019) Oestrogen receptor-negative/progesterone receptor-positive phenotype of invasive breast carcinoma in japan: re-evaluated using immunohistochemical staining. Breast Cancer. 26(2):249–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12282-018-0898-9CrossRefPubMed

14.

Cserni G, Francz M, Kalman E et al (2011) Estrogen receptor negative and progesterone receptor positive breast carcinomas-How frequent are they? Pathol Oncol Res. 17(3):663–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12253-011-9366-YCrossRefPubMed

15.

De Maeyer L, Van Limbergen E, De Nys K et al (2008) Does estrogen receptor negative/progesterone receptor positive breast carcinoma exist? J Clin Oncol. 26(2):335–6. https://doi.org/10.1200/Jco.2007.14.8411CrossRefPubMed

16.

Shen T, Brandwein-Gensler M, Hameed O et al (2015) Characterization of estrogen receptor-negative/progesterone receptor-positive breast cancer. Hum Pathol. 46(11):1776–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.Humpath.2015.07.019CrossRefPubMed

17.

Rhodes A, Jasani B (2009) the oestrogen receptor-negative/progesterone receptor-positive breast tumour: a biological entity or a technical artefact? J Clin Pathol 62(1):95–96. https://doi.org/10.1136/Jcp.2008.060723.PubmedPmid:19103868CrossRefPubMed

18.

Itoh M, Iwamoto T, Matsuoka J et al (2014) Estrogen receptor (Er) Mrna expression and molecular subtype distribution in er-negative/progesterone receptor-positive breast cancers. Breast Cancer Res Treatm 143(2):403–409. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10549-013-2763-ZCrossRef

19.

Borras M, Lacroix M, Legros N et al (1997) Estrogen receptor-negative/progesterone receptor-positive Evsa-T mammary tumor cells: a model for assessing the biological property of this peculiar phenotype of breast cancers. Cancer Lett 120(1):23–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3835(97)00285-1CrossRefPubMed

20.

Rakha EA, El-Sayed ME, Green AR et al (2007) Biologic And clinical characteristics of breast cancer with single hormone receptor positive phenotype. J Clin Oncol. 25(30):4772–8. https://doi.org/10.1200/Jco.2007.12.2747CrossRefPubMed

21.

Chan M, Chang MC, Gonzalez R et al (2015) Outcomes Of estrogen receptor negative and progesterone receptor positive breast cancer. Plos One. 10(7):E0132449. https://doi.org/10.1371/Journal.Pone.0132449CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

22.

Yu KD, Jiang YZ, Hao S et al (2015) Molecular essence and endocrine responsiveness of estrogen receptor-negative, progesterone receptor-positive, and her2-negative breast cancer. BMC Med 13:254. https://doi.org/10.1186/S12916-015-0496-ZCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

23.

Fu J, Zhong C, Wu L et al (2019) Young patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer have a higher long-term risk of breast cancer specific death. J Breast Cancer 22(1):96–108. https://doi.org/10.4048/Jbc.2019.22.E13CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

24.

Noone AM, Lund JL, Mariotto A et al (2016) Comparison Of seer treatment data with medicare claims. Med Care. 54(9):E55-64. https://doi.org/10.1097/Mlr.0000000000000073CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

25.

Ta H, Hl W, Sg H et al (2004) Breast cancer patients with progesterone receptor Pr-A-rich tumors have poorer disease-free survival rates. Clin Cancer Res 10(8):2751–2760. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.Ccr-03-0141CrossRef

26.

Martin MB, Saceda M, Lindsey RK (1993) Regulation Of Estrogen Receptor Expression In Breast Cancer. Adv Exp Med Biol. 330:143–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-2926-2_11CrossRefPubMed

27.

Sg K, Hm J, Thijssen Jh et al (1993) Wild type and alternatively spliced estrogen receptor messenger RNA in human meningioma tissue and Mcf7 breast cancer cells. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 45(4):227–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/0960-0760(93)90336-UCrossRef

28.

Fan Y, Ding X, Xu B et al (2015) Prognostic significance of single progesterone receptor positivity: a comparison study of estrogen receptor negative/progesterone receptor positive/her2 negative primary breast cancer with triple negative breast cancer. Medicine. 94(46):E2066. https://doi.org/10.1097/Md.0000000000002066CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

29.

