nach oben

Surgical Endoscopy

Erschienen in:

25.11.2020

Evaluation of a progressive algorithmic approach for the treatment of unresectable colon polyps using colon conservation techniques

verfasst von: Beiqun Zhao, Michelle T. Roper, Daniel D. Klaristenfeld, Marco J. Tomassi

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 12/2021

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

The majority of endoscopically unresectable colon polyps (EUCP) are treated by segmental colectomy. However, up to 90% of EUCP do not harbor malignancy, making colectomy an unnecessary procedure. To minimize unnecessary segmental colectomy, we established a progressive treatment algorithm utilizing colon conservation techniques (CCT). In our progressive CCT algorithm, patients with EUCP first underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). If unsuccessful, they progressed to combined endo-laparoscopic surgery (CELS) and ultimately to segmental colectomy, if necessary.

Methods

We performed a retrospective analysis of all patients treated by our progressive CCT algorithm from August 2015 to April 2019. Demographic information, polyp characteristics, and clinical outcomes were analyzed. We also compared the outcomes of our CCT algorithm group to 156 patients undergoing segmental colectomy for EUCP at related institutions from August 2015 to August 2018.

Results

A total of 102 EUCP in 97 patients were treated with our progressive CCT algorithm. Of these, 76 of 102 (75.5%) EUCP were removed without requiring segmental colectomy, with 42 EUCP removed via ESD and 34 via CELS. Interval surveillance colonoscopy confirmed that 72 of 97 (74.2%) patients with EUCP treated by CCT completely avoided segmental colectomy. Polyps > 5 cm in size was a significant predictor of CCT failure (OR 3.83, P = 0.03). When compared to an external cohort of patients undergoing segmental colectomy for EUCP, the CCT algorithm was associated with longer operative time, but shorter length of stay, with no difference in postoperative complications. The estimated total healthcare cost of the CCT algorithm was lower than segmental colectomy ($10,956.77 versus $16,692.94), with more dramatic cost savings seen in ESD ($4,492.70) and CELS ($8,507.06).

Conclusions

An established progressive CCT algorithm can result in high colon conservation rate and decrease associated health care costs compared to segmental colectomy. It is a reasonable treatment strategy for patients with EUCP.

Gallegos-Orozco JF, Gurudu SR (2010) Complex colon polypectomy. Gastroenterol Hepatol 6:375–382

Burgess NG, Hourigan LF, Zanati SA, Brown GJ, Singh R, Williams SJ, Raftopoulos SC, Ormonde D, Moss A, Byth K, Mahajan H, McLeod D, Bourke MJ (2017) Risk stratification for covert invasive cancer among patients referred for colonic endoscopic mucosal resection: a large multicenter cohort. Gastroenterology 153:732-742.e1. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2017.05.047CrossRefPubMed

Vu JV, Sheetz KH, De Roo AC, Hiatt T, Hendren S (2020) Variation in colectomy rates for benign polyp and colorectal cancer. Surg Endosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07451-5CrossRefPubMed

Bertelson NL, Kalkbrenner KA, Merchea A, Dozois EJ, Landmann RG, De Petris G, Young-Fadok TM, Etzioni DA (2012) Colectomy for endoscopically unresectable polyps: How often is it cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 55:1111–1116. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0b013e3182695115CrossRefPubMed

Longo WE, Virgo KS, Johnson FE, Oprian CA, Vernava AM, Wade TP, Phelan MA, Henderson WG, Daley J, Khuri SF (2000) Risk factors for morbidity and mortality after colectomy for colon cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 43:83–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s101510100023CrossRefPubMed

Alves A, Panis Y, Mathieu P, Mantion G, Kwiatkowski F, Slim K (2005) Postoperative mortality and morbidity in French patients undergoing colorectal surgery. Arch Surg 140:278–283. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.140.3.284CrossRefPubMed

