Introduction
Materials and methods
Definitions
Commentary
Results
Evidence and recommendations
ERAS item | Guideline | Level of evidence | Recommendation grade |
---|---|---|---|
1. Early identification of physiological derangement and intervention | Resuscitation and correction of underlying physiological derangement should begin immediately and should continue during diagnostic pathways | High | Strong |
Rapid assessment of the patient for physiological derangement using a validated method such as an early warning scoring system should occur. Abnormal scores should trigger rapid escalation to senior personnel in line with pre-established local protocols. While awaiting surgery patients should have regular re-evaluation with a frequency dictated by local physiological track and trigger protocols | High | Strong | |
2. Screen and monitor for sepsis and accompanying physiological derangement | All patients for emergency laparotomy should be assessed with a validated sepsis score as early in their presentation as possible. This should be repeated at appropriate intervals in line with severity of signs, and sepsis risk stratification guidance | High | Strong |
If SIRs, sepsis or septic shock is diagnosed, treatment should begin immediately in line with the Surviving Sepsis recognized management algorithms including measurement of lactate | High | Strong | |
Prompt antibiotic administration should occur in line with existing international guidelines on sepsis management when signs of sepsis are present, or when the underlying surgical pathology makes the patient at high risk of infection or sepsis such as patients with peritonitis or hollow viscus perforation. Specific antibiotic choice should be guided by local protocols in line with antimicrobial stewardship. Delay to antibiotic administration in patients with sepsis increases mortality | High | Strong | |
Monitoring of blood lactate as a marker of risk and in monitoring of response to resuscitation should be considered even in the absence of sepsis | High | Strong | |
3. Early imaging, surgery, and source control of sepsis | Delay to surgery increases mortality in patients with sepsis and septic shock. All patients with septic shock should receive source control with surgery or interventional radiology as soon as possible and within 3 h. For patients with sepsis without septic shock source control should occur within 6 h | High | Strong |
Perform a CT scan with IV contrast as soon as possible if indicated. The CT scan should be reviewed by a radiologist immediately. Acquiring a CT scan should not cause a delay to surgery if surgery is very urgent | High | Strong | |
4. Risk assessment | A risk score using a validated model should be performed on all patients prior to surgery and at the end of surgery. The score can be used to guide pathways of care and facilitate discussion between team members, and with patients and family on treatment, risks and limitations | High | Strong |
5. Age-related evaluation of frailty, and cognitive assessment | All patients over 65 years of age, and others at high risk, for example, patients with cancer, should be assessed for frailty using a validated frailty score | High | Strong |
Perform a validated simple assessment of cognitive function such as the Mini-Cog® in all patients over 65 years of age if time permits. For patients who are at risk for delirium and postoperative cognitive dysfunction take steps to keep the patient oriented and avoid drugs known to cause harm as defined in the Beers’ criteria | Moderate | Strong | |
All patients over 65 should have regular delirium screening pre and postoperatively with a validated assessment method | High | Strong | |
Patients over 65 years of age should be assessed by a physician with expertise in care of the older patient (geriatrician) preoperatively and evidence-based elder-friendly practices used. If preoperative assessment is not possible refer for postoperative follow-up | Low | Strong |
ERAS item | Guideline | Level of evidence | Recommendation grade |
---|---|---|---|
6. Reversal of antithrombotic medications | Strongly consider reversal of home anticoagulation medications when major surgical intervention is planned. This decision should be based on both the patient’s risk of procedure-related bleeding and the risk of thromboembolism | Moderate | Strong |
Consider platelet transfusion in patients taking antiplatelet therapy when the planned procedural bleeding risk is high. In patients with a strong indication for antiplatelet therapy, specialty consultation should be obtained for perioperative co-management of these medications | Low | Weak | |
7. Assessment of venous thromboembolism risk | Patients should be risk assessed with a validated tool for VTE risk on admission. If pharmaceutical prophylaxis is not possible mechanical prophylaxis should be used. Reassessment should occur daily postoperatively | High | Strong |
8. Pre-anesthetic medication – anxiolysis and analgesia | Sedative medication should be avoided preoperatively to avoid the risk of micro-aspiration, hypoventilation and delirium | Moderate | Strong |
Analgesia should be given to alleviate the patient’s pain and stress | High | Strong | |
Multi modal opioid-sparing analgesia should be titrated to effect to maximize comfort and minimize side-effects | High | Strong | |
9. Preoperative glucose and electrolyte management | Hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia are risk factors for adverse postoperative outcomes. Preoperatively, glucose levels should be maintained at 144-180 mg/dL (8-10 mmol/L), a variable rate (sliding scale) insulin infusion should be used judiciously to maintain blood glucose in this range with appropriate monitoring of point of care blood glucose in line with local protocols, to avoid hypoglycemia | Moderate | Weak |
Correction of potassium and magnesium prior to surgery should be done using the intravenous route with appropriate monitoring and following local hospital policy. However, it should not delay the patient being taken to the operating room | Moderate | Weak | |
10. Preoperative carbohydrate loading | Authors could not recommend use of preoperative carbohydrate loading in the emergency laparotomy population | ||
11. Preoperative nasogastric intubation | Preoperative nasogastric tube insertion should be considered on an individual basis assessing for the risk of aspiration and gastric distension depending on the pathology and patient factors | Moderate | Strong |
12. Patient and family education and shared decision making | Patients and families should have the opportunity to discuss the risk of surgery with a senior physician (this could be the surgeon, anesthesiologist or intensive care physician) prior to surgery. Counselling should be informed by a validated risk score but with the clear understanding that scores have limitations when applied to individual patients. When appropriate, treatment escalation plans and advance care plans should be discussed and documented | Low | Strong |
Clear, concise, written information or decision aids combined with verbal patient education should be provided to the patient and family before surgery if possible | Low | Strong |
Preoperative phase
1. Early identification of physiological derangement, and intervention
-
Resuscitation and correction of underlying physiological derangement should begin immediately and should continue during diagnostic pathways.
