Growth factors, silver dressings and negative pressure wound therapy in the management of hard-to-heal postoperative wounds in obstetrics and gynecology: a review

The modern concept of an “ideal dressing” assumes that the dressing should not only play a protective role or provide appropriately moist conditions, but also directly stimulate cellular regeneration. Starting from the mid-1980s, many researchers focused on cellular growth factors and opportunities of their use in the treatment of chronic wounds [23]. The growth factors being simultaneously cytokines and biologically active peptides of auto- and paracrine activity are characterized by pleiotropic effect on the course of the healing process. By binding membrane receptors of the target tissues, the growth factors trigger intracellular signaling pathways and stimulate cellular proliferation, differentiation and migration [19, 24, 25]. Importantly, the fact that growth factors do not penetrate the cell interior and thus do not directly interact with the nucleus eliminates the potential risk of mutagenic effects and neoplasia.

Due to their wide spectrum of activities and the multitude of functions, attempts are made to use growth factors in the treatment of various disorders and diseases. This mostly pertains to such disciplines as general surgery, maxillofacial surgery, plastic surgery, orthopedics and sports medicine as a consequence of the invasive nature and related necessity to repair damaged tissue structures [19, 20, 23, 26].

In 1997, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the recombinant human platelet-derived growth factor BB (rhPDGF-BB, becaplermin) in adjunctive treatment of diabetic neuropathic foot ulcers [20, 23]. To date, this is the only cellular growth factor product to be approved for use in chronic wounds and ulcers management on the basis of multicenter, randomized controlled trials. Animal studies revealed that rhPDGF-BB significantly accelerated the healing of wounds, including ischemic, and that one of the possible mechanisms of its action involves reduction of the levels of proinflammatory cytokines: tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), interleukin 1-beta (IL-1β) and metalloproteinase 2 (MMP2) and 9 (MMP9) within the wound [27]. Of the remaining growth factors, keratinocyte growth factor (KGF), granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and epidermal growth factor (EGF) were clinically confirmed to be efficient in the treatment of chronic venous ulcers [23]. The beneficial effect of growth factors such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β) on the wound healing process was demonstrated only in animal studies [23]. This small number of controlled, randomized trials conducted in appropriately large group of patients does not permit any definite conclusions regarding the efficacy of growth factors in the treatment of abnormally healing wounds, including postoperative. On the other hand, due to the high costs associated with preparation of recombinant growth factors and with application techniques preventing growth factors from being degraded too early within the administration site, the method will probably not be considered as the first-line treatment of wounds after invasive procedures.

The platelet-rich plasma (PRP) which constitutes an autologous concentrate of thrombocytes in a small volume of plasma comprises an efficient alternative to growth factors. Depending on the technique used PRP is characterized by a two- to sixfold increase in the platelet count [26, 28]. As a result, concentrations of growth factors produced by thrombocytes are increased several times. Most important growth factors found in the PRP include: 3 isomers of PDGF (PDGFαα, PDGFββ, PDGFαβ), TGFβ1, TGFβ2, VEGF and EGF [26, 28]. Due to the low plasma volume, PRP contains also adhesion proteins such as fibrin, fibronectin and vitronectin involved in the extracellular matrix formation and thus being of importance for the wound healing process. Results of in vitro and animal studies revealed the effect of platelet-rich plasma on the migration, proliferation and differentiation of cells involved in the healing process as well as angiogenesis-stimulating properties [28]. The efficacy of PRP was shown to depend mostly on appropriate preparation technique that ensures a possibly highest level of platelets per unit volume without their simultaneous degradation. To date several systems for PRP preparation were developed with only few of them allowing to achieve the required “therapeutic” platelet concentration of ≥1 × 10⁶/µl [26]. The process for preparation of platelet-rich plasma generates much less costs compared to genetic engineering methods used in preparation of recombinant growth factors while the autologous nature of the product eliminates the risk of transmission of viral infections, such as hepatitis virus or HIV infection.

Discussed below are the attempts made hitherto with regard to the use of cellular growth factors and PRP derivatives in the treatment of difficult-to-heal postsurgical obstetrical and gynecological wounds.

