Skip to main content
Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery 8/2014

01.08.2014

Enhanced Recovery Pathway for Urgent Colectomy

verfasst von: Didier Roulin, Catherine Blanc, Mirza Muradbegovic, Dieter Hahnloser, Nicolas Demartines, Martin Hübner

Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery | Ausgabe 8/2014

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Enhanced recovery protocols have been proven to decrease complications and hospital stay following elective colorectal surgery. However, these principles have not yet been reported for urgent surgery procedures. We aimed to assess our initial experience with urgent colectomies performed within an established enhanced recovery pathway.

Methods

In a prospective cohort study, all patients undergoing colonic resection between April 2012 and March 2013 were treated according to a standardized enhanced recovery protocol. Urgent surgeries were compared with the elective procedures with regards to baseline characteristics, compliance with enhanced recovery items, and clinical outcome.

Results

Patients (N = 28) requiring urgent colonic resection were included and compared with patients undergoing elective colectomy (N = 63). Overall compliance with the protocol was 57 % for the urgent compared with 77 % for the elective procedures (p = 0.006). The pre-operative compliance was 64 versus 96 % (p < 0.001), the intra-operative compliance was 77 versus 86 % (p = 0.145), and the post-operative compliance was 49 versus 67 % (p = 0.015), for the urgent and elective resections, respectively. Overall, 18 urgent patients (64 %) and 32 elective patients (51 %) developed postoperative complications (p = 0.261). Median postoperative length of stay was 8 days in the urgent setting compared with 5 days in the elective setting (p = 0.006).