-
Rapid assessment of the patient for physiological derangement using a validated method [49] such as an Early Warning Scoring (EWS) system should occur. Abnormal scores should trigger rapid escalation to senior personnel in line with pre-established local protocols. While awaiting surgery patients should have regular re-evaluation, with a frequency dictated by local physiological track and trigger protocols.
-
Level of evidence: High.
-
Recommendation grade: Strong.
2. Screen and monitor for sepsis and accompanying physiological derangement
-
If SIRS, sepsis or septic shock are diagnosed, or when the underlying surgical pathology makes the patient at high risk of infection or sepsis, such as patients with peritonitis or hollow viscus perforation, treatment should begin immediately in line with the Surviving Sepsis management algorithms including measurement of lactate [46]. Delay to antibiotic administration in patients with sepsis increases mortality [64].
-
Monitoring of blood lactate as a marker of risk and in assessment of physiological response to resuscitation should be considered even in the absence of sepsis.
-
Level of evidence: High-large prospective cohort studies and international guidelines.
-
Recommendation grade: Strong.
3. Early imaging, surgery, and source control of sepsis
-
Delay to surgery increases mortality in patients with sepsis and septic shock. All patients with septic shock should receive source control with surgery or interventional radiology as soon as possible and within 3 h. For patients with sepsis without septic shock, source control should occur within 6 h.
-
Level of evidence: High-large prospective cohort studies, large retrospective cohort studies, national guidelines.
-
Recommendation grade: Strong.
Radiological investigation
-
Perform a CT scan with IV contrast as soon as possible if indicated. The CT scan should be reviewed by a radiologist immediately. Acquiring a CT scan should not cause a delay to surgery if surgery is very urgent.
4. Risk assessment
-
A risk score using a validated model should be performed and documented on all patients prior to surgery, and at the end of surgery. The score can be used to guide pathways of care and facilitate discussion between team members and with patients and family on treatment, risks and limitations.
-
Level of evidence: High.
-
Recommendation grade: Strong.
5. Age-related evaluation of frailty, and cognitive assessment
Delirium and perioperative neurocognitive disorders
Medication or class of medication | Examples | Rationale for avoiding |
---|---|---|
First generation antihistamines | Diphenhydramine, Chlorpheniramine | Central anticholinergic effects |
Phenothiazine-type antiemetics | Prochlorperazine, Promethazine | Central anticholinergic effects |
Antispasmodics/anticholinergics | Atropine, Scopolamine | Central anticholinergic effects |
Antipsychotics(first and second generation) | Haloperidol | Risk of cognitive impairment, delirium, neuroleptic malignant syndrome, tardive dyskinesia |
Benzodiazepines | Midazolam, Diazepam, Temazepam | Risk of cognitive impairment, delirium |
Benzodiazepine receptor agonist hypnotics “ Z drugs” | Zolpidem, Eszopiclone | Delirium, falls |
Corticosteroids | Hydrocortisone, Methylprednisolone | Risk of cognitive impairment, delirium, psychosis |
H2-receptor antagonists | Ranitidine | Risk of cognitive impairment, delirium |
Metoclopramide | Extrapyramidal effects | |
Pethidine/Meperidine | Neurotoxic effect |
-
All patients over 65 years of age, and others at high risk, for example patients with cancer, should be assessed for frailty using a validated frailty score [83].Evidence: High.Recommendation grade: Strong.
