nach oben

Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy

Erschienen in:

20.06.2023 | Anatomic Variations

Evaluation of celiac artery and common hepatic artery variations by CT-angiography and new classification model

verfasst von: Zeliha Türkyılmaz, Osman Kula, Ahmet Onur Çelik, Tuğrul Demirel, Burak Günay

Erschienen in: Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy | Ausgabe 8/2023

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Knowledge of anatomical variations is important in all interventional procedures. This study aims to evaluate the variations and prevalence of celiac trunk (CeT) and its branches.

Methods

The computerized tomography-angiography (CT-A) findings of 941 adult patients were evaluated retrospectively. Variations of the CeT and common hepatic artery (CHA) were evaluated according to the number of branches and their origin. Findings were compared with classical classification methods. A new classification model has been defined.

Results

Normal (complete) trifurcation was detected in 856 (90.9%) of them, where left gastric artery (LGA), splenic artery (SpA) and CHA branches were derived from the CeT. Among 856 complete trifurcation cases, 773 (90.3%) had non-classical trifurcation patterns. The rate of classic trifurcation was 8.8%, while non-classic trifurcation was 82.1% in all cases. In one case (0.1%), LGA and left hepatic artery together and right hepatic artery and SpA together appeared as a double bifurcation. Complete celiacomesenteric trunk was observed only in 4 (0.42%) cases. In seven cases (0.7%), LGA, SpA and CHA were coming out of abdominal aorta (AAo) independently. CHA normal anatomy (Michels Type I) was detected in 618 (65.5%) patients. We found that 49 (5.2%) of our cases were ambiguous according to the Michels Classification. We have described five different variations of hepatic arteries directly arising from the AAo.

Conclusion

Preoperative recognition of anatomical variations of CeT, superior mesenteric artery and CHA is of primary importance in both surgical and radiological procedures. With careful evaluation of CT-angiographies, it is possible to detect rare variations.

Adachi B (1928) Das Arteriensystem der Japaner. Vol.2. Verlag der Kaiserlich-[1] Japanischen Universitatzu Kyoto

Bergman RA, Afifi AK, Miyauchi R (2011) Celiac trunk arteries. In: Illustrated encyclopedia of human anatomic variation: Opus II: Cardiovascular System: Arteries: Abdomen [Online]. Available at: www.anatomyatlases.org

Bordei P, Baz R, Rusali V, Jecan CR, Ardeleanu V (2019) Morphological characteristics of the celiac-mesenteric trunk. Rom J Mil Med 2:31–35

Brasil IRC, Araujo IFD, Lima AALDA, Melo ELA, Esmeraldo RDM (2018) Computed tomography angiography study of variations of the celiac trunk and hepatic artery in 100 patients. Radiol Bras 51:32–36. https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-3984.2016.0179CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Chen H, Yano R, Emura S, Shoumura S (2009) Anatomic variation of the celiac trunk with special reference to hepatic artery patterns. Ann Anat 191(4):399–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aanat.2009.05.002CrossRefPubMed

Covey AM, Brody LA, Maluccio MA, Getrajdman GI, Brown KT (2002) Variant hepatic arterial anatomy revisited: digital subtraction angiography performed in 600 patients. Radiology 224(2):542–547. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2242011283CrossRefPubMed

Ekingen A, Hatipoğlu ES, Hamidi C (2021) Distance measurements and origin levels of the coeliac trunk, superior mesenteric artery, and inferior mesenteric artery by multiple-detector computed tomography angiograph. Anat Sci Int 96:132–141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12565-020-00571-xCrossRefPubMed

Ekingen A, Tuncer MC, Ertuğrul O (2020) Investigation of proper hepatic artery and gastroduodenal artery variations by multidetector computed tomography angiography method. Acta Chir Belg 120(2):102–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/00015458.2019.1570744CrossRefPubMed

Gkaragkounis A, Fanariotis M, Tepetes K, Fezoulidis I, Vassiou K (2020) Celiac trunk and hepatic arteries: anatomical variations of liver arterial supply as detected with multidetector computed tomography in 1.520 patients and its clinical importance. Clin Anat 33(7):1091–1101. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.235111CrossRefPubMed

10.

