Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Strahlentherapie und Onkologie 9/2022

21.01.2022 | Original Article

Evaluating dosimetric parameters predictive of hematologic toxicity in cervical cancer patients undergoing definitive pelvic chemoradiotherapy

verfasst von: Elham Rahimy, MD, Rie von Eyben, MS, Jonathan Lewis, BS, Dimitre Hristov, PhD, Elizabeth Kidd, MD

Erschienen in: Strahlentherapie und Onkologie | Ausgabe 9/2022

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

We performed a retrospective study of cervical cancer pelvic radiotherapy plans to explore dosimetric parameters predictive of hematologic toxicity (HT), with specific interest in evaluating metabolic parameters and identifying the best predictive model.

Methods

Active marrow was retroactively contoured as pelvic bone with SUV > mean on 18F-FDG-PET. “Highly active” marrow was contoured as the hottest 10–14% volume of active marrow. Pelvic bone contour was segmented into lumbosacral, iliac crest, and lower pelvis. Predictors of HT were evaluated using logistic regression and repeated measures modeling.

Results

One hundred women were evaluated from 2009 to 2020. The plurality/majority had stage IIIC1 disease (38%) and underwent IMRT (88%) with pelvic field alone (72%). The majority received weekly cisplatin (78%), and 82% completed at least five cycles. The most common HT was leukopenia (grade 2+: 68%). Predictors of grade 2+ and 3+ HT were baseline WBC (p < 0.001), and 10- and 20-Gy dosimetric parameters to the active marrow, highly active marrow, and pelvic bone. The best predictive model of leukocyte trajectory included baseline WBC (p < 0.001), highly active marrow V20 (p < 0.001), and interactions of baseline WBC with time (p < 0.001) and highly active marrow V20 (p < 0.001), such that those with low baseline WBC experienced the greatest impact of highly active marrow V20.