First reports on the possible use of negative pressure as a method to treat chronic and difficult-to-heal wounds date from the late 1980s. Study conducted by Kostiuchenko et al. demonstrated beneficial effect of vacuum used as supportive therapy to surgical debridement in the management of infected wounds [46]. In a group of 116 patients subjected to experimental treatment, placing a suction pump at the wound surface generating a negative pressure of 100 mmHg for 5–10 min both before and after the debridement procedure, better healing results were observed as compared to the group of 105 patients treated in the standard manner.

The concept of the Russian researchers was confirmed by an animal model study published in 1997 by Morykwas et al. [47]. Application of subatmospheric pressure of 125 mmHg contributed to a fourfold increase in blood flow within the wound bed as well as to significant reduction in the tissue bacterial counts within the wound area from 10⁸/g of tissue to 10⁵/g of tissue after 4 days of treatment. Similar result in the control group was noted after 11 days of treatment (p < 0.05). In addition, a statistically significant acceleration of granulation tissue formation was observed in comparison with the control group—an increase of 63.3 % upon continuous negative pressure and of 103 % upon intermittent negative pressure application (p < 0.05).

A study conducted in the same year with the use of the same methodology to assess the clinical efficacy of NPWT in a group of 300 wounds (175 chronic wounds, 94 subacute wounds, and 31 acute wounds) revealed favorable response to the treatment in 296 cases. A reduction in the edema was observed in the wound region while also confirming the previously observed increase in blood flow and enhanced formation of granulation tissue [48].

Today, NPWT is a worldwide-established method for the treatment of chronic and difficult-to-heal wounds with efficacy confirmed by numerous clinical studies [21, 22, 49, 50]. Similar to growth factors, negative pressure affects processes determining proper wound healing by providing moist environment, increasing blood perfusion, accelerating the formation of granulation tissue and removing excess exudate from the site of the injury, thus indirectly reducing the risk of infection [47, 48, 51]. As a result, the list of NPWT indications is being continuously extended. In 1995, FDA approved NPWT as a method to treat acute and chronic post-traumatic wounds and burns were added to the list of indications 7 years later [49].

Over the years, numerous negative pressure systems have been developed. A standard kit includes a porous polyurethane foam, an adhesive sealing film, a drain, a vacuum pump and a container for secretions. Depending on the intended use, the devices may be either stationary or mobile, and the negative pressure may be dosed in either constant or intermittent manner, usually within the range of 50 mmHg down to 150 mmHg [49, 50, 52]. The most recent models of vacuum-assisted closure devices facilitate: ambulatory use, removal of larger quantities of the secretion and irrigation of the wound site with antibiotic solution and/or local anesthetics; antiseptic silver-coated sponges are also used [49, 50, 52].

Contraindications to NPWT include malignant lesions and extensive necrosis in the wound region, osteomyelitis, fistulas and exposed blood vessels, nerves, bones, or organs [50, 52]. Therefore, it is important to remove necrotized tissue from the wound bed and cover the exposed structures with a non-adherent material, e.g., a silicone dressing prior to applying negative pressure. This barrier material would additionally protect the tissues from growing into the polyurethane foam [50, 52]. In cases of wound infections, it is important to provide local and/or systemic treatment with antiseptic dressings, antifungals or antibiotics and similar to other methods used in wound management, treatment of concomitant diseases combined with elimination of factors disturbing normal healing, e.g., by controlling metabolic disorders due to diabetes or malnutrition is an inseparable part of vacuum therapy [50].

Adverse events are rarely observed with NPWT. Those most common include tissue necrosis, fistula formation as well as pain and bleeding accompanying dressing change due to granulation tissue ingrowth into the foam [50, 52]. The latter two may be prevented by the use of interface dressings separating the tissues from the material filling in the wound bed. Other procedures used in pain management involve reduction in suction power by ca. 25 mmHg, saturation of the dressing with 0.9 % sodium chloride or 1 % lidocaine solution 15–30 min before the planned dressing change, covering the wound bed with hydrogels as well as more frequent dressing changes and premedication with analgesic agents [50, 52].