Cohan JN, Donahue C, Pantel HJ, Ricciardi R, Kleiman DA, Read TE, Marcello PW (2020) Endoscopic step up: a colon sparing alternative to colectomy to improve outcomes and reduce costs for patients with advanced neoplastic polyps. Dis Colon Rectum 63:842–849. https://doi.org/10.1097/dcr.0000000000001645CrossRefPubMed

Lascarides C, Buscaglia JM, Denoya PI, Nagula S, Bucobo JC, Bergamaschi R (2016) Laparoscopic right colectomy vs laparoscopic-assisted colonoscopic polypectomy for endoscopically unresectable polyps: a randomized controlled trial. Color Dis 18:1050–1056. https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.13346CrossRef

National Comprehensive Cancer Network (2020) Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Colon Cancer. (Versions 2.2020). https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/colon.pdf. Accessed 4 April 2020.

10.

Jayaram A, Barr N, Plummer R, Yao M, Chen L, Yoo J (2019) Combined endo-laparoscopic surgery (CELS) for benign colon polyps: a single institution cost analysis. Surg Endosc 33:3238–3242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-06610-zCrossRefPubMed

11.

Gamaleldin M, Benlice C, Delaney CP, Steele S, Gorgun E (2018) Management of the colorectal polyp referred for resection: a case-matched comparison of advanced endoscopic surgery and laparoscopic colectomy. Surgery 163:522–527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2017.10.057CrossRefPubMed

12.

Saito Y, Uraoka T, Matsuda T, Emura F, Ikehara H, Mashimo Y, Kikuchi T, Fu KI, Sano Y, Saito D (2007) Endoscopic treatment of large superficial colorectal tumors: a case series of 200 endoscopic submucosal dissections (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 66:966–973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2007.02.053CrossRefPubMed

13.

Saito Y, Uraoka T, Yamaguchi Y, Hotta K, Sakamoto N, Ikematsu H, Fukuzawa M, Kobayashi N, Nasu J, Michida T, Yoshida S, Ikehara H, Otake Y, Nakajima T, Matsuda T, Saito D (2010) A prospective, multicenter study of 1111 colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissections (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 72:1217–1225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.004CrossRefPubMed

14.

Nakamura F, Saito Y, Sakamoto T, Otake Y, Nakajima T, Yamamoto S, Murakami Y, Ishikawa H, Matsuda T (2015) Potential perioperative advantage of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection versus laparoscopy-assisted colectomy. Surg Endosc 29:596–606. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3705-5CrossRefPubMed

15.

Wilhelm D, Von Delius S, Weber L, Meining A, Schneider A, Friess H, Schmid RM, Frimberger E, Feussner H (2009) Combined laparoscopic-endoscopic resections of colorectal polyps: 10-Year experience and follow-up. Surg Endosc Other Interv Tech 23:688–693. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-0282-5CrossRef

16.

Franklin ME, Díaz-E JA, Abrego D, Parra-Dávila E, Glass JL (2000) Laparoscopic-assisted colonoscopic polypectomy: the Texas endosurgery institute experience. Dis Colon Rectum 43:1246–1249. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02237429CrossRefPubMed

17.

Longcroft-Wheaton G, Duku M, Mead R, Basford P, Bhandari P (2013) Risk stratification system for evaluation of complex polyps can predict outcomes of endoscopic mucosal resection. Dis Colon Rectum 56:960–966. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0b013e31829193e0CrossRefPubMed

18.

Law R, Das A, Gregory D, Komanduri S, Muthusamy R, Rastogi A, Varge J, Wallace MB, Raju GS, Mounzer R, Klapman J, Shah J, Watson R, Wilson R, Edmundowicz SA, Wani S (2016) Endoscopic resection is cost-effective compared with laparoscopic resection in the management of complex colon polyps: an economic analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 83:1248–1257CrossRef

19.

Carmichael JC, Keller DS, Baldini G, Bordeianou L, Weiss E, Lee L, Boutros M, McClane J, Feldman LS, Steele SR (2017) Clinical practice Guidelines for enhanced recovery after colon and rectal surgery from the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons and Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons. Dis Colon Rectum 60:761–784. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000000883CrossRefPubMed

20.

