nach oben

Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology

Erschienen in:

22.02.2022 | Glaucoma

Evaluation of the association between macular damage and disability glare in patients with advanced glaucoma

verfasst von: Yun Hsia, Tsing-Hong Wang, Jehn-Yu Huang, Chien-Chia Su

Erschienen in: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology | Ausgabe 9/2022

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

This study aimed to investigate the factors associated with disability glare in patients with advanced glaucoma and evaluate the impact of disability glare on the vision-related quality of life.

Methods

We prospectively studied 225 eyes (225 patients) with advanced glaucoma. The visual function was evaluated using the 10–2 and 24–2 Humphrey visual field (VF) (Dublin, California) and contrast sensitivity test. Structural parameters were obtained using RTVue optical coherence tomography and angiography (Fremont, California). Significant loss of macular vessel density (mVD) was defined as VD < 30%. Each participant completed the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire 25 (NEI-VFQ-25) and questions regarding subjective symptoms of glare.

Results

Fifty-six patients (24.9%) experienced glare and had a lower NEI-VFQ-25 composite score (P = 0.017). The average retinal nerve fiber layer and ganglion cell complex thickness and mean deviation (MD) in the 24–2 VF test were not associated with glare. Significant superior or inferior mVD loss (P < 0.001; odds ratio [OR], 3.45; and 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.83–6.55), lower logarithmic contrast sensitivity at 0.75 cycles/degree (P < 0.001; OR, 0.27; and 95% CI, 0.13–0.56), and worse MD in the 10–2 VF test (P < 0.001; OR, 0.93; and 95% CI, 0.89–0.97) showed an association with glare.

Conclusion

In advanced glaucoma, central VF defect and mVD loss are associated with disability glare, which negatively impacts vision-related quality of life.

Klein J, Pierscionek BK, Lauritzen J, Derntl K, Grzybowski A, Zlatkova MB (2015) The effect of cataract on early stage glaucoma detection using spatial and temporal contrast sensitivity tests. PLoS ONE 10:e0128681. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128681CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Enoch J, Jones L, Taylor DJ, Bronze C, Kirwan JF, Jones PR, Crabb DP (2020) How do different lighting conditions affect the vision and quality of life of people with glaucoma? A systematic review. Eye (Lond) 34:138–154. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-019-0679-5CrossRef

Wolffsohn JS, Cochrane AL (1998) Low vision perspectives on glaucoma. Clin Exp Optom 81:280–289. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1444-0938.1998.tb06748.xCrossRefPubMed

Mainster MA, Turner PL (2012) Glare’s causes, consequences, and clinical challenges after a century of ophthalmic study. Am J Ophthalmol 153:587–593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2012.01.008CrossRefPubMed

Hamedani M, Dulley B, Murdoch I (2021) Glaucoma and glare. Eye (Lond) 35:1741–1747. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-020-01164-8CrossRef

Bierings RAJM, van Sonderen FLP, Jansonius NM (2018) Visual complaints of patients with glaucoma and controls under optimal and extreme luminance conditions. Acta Ophthalmol 96:288–294. https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.13695CrossRefPubMed

Nelson P, Aspinall P, Papasouliotis O, Worton B, O’Brien C (2003) Quality of life in glaucoma and its relationship with visual function. J Glaucoma 12:139–150. https://doi.org/10.1097/00061198-200304000-00009CrossRefPubMed

Bhorade AM, Perlmutter MS, Wilson B, Kambarian J, Chang S, Pekmezci M, Gordon M (2013) Differences in vision between clinic and home and the effect of lighting in older adults with and without glaucoma. JAMA Ophthalmol 131:1554–1562. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2013.4995CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Blumberg DM, Liebmann JM, Hirji SH, Hood DC (2019) Diffuse macular damage in mild to moderate glaucoma is associated with decreased visual function scores under low luminance conditions. Am J Ophthalmol 208:415–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2019.08.024CrossRefPubMed

10.

Siah WF, O’Brien C, Loughman JJ (2018) Macular pigment is associated with glare-affected visual function and central visual field loss in glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 102:929–935. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2017-310215CrossRefPubMed

11.

Hodapp E, Parrish RK II, Anderson DR (1993) Clinical decisions in glaucoma. Mosby, St Louis

12.

Fatehi N, Nowroozizadeh S, Henry S, Coleman AL, Caprioli J, Nouri-Mahdavi K (2017) Association of structural and functional measures with contrast sensitivity in glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 178:129–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2017.03.019CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

13.

