Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Pediatric Radiology 2/2018

18.10.2017 | Original Article

Female gonadal shielding with automatic exposure control increases radiation risks

verfasst von: Summer L. Kaplan, Dennise Magill, Marc A. Felice, Rui Xiao, Sayed Ali, Xiaowei Zhu

Erschienen in: Pediatric Radiology | Ausgabe 2/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Gonadal shielding remains common, but current estimates of gonadal radiation risk are lower than estimated risks to colon and stomach. A female gonadal shield may attenuate active automatic exposure control (AEC) sensors, resulting in increased dose to colon and stomach as well as to ovaries outside the shielded area.

Objective

We assess changes in dose–area product (DAP) and absorbed organ dose when female gonadal shielding is used with AEC for pelvis radiography.

Materials and methods

We imaged adult and 5-year-old equivalent dosimetry phantoms using pelvis radiograph technique with AEC in the presence and absence of a female gonadal shield. We recorded DAP and mAs and measured organ absorbed dose at six internal sites using film dosimetry.

Results

Female gonadal shielding with AEC increased DAP 63% for the 5-year-old phantom and 147% for the adult phantom. Absorbed organ dose at unshielded locations of colon, stomach and ovaries increased 21–51% in the 5-year-old phantom and 17–100% in the adult phantom. Absorbed organ dose sampled under the shield decreased 67% in the 5-year-old phantom and 16% in the adult phantom.