Similar as in the case of growth factors, the number of studies on the use of NPWT in the treatment of difficult-to-heal obstetric and gynecological postsurgical wounds is low. One of the first reports includes a case series description of complex wound failures after major gynecologic procedures by Argenta et al. [53]. Application of vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) device in three patients who had experienced abnormal wound healing during the postoperative period demonstrated good tolerance and high efficacy with regard to granulation tissue formation within the first 48 h since the initiation. No adverse effects of therapy were observed, and satisfactory results of treatment were obtained despite numerous burdens of patients including morbid obesity, diabetes or ongoing chemotherapy. It is noteworthy that in one case the use of subatmospheric pressure resulted in closure of an enterocutaneous fistula considered to be a contraindication to VAC therapy.

Miller et al. reported a clinical case of wound dehiscence in a moderately obese patient subjected to abdominal hysterectomy in whom negative pressure of 80 mmHg applied for 6–8 h daily contributed to complete healing of the wound after 3 months of treatment [54]. During the entire treatment period involving three dressing changes per week, the patient required no analgesics which, according to authors, supports the idea of using lower vacuum levels than generally accepted. In a case series study by Stannard et al., the authors suggested a possibility of a prophylactic use of NPWT directly after the surgery (continuous negative pressure of 125 mmHg for 4 days) to prevent wound infection and breakdown in morbidly obese patients subjected to abdominal hysterectomy [55]. In another case report by Gourgiotis et al. the application of topical VAC therapy in patient with abdominal compartment syndrome and skin defect following major gynecologic surgery reduced the need for fluids and vasopressor agents, prevented fascial retraction and visceral adherence, and finally enabled delayed fascial closure [56]. Lavoie et al. presented effective use of NPWT with gauze filling in the case of extensive adipose tissue necrosis following abdominal hysterectomy [57].

In 2004, Schimp et al. published a report on the efficacy of VAC device in patients subjected to major gynecological procedures, such as total abdominal hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and vulvectomy with or without an inguinal lymph node dissection in whom complex wound failures occurred during the postoperative period [58]. A retrospective study included a group of 27 women; 25 diagnosed with malignant tumors of the uterine cervix, endometrium, ovary and vulva. In 23 cases, VAC device was used upon wound dehiscence occurrence (range 0–88 days postoperatively); in the remaining 4 patients vacuum device was placed directly after the reoperation; in 3 women, the dehiscence was located in a previously irradiated area, and wound infection was clinically confirmed in 10 patients. The range of negative pressure used was between 50 and 125 mmHg; dressings were changed in 2-day intervals, occasionally after premedication with oral analgesics. The mean period of vacuum use in the study was 32 (3–88) days; during this time, the authors observed a significant reduction in the size of the wound—96 % reduction as compared to the baseline area. In one case, the treatment was discontinued due to bleeding, while 67 % of the remaining patients complained of pain that accompanied dressing changes. No other complications or treatment-emergent adverse effects were observed. At the time of last visit (mean follow-up: 52 days), 96 % of patients presented complete wound healing.

In a retrospective non-randomized study conducted by Narducci et al. in a group of 54 women subjected to radical vulvectomy or wide local vulvectomy with defect volume larger than 40 cm³, inguinal lymphadenectomy and/or myocutaneous flap reconstruction, the authors observed a statistically shorter time until complete wound healing after VAC therapy as compared with the standard management consisting in irrigation of the surgical site with 0.9 % sodium chloride and air drying [59]. Among 30 patients (2 with previous radiotherapy history) in whom constant subatmospheric pressure of 100–125 mmHg was started within the first 24 h after the surgery, the overall time until complete wound healing was 44.4 ± 18.4 days compared to 60.2 ± 28.7 days in a control group of 24 subjects (p = 0.0175). The mean duration of therapy involving dressing changes at intervals of 48–72 h performed under local or neuroleptic anesthesia was 11 (range 6–38) days. No statistically significant difference was observed with respect to the mean hospital stay between both groups. Complications of VAC observed by the authors included several cases of vestibular stenosis and one case of partial necrosis of the myocutaneous flap used for vulvar reconstruction.

Riebe et al. presented case series study regarding two patients with locally advanced vulvar cancer who received extensive surgical treatment including tumor debulking and inguino-femoral lymphadenectomy [60]. After polypropylene mesh was implanted over the exposed blood vessels followed by VAC system application, authors observed faster wound healing with lack of complications. Taking into account the fact that exposed vessels, similarly as fistulas, used to be considered as contraindications to VAC therapy initiation these observations provide new evidence regarding possibility to use subatmospheric pressure in the treatment of hard-to-heal gynecologic wounds.