-
Perform a validated simple assessment of cognitive function such as the Mini-Cog® [112] in all patients over 65 years of age if time permits. For patients who are at risk for delirium and postoperative cognitive dysfunction take steps to keep the patient oriented and avoid drugs known to cause harm as defined in the Beers’ criteria [111].Level of evidence: Moderate.Recommendation grade: Strong.
-
All patients over 65 should have regular delirium screening pre and postoperatively with a validated assessment method [113].Level of evidence: High.Recommendation grade: Strong.
-
Patients over 65 years of age should be assessed by a physician with expertise in care of the older patient (geriatrician) pre-operatively and evidence-based elder-friendly practices used. If preoperative assessment is not possible refer for postoperative follow-up.
-
Level of evidence: Low.
-
Recommendation grade: Strong.
6. Reversal of antithrombotic medications
Anticoagulants and platelet function inhibitors
Anticoagulants (Warfarin, DOACs, Heparin/Enoxaparin)
-
Strongly consider reversal of home anticoagulation medications when major surgical intervention is planned. This decision should be based on both the patient’s risk of procedure-related bleeding and the risk of thromboembolism.
-
Level of evidence: Moderate.
-
Recommendation grade: Strong.
Platelet inhibitors: (including Aspirin, Clopidogrel, Dipyridamole, Ticagrelor)
-
Consider platelet transfusion in patients taking antiplatelet therapy when the planned procedural bleeding risk is high. In patients with a strong indication for antiplatelets, specialty consultation should be obtained for perioperative co-management of these medications.
-
Level of evidence: Low.
-
Recommendation grade: Weak.
7. Assessment of venous thromboembolism risk
-
Patients should be risk assessed with a validated tool for VTE risk on admission. If pharmaceutical prophylaxis is not possible mechanical prophylaxis should be used. Reassessment should occur daily postoperatively [131].
-
Level of evidence: Strong (extrapolated from studies in elective major abdominal surgery).
-
Recommendation grade: Strong.
8. Pre-anesthetic medication—anxiolysis and analgesia
-
Sedative medication should be avoided preoperatively to avoid the risk of micro-aspiration, hypoventilation and delirium.
-
Evidence: Moderate.
-
Recommendation grade: Strong.
-
Analgesia should be given to alleviate the patient’s pain and stress.
-
Evidence: High.
-
Recommendation grade: Strong.
-
Multi modal opioid-sparing analgesia should be titrated to effect to maximize comfort and minimize side-effects.
-
Evidence: High.
-
Recommendation grade: Strong.
9. Preoperative glucose and electrolyte management
-
Hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia are risk factors for adverse postoperative outcomes. Pre-operatively, glucose levels should be maintained at 144–180 mg/dL (8–10 mmol/L), a variable rate (sliding scale) insulin infusion should be used judiciously to maintain blood glucose in this range with appropriate monitoring of point of care blood glucose in line with local protocols to avoid hypoglycemia.
-
Correction of potassium, magnesium and phosphate prior to surgery should be done using the intravenous route with appropriate monitoring and following local hospital policy. However, it should not delay the patient from being taken to the operating room.
-
Level of evidence: moderate (inconsistency, extrapolated, uncertain target glucose values, potassium and magnesium extrapolated from cardiac and critical care data).
-
Recommendation grade: weak (benefit must be outweighed against the risk of hypoglycemia, diabetic patients likely to benefit the most, the risk of atrial fibrillation may be reduced by fluid and electrolyte correction, but the cause is multifactorial).
10. Preoperative carbohydrate loading
-
Level of evidence: Low and potential harm.
-
Recommendation grade: Strong, do not use in the emergency laparotomy population.
11. Pre-operative nasogastric intubation
-
Pre-operative nasogastric tube insertion should be considered on an individual basis assessing for the risk of aspiration and gastric distension depending on the pathology and patient factors.
-
Level of evidence: Moderate (extrapolation from elective surgery).
-
Recommendation grade: Strong (aspiration can be life-threatening and its reduction by nasogastric insertion outweighs the risk of short-term use).
12. Patient and family education and shared decision making
-
Patients and families should have the opportunity to discuss the risk of surgery with a senior physician (this could be the surgeon, anesthesiologist or intensive care physician) prior to surgery. Counseling should be informed by a validated risk score but with the clear understanding that scores have limitations when applied to individual patients. When appropriate, treatment escalation plans and advance care plans should be discussed and documented.
-
Clear, concise, written information or decision aids combined with verbal patient education should be provided to the patient and family before surgery if possible.
-
Level of evidence: Low.
-
Recommendation grade: Strong (improves informed consent process).