Conclusion

Baseline WBC was highly predictive of HT; dosimetric predictors included dose to the active marrow, highly active marrow, and pelvic bone, with the greatest impact from V20 to the highly active marrow, particularly in women with low baseline WBC. Future studies should consider incorporating baseline WBC and limiting dose to the most highly active marrow.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Arbyn M et al (2020) Estimates of incidence and mortality of cervical cancer in 2018: a worldwide analysis. Lancet Glob Health 8(2):e191–e203CrossRef Arbyn M et al (2020) Estimates of incidence and mortality of cervical cancer in 2018: a worldwide analysis. Lancet Glob Health 8(2):e191–e203CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Chemoradiotherapy for Cervical Cancer Meta-Analysis Collaboration (2008) Reducing uncertainties about the effects of chemoradiotherapy for cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data from 18 randomized trials. J Clin Oncol 26(35):5802–5812CrossRef Chemoradiotherapy for Cervical Cancer Meta-Analysis Collaboration (2008) Reducing uncertainties about the effects of chemoradiotherapy for cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data from 18 randomized trials. J Clin Oncol 26(35):5802–5812CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Hayman JA et al (2011) Distribution of proliferating bone marrow in adult cancer patients determined using FLT-PET imaging. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 79(3):847–852CrossRef Hayman JA et al (2011) Distribution of proliferating bone marrow in adult cancer patients determined using FLT-PET imaging. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 79(3):847–852CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Mell LK et al (2017) Bone marrow-sparing intensity modulated radiation therapy with concurrent cisplatin for stage IB-IVA cervical cancer: an international multicenter phase II clinical trial (INTERTECC-2). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 97(3):536–545CrossRef Mell LK et al (2017) Bone marrow-sparing intensity modulated radiation therapy with concurrent cisplatin for stage IB-IVA cervical cancer: an international multicenter phase II clinical trial (INTERTECC-2). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 97(3):536–545CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Chemoradiotherapy for Cervical Cancer Meta-Analysis Collaboration (2008) Reducing uncertainties about the effects of chemoradiotherapy for cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data from 18 randomized trials. J Clin Oncol 26(35):5802–5812CrossRef Chemoradiotherapy for Cervical Cancer Meta-Analysis Collaboration (2008) Reducing uncertainties about the effects of chemoradiotherapy for cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data from 18 randomized trials. J Clin Oncol 26(35):5802–5812CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Keys HM et al (1999) Cisplatin, radiation, and adjuvant hysterectomy compared with radiation and adjuvant hysterectomy for bulky stage IB cervical carcinoma. N Engl J Med 340(15):1154–1161CrossRef Keys HM et al (1999) Cisplatin, radiation, and adjuvant hysterectomy compared with radiation and adjuvant hysterectomy for bulky stage IB cervical carcinoma. N Engl J Med 340(15):1154–1161CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat de Boer SM et al (2018) Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone for women with high-risk endometrial cancer (PORTEC-3): final results of an international, open-label, multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 19(3):295–309CrossRef de Boer SM et al (2018) Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone for women with high-risk endometrial cancer (PORTEC-3): final results of an international, open-label, multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 19(3):295–309CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat de Boer SM et al (2019) Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone in women with high-risk endometrial cancer (PORTEC-3): patterns of recurrence and post-hoc survival analysis of a randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 20(9):1273–1285CrossRef de Boer SM et al (2019) Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone in women with high-risk endometrial cancer (PORTEC-3): patterns of recurrence and post-hoc survival analysis of a randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 20(9):1273–1285CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat David JM et al (2019) 18F-FDG PET predicts hematologic toxicity in patients with locally advanced anal cancer treated with chemoradiation. Adv Radiat Oncol 4(4):613–622CrossRef David JM et al (2019) 18F-FDG PET predicts hematologic toxicity in patients with locally advanced anal cancer treated with chemoradiation. Adv Radiat Oncol 4(4):613–622CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Yeung AR et al (2020) Improvement in patient-reported outcomes with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (RT) compared with standard RT: a report from the NRG oncology RTOG 1203 study. J Clin Oncol 38(15):1685–1692CrossRef Yeung AR et al (2020) Improvement in patient-reported outcomes with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (RT) compared with standard RT: a report from the NRG oncology RTOG 1203 study. J Clin Oncol 38(15):1685–1692CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Chopra S et al (2020) Phase III randomized trial of postoperative adjuvant conventional radiation (3DCRT) versus image guided intensity modulated radiotherapy (IG-IMRT) in cervical cancer (PARCER): final analysis. American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) 