Conclusions

Many of the intra-operative and post-operative enhanced recovery items can also be applied to urgent colectomy, entailing outcomes that approach the results achieved in the elective setting.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Rawlinson A, Kang P, Evans J, Khanna A (2011) A systematic review of enhanced recovery protocols in colorectal surgery. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 93:583–588PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Rawlinson A, Kang P, Evans J, Khanna A (2011) A systematic review of enhanced recovery protocols in colorectal surgery. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 93:583–588PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Wind J, Polle SW, Fung Kon Jin PH et al (2006) Systematic review of enhanced recovery programmes in colonic surgery. Br J Surg 93:800–809PubMedCrossRef Wind J, Polle SW, Fung Kon Jin PH et al (2006) Systematic review of enhanced recovery programmes in colonic surgery. Br J Surg 93:800–809PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Varadhan KK, Neal KR, Dejong CH et al (2010) The Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) pathway for patients undergoing major elective open colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin Nutr 2010:434–440CrossRef Varadhan KK, Neal KR, Dejong CH et al (2010) The Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) pathway for patients undergoing major elective open colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin Nutr 2010:434–440CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Kehlet H (2011) Surgery: fast-track colonic surgery and the ‘knowing-doing’ gap. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 8:539–540PubMedCrossRef Kehlet H (2011) Surgery: fast-track colonic surgery and the ‘knowing-doing’ gap. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 8:539–540PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Spanjersberg WR, Reurings J, Keus F, van Laarhoven CJ (2011) Fast track surgery versus conventional recovery strategies for colorectal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2):CD007635 Spanjersberg WR, Reurings J, Keus F, van Laarhoven CJ (2011) Fast track surgery versus conventional recovery strategies for colorectal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2):CD007635
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Gustafsson UO, Scott MJ, Schwenk W et al (2013) Guidelines for perioperative care in elective colonic surgery: enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society recommendations. World J Surg 37:259–284. doi:10.1007/s00268-012-1772-0 PubMedCrossRef Gustafsson UO, Scott MJ, Schwenk W et al (2013) Guidelines for perioperative care in elective colonic surgery: enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society recommendations. World J Surg 37:259–284. doi:10.​1007/​s00268-012-1772-0 PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Gustafsson UO, Hausel J, Thorell A et al (2011) Adherence to the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocol and outcomes after colorectal cancer surgery. Arch Surg 146:571–577PubMedCrossRef Gustafsson UO, Hausel J, Thorell A et al (2011) Adherence to the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocol and outcomes after colorectal cancer surgery. Arch Surg 146:571–577PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Roulin D, Donadini A, Gander S et al (2013) Cost-effectiveness of the implementation of an enhanced recovery protocol for colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 100:1108–1114PubMedCrossRef Roulin D, Donadini A, Gander S et al (2013) Cost-effectiveness of the implementation of an enhanced recovery protocol for colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 100:1108–1114PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Lassen K, Soop M, Nygren J et al (2009) Consensus review of optimal perioperative care in colorectal surgery: enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Group recommendations. Arch Surg 144:961–969PubMedCrossRef Lassen K, Soop M, Nygren J et al (2009) Consensus review of optimal perioperative care in colorectal surgery: enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Group recommendations. Arch Surg 144:961–969PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Prytherch DR, Whiteley MS, Higgins B et al (1998) POSSUM and Portsmouth POSSUM for predicting mortality. Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and morbidity. Br J Surg 85:1217–1220PubMedCrossRef Prytherch DR, Whiteley MS, Higgins B et al (1998) POSSUM and Portsmouth POSSUM for predicting mortality. Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and morbidity. Br J Surg 85:1217–1220PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Maessen J, Dejong CH, Hausel J et al (2007) A protocol is not enough to implement an enhanced recovery programme for colorectal resection. Br J Surg 94:224–231PubMedCrossRef Maessen J, Dejong CH, Hausel J et al (2007) A protocol is not enough to implement an enhanced recovery programme for colorectal resection. Br J Surg 94:224–231PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Ahmed J, Khan S, Lim M et al (2012) Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocols—compliance and variations in practice during routine colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis 14:1045–1051PubMedCrossRef Ahmed J, Khan S, Lim M et al (2012) Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocols—compliance and variations in practice during routine colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis 14:1045–1051PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Vlug MS, Wind J, Hollmann MW et al (2011) Laparoscopy in combination with fast track multimodal management is the best perioperative strategy in patients undergoing colonic surgery: a randomized clinical trial (LAFA-study). Ann Surg 254:868–875PubMedCrossRef Vlug MS, Wind J, Hollmann MW et al (2011) Laparoscopy in combination with fast track multimodal management is the best perioperative strategy in patients undergoing colonic surgery: a randomized clinical trial (LAFA-study). Ann Surg 254:868–875PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Gillissen F, Hoff C, Maessen JM et al (2013) Structured synchronous implementation of an enhanced recovery program in elective colonic surgery in 33 hospitals in the Netherlands. World J Surg 37:1082–1093. doi:10.1007/s00268-013-1938-4 PubMedCrossRef Gillissen F, Hoff C, Maessen JM et al (2013) Structured synchronous implementation of an enhanced recovery program in elective colonic surgery in 33 hospitals in the Netherlands. World J Surg 37:1082–1093. doi:10.​1007/​s00268-013-1938-4 PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Cakir H, van Stijn MF, Lopes Cardozo AM et al (2013) Adherence to Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) and length of stay after colonic resection. Colorectal Dis 15:1019–1025PubMedCrossRef Cakir H, van Stijn MF, Lopes Cardozo AM et al (2013) Adherence to Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) and length of stay after colonic resection. Colorectal Dis 15:1019–1025PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Sammour T, Zargar-Shoshtari K, Bhat A et al (2010) A programme of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) is a cost-effective intervention in elective colonic surgery. N Z Med J 123:61–70PubMed Sammour T, Zargar-Shoshtari K, Bhat A et al (2010) A programme of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) is a cost-effective intervention in elective colonic surgery. N Z Med J 123:61–70PubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Muller S, Zalunardo MP, Hubner M et al (2009) A fast-track program reduces complications and length of hospital stay after open colonic surgery. Gastroenterology 136:842–847PubMedCrossRef Muller S, Zalunardo MP, Hubner M et al (2009) A fast-track program reduces complications and length of hospital stay after open colonic surgery. Gastroenterology 136:842–847PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Adamina M, Kehlet H, Tomlinson GA et al (2011) Enhanced recovery pathways optimize health outcomes and resource utilization: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in colorectal surgery. Surgery 149:830–840PubMedCrossRef Adamina M, Kehlet H, Tomlinson GA et al (2011) Enhanced recovery pathways optimize health outcomes and resource utilization: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in colorectal surgery. Surgery 149:830–840PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Enhanced Recovery Pathway for Urgent Colectomy
verfasst von
Didier Roulin
Catherine Blanc
Mirza Muradbegovic
Dieter Hahnloser
Nicolas Demartines
Martin Hübner
Publikationsdatum
01.08.2014
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
World Journal of Surgery / Ausgabe 8/2014
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-014-2518-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2014

World Journal of Surgery 8/2014 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.