Haller VA (1765) Icones anatomicae in quibus aliquae partes corporis humani declineate proponuntur et arteriarum potissimum historia continetur. Vandenhoeck, Gottingen

11.

Hiatt JR, Gabbay J, Busuttil RW (1994) Surgical anatomy of the hepatic arteries in 1000 cases. Ann Surg 220(1):50–52. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-199407000-00008CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

12.

Juszczak A, Czyżowski J, Mazurek A, Walocha JA, Pasternak A (2021) Anatomical variants of coeliac trunk in Polish population using multidetector computed tomography angiography. Folia Morphol 80(2):290–296. https://doi.org/10.5603/FM.a2020.0051CrossRef

13.

Koops A, Wojciechowski B, Broering DC, Adam G, Krupski-Berdien G (2004) Anatomic variations of the hepatic arteries in 604 selective celiac and superior mesenteric angiographies. Surg Radiol Anat 26(3):239–244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-004-0229-zCrossRefPubMed

14.

Lippert H, Pabst R (1985) Arterial variations in man. Classification and frequency Ed. Bergmann Verlag, Muenchen, pp 46–51

15.

Loschner C, Nagel SN, Kausche S, Teichgraber U (2015) Hepatic arterial supply in 1297 CT-angiographies. RoFo Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der R 187(4):276–282. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1385816CrossRef

16.

Malnar D, StarcevicKlasan G, Miletic D, Bajek S, SoicVranic T, Arbanas J, Bobinac D, Coklo M (2010) Properties of the celiac trunk–anatomical study. Coll Antropol 34(3):917-921.11PubMed

17.

Marco-Clement I, Martinez-Barco A, Ahumada N, Simon C, Valderrama JM, Sanudo J, Arrazola J (2016) Anatomical variations of the celiac trunk: cadaveric and radiological study. Surg Radiol Anat 38(4):501–510. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-015-1542-4CrossRefPubMed

18.

Matusz P, Miclaus GD, Ples H, Tubbs RS, Loukas M (2012) Absence of the celiac trunk: case report using MDCT angiography. Surg Radiol Anat 34(10):959–963. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-012-0989-9CrossRefPubMed

19.

Michels NA (1955) Blood supply and anatomy of the upper abdominal organs with a descriptive Atlas. JB Lippincott, Philadelphia, pp 136–147

20.

Morita M (1935) Reports and conception of three anomalous cases on the area of the celiac and superior mesenteric arteries. Igaku Kenkyu (Acta Med) 9:1993–2006

21.

Noussios G, Dimitriou I, Chatzis I, Katsourakis A (2017) The main anatomic variations of the hepatic artery and their importance in surgical practice: review of the literature. J Clin Med Res 9(4):248–252. https://doi.org/10.14740/jocmr2902wCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

22.

Panagouli E, Venieratos D, Lolis E, Skandalakis P (2013) Variations in the anatomy of the celiac trunk: a systematic review and clinical implications. Ann Anat 195(6):501–511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aanat.2013.06.003CrossRefPubMed

23.

Petrella S, de Sousa Rodriguez CF, Sgrott EA, Fernandes GJM, Marques SR, Prates JC (2007) Anatomy and variations of the celiac trunk. Int J Morphol 25(2):249–257. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-95022007000200002CrossRef

24.

Pinal-Garcia DF, Nuno-Guzman CM, Gonzalez-Gonzalez ME, Ibarra-Hurtado TR (2018) The celiac trunk and its anatomical variations: a cadaveric study. J Clin Med Res 10(4):321–329. https://doi.org/10.14740/jocmr3356wCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

25.

Prakash Raiinil T, Mokhas V, Sivacharan PV, Shashirekha M (2012) Coeliac trunk and its branches: anatomical variations and clinical implications. Singap Med J 53(5):329–331

26.

Roma S, D’Amato D, Ranalli T, Nardone V, Pace C, Lenci I, Francioso S, Brega A, Manzia TM, Orlacchio A (2019) Vascular anomalies of the celiac trunk and implications in treatment of HCC with TACE. Description of a case and review of the literature. Radiol Case Rep 14(10):1221–1227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radcr.2019.07.011CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

27.