Conclusion

Female gonadal shielding combined with AEC during pelvic radiography increases absorbed dose to organs with greater radiation sensitivity and to unshielded ovaries. Difficulty in proper use of gonadal shields has been well described, and use of female gonadal shielding may be inadvisable given the risks of increasing radiation.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Ardran GM, Crooks HE (1957) Gonad radiation dose from diagnostic procedures. Br J Radiol 30:295–297CrossRefPubMed Ardran GM, Crooks HE (1957) Gonad radiation dose from diagnostic procedures. Br J Radiol 30:295–297CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Stanford RW, Vance J (1955) The quantity of radiation received by the reproductive organs of patients during routine diagnostic X-ray examinations. Br J Radiol 28:266–273CrossRefPubMed Stanford RW, Vance J (1955) The quantity of radiation received by the reproductive organs of patients during routine diagnostic X-ray examinations. Br J Radiol 28:266–273CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Abram E, Wilkinson DM, Hodson CJ (1958) Gonadal protection from X radiation for the female. Br J Radiol 31:335–3365CrossRefPubMed Abram E, Wilkinson DM, Hodson CJ (1958) Gonadal protection from X radiation for the female. Br J Radiol 31:335–3365CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Adran GM, Kemp FH (1957) Protection of the male gonads in diagnostic procedures. Br J Radiol 30:280CrossRefPubMed Adran GM, Kemp FH (1957) Protection of the male gonads in diagnostic procedures. Br J Radiol 30:280CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Feldman A, Babcock GC, Lanier RR et al (1958) Gonadal exposure dose from diagnostic X-ray procedures. Radiology 71:197–207CrossRefPubMed Feldman A, Babcock GC, Lanier RR et al (1958) Gonadal exposure dose from diagnostic X-ray procedures. Radiology 71:197–207CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat International Commission on Radiological Protection (1977) ICRP publication 26: recommendations of the ICRP. Ann ICRP 1 International Commission on Radiological Protection (1977) ICRP publication 26: recommendations of the ICRP. Ann ICRP 1
7.
Zurück zum Zitat International Commission on Radiological Protection (1991) ICRP publication 60: 1990 recommendations of the ICRP. Ann ICRP 21 International Commission on Radiological Protection (1991) ICRP publication 60: 1990 recommendations of the ICRP. Ann ICRP 21
8.
Zurück zum Zitat International Commission on Radiological Protection (2007) ICRP publication 103: the 2007 recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Ann ICRP 37:1–332 International Commission on Radiological Protection (2007) ICRP publication 103: the 2007 recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Ann ICRP 37:1–332
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Rossi RP, Lin P-JP, Rauch PL et al (1985) AAPM report 14: performance specifications and acceptance testing for X-ray generators and automatic exposure control devices. American Association of Physicists in Medicine, New York Rossi RP, Lin P-JP, Rauch PL et al (1985) AAPM report 14: performance specifications and acceptance testing for X-ray generators and automatic exposure control devices. American Association of Physicists in Medicine, New York
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang ZJ, Chen KS, Gould R et al (2011) Positive enteric contrast material for abdominal and pelvic CT with automatic exposure control: what is the effect on patient radiation exposure? Eur J Radiol 79:e58–e62CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wang ZJ, Chen KS, Gould R et al (2011) Positive enteric contrast material for abdominal and pelvic CT with automatic exposure control: what is the effect on patient radiation exposure? Eur J Radiol 79:e58–e62CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Paul J, Schell B, Kerl JM et al (2011) Effect of contrast material on image noise and radiation dose in adult chest computed tomography using automatic exposure control: a comparative study between 16-, 64- and 128-slice CT. Eur J Radiol 79:e128–e132CrossRefPubMed Paul J, Schell B, Kerl JM et al (2011) Effect of contrast material on image noise and radiation dose in adult chest computed tomography using automatic exposure control: a comparative study between 16-, 64- and 128-slice CT. Eur J Radiol 79:e128–e132CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Nguyen KK, Schlaifer AE, Smith DL et al (2012) In automated fluoroscopy settings, does shielding affect radiation exposure to surrounding unshielded tissues? J Endourol 26:1489–1493CrossRefPubMed Nguyen KK, Schlaifer AE, Smith DL et al (2012) In automated fluoroscopy settings, does shielding affect radiation exposure to surrounding unshielded tissues? J Endourol 26:1489–1493CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Persliden J, Schuwert P, Mortensson W (1996) Comparison of absorbed radiation doses in barium and air enema reduction of intussusception: a phantom study. Pediatr Radiol 26:329–332CrossRefPubMed Persliden J, Schuwert P, Mortensson W (1996) Comparison of absorbed radiation doses in barium and air enema reduction of intussusception: a phantom study. Pediatr Radiol 26:329–332CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Goske MJ, Charkot E, Herrmann T et al (2011) Image Gently: challenges for radiologic technologists when performing digital radiography in children. Pediatr Radiol 41:611–619CrossRefPubMed Goske MJ, Charkot E, Herrmann T et al (2011) Image Gently: challenges for radiologic technologists when performing digital radiography in children. Pediatr Radiol 41:611–619CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Wainwright AM (2000) Shielding reproductive organs of orthopaedic patients during pelvic radiography. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 82:318–321PubMedPubMedCentral Wainwright AM (2000) Shielding reproductive organs of orthopaedic patients during pelvic radiography. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 82:318–321PubMedPubMedCentral
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Liakos P, Schoenecker PL, Lyons D et al (2001) Evaluation of the efficacy of pelvic shielding in preadolescent girls. J Pediatr Orthop 21:433–435PubMed Liakos P, Schoenecker PL, Lyons D et al (2001) Evaluation of the efficacy of pelvic shielding in preadolescent girls. J Pediatr Orthop 21:433–435PubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat McCarty M, Waugh R, McCallum H et al (2001) Paediatric pelvic imaging: improvement in gonad shield placement by multidisciplinary audit. Pediatr Radiol 31:646–649CrossRefPubMed McCarty M, Waugh R, McCallum H et al (2001) Paediatric pelvic imaging: improvement in gonad shield placement by multidisciplinary audit. Pediatr Radiol 31:646–649CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Sikand M, Stinchcombe S, Livesley PJ (2003) Study on the use of gonadal protection shields during paediatric pelvic X-rays. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 85:422–425CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sikand M, Stinchcombe S, Livesley PJ (2003) Study on the use of gonadal protection shields during paediatric pelvic X-rays. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 85:422–425CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Gul A, Zafar M, Maffulli N (2005) Gonadal shields in pelvic radiographs in pediatric patients. Bull Hosp Jt Dis 63:13–14PubMed Gul A, Zafar M, Maffulli N (2005) Gonadal shields in pelvic radiographs in pediatric patients. Bull Hosp Jt Dis 63:13–14PubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Bardo DM, Black M, Schenk K et al (2009) Location of the ovaries in girls from newborn to 18 years of age: reconsidering ovarian shielding. Pediatr Radiol 39:253–259CrossRefPubMed Bardo DM, Black M, Schenk K et al (2009) Location of the ovaries in girls from newborn to 18 years of age: reconsidering ovarian shielding. Pediatr Radiol 39:253–259CrossRefPubMed
25.
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Fawcett SL, Barter SJ (2009) The use of gonad shielding in paediatric hip and pelvis radiographs. Br J Radiol 82:363–370CrossRefPubMed Fawcett SL, Barter SJ (2009) The use of gonad shielding in paediatric hip and pelvis radiographs. Br J Radiol 82:363–370CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Frantzen MJ, Robben S, Postma AA et al (2012) Gonad shielding in paediatric pelvic radiography: disadvantages prevail over benefit. Insights Imaging 3:23–32CrossRefPubMed Frantzen MJ, Robben S, Postma AA et al (2012) Gonad shielding in paediatric pelvic radiography: disadvantages prevail over benefit. Insights Imaging 3:23–32CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee MC, Lloyd J, Solomito MJ (2017) Poor utility of gonadal shielding for pediatric pelvic radiographs. Orthopedics 40:e623–e627CrossRefPubMed Lee MC, Lloyd J, Solomito MJ (2017) Poor utility of gonadal shielding for pediatric pelvic radiographs. Orthopedics 40:e623–e627CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Karami V, Zabihzadeh M, Shams N, Saki Malehi A (2017) Gonad shielding during pelvic radiography: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Iran Med 20:113–123PubMed Karami V, Zabihzadeh M, Shams N, Saki Malehi A (2017) Gonad shielding during pelvic radiography: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Iran Med 20:113–123PubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Winfeld M, Strubel N, Pinkney L et al (2013) Relative distribution of pertinent findings on portable neonatal abdominal radiographs: can we shield the gonads? Pediatr Radiol 43:1295–1302CrossRefPubMed Winfeld M, Strubel N, Pinkney L et al (2013) Relative distribution of pertinent findings on portable neonatal abdominal radiographs: can we shield the gonads? Pediatr Radiol 43:1295–1302CrossRefPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat American College of Radiology, Society for Pediatric Radiology (2014) ACR-SPR practice parameter for general radiography, amended 2014. Vol RES 30–2013 (Res 39) American College of Radiology, Society for Pediatric Radiology (2014) ACR-SPR practice parameter for general radiography, amended 2014. Vol RES 30–2013 (Res 39)
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Don S (2004) Radiosensitivity of children: potential for overexposure in CR and DR and magnitude of doses in ordinary radiographic examinations. Pediatr Radiol 34:S167–S172CrossRefPubMed Don S (2004) Radiosensitivity of children: potential for overexposure in CR and DR and magnitude of doses in ordinary radiographic examinations. Pediatr Radiol 34:S167–S172CrossRefPubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Kaplan SL, Magill D, Felice MA et al (2015) Lead gonad shields: good or bad for patient radiation exposure? Pediatr Radiol 45:S89–S90 Kaplan SL, Magill D, Felice MA et al (2015) Lead gonad shields: good or bad for patient radiation exposure? Pediatr Radiol 45:S89–S90
Metadaten
Titel
Female gonadal shielding with automatic exposure control increases radiation risks
verfasst von
Summer L. Kaplan
Dennise Magill
Marc A. Felice
Rui Xiao
Sayed Ali
Xiaowei Zhu
Publikationsdatum
18.10.2017
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Pediatric Radiology / Ausgabe 2/2018
Print ISSN: 0301-0449
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1998
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-017-3996-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2018