Single reports present effectiveness of NPWT combined with split-thickness skin grafting after surgical treatment of rare diseases of the vulva such as Paget’s disease, hidradenitis suppurativa or syringoid eccrine carcinoma [61‐63].

NPWT was shown to be effective in preventing surgical site infections (SSIs) in women after cesarean section. Administration of single-use NPWT for 7 days postoperatively in 50 patients prevented SSIs and consequently readmissions to the hospital in the high-risk group of women with BMI ≥35 kg/m² [64]. In a retrospective cohort study conducted by Mark et al. including 63 patients after cesarean section with BMI of >45 kg/m², the use of NPWT reduced the percentage of wound complications from 10.4 % in the control group to 0 % in the study group (p = 0.15) [65]. On the other hand, significantly longer duration of surgery and lower percentage of scheduled cesarean sections were observed in the control group, possibly contributing to the higher rate of complications.

Single attempts were made to use subatmospheric pressure in the treatment of necrotising fasciitis in women after cesarean section [66, 67]. As a result of a complex management strategy including surgical debridement of necrotic tissue, use of broad-spectrum antibiotics with simultaneous negative pressure therapy wounds were completely healed in two patients who had been diagnosed with this potentially life-threatening infection in the postoperative period [66, 67].

A team of Danish researchers presented interesting study regarding psychosocial aspects of NPWT among patients in an outpatient setting [68]. Based on an analysis and interpretation of individually collected interviews of 10 patients with wound healing disorders including four patients after cesarean section i.a. the efficacy of therapy and its impact on everyday functioning, need for relatives care and support, and ability to manage a device were assessed. The study indicated that in general, patients considered NPWT to be effective, and despite the fact that it was associated with a feeling of dependence at the beginning, therapy became more acceptable with time. Importantly, all patients reported a feeling of embarrassment during social situations due to a device being present. With regard to patients after cesarean section who at the same time comprised a group of young mothers, help and support of their relatives were extremely important.

Finally, single reports analyzing the costs of vacuum therapy in obstetrics and gynecology suggest economic benefits of the treatment. A study conducted by Lewis et al. using the theoretical model to assess the costs of care using prophylactic NPWT in a group of 431 patients after laparotomy due to gynecological malignancy revealed the cost-effectiveness of such management amounting to $104 savings per one patient compared to the routine management with the assumption of 50 % treatment efficacy [69]. The generated savings were even higher in the group of obese and morbidly obese patients; in authors’ opinion, this group of patients may benefit most from prophylactic NPWT.

Despite unquestionable benefits of NPWT it is necessary to pay special attention to iatrogenic mistakes that might occur during treatment as evidenced by Beral et al. who reported a case of abnormal wound healing as a consequence of retained foam pieces in patient after total abdominal hysterectomy [70]. Taking into account radiolucent nature of the foam making subsequent detection difficult as well as the fact that often many fragments are used to fill in the wound bed it seems reasonable to record the number of removed foam pieces during each dressing replacement.

Summarizing all written above, the review of available literature leads to a conclusion that negative pressure wound therapy constitutes a promising alternative to the standard wound management regimens in obstetrics and gynecology. Vacuum therapy appears to be particularly beneficial in the group of obese patients, patients undergoing radical vulvectomy, vulvar reconstruction and patients with history of radiation therapy. In women after cesarean section and with risk factors responsible for abnormal wound healing, prophylactic NPWT may prevent surgical site infections and additional hospital stay, reduce treatment costs and, what is equally important, permit the patient to fulfill her role as a mother without any restrictions. Similar as in the case of growth factors, there are not enough randomized controlled trials to justify the use of NPWT in everyday clinical practice while simultaneously analyzing the effect of the vacuum therapy on the overall treatment costs. It is necessary to develop a unified regimen for the use of NPWT, defining the optimum negative pressure levels, dressing type, dressing change intervals and treatment duration depending on the type of the wound. It also appears reasonable to explore the possibilities of using NPWT in combination with other wound treatment methods, such as growth factors or antiseptic dressings.