2020 Annual Meeting.CrossRef Chopra S et al (2020) Phase III randomized trial of postoperative adjuvant conventional radiation (3DCRT) versus image guided intensity modulated radiotherapy (IG-IMRT) in cervical cancer (PARCER): final analysis. American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) 2020 Annual Meeting.CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhou YM et al (2018) The absolute volume of PET-defined, active bone marrow spared predicts for high grade hematologic toxicity in cervical cancer patients undergoing chemoradiation. Clin Transl Oncol 20(6):713–718CrossRef Zhou YM et al (2018) The absolute volume of PET-defined, active bone marrow spared predicts for high grade hematologic toxicity in cervical cancer patients undergoing chemoradiation. Clin Transl Oncol 20(6):713–718CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Rose BS et al (2012) Correlation between radiation dose to ¹8F‑FDG-PET defined active bone marrow subregions and acute hematologic toxicity in cervical cancer patients treated with chemoradiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 83(4):1185–1191CrossRef Rose BS et al (2012) Correlation between radiation dose to ¹8F‑FDG-PET defined active bone marrow subregions and acute hematologic toxicity in cervical cancer patients treated with chemoradiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 83(4):1185–1191CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Huang J et al (2020) Pelvic bone marrow sparing intensity modulated radiotherapy reduces the incidence of the hematologic toxicity of patients with cervical cancer receiving concurrent chemoradiotherapy: a single-center prospective randomized controlled trial. Radiat Oncol 15(1):180CrossRef Huang J et al (2020) Pelvic bone marrow sparing intensity modulated radiotherapy reduces the incidence of the hematologic toxicity of patients with cervical cancer receiving concurrent chemoradiotherapy: a single-center prospective randomized controlled trial. Radiat Oncol 15(1):180CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Mell LK et al (2006) Dosimetric predictors of acute hematologic toxicity in cervical cancer patients treated with concurrent cisplatin and intensity-modulated pelvic radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 66(5):1356–1365CrossRef Mell LK et al (2006) Dosimetric predictors of acute hematologic toxicity in cervical cancer patients treated with concurrent cisplatin and intensity-modulated pelvic radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 66(5):1356–1365CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Freese C et al (2018) The volume of PET-defined, active bone marrow spared predicts acute hematologic toxicities in anal cancer patients receiving concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Acta Oncol 57(5):683–686CrossRef Freese C et al (2018) The volume of PET-defined, active bone marrow spared predicts acute hematologic toxicities in anal cancer patients receiving concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Acta Oncol 57(5):683–686CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Kumar T et al (2019) Correlation between pelvic bone marrow radiation dose and acute hematological toxicity in cervical cancer patients treated with concurrent chemoradiation. Cancer Manag Res 11:6285–6297CrossRef Kumar T et al (2019) Correlation between pelvic bone marrow radiation dose and acute hematological toxicity in cervical cancer patients treated with concurrent chemoradiation. Cancer Manag Res 11:6285–6297CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee AY et al (2017) Hematologic nadirs during chemoradiation for anal cancer: temporal characterization and dosimetric predictors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 97(2):306–312CrossRef Lee AY et al (2017) Hematologic nadirs during chemoradiation for anal cancer: temporal characterization and dosimetric predictors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 97(2):306–312CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Burt LM et al (2021) Cervix cancer in sub-saharan Africa: an assessment of cervical cancer management. JCO Glob Oncol 7:173–182CrossRef Burt LM et al (2021) Cervix cancer in sub-saharan Africa: an assessment of cervical cancer management. JCO Glob Oncol 7:173–182CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Lim K et al (2011) Consensus guidelines for delineation of clinical target volume for intensity-modulated pelvic radiotherapy for the definitive treatment of cervix cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 79(2):348–355CrossRef Lim K et al (2011) Consensus guidelines for delineation of clinical target volume for intensity-modulated pelvic radiotherapy for the definitive treatment of cervix cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 79(2):348–355CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Kozak MM et al (2019) Less than whole uterus irradiation for locally advanced cervical cancer maintains locoregional control and decreases radiation dose to bowel. Pract Radiat Oncol 9(2):e164–e171CrossRef Kozak MM et al (2019) Less than whole uterus irradiation for locally advanced cervical cancer maintains locoregional control and decreases radiation dose to bowel. Pract Radiat Oncol 9(2):e164–e171CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Mell LK et al (2008) Association between bone marrow dosimetric parameters and acute hematologic toxicity in anal cancer patients treated with concurrent chemotherapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 70(5):1431–1437CrossRef Mell LK et al (2008) Association between bone marrow dosimetric parameters and acute hematologic toxicity in anal cancer patients treated with concurrent chemotherapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 70(5):1431–1437CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen SY, Feng Z, Yi X (2017) A general introduction to adjustment for multiple comparisons. J Thorac Dis 9(6):1725–1729CrossRef Chen SY, Feng Z, Yi X (2017) A general introduction to adjustment for multiple comparisons. J Thorac Dis 9(6):1725–1729CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Tibshirani R (1996) Regression shrinkage and selection via the Lasso. J R Statist Soc B 58(1):267 Tibshirani R (1996) Regression shrinkage and selection via the Lasso. J R Statist Soc B 58(1):267
