Emerging technologies for analyzing biospecimens have led to advances in understanding the interacting role of genetics and environment on development and individual responsivity to prevention and intervention programs. The scientific study of gene-environment influences has also benefited from the growth of Big Data tools that allow linking genomic data to health, educational, and other information stored in large integrated datasets. These advances have created a new frontier of ethical challenges for scientists as they collect, store, or engage in secondary use of potentially identifiable information and biospecimens. To address challenges arising from technological advances and the expanding contexts in which potentially identifiable information and biospecimens are collected and stored, the Office of Human Research Protections has revised federal regulations for the protection of human subjects. The revised regulations create a new format, content, and transparency requirements for informed consent, including a new mechanism known as broad consent. Broad consent offers participants a range of choices regarding consent for the storage and future use of their personally identifiable data. These regulations have important implications for how prevention scientists and oversight boards acquire participant consent for the collection, storage, and future use of their data by other investigators for scientific purposes significantly different from the original study. This article describes regulatory changes and challenges affecting traditional informed consent for prevention research, followed by a description of the rationale and requirements for obtaining broad consent, and concludes with a discussion of future challenges involving ongoing transparency and protections for participants and their communities.
Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., Van Ijzendoorn, M. H., Mesman, J., Alink, L. R., & Juffer, F. (2008). Effects of an attachment-based intervention on daily cortisol moderated by dopamine receptor D4: A randomized control trial on 1- to 3-year-olds screened for externalizing behavior. Developmental Psychopathology, 20, 805–820. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579408000382. CrossRef
Bardill, J., & Garrison, N. A. (2015). Naming indigenous concerns, framing considerations for stored biospecimens. American Journal of Bioethics, 15, 73–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2015.1062164. CrossRefPubMed
Berkman, B. E., Wendler, D., Sullivan, H. K., & Grady, C. (2017). A proposed process for reliably updating the common rule. The American Journal of Bioethics, 17, 8–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2017.1329478. CrossRefPubMed
Brody, G. H., Beach, S. R., Philibert, R. A., Chen, Y. F., & Murry, V. M. (2009). Prevention effects moderate the association of 5-HTTLPR and youth risk behavior initiation: Gene× environment hypotheses tested via a randomized prevention design. Child Development, 80, 645–661. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01288.x. CrossRefPubMed
Calvin, C. M., Deary, I. J., Webbink, D., Smith, P., Fernandes, C., Lee, S. H., ... Visscher, P. M. (2012). Multivariate genetic analyses of cognition and academic achievement from two population samples of 174,000 and 166,000 school children. Behavior Genetics, 42, 699–710. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10519-012-9549-7 CrossRefPubMed
Caspi, A., Belsky, D. W., Moffitt, T. E., Houts, R. M., Harrington, H., Hogan, S., . . . Poulton, R. (2017). Childhood forecasting of a small segment of the population with large economic burden. Nature Human Behaviour, 1. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-016-0005 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Condit, C. M. (2010). Public understandings of genetics and health. Clinical Genetics, 77, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-0004.2009.01316.x. CrossRefPubMed
Consolidated Appropriations Act, H.R. 1625, Pub. L. No. 115–141 (2018).
Cooper, Z. N., Nelson, R. M., & Ross, L. F. (2006). Informed consent for genetic research involving pleiotropic genes: An empirical study of ApoE research. IRB: Ethics & Human Research, 28, 1–11 Retrieved https://www.jstor.org/stable/30033207.
Davies, G., Marioni, R. E., Liewald, D. C., Hill, W. D., Hagenaars, S. P., Harris, S. E., . . . Deary, I. J. (2016). Genome-wide association study of cognitive functions and educational attainment in UK Biobank (N=112 151). Molecular Psychiatry, 21, 758–767. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/mp.2016.45 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
De Vries, R. G., Tomlinson, T., Kim, H. M., Krenz, C., Haggerty, D., Ryan, K. A., & Kim, S. Y. (2016). Understanding the public's reservations about broad consent and study-by-study consent for donations to a biobank: Results of a national survey. PLoS One, 11, e0159113. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159113. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Dick, D., Latendresse, S., & Riley, B. (2011). Incorporating genetics into your studies: A guide for social scientists. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 2. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2011.00017/full
Dickert, N. W., Eyal, N., Goldkind, S. F., Grady, C., Joffe, S., Lo, B., . . . Kim, S. Y. H. (2017). Reframing consent for clinical research: A function-based approach. The American Journal of Bioethics, 17, 3–11. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2017.1388448 CrossRefPubMed
Fisher, C. B. (2015). Enhancing the responsible conduct of sexual health prevention research across global and local contexts: Training for evidence-based research ethics. Ethics & Behavior, 25, 87–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2014.948956. CrossRef
Fisher, C. B. (2017a). Decoding the ethics code: A practical guide for psychologists (4th ed.). Thoasand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Fisher, C. B. (2017b). Ethical risks and remedies in social behavioral research involving genetic testing. In E. L. G. S. Bourgy, S. R. Latham, & M. Tan (Eds.), Current perspectives in psychology: Education, ethics, and genetics (pp. 263–283). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
Fisher, C. B. (2017c). Rethinking individual and group harms in the age of genomics and big data. New York: Paper presented at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai IRB Retreat.