Infections are one of the main factors responsible for impaired postoperative wound healing. In the conditions of intact integuments integrity, the epidermis acts as a mechanical barrier against pathogenic microorganisms supported by the acidic environment and physiological bacterial flora on the skin surface. However, as the skin is incised, these mechanisms of protection lose their relevance and the wound becomes an open gate for pathogens. Endo- and exotoxins produced by microorganisms alter the course of healing, simultaneously depleting local environment of oxygen and nutrients. The inflow of inflammatory cells into the wound, stimulated by the presence of pathogens crucial in the initial phase of healing, may further enhance hypoxia, inhibit the activity of growth factors and extend the overall healing time if the infection prolongs. As a result, a negative feedback loop is activated, with oxygen deficiency causing tissue necrosis within the wound and promoting growth of pathogenic microorganisms. In addition, depletion of oxygen impairs the host cell-mediated response of leukocytes and makes the local microenvironment prone to colonization by anaerobic bacteria [71].

The risk factors for the surgical site infection are similar to the factors impairing normal wound healing process as discussed in introduction and include: elderly age, obesity, diabetes, malnutrition, anemia, nicotinism, renal and liver impairment, immunosuppression, irradiation as well as the size, depth and location of the wound, duration of the surgery, type of suturing materials used, presence of drains, damage and hypoperfusion of the surrounding tissues, free spaces left and insufficient hemostasis [5, 71, 72]. Hair shaving, particularly on the day before the procedure, is responsible for the increased percentage of SSIs, as is prolonged hospitalization [2, 5, 72]. Since the risk factors of wound infection are similar to factors responsible for disturbances in normal healing process, it appears reasonable to treat every case of a chronic, difficult-healing wound as potentially infected.

According to the guidelines of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, postoperative wounds in obstetrics and gynecology are classified as clean-contaminated [72]. Literature data estimate the incidence of infected wounds in obstetrics and gynecology at 1–4 % to 8–12 % [1, 7, 10‐12]. With regard to the two most common procedures—abdominal hysterectomy and cesarean section, SSIs rates are 3.0–12.2 % and 1.8–11.3 %, respectively, while in women after surgical treatment of cancer of the vulva, the percentage of wound infections is even greater and amounts to 21–39 % [1‐5, 7, 8, 10‐13].

In most cases, microorganisms responsible for the infections of obstetric and gynecological postoperative wounds are the patient’s endogenous bacterial flora. Most commonly isolated strains include: Staphylococcus aureus, aerobic Gram-negative bacilli (Escherichia coli, Proteus sp., Klebsiella sp., Enterobacter sp.), Enterococcus sp., β-hemolyzing streptococci of groups A, B, C and G, anaerobic bacterial species and Pseudomonas aeruginosa [1, 7, 10, 11]. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is detected in 2–53 % inoculates from infected obstetric/gynecological wounds [7, 10, 11]. Fungi, mainly Candida sp. constitute a rare etiological factor in postoperative wound infections in gynecology [7].

Proper management of infected wounds is a multistage process involving wound debridement, lavasepsis and the use of local and/or systemic agents (antiseptics, antibiotics). In the era of increasing bacterial resistance to antibiotics, topical treatment with antiseptics plays an important role, as the agents are less selective but allow to achieve higher therapeutic concentrations within the wound, particularly in concomitant ischemic conditions. Antiseptic dressings are an example of such activity; among these, dressings containing silver are the group of best documented efficacy.

Antiseptic properties of silver in the treatment of wound infections were already known in the ancient times. Today, silver dressings are a novel method for topical treatment of infected and difficult-to-heal wounds. This is mostly due to the silver’s broad spectrum of antimicrobial action against both fungi and bacteria including MRSA or vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) [20, 71, 73‐77]. Combined with relatively low toxicity, aforementioned properties make silver a very valuable tool for fighting pathogens responsible for infections of wounds after iatrogenic activities.