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhu H et al (2015) Longitudinal study of acute haematologic toxicity in cervical cancer patients treated with chemoradiotherapy. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 59(3):386–393 (quiz 394)CrossRef Zhu H et al (2015) Longitudinal study of acute haematologic toxicity in cervical cancer patients treated with chemoradiotherapy. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 59(3):386–393 (quiz 394)CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Yang FE et al (1995) Analysis of weekly complete blood counts in patients receiving standard fractionated partial body radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 33(3):617–617PubMed Yang FE et al (1995) Analysis of weekly complete blood counts in patients receiving standard fractionated partial body radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 33(3):617–617PubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Murata Y et al (2006) Correlations between 18F-FDG uptake by bone marrow and hematological parameters: measurements by PET/CT. Nucl Med Biol 33(8):999–1004CrossRef Murata Y et al (2006) Correlations between 18F-FDG uptake by bone marrow and hematological parameters: measurements by PET/CT. Nucl Med Biol 33(8):999–1004CrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Kershah S et al (2013) Comparison of standardized uptake values in normal structures between PET/CT and PET/MRI in an oncology patient population. Mol Imaging Biol 15(6):776–785CrossRef Kershah S et al (2013) Comparison of standardized uptake values in normal structures between PET/CT and PET/MRI in an oncology patient population. Mol Imaging Biol 15(6):776–785CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Albuquerque K et al (2011) Radiation-related predictors of hematologic toxicity after concurrent chemoradiation for cervical cancer and implications for bone marrow-sparing pelvic IMRT. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 79(4):1043–1047CrossRef Albuquerque K et al (2011) Radiation-related predictors of hematologic toxicity after concurrent chemoradiation for cervical cancer and implications for bone marrow-sparing pelvic IMRT. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 79(4):1043–1047CrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Klopp AH et al (2013) Hematologic toxicity in RTOG 0418: a phase 2 study of postoperative IMRT for gynecologic cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 86(1):83–90CrossRef Klopp AH et al (2013) Hematologic toxicity in RTOG 0418: a phase 2 study of postoperative IMRT for gynecologic cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 86(1):83–90CrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Mell LK et al (2008) Dosimetric comparison of bone marrow-sparing intensity-modulated radiotherapy versus conventional techniques for treatment of cervical cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 71(5):1504–1510CrossRef Mell LK et al (2008) Dosimetric comparison of bone marrow-sparing intensity-modulated radiotherapy versus conventional techniques for treatment of cervical cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 71(5):1504–1510CrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Rose BS et al (2011) Normal tissue complication probability modeling of acute hematologic toxicity in cervical cancer patients treated with chemoradiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 79(3):800–807CrossRef Rose BS et al (2011) Normal tissue complication probability modeling of acute hematologic toxicity in cervical cancer patients treated with chemoradiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 79(3):800–807CrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Harrell FE et al (1984) Regression modelling strategies for improved prognostic prediction. Stat Med 3(2):143–152CrossRef Harrell FE et al (1984) Regression modelling strategies for improved prognostic prediction. Stat Med 3(2):143–152CrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Ashbeck EL, Bell ML (2016) Single time point comparisons in longitudinal randomized controlled trials: power and bias in the presence of missing data. BMC Med Res Methodol 16:43CrossRef Ashbeck EL, Bell ML (2016) Single time point comparisons in longitudinal randomized controlled trials: power and bias in the presence of missing data. BMC Med Res Methodol 16:43CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Evaluating dosimetric parameters predictive of hematologic toxicity in cervical cancer patients undergoing definitive pelvic chemoradiotherapy
verfasst von
Elham Rahimy, MD
Rie von Eyben, MS
Jonathan Lewis, BS
Dimitre Hristov, PhD
Elizabeth Kidd, MD
Publikationsdatum
21.01.2022
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Strahlentherapie und Onkologie / Ausgabe 9/2022
Print ISSN: 0179-7158
Elektronische ISSN: 1439-099X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-021-01885-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2022

Strahlentherapie und Onkologie 9/2022 Zur Ausgabe

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.