Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Ophthalmology 6/2017

08.12.2016 | Original Paper

Fixation preference test: reliability for the detection of amblyopia in patients with strabismus and interexaminer agreement

verfasst von: Kadriye Erkan Turan, Hande Taylan Sekeroglu, Sevilay Karahan, Ali Sefik Sanac

Erschienen in: International Ophthalmology | Ausgabe 6/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to analyze the reliability of the fixation preference test (FPT) in the detection of amblyopia, and to determine interexaminer agreement.

Methods

Eighty patients whose visual acuity could be tested objectively and had a horizontal misalignment of more than 10 prism diopters were enrolled. The best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and orthoptic findings were all recorded. Non-preferred eye in primary position and fixation preference grade were assessed independently by two masked experienced examiners. The primary outcome measures were reliability of FPT in terms of its correlation with BCVA and interexaminer agreement.

Results

There was no significant correlation between fixation preference grades and interocular visual acuity difference as well as the type and amount of deviation, the presence of fusion, stereopsis, anisometropia, and previous strabismus surgery for none of the examiners (p > 0.05 for all). Sensitivity was 52.0% for examiner 1 and 54.0% for examiner 2 while specificity was 50.0 and 46.7%, respectively. Interexaminer agreement was 76.7% (p < 0.001) for all patients.

Conclusions

FPT is widely used in children particularly when the visual acuity cannot be determined in an objective manner. The test may not be accurate and reliable in the detection of amblyopia and also in predicting the visual acuity difference between both eyes, even though it was found to show a high degree of agreement between examiners. In conclusion, it should be kept in mind that the reliability of FPT may be limited and the results should be interpreted with caution and be supported by other tests.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat von Noorden GK, Campos E (2002) Binocular vision and ocular motility, 6th edn. Mosby, St Louis von Noorden GK, Campos E (2002) Binocular vision and ocular motility, 6th edn. Mosby, St Louis
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Sener EC, Mocan MC, Gedik S, Ergin A, Sanaç AS (2002) The reliability of grading the fixation preference test for the assessment of interocular visual acuity differences in patients with strabismus. J AAPOS 6:191–194CrossRefPubMed Sener EC, Mocan MC, Gedik S, Ergin A, Sanaç AS (2002) The reliability of grading the fixation preference test for the assessment of interocular visual acuity differences in patients with strabismus. J AAPOS 6:191–194CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Knapp P, Moore S (1962) Diagnostic procedures in an orthoptic evaluation. Am Orthopt J 12:63–69PubMed Knapp P, Moore S (1962) Diagnostic procedures in an orthoptic evaluation. Am Orthopt J 12:63–69PubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Laws D, Noonan CP, Ward A, Chandna A (2000) Binocular fixation pattern and visual acuity in children with strabismic amblyopia. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 37:24–28PubMed Laws D, Noonan CP, Ward A, Chandna A (2000) Binocular fixation pattern and visual acuity in children with strabismic amblyopia. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 37:24–28PubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Attarzadeh A, Hoseinirad A, Farvardin M, Talebnejad MR, Alipour A (2009) Reliability of fixation preference for detecting amblyopia in strabismic patients. J Ophthalmic Vis Res 4:160–163PubMedPubMedCentral Attarzadeh A, Hoseinirad A, Farvardin M, Talebnejad MR, Alipour A (2009) Reliability of fixation preference for detecting amblyopia in strabismic patients. J Ophthalmic Vis Res 4:160–163PubMedPubMedCentral
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Wright KW, Edelman PM, Walonker F, Yiu S (1986) Reliability of fixation preference testing in diagnosing amblyopia. Arch Ophthalmol 104:549–553CrossRefPubMed Wright KW, Edelman PM, Walonker F, Yiu S (1986) Reliability of fixation preference testing in diagnosing amblyopia. Arch Ophthalmol 104:549–553CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Hakim OM (2007) Association between fixation preference testing and strabismic pseudoamblyopia. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 44:174–177PubMed Hakim OM (2007) Association between fixation preference testing and strabismic pseudoamblyopia. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 44:174–177PubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Friedman DS, Katz J, Repka MX et al (2008) Lack of concordance between fixation preference and HOTV optotype visual acuity in preschool children: the Baltimore Pediatric Eye Disease Study. Ophthalmology 115:1796–1799CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Friedman DS, Katz J, Repka MX et al (2008) Lack of concordance between fixation preference and HOTV optotype visual acuity in preschool children: the Baltimore Pediatric Eye Disease Study. Ophthalmology 115:1796–1799CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Cotter SA, Tarczy-Hornoch K, Song E, Multi-Ethnic Pediatric Eye Disease Study Group et al (2009) Fixation preference and visual acuity testing in a population-based cohort of preschool children with amblyopia risk factors. Ophthalmology 116:145–153CrossRefPubMed Cotter SA, Tarczy-Hornoch K, Song E, Multi-Ethnic Pediatric Eye Disease Study Group et al (2009) Fixation preference and visual acuity testing in a population-based cohort of preschool children with amblyopia risk factors. Ophthalmology 116:145–153CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat American Academy of Ophthalmology (2007-2008) Amblyopia. In: Basic and clinical science course: pediatric ophthalmology and strabismus. The Academy, San Francisco, pp 67–75 American Academy of Ophthalmology (2007-2008) Amblyopia. In: Basic and clinical science course: pediatric ophthalmology and strabismus. The Academy, San Francisco, pp 67–75
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Wallace DK (2010) Fixation preference tests for amblyopia: invaluable, useless, or somewhere in the middle? J AAPOS 14:201–202CrossRefPubMed Wallace DK (2010) Fixation preference tests for amblyopia: invaluable, useless, or somewhere in the middle? J AAPOS 14:201–202CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Procianoy L, Procianoy E (2010) The accuracy of binocular fixation preference for the diagnosis of strabismic amblyopia. J AAPOS 14:205–210CrossRefPubMed Procianoy L, Procianoy E (2010) The accuracy of binocular fixation preference for the diagnosis of strabismic amblyopia. J AAPOS 14:205–210CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Fixation preference test: reliability for the detection of amblyopia in patients with strabismus and interexaminer agreement
verfasst von
Kadriye Erkan Turan
Hande Taylan Sekeroglu
Sevilay Karahan
Ali Sefik Sanac
Publikationsdatum
08.12.2016
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
International Ophthalmology / Ausgabe 6/2017
Print ISSN: 0165-5701
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-2630
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-016-0403-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2017

International Ophthalmology 6/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Neu im Fachgebiet Augenheilkunde

Update Augenheilkunde

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.