Lin JC, Chie WC (2010) Psychometric validation of the Taiwan Chinese version of the 25-Item National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire. J Eval Clin Pract 16:619–626. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2753.2009.01253.xCrossRefPubMed

14.

Mangione CM, Lee PP, Gutierrez PR, Spritzer K, Berry S, Hays RD, Investigators NEIVFQFT (2001) Development of the 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire. Arch Ophthalmol 119:1050–1058. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.119.7.1050CrossRefPubMed

15.

Mills RP, Budenz DL, Lee PP, Noecker RJ, Walt JG, Siegartel LR, Evans SJ, Doyle JJ (2006) Categorizing the stage of glaucoma from pre-diagnosis to end-stage disease. Am J Ophthalmol 141:24–30. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.119.7.1050https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2005.07.044

16.

Rubin GS, Bandeen-Roche K, Huang GH, Muñoz B, Schein OD, Fried LP, West SK (2001) The association of multiple visual impairments with self-reported visual disability: SEE project. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 42:64–72PubMed

17.

Hu CX, Zangalli C, Hsieh M, Gupta L, Williams AL, Richman J, Spaeth GL (2014) What do patients with glaucoma see? Visual symptoms reported by patients with glaucoma. Am J Med Sci 348:403–409. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAJ.0000000000000319CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

18.

Tam ALC, Trope GE, Buys YM, Yang Y, Shen C, Jin YP (2018) Self-perceived impact of glaucomatous visual field loss and visual disabilities on driving difficulty and cessation. J Glaucoma 27:981–986. https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0000000000001079CrossRefPubMed

19.

Sencanic I, Gazibara T, Dotlic J, Stamenkovic M, Jaksic V, Bozic M, Grgurevic A (2018) Validation of the Glaucoma Quality of Life-15 Questionnaire in Serbian language. Int J Ophthalmol 11(10):1674–1684. https://doi.org/10.18240/ijo.2018.10.16CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

20.

Lappas A, Foerster AM, Schild AM, Rosentreter A, Dietlein TS (2011) Quantification of subjective visual quality of life in glaucoma patients: first results of a German version of the GQL-15 questionnaire. Ophthalmologe 108:745–752. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00347-011-2360-7CrossRefPubMed

21.

Vivekanand U, Kamath YS (2019) A comparison of the contrast sensitivity function between age-matched phakic emmetropes and pseudophakic individuals with aspheric intraocular lenses. Taiwan J Ophthalmol 9:33–36. https://doi.org/10.4103/tjo.tjo_122_17CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

22.

Masket S (1992) Relationship between postoperative pupil size and disability glare. J Cataract Refract Surg 18:506–507. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0886-3350(13)80107-1CrossRefPubMed

23.

Fechtner RD, Godfrey DG, Budenz D, Stewart JA, Stewart WC, Jasek MC (2010) Prevalence of ocular surface complaints in patients with glaucoma using topical intraocular pressure-lowering medications. Cornea 29:618–621. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICO.0b013e3181c325b2CrossRefPubMed

24.

Koh S, Maeda N, Ikeda C, Asonuma S, Ogawa M, Hiraoka T, Oshika T, Nishida K (2017) The effect of ocular surface regularity on contrast sensitivity and straylight in dry eye. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 58(5):2647–2651. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.17-21894CrossRefPubMed

25.

McDonald JE 2nd, El-MoatassemKotb AM, Decker BB (2001) Effect of brimonidine tartrate ophthalmic solution 0.2% on pupil size in normal eyes under different luminance conditions. J Cataract Refract Surg 27(4):560–564. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0886-3350(01)00769-6CrossRefPubMed

26.

Mashige KP (2010) Night vision and glare vision thresholds and recovery time in myopic and hyperopic eyes. Afr Vis Eye Health 69:132–139. https://doi.org/10.4102/aveh.v69i3.136CrossRef

27.

Karimian F, Feizi S, Doozande A (2010) Higher-order aberrations in myopic eyes. J Ophthalmic Vis Res 5:3–9PubMedPubMedCentral

28.

Liou SW, Chiu CJ (2001) Myopia and contrast sensitivity function. Curr Eye Res 22:81–84. https://doi.org/10.1076/ceyr.22.2.81.5530CrossRefPubMed

29.

Penteado RC, Zangwill LM, Daga FB, Saunders LJ, Manalastas PIC, Shoji T, Akagi T, Christopher M, Yarmohammadi A, Moghimi S, Weinreb RN (2018) Optical coherence tomography angiography macular vascular density measurements and the central 10–2 visual field in glaucoma. J Glaucoma 27:481–489. https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0000000000000964CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

30.