The mechanisms of silver action involve inhibition of the cellular respiration, binding of nucleic acids and causing their denaturation, inhibiting cell replication and altering the permeability of microbial cell membranes [20, 71, 73, 74, 78]. This is achieved by means of reactions of the silver ions with proteins, DNA or RNA and negatively charged chloride ions inside pathogens cells. An adverse side of this interaction is the inactivation of highly reactive and positively charged silver ions (Ag⁺) by chlorides and various anionic complexes present in the wound bed. As a result, a rapid drop in the concentration of an active form of silver that might effectively inhibit the growth of microorganisms responsible for the infection occurs within the wound. According to the literature data, concentrations of silver associated with the highest bactericidal efficacy as measured by the 3-log reduction in the bacterial counts should exceed 30–40 mg/l [20, 71, 73]. Therefore, silver-based treatment of infected wounds requires that the dressings provide appropriate concentrations of Ag ions in the wound bed and maintain these concentrations for possibly the longest time, thus ensuring adequate activity and preventing resistance.

For nearly four decades of their use, silver nitrate and silver sulfadiazine became gold standards in the silver-based treatment of wound infections [71]. Both products contain positively charged Ag ions in high concentrations (0.5 % silver nitrate solution—3176 mg/l; 1 % silver sulfadiazine—3025 mg/l) [20, 71]. Although, concentration values markedly exceed the recommended levels of 30–40 mg/l, due to the presence of Ag⁺, both drugs are characterized by low residual activity [20, 71, 73]. Achieving appropriate antimicrobial activity requires, therefore, frequent drug applications into the wound region—for silver sulfadiazine, it is recommended to change the dressing twice a day while for silver nitrate, dressings should be changed 12 times during each 24 h [20, 71, 73, 74].

An innovation in the silver-based therapy of infected wounds—nanocrystalline silver dressings were introduced into clinical use in the late 1990s. The novelty of these dressings as compared to the dressings discussed above consists in releasing both positively charged Ag ions and uncharged Ag (Ag⁰) forms [20, 71, 73‐75]. Since uncharged silver is less prone to react with anionic complexes, it is possible to maintain appropriate concentration and activity of silver inside the wound for longer periods. As the reserves of ionic silver are depleted, additional amounts of Ag⁰ and Ag⁺ ions are released from the dressing, ensuring continuous and steady supply of active silver [73]. The clinical implication of these properties is the ability to change the dressing less frequently, resulting in the treatment being more comfortable to the patient and protecting the wound from injuries that might occur upon the dressing change [20, 71, 73, 74]. Contrary to other types of dressings where silver is added in the form of a solution, cream, ointment or an additional dressing layer, incorporation of silver nanocrystals with the diameters of <20 nm into the dressing facilitates accumulation of larger quantities of silver within a small volume. In practice this allows to achieve high initial concentration of silver within the wound. In case of nanocrystalline silver dressings, this concentration is 70–100 mg/l and may be maintained at this level for up to 7 days [20, 71, 73, 75].

The superiority of nanocrystalline silver over silver nitrate and silver sulfadiazine in inhibiting bacterial growth was demonstrated by Yin et al. [76]. Following inoculation of dressings with an aliquot of bacterial suspension to reach approximately 10⁷ colony-forming units of S. aureus, researchers demonstrated that the use of nanocrystalline silver was able to reduce the bacterial counts to less than 10² cells after 1 h application. In case of silver nitrate and silver sulfadiazine, similar results were obtained after 4 and 6 h, respectively. Study conducted in 1998 by Wright et al. evaluated bactericidal effects of silver nitrate, silver sulfadiazine and nanocrystalline silver against particularly resistant strains, such as MRSA and VRE [77]. Using a methodology similar as the previously mentioned investigators, the authors observed a 7-log reduction in MRSA and VRE counts following 30 min after inoculation when nanocrystalline silver was used. Reduction of such magnitude could not be observed for dressings containing silver nitrate or silver sulfadiazine after incubation lasting three and half hours. Interestingly, both drugs showed only minor antibacterial activity after 30 min of incubation.

Apart from antimicrobial activity silver delivery systems, in particular silver nanoparticles present anti-inflammatory properties depending on the delivery technique, available concentration of silver and duration of release. Reduction in matrix metalloproteinases’ (MMPs) levels is one of the actions of particular importance as it was demonstrated that the release of metalloproteinases 2 (MMP-2) and 9 (MMP-9) while being indispensable for normal healing, may alter its course when present at excess concentrations by degrading fibronectin, vitronectin and peptide growth factors [71, 73‐75, 78]. The remaining properties of nanocrystalline silver are responsible for the down-regulation of inflammatory activity within the wound area by reducing the TNF-α production and inducing apoptosis [71, 73‐75, 78].