Childers CP, Maggard-Gibbons M (2018) Understanding costs of care in the operating room. JAMA Surg. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2017.6233CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

21.

Kaiser Family Foundation (2020) Hospital Adjusted Expenses per Inpatient Day. https://www.kff.org/health-costs/state-indicator/expenses-per-inpatient-day/?currentTimeframe=0&selectedRows=%7B%22wrapups%22:%7B%22united-states%22:%7B%7D%7D%7D&sortModel=%7B%22colId%22:%22Location%22,%22sort%22:%22asc%22%7D. Accessed 4 April 2020.

22.

Gorgun E, Benlice C, Abbas MA, Steele S (2018) Experience in colon sparing surgery in North America: advanced endoscopic approaches for complex colorectal lesions. Surg Endosc 32:3114–3121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6026-2CrossRefPubMed

23.

Crawshaw BP, Chien HL, Augestad KM, Delaney CP (2015) Effect of laparoscopic surgery on health care utilization and costs in patients who undergo colectomy. JAMA Surg 150:410–415. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2014.3171CrossRefPubMed

24.

Yan J, Trencheva K, Lee SW, Sonoda T, Shukla P, Milsom JW (2011) Treatment for right colon polyps not removable using standard colonoscopy: combined laparoscopic-colonoscopic approach. Dis Colon Rectum 54:753–758. https://doi.org/10.1007/DCR.0b013e3182108289CrossRefPubMed

25.

Tanaka S, Oka S, Kaneko I, Hirata M, Mouri R, Kanao H, Yoshida S, Chayama K (2007) Endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal neoplasia: possibility of standardization. Gastrointest Endosc 66:100–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2007.02.032CrossRefPubMed

26.

Lee SW, Garrett KA, Shin JH, Trencheva K, Sonoda T, Milsom JW (2013) Dynamic article: long-term outcomes of patients undergoing combined endolaparoscopic surgery for benign colon polyps. Dis Colon Rectum 56:869–873. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0b013e3182821e58CrossRefPubMed

27.

Lee EJ, Lee JB, Lee SH, Kim DS, Lee DH, Lee DS, Youk EG (2013) Endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumors—1,000 colorectal ESD cases: one specialized institute’s experiences. Surg Endosc 27:31–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2403-4CrossRefPubMed

28.

Voloyiannis T, Snyder MJ, Bailey RR, Pidala M (2008) Management of the difficult colon polyp referred for resection: resect or rescope? Dis Colon Rectum 51:292–295. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-007-9175-2CrossRefPubMed

29.

Loungnarath R, Mutch MG, Birnbaum EH, Read TE, Fleshman JW (2010) Laparoscopic colectomy using cancer principles is appropriate for colonoscopically unresectable adenomas of the colon. Dis Colon Rectum 53:1017–1022. https://doi.org/10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181df0b8fCrossRefPubMed

Titel: Evaluation of a progressive algorithmic approach for the treatment of unresectable colon polyps using colon conservation techniques
verfasst von: Beiqun Zhao
Michelle T. Roper
Daniel D. Klaristenfeld
Marco J. Tomassi
Publikationsdatum: 25.11.2020
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 12/2021
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-08163-6

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Aktuelle BDC Leitlinien-Webinare

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare

CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 12/2021

Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy reduces incidence of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula in soft pancreas with a smaller than 2 mm pancreatic duct

Ten-year trends in minimally invasive hernia repair: a NSQIP database review

Ten-year outcomes after primary vertical sleeve gastrectomy for morbid obesity: a monocentric cohort study

EUS is accurate in characterizing pancreatic cystic lesions; a prospective comparison with cross-sectional imaging in resected cases

Robotic Complete Mesocolic Excision (CME) is a safe and feasible option for right colonic cancers: short and midterm results from a single-centre experience

Intraoperative cholangiography with filling defects: comparative complication analysis of postoperative transcystic duct (TCD) catheter maintenance

Update Chirurgie

Aktuelle BDC Leitlinien-Webinare

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“