Perou CM, Sorlie T, Eisen MB et al (2000) Molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature. 406(6797):747–52. https://doi.org/10.1038/35021093CrossRefPubMed

30.

Yin D, Wang YL, Wang YF et al (2015) Correlation between clinical pathology of luminal b breast cancer and determination of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor and her2 expression combined with nuclear morphology. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents. 29(3):579–87PubMed

31.

Liu S, Chapman JA, Burnell MJ et al (2015) Prognostic And predictive investigation of Pam50 intrinsic subtypes in the Ncic Ctg Ma.21 phase Iii chemotherapy trial. Breast Cancer Res Treatm 149(2):439–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10549-014-3259-1CrossRef

32.

Prat A, Parker JS, Fan C et al (2012) Pam50 assay and the three-gene model for identifying the major and clinically relevant molecular subtypes of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treatm 135(1):301–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10549-012-2143-0CrossRef

33.

Carey LA, Dees EC, Sawyer L et al (2007) The triple negative paradox: primary tumor chemosensitivity of breast cancer subtypes. Clin Cancer Res 13(8):2329–34. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.Ccr-06-1109CrossRefPubMed

34.

Prat A, Perou CM (2011) Deconstructing the molecular portraits of breast cancer. Mol Oncol. 5(1):5–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.Molonc.2010.11.003CrossRefPubMed

35.

Sorlie T, Tibshirani R, Parker J et al (2003) Repeated observation of breast tumor subtypes in independent gene expression data sets. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 100(14):8418–23. https://doi.org/10.1073/Pnas.0932692100CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

36.

Haibe-Kains B, Desmedt C, Loi S et al (2012) A three-gene model to robustly identify breast cancer molecular subtypes. J Natl Cancer Institute. 104(4):311–25. https://doi.org/10.1093/Jnci/Djr545CrossRef

37.

Chia SK, Bramwell VH, Tu D et al (2012) A 50-gene intrinsic subtype classifier for prognosis and prediction of benefit from adjuvant tamoxifen. Clin Cancer Res 18(16):4465–72. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.Ccr-12-0286CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

38.

Sanchez-Munoz A, Plata-Fernandez Y, Fernandez M et al (2014) Tumor histological subtyping determined by hormone receptors and Her2 status defines different pathological complete response and outcome to dose-dense neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients. Clin Transl Oncol 16(6):548–554. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12094-013-1116-ZCrossRefPubMed

39.

Iwata H, Sato N, Masuda N et al (2011) Docetaxel followed by fluorouracil/epirubicin/cyclophosphamide as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with primary breast cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol 41(7):867–875. https://doi.org/10.1093/Jjco/Hyr081.PubmedPmid:21719750CrossRefPubMed

40.

Rouzier R, Perou CM, Symmans WF et al (2005) Breast cancer molecular subtypes respond differently to preoperative chemotherapy. Clin Cancer Res 11(16):5678–85. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.Ccr-04-2421CrossRefPubMed

41.

42.

Davies C, Godwin J, Gray R et al (2011) Relevance of breast cancer hormone receptors and other factors to the efficacy of adjuvant tamoxifen: patient-level meta-analysis of randomised trials. Lancet (London, England). 378(9793):771–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60993-8CrossRef

Titel: Estrogen receptor-negative/progesterone receptor-positive and her-2-negative breast cancer might no longer be classified as hormone receptor-positive breast cancer
verfasst von: Hongjuan Zheng
Chenyang Ge
Haiping Lin
Lunpo Wu
Qinghua Wang
Shishi Zhou
Wanfen Tang
Xia Zhang
Xiayun Jin
Xifeng Xu
Zhongwu Hong
Jianfei Fu
Jinlin Du
Publikationsdatum: 10.04.2022
Verlag: Springer Nature Singapore
Erschienen in: International Journal of Clinical Oncology / Ausgabe 7/2022
Print ISSN: 1341-9625
Elektronische ISSN: 1437-7772
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-022-02158-0

Springer Medizin

Estrogen receptor-negative/progesterone receptor-positive and her-2-negative breast cancer might no longer be classified as hormone receptor-positive breast cancer