Among the reports published to date on the use of silver-containing dressings in the treatment of infected postoperative wounds, only a few were based on randomized controlled trials conducted in appropriately large subject groups with majority being in vitro or case series studies. Number of reports describing the use of silver in the treatment of infected and hard-to-heal postsurgical wounds in obstetrics and gynecology is also limited.

Markowska-Sioma conducted a prospective study to assess the efficacy of metallic-coated silver dressings in the treatment of difficult-healing wounds after major gynecological surgeries [79]. During a 10-month follow-up period, healing disorders were observed in two patients after radical vulvectomy and in one patient after abdominal hysterectomy. Bacteriological examination of wounds revealed the presence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Proteus mirabilis, Streptococcus anhaemoliticus and Enterococcus faecalis in patients after radical vulvectomy, while a negative result of culture was obtained for patient after abdominal hysterectomy. An initial stage of the wound treatment included autolytic debridement followed by cleansing of the wound with octenidine before each dressing change. At the beginning of the treatment silver dressings were changed every day, and after clinical improvement every 2–3 days. On day 14, complete healing of abdominal hysterectomy wound was observed; radical vulvectomy wounds took longer to heal, with no times of complete healing being indicated in the article. In patients’ opinion, the treatment outcomes were positive.

Prophylactic use of silver dressings for the prevention of surgical site infections in women undergoing cesarean section was the subject of one full text study. Connery et al. conducted a retrospective study assessing the efficacy of dressings consisting of nylon fibers autocatalytically coated with metallic silver for the prevention of SSIs after the cesarean section [80]. Among 72 patients in the study, 36 were included in the control group and managed in conventional manner using gauze pads. In the follow-up period, postsurgical wound infections were observed in two patients in the study group and two patients in the control group. The obtained results could not demonstrate that silver-impregnated dressings significantly reduced the risk of SSIs following cesarean section; however, due to the fact that comorbidities were significantly more common in the study group, the obtained results might, in the opinion of investigators, not fully reflect the efficacy of the tested dressings.

In summary, silver dressings may comprise a useful tool in the treatment of infected obstetric and gynecological wounds, although only limited reports suggest their beneficial effect on the healing process in both wounds following vulvectomy and wounds after laparotomy as part of hysterectomy or cesarean section procedures. The proven efficacy of silver is largely due to its low toxicity and broad spectrum of antimicrobial action, which is particularly important in the era of increasing bacterial resistance to antibiotics. On the other hand, recently published studies on the prevention of wound infections in patients undergoing cesarean section did not confirm a higher efficacy of silver dressings compared with standard dressings while pointing out the high cost of such treatment. As a consequence, similar as in the case of NPWT and growth factors, a higher number of prospective studies must be conducted in an appropriately large population of women to develop standardized management methods making use of individual silver dressings, especially with regard to the particularly beneficial nanocrystalline silver dressings.

Obstetrics and gynecology are examples of surgical disciplines where wound healing disorders are one of the most common complications and the efficacy of standard treatment regimens is not always satisfactory. Chronic, difficult-to-heal and infected wounds lead to the development of further, oftentimes serious complications that reduce the quality of life of the patients, extend hospitalization times and generate additional treatment costs. Conclusions from the literature review regarding the use of growth factors, NPWT and silver dressings suggest that these methods may play an important role in the management of wound after invasive obstetric and gynecological procedures. This is particularly relevant in a group of high-risk patients, e.g., obese patients, patients after vulvectomy or previous radiation therapy. The use of novel wound management methods in above-mentioned patient cohorts may significantly improve the final treatment outcomes, reduce postoperative complications and the related morbidity and mortality rates, improve the quality of life and reduce costs due to additional medical procedures. On the other hand, the non-numerous studies evaluating first attempts to use these methods in obstetrics and gynecology, mostly non-randomized and conducted in small populations, do not permit any definite conclusion regarding their usefulness, efficacy and cost-effectiveness. Prospective studies on the use of growth factors, platelet-rich plasma derivatives, negative pressure wound therapy and silver dressings in the treatment of chronic, hard-to-heal postsurgical wounds following obstetric and gynecological interventions are required.