Saba L, Mallarini G (2011) Anatomic variations of arterial liver vascularization: an analysis by using MDCTA. Surg Radiol Anat 33(7):559–568. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-011-0778-xCrossRefPubMed

28.

Selveraj L, Sundaramurthi I (2015) Study of normal branching pattern of the Coeliac Trunk and its variations using CT angiography. J Clin Diagn Res 9(9):1–4. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2015/12593.6523CrossRef

29.

Silveira LA, Silveira FB, Fazan VP (2009) Arterial diameter of the celiac trunk and its branches: anatomical study. Acta Cir Bras 24:43–47. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-86502009000100009CrossRefPubMed

30.

Song SY, Chung JW, Yin YH, Jae HJ, Kim HC, Jeon UB, Cho BH, So YH, Park JH (2010) Celiac axis and common hepatic artery variations in 5002 patients: systematic analysis with spiral CT and DSA. Radiology 255(1):278–288. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.09090389CrossRefPubMed

31.

Sureka B, Mittal MK, Mittal A, Sinha M, Bhambri NK, Thukral BB (2013) Variations of celiac axis, common hepatic artery and its branches in 600 patients. Indian J Radiol Imaging 23(03):223–233. https://doi.org/10.4103/0971-3026.120273CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

32.

Tandler J (1904) Über die varietäten der arteria coeliaca und deren entwickelung. Anatomische Hefte 25:473–500CrossRef

33.

Tang W, Shi J, Kuang LQ, Tang SY, Wang Y (2019) Celiomesenteric trunk: new classification based on multidetector computed tomography angiographic findings and probable embryological mechanisms. World J Clin Cases 7(23):3980–3989. https://doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v7.i23.3980CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

34.

Ugurel MS, Battal B, Bozlar U, Nural MS, Tasar M, Ors F, Saglam M, Karademir I (2010) Anatomical variations of hepatic arterial system, coeliac trunk and renal arteries: an analysis with multidetector CT angiography. Br J Radiol 83(992):661–667. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr/21236482CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

35.

Yi SQ, Terayama H, Naito M, Hirai S, Alimujang S, Yi N, Tanaka S, Itoh M (2008) Absence of the celiac trunk: case report and review of the literature. Clin Anat 21(4):283–286. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.20627CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Evaluation of celiac artery and common hepatic artery variations by CT-angiography and new classification model
verfasst von: Zeliha Türkyılmaz
Osman Kula
Ahmet Onur Çelik
Tuğrul Demirel
Burak Günay
Publikationsdatum: 20.06.2023
Verlag: Springer Paris
Erschienen in: Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy / Ausgabe 8/2023
Print ISSN: 0930-1038
Elektronische ISSN: 1279-8517
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-023-03180-1

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Evaluation of celiac artery and common hepatic artery variations by CT-angiography and new classification model

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Neu im Fachgebiet Radiologie

Ein Drittel der jungen Ärztinnen und Ärzte erwägt abzuwandern

Endlich: Zi zeigt, mit welchen PVS Praxen zufrieden sind

Akuter Schwindel: Wann lohnt sich eine MRT?

Screening-Mammografie offenbart erhöhtes Herz-Kreislauf-Risiko

Update Radiologie

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2023

The unilateral muscular slip of the two-bellied Serratus Posterior Inferior muscle: a case report and a review of literature

Persistent trigeminal artery–superior cerebellar artery segmental fusion diagnosed using magnetic resonance angiography

How to understand an enlarged Meckel’s cave? An anatomical study

Assessment of the prelacrimal recess in different maxillary sinus pneumatizations in relation to endoscopic prelacrimal recess approaches: a computed tomography study

Comment on “Surgical anatomy of the lingual lymph nodes: systematic literature analysis and proposition for topographic classification”

Correction to: Assessment of the prelacrimal recess in different maxillary sinus pneumatizations in relation to endoscopic prelacrimal recess approaches: a computed tomography study

Neu im Fachgebiet Radiologie

Ein Drittel der jungen Ärztinnen und Ärzte erwägt abzuwandern

Endlich: Zi zeigt, mit welchen PVS Praxen zufrieden sind

Akuter Schwindel: Wann lohnt sich eine MRT?

Screening-Mammografie offenbart erhöhtes Herz-Kreislauf-Risiko

Update Radiologie