Pediatric Radiology 2/2018 Zur Ausgabe

S3-Leitlinie zu Pankreaskrebs aktualisiert

23.04.2024 Pankreaskarzinom Nachrichten

Die Empfehlungen zur Therapie des Pankreaskarzinoms wurden um zwei Off-Label-Anwendungen erweitert. Und auch im Bereich der Früherkennung gibt es Aktualisierungen.

Fünf Dinge, die im Kindernotfall besser zu unterlassen sind

18.04.2024 Pädiatrische Notfallmedizin Nachrichten

Im Choosing-Wisely-Programm, das für die deutsche Initiative „Klug entscheiden“ Pate gestanden hat, sind erstmals Empfehlungen zum Umgang mit Notfällen von Kindern erschienen. Fünf Dinge gilt es demnach zu vermeiden.

„Nur wer sich gut aufgehoben fühlt, kann auch für Patientensicherheit sorgen“

13.04.2024 Klinik aktuell Kongressbericht

Die Teilnehmer eines Forums beim DGIM-Kongress waren sich einig: Fehler in der Medizin sind häufig in ungeeigneten Prozessen und mangelnder Kommunikation begründet. Gespräche mit Patienten und im Team können helfen.

Wie toxische Männlichkeit der Gesundheit von Männern schadet

08.04.2024 Andrologie Nachrichten

Stark, erfolgreich, allzeit belastbar – das sind Erwartungen, die Jungen und Männer von der Gesellschaft spüren. Das kann sie „toxisch“ werden lassen – und letztlich sogar der Gesundheit schaden, mahnt Dr. Dirk Sander von der Deutschen Aidshilfe.

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.