Fisher, C. B., & Ragsdale, K. (2006). A goodness-of-fit ethic for multicultural research. In J. Trimble & C. B. Fisher (Eds.), The handbook of ethical research with ethnocultural populations and communities (pp. 3–26). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Fisher, C. B., Brunnquell, D. J., Hughes, D. L., Liben, L. S., Maholmes, V., Plattner, S., ... Susman, E. J. (2013). Preserving and enhancing the responsible conduct of research involving children and youth: A response to proposed changes in federal regulations. social policy report, Society for Research in Child Development, 27, 3–15.
Glenn, A. L., Lochman, J. E., Dishion, T., Powell, N. P., Boxmeyer, C., & Qu, L. (2018). Oxytocin receptor gene variant interacts with intervention delivery format in predicting intervention outcomes for youth with conduct problems. Prevention Science, 19, 38–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-017-0777-1. CrossRefPubMed
Grady, C., Eckstein, L., Berkman, B., Brock, D., Cook-Deegan, R., Fullerton, S. M., ... Wendler, D. (2015). Broad consent for research with biological samples: Workshop conclusions. The American Journal of Bioethics, 15, 34–42. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2015.1062162 CrossRefPubMed
Greven, C. U., Harlaar, N., Kovas, Y., Chamorro-Premuzic, T., & Plomin, R. (2009). More than just IQ: School achievement is predicted by self-perceived abilities—But for genetic rather than environmental reasons. Psychological Science, 20, 753–762. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02366.x. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Hansson, M. G., Lochmüller, H., Riess, O., Schaefer, F., Orth, M., Rubinstein, Y., ..., Posada, M. (2016). The risk of re-identification versus the need to identify individuals in rare disease research. European Journal of Human Genetics, 24, 1553–1558. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/ejhg.2016.52 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Haworth, C. M. A., & Plomin, R. (2012). Genetics and education: Toward a genetically sensitive classroom. In K. R. Harris, S. Graham, T. Urdan, C. B. McCormick, G. M. Sinatra, & J. Sweller (Eds.), APA educational psychology handbook, Vol 1: Theories, constructs, and critical issues (pp. 529–559). Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association. CrossRef
Homer, N., Szelinger, S., Redman, M., Duggan, D., Tembe, W., Muehling, J., ... Craig, D. W. (2008). Resolving individuals contributing trace amounts of DNA to highly complex mixtures using high-density SNP genotyping microarrays. PLoS Genetics, 4, e1000167. doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1000167 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Jarvik, G. P., Amendola, L. M., Berg, J., Brothers, K., Clayton, E., Chung, W., ... Wolf, W. (2014). Return of genomic results to research participants: The floor, the ceiling, and the choices in between. American Journal of Human Genetics 818–826. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2014.04.009 CrossRefPubMed
Kaufman, D., Geller, G., Leroy, L., Murphy, J., Scott, J., & Hudson, K. (2008). Ethical implications of including children in a large biobank for genetic-epidemiologic research: A qualitative study of public opinion. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part C: Seminars in Medical Genetics, 148C, 31–39. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.c.30159 CrossRef
Kaufman, D. J., Baker, R., Milner, L. C., Devaney, S., & Hudson, K. L. (2016). A survey of U.S. adults' opinions about conduct of a nationwide Precision Medicine Initiative® cohort study of genes and environment. PLoS One, 11, e0160461. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0160461. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Kegel, C. A., Bus, A. G., & van IJzendoorn, M. H. (2011). Differential susceptibility in early literacy instruction through computer games: The role of the dopamine D4 receptor gene (DRD4). Mind, Brain, and Education, 5, 71–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-228X.2011.01112.x. CrossRef
Kong, C. C., Tarling, T. E., Strahlendorf, C., Dittrick, M., & Vercauteren, S. M. (2016). Opinions of adolescents and parents about pediatric biobanking. Journal of Adolescent Health, 58, 474–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2015.12.015. CrossRefPubMed
Krapohl, E., Rimfeld, K., Shakeshaft, N. G., Trzaskowski, M., McMillan, A., Pingault, J.B., ... Dale, P. S. (2014). The high heritability of educational achievement reflects many genetically influenced traits, not just intelligence. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(42), 15273–15278. doi: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1408777111 CrossRef
Leadbeater, B. J., Dishion, T., Sandler, I., Bradshaw, C. P., Dodge, K., Gottfredson, D., ..., Smith, E. P. (2018). Ethical challenges in promoting the implementation of preventive interventions: Report of the SPR task force. Prevention Science. Advance online publication. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-018-0912-7
Mac Queen, K. M., & Alleman, P. (2008). International perspectives on the collection, storage, and testing of human biospecimens in HIV research. IRB, 30, 9–14 Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4413897/.