Jung KI, Ryu HK, Hong KH, Kim YC, Park CK (2021) Simultaneously performed combined 24–2 and 10–2 visual field tests in glaucoma. Sci Rep 11:1227. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-80318-wCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

31.

Moghimi S, Bowd C, Zangwill LM, Penteado RC, Hasenstab K, Hou H, Ghahari E, Manalastas PIC, Proudfoot J, Weinreb RN (2019) Measurement floors and dynamic ranges of OCT and OCT angiography in glaucoma. Ophthalmology 126:980–988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.03.003CrossRefPubMed

32.

Bowd C, Zangwill LM, Weinreb RN, Medeiros FA, Belghith A (2017) Estimating optical coherence tomography structural measurement floors to improve detection of progression in advanced glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 175:37–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2016.11.010CrossRefPubMed

33.

Ghahari E, Bowd C, Zangwill LM, Proudfoot J, Hasenstab KA, Hou H, Penteado RC, Manalastas PIC, Moghimi S, Shoji T, Christopher M, Yarmohammadi A, Weinreb RN (2019) Association of macular and circumpapillary microvasculature with visual field sensitivity in advanced glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 204:51–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2019.03.004CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

34.

Jammal AA, Ferreira BG, Zangalli CS, Vianna JR, Thompson AC, Artes PH, Costa VP, Reis ASC (2020) Evaluation of contrast sensitivity in patients with advanced glaucoma: comparison of two tests. Br J Ophthalmol 104:1418–1422. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2019-315273CrossRefPubMed

35.

Bierings RAJM, Overkempe T, van Berkel CM, Kuiper M, Jansonius NM (2019) Spatial contrast sensitivity from star- to sunlight in healthy subjects and patients with glaucoma. Vision Res 158:31–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2019.01.011CrossRefPubMed

36.

Sample PA, Juang PS, Weinreb RN (1991) Isolating the effects of primary open-angle glaucoma on the contrast sensitivity function. Am J Ophthalmol 112:308–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9394(14)76732-7CrossRefPubMed

37.

Loughman J, Akkali MC, Beatty S, Scanlon G, Davison PA, O’Dwyer V, Cantwell T, Major P, Stack J, Nolan JM (2010) The relationship between macular pigment and visual performance. Vision Res 50:1249–1256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2010.04.009CrossRefPubMed

38.

Janz NK, Musch DC, Gillespie BW, Wren PA, Niziol LM (2009) Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treatment Study (CIGTS) Investigators Evaluating clinical change and visual function concerns in drivers and nondrivers with glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 50:1718–1725. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.08-2575CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Evaluation of the association between macular damage and disability glare in patients with advanced glaucoma
verfasst von: Yun Hsia
Tsing-Hong Wang
Jehn-Yu Huang
Chien-Chia Su
Publikationsdatum: 22.02.2022
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology / Ausgabe 9/2022
Print ISSN: 0721-832X
Elektronische ISSN: 1435-702X
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-022-05593-x

Update Augenheilkunde

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Live-Webinar "Chronische Unterbauch- und Viszeralschmerzen in der Praxis managen"

Springer Medizin

Evaluation of the association between macular damage and disability glare in patients with advanced glaucoma

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Neu im Fachgebiet Augenheilkunde

Ophthalmika in der Schwangerschaft

Operative Therapie und Keimnachweis bei endogener Endophthalmitis

Bakterielle endogene Endophthalmitis

So erreichen Sie eine bestmögliche Wundheilung der Kornea

Update Augenheilkunde

Live-Webinar "Chronische Unterbauch- und Viszeralschmerzen in der Praxis managen"

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2022

Enucleation in pediatric open globe injuries: demographics and risk factors

Temporal contrast adaptation in the analysis of visual function in primary open-angle glaucoma

Comparable postoperative myopic shift in eyes with retinal vascular diseases and vitreomacular interface diseases after phacovitrectomy

A comparison of long-term results after Baerveldt 250 implantation in advanced uveitic vs. other forms of glaucoma

Optimization of intraocular lens selection for pediatric cataract surgery

Temporal trends in ocular manifestations of HIV/AIDS patients in the past 18 years in a tertiary hospital in China

Neu im Fachgebiet Augenheilkunde

Ophthalmika in der Schwangerschaft

Operative Therapie und Keimnachweis bei endogener Endophthalmitis

Bakterielle endogene Endophthalmitis

So erreichen Sie eine bestmögliche Wundheilung der Kornea

Update Augenheilkunde