Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology 11/2020

30.04.2020 | Hepatobiliary

Evaluation of simultaneous-multislice diffusion-weighted imaging of liver at 3.0 T with different breathing schemes

verfasst von: Yigang Pei, Siming Xie, Wenzheng Li, Xianjing Peng, Qin Qin, Qian Ye, Mengsi Li, Jiaxi Hu, Jiale Hou, Guijing Li, Shuo Hu

Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology | Ausgabe 11/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To obtain the optimal simultaneous-multislice (SMS)—accelerated diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) of the liver at 3.0 T MRI by systematically estimating the repeatability of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and image quality of different breathing schemes in comparison to standard DWI (STD) and other SMS sequences.

Methods

In this institutional review board-approved prospective study, hepatic DWIs (b = 50, 300, 600 s/mm2) were performed in 23 volunteers on 3.0 T MRI using SMS and STD with breath-hold (BH-SMS, BH-STD), free-breathing (FB-SMS, FB-STD) and respiratory-triggered (RT-SMS, RT-STD). Reduction of scan time with SMS-acceleration was calculated. ADC and SNR were measured in nine anatomic locations and image quality was assessed on all SMS and STD sequences. An optimal SMS-DWI was decided by systematically comparing the ADC repeatability, SNR and image quality among above DWIs.

Results

SMS-DWI reduced scan time significantly by comparison with corresponding STD-DWI (27 vs. 42 s for BH, 54 vs. 78 s for FB and 42 vs. 97 s for RT). In all DWIs, BH-SMS had the greatest intraobserver agreement (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC): 0.920–0.944) and good interobserver agreement (ICC: 0.831–0.886) for ADC measurements, and had the best ADC repeatability (mean ADC absolute differences: 0.046–0.058 × 10−3mm2/s, limits of agreement (LOA): 0.010–0.013 × 10−3mm2/s) in nine locations. BH-SMS had the highest SNR in three representative sections except for RT-STD. There were no significant differences in image quality between BH-SMS and other DWI sequences (median BH-SMS: 4.75, other DWI: 4.5–5.0; P > 0.0.5).

Conclusion

BH-SMS provides considerable scan time reduction with good image quality, sufficient SNR and highest ADC repeatability on 3.0 T MRI, which is thus recommended as the optimal hepatic DWI sequence for those subjects with adequate breath-holding capability.
Literatur
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Gong NJ, Wong CS, Chu YC, Gu J. Treatment response monitoring in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumor using diffusion-weighted imaging: preliminary results in comparison with positron emission tomography/computed tomography. NMR BIOMED. 2013;26:185-92. https://doi.org/10.1002/nbm.2834CrossRefPubMed Gong NJ, Wong CS, Chu YC, Gu J. Treatment response monitoring in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumor using diffusion-weighted imaging: preliminary results in comparison with positron emission tomography/computed tomography. NMR BIOMED. 2013;26:185-92. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1002/​nbm.​2834CrossRefPubMed
8.
13.
19.
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. PSYCHOL BULL. 1979;86:420-28.CrossRef Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. PSYCHOL BULL. 1979;86:420-28.CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. LANCET. 1986;1:307-10.CrossRef Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. LANCET. 1986;1:307-10.CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Bland JM, Altman DG. Multiple significance tests: the Bonferroni method. BMJ. 1995;310:170.CrossRef Bland JM, Altman DG. Multiple significance tests: the Bonferroni method. BMJ. 1995;310:170.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Evaluation of simultaneous-multislice diffusion-weighted imaging of liver at 3.0 T with different breathing schemes
verfasst von
Yigang Pei
Siming Xie
Wenzheng Li
Xianjing Peng
Qin Qin
Qian Ye
Mengsi Li
Jiaxi Hu
Jiale Hou
Guijing Li
Shuo Hu
Publikationsdatum
30.04.2020
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Abdominal Radiology / Ausgabe 11/2020
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Elektronische ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-020-02538-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 11/2020

Abdominal Radiology 11/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.