Malin, B., & Sweeney, L. (2001). Re-identification of DNA through an automated linkage process. Proceedings, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 423–427. Retrieved from http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~malin/papers/reid_AMIA.pdf
Mandelli, L., & Serretti, A. (2013). Gene environment interaction studies in depression and suicidal behavior: An update. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 37, 2375–2397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.07.011. CrossRef
McCrory, E., De Brito, S. A., & Viding, E. (2010). Research review: The neurobiology and genetics of maltreatment and adversity. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 51, 1079–1095. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2010.02271.x. CrossRefPubMed
McGuire, A. L., Hamilton, J. A., Lunstroth, R., McCullough, L. B., & Goldman, A. (2008). DNA data sharing: Research participants' perspectives. Genetic Medicine, 10, 46–53. https://doi.org/10.1097/GIM.0b013e31815f1e00. CrossRef
McGuire, A. L., Oliver, J. M., Slashinski, M. J., Graves, J. L., Wang, T., Kelly, P. A., ... Hilsenbeck, S. G. (2011). To share or not to share: a randomized trial of consent for data sharing in genome research. Genetic Medicine, 13, 948–955. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/GIM.0b013e3182227589 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Office for Human Research Protections. (2017). Federal Register Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects. Retrieved from https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2017-01-19/html/2017-01058.htm.
Pearson, C. R., Parker, M., Fisher, C. B., & Moreno, C. (2014). Capacity building from the inside out: Development and evaluation of a CITI ethics certification training module for American Indian and Alaska Native community researchers. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 9, 46–57. https://doi.org/10.1525/jer.2014.9.1.4. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Ravitsky, V., & Wilfond, B. S. (2006). Disclosing individual genetic results to research participants. IRB: Ethics & Human Research, 29, 10.
Russell, M. A., Schlomer, G. L., Cleveland, H. H., Feinberg, M. E., Greenberg, M. T., Vandenbergh, D. J., ..., Redmond, C. (2017). PROSPER intervention effects on adolescents’ alcohol misuse vary by GABRA2 genotype and age. Prevention Science, 19(1), 27–37. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-017-0751-y CrossRef
Sahota, P. C. (2014). Body fragmentation: Native american community members’ views on specimen disposition in biomedical/genetics research. American Journal of Bioethics: Empirical Bioethics, 5, 19–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/23294515.2014.896833. CrossRef
Society for Research in Child Development (SRCD). (2018). Member resource on NIH clinical trials. Retrieved from https://www.srcd.org/membership/member-resource-nih-clinical-trials
Sreenivasan, G. (2003). Does informed consent to research require comprehension? Lancet, 362, 2016–2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(03)15025-8. CrossRefPubMed
Strauss, D. (2017). Changes to the Common Rule: Implications for informed consent. Paper presented at the Fordham University HIV and Drug Abuse Prevention Ethics Training Program. New York: Bronx Retrieved from https://www.fordham.edu/downloads/file/8959/changes_to_the_common_rule_implications_for_informed_consent.
Sugarman, J. (2017). Examining provisions related to consent in the revised common rule. American Journal of Bioethics, 17, 22–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2017.1329483. CrossRefPubMed
Tam, N. T., Nguyen, T. H., Le Thi, B. T., Nguyen, P. L., Nguyen, T. H. T., Kenji, H., & Juntra, K. (2015). Participants’ understanding of informed consent in clinical trials over three decades: Systematic review and meta-analysis. (2015). Bulletin of the World Health Organization., 93, 186–198H. https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.14.141390. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2012). Guidance regarding methods for de-identification of protected health information in accordance with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) Privacy Rule. Retrieved from https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/ocr/privacy/hipaa/understanding/coveredentities/De-identification/hhs_deid_guidance.pdf
University of Southern California. (2012). University of Southern California (USC) Policy: Biorepositories. Retrieved from https://policy.usc.edu/biorepositories/.
Wertz, J., Caspi, A., Belsky, D., Beckley, A., Arseneault, L., Barnes, J., ... Morgan, N. (2018). Genetics and crime: Integrating new genomic discoveries into psychological research about antisocial behavior. Psychological Science, 29, 791–803. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617744542 CrossRefPubMed
Zheng, Y., Albert, D., McMahon, R. J., Dodge, K., Dick, D., & Conduct Problems Prevention Research. (2018). Glucocorticoid receptor (NR3C1) gene polymorphism moderate intervention effects on the developmental trajectory of African-American adolescent alcohol abuse. Prevention Science, 19, 79–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-016-0726-4. CrossRefPubMed
- Genomics, Big Data, and Broad Consent: a New Ethics Frontier for Prevention Science
Celia B. Fisher
Deborah M. Layman
- Springer US